Presidential Poll: Trump vs. Warren

If the Presidential election was held today who do you prefer to vote for?


  • Total voters
    49

HappyJoy

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
24,871
Reaction score
2,532
Points
290
^Awesome, you guys are finally running out of memes.
 

AzogtheDefiler

The Pale Orc
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2018
Messages
28,262
Reaction score
6,148
Points
290
Location
Boston, MA
You’re the expert on lying. Tell me again how Trump was “pleading” to get Russia into the G7. Liar.
You don't like that do you? Tough, it's a descriptor, it's my opinion. Where as a prediction model is decidedly not a poll. Dunce.

What I actually said was Trump was pleading Putin's case, which is different than just pleading.

Day 945: Bucking world leaders, Trump gets ready to plead Russia's case at the G7
An MSNBC biased editorial doesn’t equate to pleading. Nowhere in his statements did I witness pleading. Suggesting would be the appropriate word. So you lied just like Fake News MSNBC. Sheep.
i said pleading his case, in other words arguing on behalf of, I think my post stands, I'm sorry you guys get trapped in lies all the time and feel
the need to even the score, first find a real lie.
Nope. He was just making a suggestion. He wasn't pleading anything. This isn't a court of law. And yes, you are sorry.

A suggestion? Riiight. A really, really bad one that no one will agree with him on. First because it's a bad idea and secondly because he's pissed his reputation away there is no incentive in working with Trump. Therefore, he will not get his way.
You’re entitled to your opinion but your opinion is not a fact. He didn’t plead as you alluded to aka lied. He made a suggestion. He knows the other countries will say no but in future negotiations with Russia he can tell them he was supportive. Win/win.

I recommend a college education for you. It is helpful.
 

JusticeHammer

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
2,099
Reaction score
442
Points
140
It would be a pleasure to vote for Pocahontas over Trumpybear any day of the week.
You are completely confused. If you like socialism that much, get out of my country.
We are and will be a Constitutional Republic until there is a new Constitution passed,(which I don't think anyone supports), so I must say, you are the one confused. What country are you in? First, why do you think I'm in your country and not my own, second, wtf should I leave my country?
yep my country and you're in it, and you can take your socialism and leave. I give two shits who you think you are, and where you are, but at this moment you're in my country and we are a capitalistic country which the dems wish to destroy, you voting for her means that is your intentions as well. turn around is fair game eh? you don't like trump and spend your days bitching, well he's at least the correct flavor of the country, not walking communism around like warren. still want to know what's she's done for the country.
Still my country. Still a constitutional republic. No initiative to change the constitution, just confused Trumpublicans, angry as always. I'm not really a Warren supporter but as I said it will be my pleasure to vote for her if if means voting against old Trumpybear and his face.
So you really do support socialism? Can't hide that. Trump or stupid socialist like Warren.
 

BlindBoo

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
32,804
Reaction score
3,774
Points
1,130
It would be a pleasure to vote for Pocahontas over Trumpybear any day of the week.
You are completely confused. If you like socialism that much, get out of my country.
We are and will be a Constitutional Republic until there is a new Constitution passed,(which I don't think anyone supports), so I must say, you are the one confused. What country are you in? First, why do you think I'm in your country and not my own, second, wtf should I leave my country?
yep my country and you're in it, and you can take your socialism and leave. I give two shits who you think you are, and where you are, but at this moment you're in my country and we are a capitalistic country which the dems wish to destroy, you voting for her means that is your intentions as well. turn around is fair game eh? you don't like trump and spend your days bitching, well he's at least the correct flavor of the country, not walking communism around like warren. still want to know what's she's done for the country.
Still my country. Still a constitutional republic. No initiative to change the constitution, just confused Trumpublicans, angry as always. I'm not really a Warren supporter but as I said it will be my pleasure to vote for her if if means voting against old Trumpybear and his face.
So you really do support socialism? Can't hide that. Trump or stupid socialist like Warren.
I will not support any effort to change us from a constitutional republic to a constitutional socialist state.
 

