Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.This narrative, that the election was stolen, isn’t going away because of court losses or election being certified.What? When the courts give a final decision and the electors finalize the election it will be over. What is the matter with you? Always combative. Are you playing dumb on purpose?
Nope. You cannot have a logical discussion. So you dance.I said hypothetical. So now you cannot even answer a hypothetical. Pretty sad.Hold on. If true and there is legitimate proof that there is fraud and Trump actually garnered more votes. You don't believe that BLM and Antifa will go wild on steroids and now Trump's base comes at em and its a war? You don't think that happens? Explain why. Again this is strictly a hypothetical.If true this could lead to a civil war.Proof of the Dems' Election Steal
The obvious -- and overwhelming -- evidence.
18 Nov 2020 ~~ By Jack Kerwick
Proof of the Dems' Election Steal | FrontpageMag
The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, arewww.frontpagemag.com
The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are insisting that President Donald J. Trump has yet to supply any “proof” to substantiate his thesis that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election race.
Before proceeding, let me put the reader on notice that I have long since stopped trying to convince partisan ideologues who lean even remotely leftward to recognize the error of their ways, to say nothing of the egregiousness of the errors of their anti-Trump biases. What follows is aimed only at those who are genuinely interested in reason, in logic, and, critically, in facts.
This column is an irrationality-free zone.
For starters, it most definitely is not just Trump and his army of lawyers who are leveling allegations of voter fraud. Approximately 73 million Americans who voted to make American history and re-elect the President in numbers both appreciably greater than had voted for him in 2016 and that had ever been achieved by any other American presidential candidate also believe that these allegations are rooted in reality.
Thus, they are convinced that their vote has been suppressed. They have been, in effect, disenfranchised.
Second, while it is undoubtedly the case that intellectual dishonesty is endemic to the media class, what accounts for this is that the latter is comprised of, at best, intellectual mediocrities, lightweights who exhibit not only little if any acquaintance with a classical—a genuine—liberal arts education, but average, or below average, intelligence. The painful lack of erudition and critical thinking ability among the talkers and scribblers explains, at least to no slight extent, the staggering ease with which they make pronouncements that could be made by only idiots and liars.
This isn’t meant as a criticism. It’s a fact that must be stated in order to grasp why it is futile to note to a journalist or a commentator, especially a Trump-hating one, that the concept of proof, like the concepts of love, hate, fairness, and any number of others, is most assuredly not a unitary one.
~[snip]~
The successful night had by Congressional Republicans and state legislatures and the hugely disappointing one suffered by Democrats; thousands of sworn affidavits attesting to voter fraud; Biden’s votes’ violation of the mathematical principle known as “Benford’s Law,” as well as other analyses conducted by data analysts demonstrating the virtual statistical certainty that the Democrat challenger lost; scores of anecdotal accounts offered by eye witnesses, voters, on the ground (e.g.“SharpeeGate”); Biden’s underperformance relative to Hillary Clinton and, remarkably, Barack Obama in 2008 in just those Democrat strongholds that were already a given for any Democrat candidate, but his overperformance in only the battleground areas; the “irregularities” of the voting machines that were used in many states but for which the company that distributes them, Dominion, is widely known—the preponderance of evidence that Democrats “meddled” in the election of 2020 and stole victory from Trump is not only mounting; it eclipses astronomically the fake evidence on the basis of which Democrats in Congress and Big Media have been anchoring their charge of “Russian meddling” in the election of 2016 for the last four years.
Where’s the proof that the Democrats are guilty in spades of precisely that with which they have been incessantly (stupidly, dishonestly) charging Trump, Vladimir Putin, and “the Russians?” It is ubiquitous, comprised of numerous considerations that all with the will to see can discern for themselves.
Comment:
Strangely, The media expects us all to believe a candidate who barely left his basement, limited his campaign, shows signs of dementia, is tainted with scandals, is lucky to draw a couple dozen supporters when he does speak publicly, whose party supports riots and defunding the police, pledges to stop oil drilling and fracking, somehow managed to obliterate Obama's 2008 record vote total by roughly 10 million votes with nearly 80 million in total. Needless to say, the contradictions involved in this election and the supposed end result feel like an episode of the Twilight Zone....
