Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Be it resolved, don't trust the mainstream media."
Munk Debate - Mainstream Media ft. Douglas Murray, Matt Taibbi, Malcolm Gladwell, Michelle Goldberg
"At the beginning of the debate, 48% voted in favour of the resolution, while 52% voted against the resolution. At the end of the debate, 67% voted in favour of the resolution, while 33% voted against it, representing a 39% switch to the PRO side, the biggest switch in Munk history."
Chapters:
0:00 - Montage of past debates
2:26 - Moderator's introduction
7:04 - Preliminary poll
10:05 - Taibbi's opening statement
15:39 - Goldberg's opening statement
21:40 - Murray's opening statement
27:52 - Gladwell's opening statement
34:25 - Taibbi's first rebuttal
36:56 - Goldberg's first rebuttal
40:06 - Murray's first rebuttal
43:17 - Gladwell's first rebuttal
46:41 - Taibbi's second rebuttal
49:45 - Goldberg's second rebuttal
51:55 - Murray's second rebuttal
54:02 - Gladwell's second rebuttal
56:10 - Open discussion
1:22:17 - Gladwell's closing statement
1:24:55 - Murray's closing statement
1:28:12 - Goldberg's closing statement
1:31:49 - Taibbi's closing statement
1:35:01 - Debate results
"Be it resolved, don't trust the mainstream media."
Munk Debate - Mainstream Media ft. Douglas Murray, Matt Taibbi, Malcolm Gladwell, Michelle Goldberg
"At the beginning of the debate, 48% voted in favour of the resolution, while 52% voted against the resolution. At the end of the debate, 67% voted in favour of the resolution, while 33% voted against it, representing a 39% switch to the PRO side, the biggest switch in Munk history."
Chapters:
0:00 - Montage of past debates
2:26 - Moderator's introduction
7:04 - Preliminary poll
10:05 - Taibbi's opening statement
15:39 - Goldberg's opening statement
21:40 - Murray's opening statement
27:52 - Gladwell's opening statement
34:25 - Taibbi's first rebuttal
36:56 - Goldberg's first rebuttal
40:06 - Murray's first rebuttal
43:17 - Gladwell's first rebuttal
46:41 - Taibbi's second rebuttal
49:45 - Goldberg's second rebuttal
51:55 - Murray's second rebuttal
54:02 - Gladwell's second rebuttal
56:10 - Open discussion
1:22:17 - Gladwell's closing statement
1:24:55 - Murray's closing statement
1:28:12 - Goldberg's closing statement
1:31:49 - Taibbi's closing statement
1:35:01 - Debate results
Right. Much more accurate to depend on some anonymous site where the guy claims to be an expert on politics and car repair.Anyone who turns to mainstream media sources for “news” is intentionally seeking propaganda at this point…
![]()
The Media Lies Add Up
The Left, including the media, has misled the public. This fact culminated in calls for President Biden to step aside before the election.www.dailysignal.com
Why?21:00 mark “who would care about the Hunter Biden Laptop from Hell situation”??
Ummmm…literally everyone on the planet who cares about actual journalism
That flawlessly summarized it right there. The left deeply desires totalitarian control and the fact that technology has allowed information to flow freely around the world in real time has them in a total outrage.
Because it showed that Joe Biden was not only a pathological liar but also that he violated the Emoluments Clause - a very serious felony.Why?
I’m sorry, I don’t speak Ebonics. No idea what you’re trying to say here.Should we just as much about Fat Elvis killing the Stormy Daniels payola?
A violation of the emoluments clause?Because it showed that Joe Biden was not only a pathological liar but also that he violated the Emoluments Clause - a very serious felony.
The fact that you have to ask “why” shows just how uninformed you are about all of this subject matter.
I’m sorry, I don’t speak Ebonics. No idea what you’re trying to say here.
Yes…violation of the Emoluments Clause. Your usual fake, nervous laughter once again indicates that you have nothing intelligent to say, but are just super pissed off that the facts bury the Democrats yet again,A violation of the emoluments clause?
Hilarious
HilariousYes…violation of the Emoluments Clause. Your usual fake, nervous laughter once again indicates that you have nothing intelligent to say, but are just super pissed off that the facts bury the Democrats yet again,
The evidence was on the laptop (that the liberal media tried like hell to suppress so that mindless people like you would continue to cry “what evidence…roh…what evidence” like mindless little parrots)What evidence do you have that would convince anyone outside of the cult do you have.
What evidence about President Biden can you provide from the laptop?The evidence was on the laptop (that the liberal media tried like hell to suppress so that mindless people like you would continue to cry “what evidence…roh…what evidence” like mindless little parrots)
This has been covered over and over in this thread (and others). You’re response is always the same: like an immature child, you put your fingers in your ears and cry “nah-nah-nah-nah” and the you post “hilarious” (What evidence about President Biden can you provide from the laptop?
The laptop shows no such thing or Comer Pyle and Gymnasium Jordan would have showed us the evidence.This has been covered over and over in this thread (and others). You’re response is always the same: like an immature child, you put your fingers in your ears and cry “nah-nah-nah-nah” and the you post “hilarious” () because you’re on the wrong side of the facts.
The laptop shows that Joe Biden sold access to the Office of the Vice President to China and Ukraine (a violation of the Emoluments Clause). This was confirmed by Hunter Biden’s testimony under oath.
That reality is also illustrated in the fact that a life-long “public servant” inexplicably has a net worth of more than $10 million.
Great. After all the double talk we are finally getting to the bottom of things. What evidence from the laptop proves Biden did such a thing. You can imagine the frustration caused by repeated claims that the laptop proved all that, but when it came time to point out exactly how the laptop proved it, we got nothing. I'm glad you will finally point that out for everybody to see. I await your revelation.This has been covered over and over in this thread (and others). You’re response is always the same: like an immature child, you put your fingers in your ears and cry “nah-nah-nah-nah” and the you post “hilarious” () because you’re on the wrong side of the facts.
The laptop shows that Joe Biden sold access to the Office of the Vice President to China and Ukraine (a violation of the Emoluments Clause). This was confirmed by Hunter Biden’s testimony under oath.
That reality is also illustrated in the fact that a life-long “public servant” inexplicably has a net worth of more than $10 million.
See? Exactly what I said you would do - put your fingers in your ears and cry “nah-nah-nah-nah”.The laptop shows no such thing or Comer Pyle and Gymnasium Jordan would have showed us the evidence.
Maybe you can?
All of the emails proved it. And you know it. But you actually believe if you simply deny reality, you can alter realityGreat. After all the double talk we are finally getting to the bottom of things. What evidence from the laptop proves Biden did such a thing. You can imagine the frustration caused by repeated claims that the laptop proved all that, but when it came time to point out exactly how the laptop proved it, we got nothing. I'm glad you will finally point that out for everybody to see. I await your revelation.
So what happened to the house committee?See? Exactly what I said you would do - put your fingers in your ears and cry “nah-nah-nah-nah”.
The laptop absolutely showed it - which is why the lying Democrats put out the pitiful “Russian Disinformation” claim.
It’s hilarious that you actually believe you can alter reality if you just deny reality. Liberalism truly is a mental disease.