HappyJoy

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
24,871
Reaction score
2,532
Points
290
You don't like that do you? Tough, it's a descriptor, it's my opinion. Where as a prediction model is decidedly not a poll. Dunce.

What I actually said was Trump was pleading Putin's case, which is different than just pleading.

Day 945: Bucking world leaders, Trump gets ready to plead Russia's case at the G7
An MSNBC biased editorial doesn’t equate to pleading. Nowhere in his statements did I witness pleading. Suggesting would be the appropriate word. So you lied just like Fake News MSNBC. Sheep.
i said pleading his case, in other words arguing on behalf of, I think my post stands, I'm sorry you guys get trapped in lies all the time and feel
the need to even the score, first find a real lie.
Nope. He was just making a suggestion. He wasn't pleading anything. This isn't a court of law. And yes, you are sorry.

A suggestion? Riiight. A really, really bad one that no one will agree with him on. First because it's a bad idea and secondly because he's pissed his reputation away there is no incentive in working with Trump. Therefore, he will not get his way.
You’re entitled to your opinion but your opinion is not a fact. He didn’t plead as you alluded to aka lied. He made a suggestion. He knows the other countries will say no but in future negotiations with Russia he can tell them he was supportive. Win/win.

I recommend a college education for you. It is helpful.
How is that a win when he demonstrates to Russia that no one takes him seriously? Including Russia.
 

AzogtheDefiler

The Pale Orc
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2018
Messages
28,262
Reaction score
6,148
Points
290
Location
Boston, MA
An MSNBC biased editorial doesn’t equate to pleading. Nowhere in his statements did I witness pleading. Suggesting would be the appropriate word. So you lied just like Fake News MSNBC. Sheep.
i said pleading his case, in other words arguing on behalf of, I think my post stands, I'm sorry you guys get trapped in lies all the time and feel
the need to even the score, first find a real lie.
Nope. He was just making a suggestion. He wasn't pleading anything. This isn't a court of law. And yes, you are sorry.

A suggestion? Riiight. A really, really bad one that no one will agree with him on. First because it's a bad idea and secondly because he's pissed his reputation away there is no incentive in working with Trump. Therefore, he will not get his way.
You’re entitled to your opinion but your opinion is not a fact. He didn’t plead as you alluded to aka lied. He made a suggestion. He knows the other countries will say no but in future negotiations with Russia he can tell them he was supportive. Win/win.

I recommend a college education for you. It is helpful.
How is that a win when he demonstrates to Russia that no one takes him seriously? Including Russia.
Except they do take him seriously. The US continues to be the most powerful nation in the world and he has a very strong relationship with both the UK PM, Boris Johnson and Israel, our only true ally in the Middle East. If he can win the trade war with China, he will be golden. Big If, I agree. You are not impartial. You're a TDS, Trump hater. If you were objective you would see some of the positives that he has achieved. Alas, you're a loon.
 

Third Party

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
7,636
Reaction score
620
Points
275
In light of Elizabeth Warren's rise in Democratic primary polling I thought we should have another poll.

Elizabeth Warren is SO extreme far left with her promoting OPEN borders, healthcare for ILLEGALS, rampant socialism, and ATTACKING our law enforcement & border security it's CLEAR she wants to do everything she can to DESTROY traditional America!!
She would win though because there are more women than men in this country.
 

HappyJoy

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
24,871
Reaction score
2,532
Points
290
i said pleading his case, in other words arguing on behalf of, I think my post stands, I'm sorry you guys get trapped in lies all the time and feel
the need to even the score, first find a real lie.
Nope. He was just making a suggestion. He wasn't pleading anything. This isn't a court of law. And yes, you are sorry.

