Presidential awesomeness in action

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Donny reckons he whimpered like a dog. He has no proof but he knew it would appeal to his army of low info cretins. he lied to you and you dont give a shit. That makes you lower than shit.

In your estimation, perhaps. And do I give a fuck about that? I do not! Just like your bottom of the barrel football team.
I already said the death of Abu Bakr al Baghdadi is what I care about, so troll on, moron.

I'll let the US military intelligence reports settle this issue definitively. Not your
leftist rag newspaper not fit for wiping bottoms with.

 

[Markle]

Saw the post headline.

Didn't see one defending him.

How is that defending him?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I don't think we are in any threat of "isolationism" if a person advocates for NON-INTERVENTIONISM.

Sounds like someone can't separate his personal political wishes with official US government policy.
I would agree your neo isolationist b.s. does not put us in any danger mainly because so few people, if anyone at all, listens to or agrees with you.
I hope that settles this matter finally.

I am beginning to get a sense that you are too dumb to understand the difference.

...Says the idiot
who thinks what he wishes for has any overall effect at all on anything.

If suddenly we returned to a pre WWI head in the sand view of the rest of the world then your advocacy might matter.
But kettle...stop talking shit about the pot. It's you who are none too bright about this all.

 

[Markle]

Doubts over Donald Trump's dramatic account of Baghdadi raid

Footage of the US special forces raid on Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s Syrian compound reportedly consisted of overhead surveillance footage and no audio, prompting questions over the extent of the dramatic licence taken by Donald Trump in describing the final moments of one of the most wanted terrorists in the world.

US officials who also watched the feed have declined to echo details of Trump’s macabre account of the Isis’s leader death on Saturday, including that Baghdadi was “whimpering, crying and screaming all the way”.

Enabling Donny to deduce pinpoint audio reactions from a purely video link. They reckon that you cant hear a tree fall in the woods (or similar) but every day this amazing man pushes back the boundary of what is possible.

The Six Million Dollar Man had super human powers of hearing and perhaps we have found the man who could do justice to that role in any remake of the classic ?

God bless you Donny.

Guardian is even faker than NYT or WaPo.

No evidence found to support Trump's 'whimpering terrorist' account of Baghdadi killing

In the days since President Donald Trump gave the world a graphic account of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s last minutes, no evidence has emerged to confirm it. The secretary of defence, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and the regional commander who oversaw the operation that killed the leader of Isis all say they have no idea what the president was talking about.

And

That Mr Trump seems to have made up the scene of a whimpering terrorist may be shocking on one level yet not all that surprising from a president who over the years has made a habit of inventing people who do not exist and events that did not happen. Mr Trump’s flexibility with fact has become such an established feature of his presidency that polls show most Americans, including even many of his own supporters, do not, as a rule, take him at his word.

Why do you clowns degrade yourselves by defending him when he is clearly lying again ?

This thread again vividly demonstrates the rapidly increasing desperation of far-left Progressives.

NO one posting on this thread, including our illustrious Troll Tommy Tainant, has ever told a story without exaggeration, NO ONE! If the far-left wasn't so increasingly desperate, they would not care one iota about President Donald Trump's exaggerations.

No one really cares if the savage, barbaric, ruthless, terrorist Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi met his 72 virgins whimpering and crying as he hid behind his children or leading five other terrorists attacking our troops with automatic weapons.

 

[Markle]

Donny reckons he whimpered like a dog. He has no proof but he knew it would appeal to his army of low info cretins. he lied to you and you dont give a shit. That makes you lower than shit.

 

[Polishprince]

NO one posting on this thread, including our illustrious Troll Tommy Tainant, has ever told a story without exaggeration, NO ONE! If the far-left wasn't so increasingly desperate, they would not care one iota about President Donald Trump's exaggerations.

No one really cares if the savage, barbaric, ruthless, terrorist Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi met his 72 virgins whimpering and crying as he hid behind his children or leading five other terrorists attacking our troops with automatic weapons.

President Trump made the official version of the death of al-Baghdadi public immediately as it helps to take the Jihadi down a few steps. When they are recruiting terrorist-trainees, it will become harder as they will be seen rightfully as the whimpering , cowering girly-men they are, pissing themselves and begging for mercy.

For Libs to say that their President is lying, is bullshit. Just a way to boost up the Islamonazis. The idea of Trump defeating this vermin is too much for them to swallow.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Doubts over Donald Trump's dramatic account of Baghdadi raid

Footage of the US special forces raid on Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s Syrian compound reportedly consisted of overhead surveillance footage and no audio, prompting questions over the extent of the dramatic licence taken by Donald Trump in describing the final moments of one of the most wanted terrorists in the world.

US officials who also watched the feed have declined to echo details of Trump’s macabre account of the Isis’s leader death on Saturday, including that Baghdadi was “whimpering, crying and screaming all the way”.

Enabling Donny to deduce pinpoint audio reactions from a purely video link. They reckon that you cant hear a tree fall in the woods (or similar) but every day this amazing man pushes back the boundary of what is possible.