The evidence is cumulative. The 'Dead Voting', Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, memory cards being found with votes for TRump, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden? The answer is YES!!
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
No one has yet come up with a reasonable explanation as to HOW most of the Republican candidates down ballot won and expanded the GOP population in the House; but, Trump "lost". This by itself does not pass the smell test.
The evidence presented is SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).
Nope.
'If true' is where your argument breaks.
As it works just as well for any conspiracy you want to imagine. Flat Earth, Shapeshifting lizard people, Q-army, anything.
The problem you have is a connection to reality with evidence. Not what you an imagine
So, nope.
So is a flat earth.
Excellent. Typical leftist zombie.
Almost all elections will be certified in the next two weeks. Electors meet in about 4 weeks.How long should we give the blue district thieves to count the fucking votes?...ten years?....this is insanity.....everyone can see what is going on....
If you think it is the same thing then you're delusional.Nope. You cannot have a logical discussion. So you dance.I said hypothetical. So now you cannot even answer a hypothetical. Pretty sad.Hold on. If true and there is legitimate proof that there is fraud and Trump actually garnered more votes. You don't believe that BLM and Antifa will go wild on steroids and now Trump's base comes at em and its a war? You don't think that happens? Explain why. Again this is strictly a hypothetical.If true this could lead to a civil war.Proof of the Dems' Election Steal
The obvious -- and overwhelming -- evidence.
18 Nov 2020 ~~ By Jack KerwickProof of the Dems' Election Steal | FrontpageMag
The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are
The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are insisting that President Donald J. Trump has yet to supply any “proof” to substantiate his thesis that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election race.
Before proceeding, let me put the reader on notice that I have long since stopped trying to convince partisan ideologues who lean even remotely leftward to recognize the error of their ways, to say nothing of the egregiousness of the errors of their anti-Trump biases. What follows is aimed only at those who are genuinely interested in reason, in logic, and, critically, in facts.
This column is an irrationality-free zone.
For starters, it most definitely is not just Trump and his army of lawyers who are leveling allegations of voter fraud. Approximately 73 million Americans who voted to make American history and re-elect the President in numbers both appreciably greater than had voted for him in 2016 and that had ever been achieved by any other American presidential candidate also believe that these allegations are rooted in reality.
Thus, they are convinced that their vote has been suppressed. They have been, in effect, disenfranchised.
Second, while it is undoubtedly the case that intellectual dishonesty is endemic to the media class, what accounts for this is that the latter is comprised of, at best, intellectual mediocrities, lightweights who exhibit not only little if any acquaintance with a classical—a genuine—liberal arts education, but average, or below average, intelligence. The painful lack of erudition and critical thinking ability among the talkers and scribblers explains, at least to no slight extent, the staggering ease with which they make pronouncements that could be made by only idiots and liars.
This isn’t meant as a criticism. It’s a fact that must be stated in order to grasp why it is futile to note to a journalist or a commentator, especially a Trump-hating one, that the concept of proof, like the concepts of love, hate, fairness, and any number of others, is most assuredly not a unitary one.
~[snip]~
The successful night had by Congressional Republicans and state legislatures and the hugely disappointing one suffered by Democrats; thousands of sworn affidavits attesting to voter fraud; Biden’s votes’ violation of the mathematical principle known as “Benford’s Law,” as well as other analyses conducted by data analysts demonstrating the virtual statistical certainty that the Democrat challenger lost; scores of anecdotal accounts offered by eye witnesses, voters, on the ground (e.g.“SharpeeGate”); Biden’s underperformance relative to Hillary Clinton and, remarkably, Barack Obama in 2008 in just those Democrat strongholds that were already a given for any Democrat candidate, but his overperformance in only the battleground areas; the “irregularities” of the voting machines that were used in many states but for which the company that distributes them, Dominion, is widely known—the preponderance of evidence that Democrats “meddled” in the election of 2020 and stole victory from Trump is not only mounting; it eclipses astronomically the fake evidence on the basis of which Democrats in Congress and Big Media have been anchoring their charge of “Russian meddling” in the election of 2016 for the last four years.
