Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's Obama's policies, the Socialist Democrat agenda, which hurts jobs. Hell, an employer might as well legally adopt a potential employee as to hire him in the current environment.
Meanwhile back at the ranch, they have WASTED billions in so-called "job creation" with more to come. And that IS his fault. He's the guy who signs the spending bills.
Is this what you do gunny? Start new useless threads when it's shown you're fucking clueless in other threads? Why the hell do punks like you even post on a board? Look at this op. It's obvious the Prez doesn't hire or fire people in the workforce but you want to drop it as if it is some form of revelation? Given what I've seen so far I wouldn't be surprised if you made this op because you just now found out the Prez doesn't hire or fire people.
It's not that Obama wasn't tossed into a pool of gators, he was...
]It's Obama's policies, the Socialist Democrat agenda, which hurts jobs. [/B] Hell, an employer might as well legally adopt a potential employee as to hire him in the current environment.
Meanwhile back at the ranch, they have WASTED billions in so-called "job creation" with more to come. And that IS his fault. He's the guy who signs the spending bills.
]It's Obama's policies, the Socialist Democrat agenda, which hurts jobs. [/B] Hell, an employer might as well legally adopt a potential employee as to hire him in the current environment.
Meanwhile back at the ranch, they have WASTED billions in so-called "job creation" with more to come. And that IS his fault. He's the guy who signs the spending bills.
Really? Which policies, specifically and what Socialist Democrat agenda items specifically have hurt job creation. Also, when you respond, please supply data to back up your claims so I won't have to ask you again.
]It's Obama's policies, the Socialist Democrat agenda, which hurts jobs. [/B] Hell, an employer might as well legally adopt a potential employee as to hire him in the current environment.
Meanwhile back at the ranch, they have WASTED billions in so-called "job creation" with more to come. And that IS his fault. He's the guy who signs the spending bills.
Really? Which policies, specifically and what Socialist Democrat agenda items specifically have hurt job creation. Also, when you respond, please supply data to back up your claims so I won't have to ask you again.
Do I look like your personal fucking secretary?
I don't answer to you, you silly dink.
That said, if you think Obama's proposed trifecta of Cap-and-Scam, Card-Check, and Obamacare are incentives for employers to grow their businesses and hire more people... you're completely welcome to expound. I can't promise I won't laugh at you though.
Well the federal government is hiring faster than the private sector and on average government employees are paid more than private sector employees
So it can be said that the Presidents policies of ever increasing government expansion is "creating" jobs.
Of course all the money to pay for those government employees comes out of our pockets.
Well the federal government is hiring faster than the private sector and on average government employees are paid more than private sector employees
So it can be said that the Presidents policies of ever increasing government expansion is "creating" jobs.
Of course all the money to pay for those government employees comes out of our pockets.
Same place the majority of the Bush job gains came from.
Well the federal government is hiring faster than the private sector and on average government employees are paid more than private sector employees
So it can be said that the Presidents policies of ever increasing government expansion is "creating" jobs.
Of course all the money to pay for those government employees comes out of our pockets.
Same place the majority of the Bush job gains came from.
Halliburton?
Well the federal government is hiring faster than the private sector and on average government employees are paid more than private sector employees
So it can be said that the Presidents policies of ever increasing government expansion is "creating" jobs.
Of course all the money to pay for those government employees comes out of our pockets.
Same place the majority of the Bush job gains came from.
Per Message Board etiquette, since it was YOU who made the claims about Obama's policies and agenda hurting job creation, without an iota of evidence to support said claims, and no disclaimer stating that this was simply something you were pulling out of your ass, then it is upon you to provide said evidence. Are you new here, or just partisan and ignorant?
Per Message Board etiquette, since it was YOU who made the claims about Obama's policies and agenda hurting job creation, without an iota of evidence to support said claims, and no disclaimer stating that this was simply something you were pulling out of your ass, then it is upon you to provide said evidence. Are you new here, or just partisan and ignorant?
"Per Message Board etiquette"... Seriously? OMG... there just aren't enough emoticons to convey the depth of my amusement.
What are you?... Emily-freaking-Post? Is that a big concern among Socialist Democrats now?... politeness?... ettiquette?
Oh, right. I remember now. It's new. Since G.W. left office, and your puppet-masters started whining about "incivility" in the face of public protests regarding their disastrous spending and socialist policy agendas.
So, yeah. I'm suuuuurre your own personal "ettiquette" was ever-so-polite and lovely during the Bush administration and in any commentary afterward. I mean, how could it not be? You're not a... a... " PARTISAN", are you?
If I wasn't already bored with you, maybe I'd take a look at your posting history. But alas... I can hardly find anything to interest me if you're already so ignorant that the "trifecta" above must be explained to you from the economic perspective of prospective employers.
Bottom line, neither I nor the voters of America are obligated to explain anything to you. It's enough that Lord Obama will be left to sit and spin in November. Because afterall... not everyone has as much trouble understanding why turning employers into adoptive parents, excessively taxing their success, impairing their ability to operate, increasing their costs, and making policies that will deliver control of private businesses to union hands... might negatively affect employment.
Really? Which policies, specifically and what Socialist Democrat agenda items specifically have hurt job creation. Also, when you respond, please supply data to back up your claims so I won't have to ask you again.
Do I look like your personal fucking secretary?
I don't answer to you, you silly dink.
That said, if you think Obama's proposed trifecta of Cap-and-Scam, Card-Check, and Obamacare are incentives for employers to grow their businesses and hire more people... you're completely welcome to expound. I can't promise I won't laugh at you though.
Per Message Board etiquette, since it was YOU who made the claims about Obama's policies and agenda hurting job creation, without an iota of evidence to support said claims, and no disclaimer stating that this was simply something you were pulling out of your ass, then it is upon you to provide said evidence. Are you new here, or just partisan and ignorant?
What are you?... twelve years old?
Do I look like your personal fucking secretary?
I don't answer to you, you silly dink.
That said, if you think Obama's proposed trifecta of Cap-and-Scam, Card-Check, and Obamacare are incentives for employers to grow their businesses and hire more people... you're completely welcome to expound. I can't promise I won't laugh at you though.
Per Message Board etiquette, since it was YOU who made the claims about Obama's policies and agenda hurting job creation, without an iota of evidence to support said claims, and no disclaimer stating that this was simply something you were pulling out of your ass, then it is upon you to provide said evidence. Are you new here, or just partisan and ignorant?
Seriously... ??? neg-repping?
Weird, that you come in here spouting idiocy and expect no one should laugh at your silly ass, not even after you've insulted them.
Fuck. I couldn't be bothered to "neg-rep" even the looniest bastard in this joint. But then again, I'm not an infant who thinks he should be allowed to dish it out but not take it.