A suggestion? Riiight. A really, really bad one that no one will agree with him on. First because it's a bad idea and secondly because he's pissed his reputation away there is no incentive in working with Trump. Therefore, he will not get his way.
You’re entitled to your opinion but your opinion is not a fact. He didn’t plead as you alluded to aka lied. He made a suggestion. He knows the other countries will say no but in future negotiations with Russia he can tell them he was supportive. Win/win.

I recommend a college education for you. It is helpful.
How is that a win when he demonstrates to Russia that no one takes him seriously? Including Russia.
Except they do take him seriously. The US continues to be the most powerful nation in the world and he has a very strong relationship with both the UK PM, Boris Johnson and Israel, our only true ally in the Middle East. If he can win the trade war with China, he will be golden. Big If, I agree. You are not impartial. You're a TDS, Trump hater. If you were objective you would see some of the positives that he has achieved. Alas, you're a loon.
He can't even build an international coalition to work against China and instead goes it alone. All he has is Boris Johnson the guy who may be responsible for Scotland leaving the U.K. and Israel? Well, that's an insurmountable alliance isn't it? :21:
 

AzogtheDefiler

The Pale Orc
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2018
Messages
28,262
Reaction score
6,148
Points
290
Location
Boston, MA
Nope. He was just making a suggestion. He wasn't pleading anything. This isn't a court of law. And yes, you are sorry.

A suggestion? Riiight. A really, really bad one that no one will agree with him on. First because it's a bad idea and secondly because he's pissed his reputation away there is no incentive in working with Trump. Therefore, he will not get his way.
You’re entitled to your opinion but your opinion is not a fact. He didn’t plead as you alluded to aka lied. He made a suggestion. He knows the other countries will say no but in future negotiations with Russia he can tell them he was supportive. Win/win.

I recommend a college education for you. It is helpful.
How is that a win when he demonstrates to Russia that no one takes him seriously? Including Russia.
Except they do take him seriously. The US continues to be the most powerful nation in the world and he has a very strong relationship with both the UK PM, Boris Johnson and Israel, our only true ally in the Middle East. If he can win the trade war with China, he will be golden. Big If, I agree. You are not impartial. You're a TDS, Trump hater. If you were objective you would see some of the positives that he has achieved. Alas, you're a loon.
He can't even build an international coalition to work against China and instead goes it alone. All he has is Boris Johnson the guy who may be responsible for Scotland leaving the U.K. and Israel? Well, that's an insurmountable alliance isn't it? :21:
Scotland tried to leave before. Didn't happen. How can you judge someone before the final plan is implemented. The final say on the trade war is not there yet and if he fails he likely loses in 2020. Fairly simple, even for you to comprehend. China needs us more than we need China IMO.

Have you ever taken a class in a university? I highly recommended it? You got smoked in your debate with bear and I am frankly embarrassing you here no matter how many emojis you post to try to make yourself feel better.
 

HappyJoy

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
24,871
Reaction score
2,532
Points
290
A suggestion? Riiight. A really, really bad one that no one will agree with him on. First because it's a bad idea and secondly because he's pissed his reputation away there is no incentive in working with Trump. Therefore, he will not get his way.
You’re entitled to your opinion but your opinion is not a fact. He didn’t plead as you alluded to aka lied. He made a suggestion. He knows the other countries will say no but in future negotiations with Russia he can tell them he was supportive. Win/win.

I recommend a college education for you. It is helpful.
How is that a win when he demonstrates to Russia that no one takes him seriously? Including Russia.
Except they do take him seriously. The US continues to be the most powerful nation in the world and he has a very strong relationship with both the UK PM, Boris Johnson and Israel, our only true ally in the Middle East. If he can win the trade war with China, he will be golden. Big If, I agree. You are not impartial. You're a TDS, Trump hater. If you were objective you would see some of the positives that he has achieved. Alas, you're a loon.
He can't even build an international coalition to work against China and instead goes it alone. All he has is Boris Johnson the guy who may be responsible for Scotland leaving the U.K. and Israel? Well, that's an insurmountable alliance isn't it? :21:
Scotland tried to leave before. Didn't happen.
U.K. hasn't left yet.

