- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,601
- 32,541
- 2,300
He condemned the violence. explicitly.
Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Privileged Victims of the Revolution
- Thread starter HappyJoy
- Start date
He condemned the violence. explicitly.
Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,601
- 32,541
- 2,300
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.
6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.
still a hack.
HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
- 1,140
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #43
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.
He condemned the violence. explicitly.
Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
After the fact to serve his own purpose.
Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)
joaquinmiller
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2013
- 6,807
- 7,208
- 2,055
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.
6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.
still a hack.
Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,601
- 32,541
- 2,300
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.
He condemned the violence. explicitly.
Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
After the fact to serve his own purpose.
Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)
Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.
Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.
They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,601
- 32,541
- 2,300
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.
6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.
still a hack.
Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.
Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.
It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.
Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,656
- 33,566
- 2,300
There was nothing "civil" here. They destroyed property , threatened the safety of Congress, and committed murderRosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
joaquinmiller
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2013
- 6,807
- 7,208
- 2,055
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.
6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.
still a hack.
Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.
Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.
It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.
No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?
I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.
HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
- 1,140
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #49
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.
He condemned the violence. explicitly.
Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
After the fact to serve his own purpose.
Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)
Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.
He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.
Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.
It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. Hell, let's not forget about the handcuffs and nooses. God only knows what they would have done if they found Pelosi or AOC and they were heading to the one place they thought they would be. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.
They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.
They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,601
- 32,541
- 2,300
There was nothing "civil" here. They destroyed property , threatened the safety of Congress, and committed murderRosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
some of them did, yet you want to paint a broad brush.
And considering we don't know how the officer died, murder isn't proven yet.
On the other hand, we know the woman was shot in the chest, was unarmed, and while attempting to jump through a window wasn't an immediate threat to the officer.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,601
- 32,541
- 2,300
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.
He condemned the violence. explicitly.
Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
After the fact to serve his own purpose.
Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)
Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.
He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.
Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.
It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.
They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.
They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.
your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.
Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.
It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,601
- 32,541
- 2,300
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.
6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.
still a hack.
Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.
Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.
It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.
No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?
I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.
No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.
"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"
HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
- 1,140
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #53
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.
He condemned the violence. explicitly.
Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
After the fact to serve his own purpose.
Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)
Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.
He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.
Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.
It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.
They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.
They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.
your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.
Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.
It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.
Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.
joaquinmiller
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2013
- 6,807
- 7,208
- 2,055
Why is Joe Biden so quickly forming a Cabinet when my investigators have found hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes, enough to “flip” at least four States, which in turn is more than enough to win the Election? Hopefully the Courts and/or Legislatures will have....
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 22, 2020
The evidence for election fraud is Trump's word, which should be enough to make a Trump fan despair.
For context, Trump has been lying about election fraud every day for two months. For two weeks, he called on his supporters to come to DC on the 6th, and promised it would "be wild". On the 6th, he wound them up with a pack of lies and conspiracy theories and pointed them at the Capitol Bldg and a joint session of Congress.
In the Trumpverse, that can only mean he isn't responsible at all.
HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
- 1,140
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #55
There was nothing "civil" here. They destroyed property , threatened the safety of Congress, and committed murderRosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
Didn't you hear? Trump is the new Rosa Parks. Defending the oranges against civil injustice.
joaquinmiller
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2013
- 6,807
- 7,208
- 2,055
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Spit out Trump's undersized appendage, and repatriate to America. Your time in the Trumpverse was ill spent.
6/10 on language, better than idiots like Dr. Love.
still a hack.
Stipulating for the sake of argument, I'd rather be a hack than the victim of a con man, too embarrassed to admit being taken in. There was never a day in Trump's life when he was fit for the office he holds. If you couldn't see that before the election, you're an idiot. If you saw it and supported him anyway, I assume a tax cut and hating on brown people is more important to you than America.
Trump did things he said he would do during his campaign, or at least tried to do them. That's why I voted for him twice.
It's not your fault you are unable to conceptualize people thinking differently from you without being evil or stupid, it's probably your lefty education.
No, it's vetting. You didn't vet your reality TV star. You elected the lunatic fringe - a Birther, for Chrissake. You want to pretend that was honest?
I tell you what sickens me - the pretending. Pretending Trump's lies aren't lies.
No what's funny is you thinking he's the first president ever who lied, because his lies aren't as soft as prog lies.
"If you like your plan you can keep your plan, period"
" I was against gay marriage before I was for it"
"I want to be President for all Americans"
I said the pretending sickened me, not that it was funny. I don't think he's the first president to lie - that's you saying that, so you can argue against what you said, not what I said.
