Project Lift

The question is, why is Elon refusing to designate this as classified, which would make the NDAs lawful?
 
No, this is true.
No. You’re wrong or a liar.

Obviously, NDA’s are legal relative to classified information. But —

NDA’s can also be requested relative to merely “sensitive” material.

It excludes material covered under “whistleblower” protections, however.


It helps to know what you’re talking about before you post your crap, you dickbag. Of course, that would render you forever silent.
 
Obviously, NDA’s are legal relative to classified information. But —

NDA’s can also be requested relative to merely “sensitive” material.

It excludes material covered under “whistleblower” protections, however.
Holy shit, you're thick.

  • Musk explicitly refused to seek classification - that's the first red flag.
  • Musk insists Federal employees sign NDAs
  • NDAs are illegal for Federal workers except for Classified - I'll concede 'sensitive' also, which Musk also didn't seek. Why not?


As for the sentence I bolded and made big:

1745786348982.webp



Whistleblowers blab. It's what makes them a whistleblower.
4i6Ckte.gif



This is what I mean, Liability, when I say read the thread first.
 
You are too fucking stupid to read what Bradley Moss says in the first post of this thread. Yet you still shoot off your ignorant mouth, showing your ass every time.
I don't care what that shyster says.

The fact of that matter is that you lied and I proved that you lied. And so did others in this thread.

Why don't you just admit that you are wrong and apologize to the USMB forum?
 
Holy shit, you're thick.

  • Musk explicitly refused to seek classification - that's the first red flag.
  • Musk insists Federal employees sign NDAs
  • NDAs are illegal for Federal workers except for Classified - I'll concede 'sensitive' also, which Musk also didn't seek. Why not?


As for the sentence I bolded and made big:

View attachment 1105164


Whistleblowers blab. It's what makes them a whistleblower.
4i6Ckte.gif



This is what I mean, Liability, when I say read the thread first.


From your OP:

“DOGE is not spearheading anything at the FAA, nor are there any DOGE employees at FAA,” the agency spokesperson says. “Project Lift was conceived and is managed by federal employees.”

Speaking about the NDAs, the FAA spokesperson says: “Employees routinely sign non-disclosure agreements to avoid conflicts of interest.”

This was already pointed out to you in Post 11.

Seems you are trolling.
 
Holy shit, you're thick.

  • Musk explicitly refused to seek classification - that's the first red flag.
  • Musk insists Federal employees sign NDAs
  • NDAs are illegal for Federal workers except for Classified - I'll concede 'sensitive' also, which Musk also didn't seek. Why not?


As for the sentence I bolded and made big:

View attachment 1105164


Whistleblowers blab. It's what makes them a whistleblower.
4i6Ckte.gif



This is what I mean, Liability, when I say read the thread first.
You gasbag retard libturds can’t even admit when you’ve been proved wrong.

Toddle off, tard.
 
The link that says the game mint cannot ask federal employees to sign NDA’s.

You’re full of shit. But what else is new?
The government can only insist on NDA’s for classified information
From what I’m reading

Is Elmo dealing on classified info?
 
Another brilliant editorial, hahaha. No comment on your content?

How about posting the law you are referencing. Last I checked most stuff in the government in the government cant be disclosed.

That is why we hear of people leaking information getting prosecuted.

Democrats are morons, cause you idiots claim everything Trump does is illegal

Right and what about all the Congress sexual harassment payoffs that sign NDA...
 
The Pavlovian response this this thread is hilarious. You don't have a clue what Project Lift is but here you are defending it to the hilt.

That's a cult.
 
Back
Top Bottom