How can you judge someone before the final plan is implemented. The final say on the trade war is not there yet and if he fails he likely loses in 2020. Fairly simple, even for you to comprehend. China needs us more than we need China IMO.
What is the plan anyway?


Have you ever taken a class in a university? I highly recommended it? You got smoked in your debate with bear and I am frankly embarrassing you here no matter how many emojis you post to try to make yourself feel better.
I didn't consider it a debate. Looked like he went on a bender last night.
 

toobfreak

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
26,581
Reaction score
8,952
Points
910
This is not even a race. It's like putting an NFL star player in the Special Olympics.
What a curious thing. The democrats all tell us unendingly since 2015 that Trump doesn't stand a chance. Hmm.

Screen Shot 2019-08-29 at 1.02.36 PM.png


Looks like Trump is killin' it.
 

HappyJoy

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
24,871
Reaction score
2,532
Points
290

AzogtheDefiler

The Pale Orc
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2018
Messages
28,262
Reaction score
6,148
Points
290
Location
Boston, MA
You’re entitled to your opinion but your opinion is not a fact. He didn’t plead as you alluded to aka lied. He made a suggestion. He knows the other countries will say no but in future negotiations with Russia he can tell them he was supportive. Win/win.

I recommend a college education for you. It is helpful.
How is that a win when he demonstrates to Russia that no one takes him seriously? Including Russia.
Except they do take him seriously. The US continues to be the most powerful nation in the world and he has a very strong relationship with both the UK PM, Boris Johnson and Israel, our only true ally in the Middle East. If he can win the trade war with China, he will be golden. Big If, I agree. You are not impartial. You're a TDS, Trump hater. If you were objective you would see some of the positives that he has achieved. Alas, you're a loon.
He can't even build an international coalition to work against China and instead goes it alone. All he has is Boris Johnson the guy who may be responsible for Scotland leaving the U.K. and Israel? Well, that's an insurmountable alliance isn't it? :21:
Scotland tried to leave before. Didn't happen.
U.K. hasn't left yet.

How can you judge someone before the final plan is implemented. The final say on the trade war is not there yet and if he fails he likely loses in 2020. Fairly simple, even for you to comprehend. China needs us more than we need China IMO.
What is the plan anyway?


Have you ever taken a class in a university? I highly recommended it? You got smoked in your debate with bear and I am frankly embarrassing you here no matter how many emojis you post to try to make yourself feel better.
I didn't consider it a debate. Looked like he went on a bender last night.
They are leaving. The plan is to win the trade war? What do you mean. Do you need me to educate you why we are in the war? No, he embarrassed you.
 

JusticeHammer

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
2,099
Reaction score
442
Points
140
You are completely confused. If you like socialism that much, get out of my country.
We are and will be a Constitutional Republic until there is a new Constitution passed,(which I don't think anyone supports), so I must say, you are the one confused. What country are you in? First, why do you think I'm in your country and not my own, second, wtf should I leave my country?
yep my country and you're in it, and you can take your socialism and leave. I give two shits who you think you are, and where you are, but at this moment you're in my country and we are a capitalistic country which the dems wish to destroy, you voting for her means that is your intentions as well. turn around is fair game eh? you don't like trump and spend your days bitching, well he's at least the correct flavor of the country, not walking communism around like warren. still want to know what's she's done for the country.
Still my country. Still a constitutional republic. No initiative to change the constitution, just confused Trumpublicans, angry as always. I'm not really a Warren supporter but as I said it will be my pleasure to vote for her if if means voting against old Trumpybear and his face.
So you really do support socialism? Can't hide that. Trump or stupid socialist like Warren.
I will not support any effort to change us from a constitutional republic to a constitutional socialist state.
Then you shouldn't vote Democrats.
 

Zorro!