Where’s the proof that the Democrats are guilty in spades of precisely that with which they have been incessantly (stupidly, dishonestly) charging Trump, Vladimir Putin, and “the Russians?” It is ubiquitous, comprised of numerous considerations that all with the will to see can discern for themselves.
Comment:
Strangely, The media expects us all to believe a candidate who barely left his basement, limited his campaign, shows signs of dementia, is tainted with scandals, is lucky to draw a couple dozen supporters when he does speak publicly, whose party supports riots and defunding the police, pledges to stop oil drilling and fracking, somehow managed to obliterate Obama's 2008 record vote total by roughly 10 million votes with nearly 80 million in total. Needless to say, the contradictions involved in this election and the supposed end result feel like an episode of the Twilight Zone....
The evidence is cumulative. The 'Dead Voting', Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, memory cards being found with votes for TRump, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden? The answer is YES!!
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
No one has yet come up with a reasonable explanation as to HOW most of the Republican candidates down ballot won and expanded the GOP population in the House; but, Trump "lost". This by itself does not pass the smell test.
The evidence presented is SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).
Nope.
'If true' is where your argument breaks.
As it works just as well for any conspiracy you want to imagine. Flat Earth, Shapeshifting lizard people, Q-army, anything.
The problem you have is a connection to reality with evidence. Not what you an imagine
So, nope.
So is a flat earth.
Excellent. Typical leftist zombie.
There's nothing logical about entertaining a fantastically complicated conspiracy backed by nothing.
Try chatting with a Flat Earther or a Truther. I have.
Its the same conversation.
Clinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.
2 more weeks??? to count votes??? if the tables were turned you would be pulling your hair out.....enough of the BS....we are not stupid....we can see what the dems are doing....Almost all elections will be certified in the next two weeks. Electors meet in about 4 weeks.How long should we give the blue district thieves to count the fucking votes?...ten years?....this is insanity.....everyone can see what is going on....
If you have a problem with some states taking too long to count the vote, then bring it up with the state legislatures who could allow them to process ballots before Election Day like they do in most states.
Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOLClinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.
Proof of the Dems' Election Steal
The obvious -- and overwhelming -- evidence.
18 Nov 2020 ~~ By Jack KerwickProof of the Dems' Election Steal | FrontpageMag
The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are
The usual suspects in the media, i.e. both the Democrat operatives posing as “journalists” as well as anti-Trump Republican operatives posing as the same, are insisting that President Donald J. Trump has yet to supply any “proof” to substantiate his thesis that there has been voter fraud in the 2020 Presidential election race.
Before proceeding, let me put the reader on notice that I have long since stopped trying to convince partisan ideologues who lean even remotely leftward to recognize the error of their ways, to say nothing of the egregiousness of the errors of their anti-Trump biases. What follows is aimed only at those who are genuinely interested in reason, in logic, and, critically, in facts.
This column is an irrationality-free zone.
For starters, it most definitely is not just Trump and his army of lawyers who are leveling allegations of voter fraud. Approximately 73 million Americans who voted to make American history and re-elect the President in numbers both appreciably greater than had voted for him in 2016 and that had ever been achieved by any other American presidential candidate also believe that these allegations are rooted in reality.
Thus, they are convinced that their vote has been suppressed. They have been, in effect, disenfranchised.
Second, while it is undoubtedly the case that intellectual dishonesty is endemic to the media class, what accounts for this is that the latter is comprised of, at best, intellectual mediocrities, lightweights who exhibit not only little if any acquaintance with a classical—a genuine—liberal arts education, but average, or below average, intelligence. The painful lack of erudition and critical thinking ability among the talkers and scribblers explains, at least to no slight extent, the staggering ease with which they make pronouncements that could be made by only idiots and liars.
This isn’t meant as a criticism. It’s a fact that must be stated in order to grasp why it is futile to note to a journalist or a commentator, especially a Trump-hating one, that the concept of proof, like the concepts of love, hate, fairness, and any number of others, is most assuredly not a unitary one.