BrokeLoser
Diamond Member
I've never seen a more pathetic bunch of 'revolutionaries' in my life.
There you have it folks...more LefTard Logic.
"These are legit REVELUTIONAIRIES!"
"These are a pathetic bunch of REVELUTIONAIRIES."
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,601
- 32,541
- 2,300
What I don't see in those pictures ( I don't see anything wrong with the first one) is that nobody was attempting to overthrow an election and commit insurrection.
We didn't see a President or political leader winding them up and aiming them either.
Nah we just saw them giving excuses on why the people were so angry, and not condemning them.
"mostly peaceful protesters" cover and such.
Oh, well, that's okay then. If some politicians - after the fact - said he/she understood the anger, or some such, then it's perfectly okay for the President to wind up a mob and aim it at Congress. Your point is well made. And after all, Bone Spurs didn't go with them, his statement notwithstanding.
He didn't tell them to break in and enter, the prog polls excused the actual violence after the fact, thus informing those doing it that said pols at best didn't care, and at worst support them.
Trump did denounce the violence when it happened, but of course that isn't good enough for lefties, as anything he would have done wouldn't be good enough.
Are you tired of being a hack yet?
Just for fun can you post what Trump said in it's entirety during the riot? Not afterward. I don't think when the rioting starts and he calls the people (that he said he loved) to "remain peaceful" is all that helpful. At least you appear to admit that they broke the law.
He condemned the violence. explicitly.
Rosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
After the fact to serve his own purpose.
Do you think those who attacked the capital committed heinous and un-American acts? (I like to ask and not assume unlike you)
Again, just an example of nothing he could have done besides losing in 2016 would satisfy you.
He could have accepted the loss like a normal grown ass man. No, he wouldn't get any trophy points because he's expected to do that. However multiple felonies in the capital this week would not have happened. If he didn't invite anyone to Washington on he 6th for a "wild time" none of this would have happened. If he didn't push the idiotic voter fraud conspiracies none of this would have happened.
Trying to enter was civil disobedience, breaking shit and putting hands on police officers was not.
It was trespassing at best it then became violent, obstructing Congress, destruction of public and private property, potentially murder, taking firearms and bombs into the capital is well...bad. All in all it was an insurrection and most likely people will be going to prison for a long, long time and they will have done so for Trump.
They committed crimes, but I don't see the need for the hyperbole about this being a coup attempt or destroying our democracy. The ones breaking shit and attacking officers were no different than the BLM anti-fa types.
They obstructed the peaceful transfer of power being conducted by Congress. If that's not insurrection and sedition then I don't know what is.
your side has spent the past 4 years calling us and him evil stupid and everything else, have thrown out all levels of decorum. and you expect us and him to play nice? it takes two to tango, asshat.
Please show me proof of firearms and bombs in the building.
It was not insurrection, if it was then the BLM idiots who attacked the federal building in Portland were insurrectionists.
Oh, fuck you. Like Obama wasn't called every name in the book. Democrats didn't attack the capital over it. The right needs to take ownership over what happened. If those assholes had found Pelosi, AOC, Pence or others and had the handcuffs and nooses at the ready what do you think could have happened? Not to mention some were armed. An armed assault on our capital all because Trump was called a cheetoh? Fuck off.
Not to the level seen with Trump, because it takes a leftist to truly hate someone they disagree with.
- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,601
- 32,541
- 2,300
There was nothing "civil" here. They destroyed property , threatened the safety of Congress, and committed murderRosa Parks broke the law too, civil disobedience requires breaking the law.
Didn't you hear? Trump is the new Rosa Parks. Defending the oranges against civil injustice.
Who said anything about Trump with regards to my point on civil disobedience. Stop making shit up.
HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
- 1,140
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #60
I've never seen a more pathetic bunch of 'revolutionaries' in my life.
There you have it folks...more LefTard Logic.
"These are legit REVELUTIONAIRIES!"
"These are a pathetic bunch of REVELUTIONAIRIES."
I don't approve of either however one group brought guns, bombs, handcuffs, nooses, confederate flags into the capital hunting for humans so they could obstruct the peaceful transfer of power that helps us to remain a free country.
The other a cop car.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 92
- Replies
- 32
- Views
- 436
- Replies
- 65
- Views
- 561
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 165
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 208
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 74
- Views
- 218
- Replies
- 403
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 164
- Views
- 694
- Replies
- 238
- Views
- 925
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8111
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-