Utilitarian
co-Cain Manager
If you're pro-choice, you still have to decide when life legally begins. If the argument is that life legally begins at birth, then killing a pregnant woman should only count as a single homicide. Many pro-choice jurisdictions still treat it as a double homicide, which often contradicts how they define life regarding abortion, depending on how far into the pregnancy the woman was.It is leftist big govt shit.
How can you give the govt more authority over a persons body than they have? How you can you claim to be conservative, claim to be against big govt, while putting them as overseers over peoples bodies?
Bodily autonomy is one of the most important human rights in existence.
Dont get me wrong, I think abortion is abhorrent, but the govt dictating what we do with our bodies is way worse. Its tyranny.
It makes no sense to me. At all.
Most pro-choice people believe life legally begins sometime before birth, which, by your definition, would make anyone who believes life begins at any point before birth is "big government."
Bodily autonomy is indeed important, but a lot of the pro-choice people didn't apply that to vaccines during COVID. A lot of people are hypocrites in general, of course.
There has to be some logical distinction of when life legally begins, and from there, restrictions should apply to abortion. Personally, I think conception is that point, but I support exceptions for medical and eugenic reasons.
