What?!?!?!? That was the primary source of 4 yrs of Russia Conspiracy BS. Dude, you don't know very much.Not sure what FISA has to do with anything.And I disagree with you. The FISA was proven to be a sham. Trump may declare that aliens stole the vote. Courts and electors will ultimately send him home. Relax. And I believe he does have a rational basis. So let the legal battle begin. I don't necessarily believe the election was stolen but I do believe there were some inappropriate actions.His legal process is frivolous. Dozens of lawsuits tossed. His rhetoric is going far beyond what anyone should consider responsible.Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified. - 100% Subjective but that is your right.Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified.Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOLClinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.
They name streets after you...ONE WAY.
But she didn’t question the legitimacy of the outcome which is a massive difference.
Stacey Abrams did.
Trump is going through a legal process. Why do you have an issue with that? The election has not been finalized.
What is not my opinion is that Clinton has a rational basis for her complaint. Russia did involve themselves in the campaign. The FBI did publicly reveal information against protocol.
Trump’s declarations of millions of his votes being stolen are not rational and his rhetoric is attacking an institution that we depend on. He is doing so without a rational basis and is deeply irresponsible.
The scary part is that it was legitimate and so many zombies voted for one of their own.
Trump’s legal strategy does not seem to be intent on winning in court. His intent seems to be creating mass doubt in the public who would pressure Republican legislature in enough states to place their own electors for him.
This does not require that he have a rational basis, only that he be convincing enough to place political pressure on the right people.
This is why his rhetoric matters and why it’s important that we push back against false narratives that could potentially overturn the valid results of the election.