PROOF of Stolen Election

[Lesh]

False!

Please explain how it’s illegal twat

 

[Lesh]

Because we are not the Democrat party, we don't allow corruption in our party

Bwahahaha you funny

 

[elektra]

And I added commentary to it. We know why you are talking about that law.

yes, because the democrats broke the law, why else would the topic of law come up if it was not broke

 

[elektra]

Sure no problem.


No judge in America believes the election was stolen


Dismissed

thank god you speak for no judge in america

Dismissed

 

[Vegasgiants]

thank god you speak for no judge in america

Dismissed

Can you name one?


HAHAHAHAHA

 

[Lesh]

thank god you speak for no judge in america

Dismissed

60 judges HAVE spoken.

And what they have said is "You LOSE" to Trump

 

[Lesh]

yes, because the democrats broke the law, why else would the topic of law come up if it was not broke

Democrats?

i just gave you a quote of one of the REPUBLICAN lawmakers who were part of the Bi-partisan effort to extend mail in voting in PA dope

 

[Vrenn]

60 judges HAVE spoken.

And what they have said is "You LOSE" to Trump

What's coming out now is the plan that they had for Pence. Pence was to be whisked off to a car and driven to a non dicslosed location where he could not do his job. Pence screwed that up when he refused the SS to get in the car. Rump had given the SS specific orders to remove Pence for the Capital grounds.

 

[Lesh]

However the Courts shake this out...remember this. It affects only FUTURE votes

"Any decision to throw out the law would not affect the millions of votes already cast under it in the past four elections."

 

[elektra]

Can you name one?


HAHAHAHAHA

you dont speak for any of the judges, that is very clear

 

[Vegasgiants]

you dont speak for any of the judges, that is very clear

And you dont have any that agree with you


HAHAHAHAHA

 

[elektra]

Democrats?

i just gave you a quote of one of the REPUBLICAN lawmakers who were part of the Bi-partisan effort to extend mail in voting in PA dope

Again, Article 2, section 1, clause 2 of the constitution was violated, broken.

It does not matter what you quote, who you quote, facts are facts.

You gave a quote? If you gave anything, it was a mere 2 or 3 words. If you wish to quote, and link to the transcript where you get the quote, go ahead and do that. Either way, 212, the constitution was violated.

 

[Lesh]

Again, Article 2, section 1, clause 2 of the constitution was violated, broken.

It does not matter what you quote, who you quote, facts are facts.

You gave a quote? If you gave anything, it was a mere 2 or 3 words. If you wish to quote, and link to the transcript where you get the quote, go ahead and do that. Either way, 212, the constitution was violated.

Hey dip shit

"Any decision to throw out the law would not affect the millions of votes already cast under it in the past four elections."

 

[elektra]

And you dont have any that agree with you


HAHAHAHAHA

still trolling, still flaming, I see that these posts are all about how you feel

either way, you still do not speak for any judge

your comment is

DISMISSED

 

[surada]

Next, we have the sheer cowardice of SCOTUS:
The Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a dispute over whether absentee ballots received up to three days after Election Day in Pennsylvania should have been counted in the 2020 presidential election

Supreme Court won't hear 2020 election case that questioned some Pennsylvania ballots

Three conservative justices on the high court said they would have heard the Pennsylvania election cases, one vote shy of the four needed.

www.usatoday.com

Remember how Trump crippled the US post office?

 

[Lesh]

The president of the state Senate, Jake Corman (R., Centre), praised Commonwealth Court’s decision, saying he had “no confidence” in mail ballots. In 2019, after helping pass the law, he hailed it as “the most significant modernization of our elections code in decades.”

You gave a quote? If you gave anything, it was a mere 2 or 3 words. If you wish to quote, and link to the transcript where you get the quote, go ahead and do that. Either way, 212, the constitution was violated.

The quote was there. Here's the link

Pennsylvania’s mail voting law ruled unconstitutional, but remains in place as Wolf appeals

The ruling by Commonwealth Court comes in response to suits filed by a Bradford County commissioner and group of Republican state representatives.

www.spotlightpa.org

Now shut the fuck up

 

[Vegasgiants]

still trolling, still flaming, I see that these posts are all about how you feel

either way, you still do not speak for any judge

your comment is

DISMISSED

HAHAHAHA


HAHAHAHAHA


HAHAHAHAHA

 

[elektra]

The quote was there. Here's the link

Pennsylvania’s mail voting law ruled unconstitutional, but remains in place as Wolf appeals

The ruling by Commonwealth Court comes in response to suits filed by a Bradford County commissioner and group of Republican state representatives.

www.spotlightpa.org

Now shut the fuck up

that is exactly what i said, go fuck yourself dumb ass, you just posted something that confirms the fact I posted.

and the quote states that Corman has no confidence in the mail ballots

 

[elektra]

HAHAHAHA


HAHAHAHAHA


HAHAHAHAHA

just cant include relevant content in your posts, nor can you dispute my facts, which is why facts are stubborn things.

Thank you

 

[Lesh]

that is exactly what i said, go fuck yourself dumb ass, you just posted something that confirms the fact I posted.

and the quote states that Corman has no confidence in the mail ballots

NOW . But he was part of the bipartisan effort to extend the mail in ballots dumbass