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2019
Messages
7,221
Reaction score
999
Points
245
In light of Elizabeth Warren's rise in Democratic primary polling I thought we should have another poll.

Elizabeth Warren is SO extreme far left with her promoting OPEN borders, healthcare for ILLEGALS, rampant socialism, and ATTACKING our law enforcement & border security it's CLEAR she wants to do everything she can to DESTROY traditional America!!
SHE CAN’T HELP IT: Warren Backs AOC’s Illegal Immigrant Welfare Plan.

Bill package includes federal rent control, welfare for illegal immigrants and ex-cons



Bills three and four make it illegal for the federal government to deny welfare benefits to ex-convicts and illegal immigrants. The legislation does not address how to pay for the rising cost of welfare, nor does it explain how it would accomplish its goals.

"It's been really hard for me to find housing. I have the money to move places and stuff, but they deny me for my felony history. It's not right," a man with a face tattoo said in the legislative package's announcement video.

The fifth bill creates a "worker-friendly score" based on union membership and other factors that would be used to evaluate or award government contracts.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
87,269
Reaction score
7,584
Points
1,815
In light of Elizabeth Warren's rise in Democratic primary polling I thought we should have another poll.

Elizabeth Warren is SO extreme far left with her promoting OPEN borders, healthcare for ILLEGALS, rampant socialism, and ATTACKING our law enforcement & border security it's CLEAR she wants to do everything she can to DESTROY traditional America!!
SHE CAN’T HELP IT: Warren Backs AOC’s Illegal Immigrant Welfare Plan.

Bill package includes federal rent control, welfare for illegal immigrants and ex-cons



Bills three and four make it illegal for the federal government to deny welfare benefits to ex-convicts and illegal immigrants. The legislation does not address how to pay for the rising cost of welfare, nor does it explain how it would accomplish its goals.

"It's been really hard for me to find housing. I have the money to move places and stuff, but they deny me for my felony history. It's not right," a man with a face tattoo said in the legislative package's announcement video.

The fifth bill creates a "worker-friendly score" based on union membership and other factors that would be used to evaluate or award government contracts.
 

Zorro!

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2019
Messages
7,221
Reaction score
999
Points
245
The cfpb returned billions to consumers from predatory lending. Not sure why the trump fans are happy that he defanged that agency.
Donald Trump Is Targeting an Agency That Has Recovered $11.8 Billion for Consumers
It's Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court Is Poised to Strike Down a Major Obama-Era Agency.

The CFPB is the most independent of independent agencies, with power to make rules, enforce them, adjudicate violations in its own administrative hearings, and punish wrongdoers. And yet a single director heads the agency, one who can be removed only “for cause” — malfeasance rather than, say, a change in presidential policy priorities. The CFPB doesn’t even need Congress to approve its budget, because its funding requests are rubber-stamped by another agency insulated from political control: the Federal Reserve. The CFPB has regulatory authority over 19 federal consumer-protection laws. This concentration of power in the hands of a single, unelected, unaccountable official is unprecedented and cannot be squared with the Constitution’s structure, or with its purpose of protecting individual liberty from government overreach.​

The Constitution created three co-equal branches keeping one another in check to promote liberty and prevent any single person or entity from growing too powerful. During the 20th century, however, the federal government began creating “independent agencies,” typically headed by multiple commissioners appointed by the president; think of the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Federal Communications Commission.​

The Supreme Court has held such multi-member commissions to be constitutional, but most of these agencies include various other mechanisms to check their powers, such as staggered terms (meaning that a new president cannot replace the whole commission at once, but can fill some seats on it); limitations on how many members of a given political party may sit on the commission at a time; and a multi-member structure through which the commission discusses potential actions and moves forward only with a majority or consensus decision.​

Then Congress created the new type of agency that is the CFPB. Without multiple leaders to appoint, there can be no staggered terms, no partisanship restriction, and no discussion among commissioners.​

Woodrow Wilson would have smiled, but hopefully the Supreme Court won’t.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top