~[snip]~
The successful night had by Congressional Republicans and state legislatures and the hugely disappointing one suffered by Democrats; thousands of sworn affidavits attesting to voter fraud; Biden’s votes’ violation of the mathematical principle known as “Benford’s Law,” as well as other analyses conducted by data analysts demonstrating the virtual statistical certainty that the Democrat challenger lost; scores of anecdotal accounts offered by eye witnesses, voters, on the ground (e.g.“SharpeeGate”); Biden’s underperformance relative to Hillary Clinton and, remarkably, Barack Obama in 2008 in just those Democrat strongholds that were already a given for any Democrat candidate, but his overperformance in only the battleground areas; the “irregularities” of the voting machines that were used in many states but for which the company that distributes them, Dominion, is widely known—the preponderance of evidence that Democrats “meddled” in the election of 2020 and stole victory from Trump is not only mounting; it eclipses astronomically the fake evidence on the basis of which Democrats in Congress and Big Media have been anchoring their charge of “Russian meddling” in the election of 2016 for the last four years.
Where’s the proof that the Democrats are guilty in spades of precisely that with which they have been incessantly (stupidly, dishonestly) charging Trump, Vladimir Putin, and “the Russians?” It is ubiquitous, comprised of numerous considerations that all with the will to see can discern for themselves.
Comment:
Strangely, The media expects us all to believe a candidate who barely left his basement, limited his campaign, shows signs of dementia, is tainted with scandals, is lucky to draw a couple dozen supporters when he does speak publicly, whose party supports riots and defunding the police, pledges to stop oil drilling and fracking, somehow managed to obliterate Obama's 2008 record vote total by roughly 10 million votes with nearly 80 million in total. Needless to say, the contradictions involved in this election and the supposed end result feel like an episode of the Twilight Zone....
The evidence is cumulative. The 'Dead Voting', Statistical improbability, Dominion Software moving votes from Trump to Biden, hundreds of sworn testimonies, newly discovered discarded ballots by the thousands, memory cards being found with votes for TRump, etc. — ALL OF THEM FAVORING BIDEN.
So, in regards to the first question — ABSOLUTELY.
In regards to the second question: Was the fraud sufficient to hand the election to Joe Biden? The answer is YES!!
The one factor that has the potential to shift votes by the hundreds of thousands from Biden to Trump is the software used to tabulate the votes. Sidney Powell has been on top of this from the get go.... she better deliver because answering the second question very tough.
No one has yet come up with a reasonable explanation as to HOW most of the Republican candidates down ballot won and expanded the GOP population in the House; but, Trump "lost". This by itself does not pass the smell test.
The evidence presented is SOLID ENOUGH to justify state wide audits and recounts ( re-vote even ).
Thing is, this was predicted to be a problem well before the election because of the extraordinary number of absentee ballots. We attempted to get legislatures to change the rules to facilitate a more rapid counting of these ballots but some refused. So yeah, we are pulling out hair out because this was completely avoidable had you listened to us before the election.2 more weeks??? to count votes??? if the tables were turned you would be pulling your hair out.....enough of the BS....we are not stupid....we can see what the dems are doing....
Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified.Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOLClinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.
They name streets after you...ONE WAY.
Who is going to prosecute them? Corrupt Dems are never held accountable. Not by Dems, not even by GOP. The FBI is a joke they won’t do shit.The truth will come out...and then people will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.....they are not stealing this from Bush....or Romney...they are trying to steal a landslide win from Trump....I would not want to be them right now......
BULLSHIT....they are cheating.....the peoples votes were discarded....and replaced with phony software.....
Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified. - 100% Subjective but that is your right.Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified.Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOLClinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.
They name streets after you...ONE WAY.
But she didn’t question the legitimacy of the outcome which is a massive difference.
His legal process is frivolous. Dozens of lawsuits tossed. His rhetoric is going far beyond what anyone should consider responsible.Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified. - 100% Subjective but that is your right.Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified.Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOLClinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.
They name streets after you...ONE WAY.
But she didn’t question the legitimacy of the outcome which is a massive difference.
Stacey Abrams did.
Trump is going through a legal process. Why do you have an issue with that? The election has not been finalized.
And I disagree with you. The FISA was proven to be a sham. Trump may declare that aliens stole the vote. Courts and electors will ultimately send him home. Relax. And I believe he does have a rational basis. So let the legal battle begin. I don't necessarily believe the election was stolen but I do believe there were some inappropriate actions.His legal process is frivolous. Dozens of lawsuits tossed. His rhetoric is going far beyond what anyone should consider responsible.Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified. - 100% Subjective but that is your right.Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified.Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOLClinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.
They name streets after you...ONE WAY.
But she didn’t question the legitimacy of the outcome which is a massive difference.
Stacey Abrams did.
Trump is going through a legal process. Why do you have an issue with that? The election has not been finalized.
What is not my opinion is that Clinton has a rational basis for her complaint. Russia did involve themselves in the campaign. The FBI did publicly reveal information against protocol.
Trump’s declarations of millions of his votes being stolen are not rational and his rhetoric is attacking an institution that we depend on. He is doing so without a rational basis and is deeply irresponsible.
Almost all elections will be certified in the next two weeks. Electors meet in about 4 weeks.How long should we give the blue district thieves to count the fucking votes?...ten years?....this is insanity.....everyone can see what is going on....
If you have a problem with some states taking too long to count the vote, then bring it up with the state legislatures who could allow them to process ballots before Election Day like they do in most states.
www.usatoday.com
This was a massive landslide win for Trump and the media and everyone knows it....historic win.....and they are being allowed to steal it.....its time to fight....if we don't we lose the free nation guaranteed us by the constitution....they will use covid to crush our freedoms.....Almost all elections will be certified in the next two weeks. Electors meet in about 4 weeks.How long should we give the blue district thieves to count the fucking votes?...ten years?....this is insanity.....everyone can see what is going on....
If you have a problem with some states taking too long to count the vote, then bring it up with the state legislatures who could allow them to process ballots before Election Day like they do in most states.
~~~~~~
New York State has yet to fully tabulate their vote... In fact the majority of the counties voted in favor of Trump. Yet, Biden supposedly won the state.
New York Presidential Election Results | USA TODAY
See election results, a county-by-county map and more for the New York Presidential election on Nov. 3, 2020.
Not sure what FISA has to do with anything.And I disagree with you. The FISA was proven to be a sham. Trump may declare that aliens stole the vote. Courts and electors will ultimately send him home. Relax. And I believe he does have a rational basis. So let the legal battle begin. I don't necessarily believe the election was stolen but I do believe there were some inappropriate actions.His legal process is frivolous. Dozens of lawsuits tossed. His rhetoric is going far beyond what anyone should consider responsible.Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified. - 100% Subjective but that is your right.Clinton had very good reason to be upset. There was extensive foreign interference and the behavior of the FBI was out of line in my opinion. She was perfectly justified.Clinton did and then went on talk shows and such and cried that she was robbed. Democrats for the next 4 years tried to undermine and even impeached Trump. Media was complicit. You don't know what "false equivalency" means. They announced Abrams as the Governor of GA at the the DNC, did they not? LOLClinton conceded the day after the election. There was no narrative that the election was stolen by criminal voter fraud. This is a false equivalency.Narrative from the leftists was that Trump stole the 2016 election and that Abrams is the governor of GA. Neither made it so. Who cares about the narrative? Media is 95% Leftist. Don't worry you'll get your president but our problems will still be here but now you won't have a scapegoat.
They name streets after you...ONE WAY.
But she didn’t question the legitimacy of the outcome which is a massive difference.
Stacey Abrams did.
Trump is going through a legal process. Why do you have an issue with that? The election has not been finalized.
What is not my opinion is that Clinton has a rational basis for her complaint. Russia did involve themselves in the campaign. The FBI did publicly reveal information against protocol.
Trump’s declarations of millions of his votes being stolen are not rational and his rhetoric is attacking an institution that we depend on. He is doing so without a rational basis and is deeply irresponsible.
The scary part is that it was legitimate and so many zombies voted for one of their own.
Nothing to see here