The Six Million Dollar Man had super human powers of hearing and perhaps we have found the man who could do justice to that role in any remake of the classic ?

God bless you Donny.

Guardian is even faker than NYT or WaPo.

No evidence found to support Trump's 'whimpering terrorist' account of Baghdadi killing

In the days since President Donald Trump gave the world a graphic account of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s last minutes, no evidence has emerged to confirm it. The secretary of defence, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and the regional commander who oversaw the operation that killed the leader of Isis all say they have no idea what the president was talking about.

And

That Mr Trump seems to have made up the scene of a whimpering terrorist may be shocking on one level yet not all that surprising from a president who over the years has made a habit of inventing people who do not exist and events that did not happen. Mr Trump’s flexibility with fact has become such an established feature of his presidency that polls show most Americans, including even many of his own supporters, do not, as a rule, take him at his word.

Why do you clowns degrade yourselves by defending him when he is clearly lying again ?

This thread again vividly demonstrates the rapidly increasing desperation of far-left Progressives.

NO one posting on this thread, including our illustrious Troll Tommy Tainant, has ever told a story without exaggeration, NO ONE! If the far-left wasn't so increasingly desperate, they would not care one iota about President Donald Trump's exaggerations.

No one really cares if the savage, barbaric, ruthless, terrorist Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi met his 72 virgins whimpering and crying as he hid behind his children or leading five other terrorists attacking our troops with automatic weapons.

He lied and you dumb fucks lap it up.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

He lied and you dumb fucks lap it up.

You're repeating your worthless self now. But it's nice you post a picture of your dear dad with your drivel now.

 

[Polishprince]

Doubts over Donald Trump's dramatic account of Baghdadi raid

Footage of the US special forces raid on Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s Syrian compound reportedly consisted of overhead surveillance footage and no audio, prompting questions over the extent of the dramatic licence taken by Donald Trump in describing the final moments of one of the most wanted terrorists in the world.

US officials who also watched the feed have declined to echo details of Trump’s macabre account of the Isis’s leader death on Saturday, including that Baghdadi was “whimpering, crying and screaming all the way”.

Enabling Donny to deduce pinpoint audio reactions from a purely video link. They reckon that you cant hear a tree fall in the woods (or similar) but every day this amazing man pushes back the boundary of what is possible.

The Six Million Dollar Man had super human powers of hearing and perhaps we have found the man who could do justice to that role in any remake of the classic ?

God bless you Donny.

Guardian is even faker than NYT or WaPo.

No evidence found to support Trump's 'whimpering terrorist' account of Baghdadi killing

In the days since President Donald Trump gave the world a graphic account of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s last minutes, no evidence has emerged to confirm it. The secretary of defence, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and the regional commander who oversaw the operation that killed the leader of Isis all say they have no idea what the president was talking about.

And

That Mr Trump seems to have made up the scene of a whimpering terrorist may be shocking on one level yet not all that surprising from a president who over the years has made a habit of inventing people who do not exist and events that did not happen. Mr Trump’s flexibility with fact has become such an established feature of his presidency that polls show most Americans, including even many of his own supporters, do not, as a rule, take him at his word.

Why do you clowns degrade yourselves by defending him when he is clearly lying again ?

This thread again vividly demonstrates the rapidly increasing desperation of far-left Progressives.

NO one posting on this thread, including our illustrious Troll Tommy Tainant, has ever told a story without exaggeration, NO ONE! If the far-left wasn't so increasingly desperate, they would not care one iota about President Donald Trump's exaggerations.

No one really cares if the savage, barbaric, ruthless, terrorist Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi met his 72 virgins whimpering and crying as he hid behind his children or leading five other terrorists attacking our troops with automatic weapons.

He lied and you dumb fucks lap it up.

Can you prove the President lied on this? Or are you instinctively just taking the Islamic State's word that their caliph isn't a coward?

 

[Meathead]

Doubts over Donald Trump's dramatic account of Baghdadi raid

Footage of the US special forces raid on Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s Syrian compound reportedly consisted of overhead surveillance footage and no audio, prompting questions over the extent of the dramatic licence taken by Donald Trump in describing the final moments of one of the most wanted terrorists in the world.

US officials who also watched the feed have declined to echo details of Trump’s macabre account of the Isis’s leader death on Saturday, including that Baghdadi was “whimpering, crying and screaming all the way”.

Enabling Donny to deduce pinpoint audio reactions from a purely video link. They reckon that you cant hear a tree fall in the woods (or similar) but every day this amazing man pushes back the boundary of what is possible.

The Six Million Dollar Man had super human powers of hearing and perhaps we have found the man who could do justice to that role in any remake of the classic ?

God bless you Donny.

Guardian is even faker than NYT or WaPo.

No evidence found to support Trump's 'whimpering terrorist' account of Baghdadi killing

In the days since President Donald Trump gave the world a graphic account of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s last minutes, no evidence has emerged to confirm it. The secretary of defence, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and the regional commander who oversaw the operation that killed the leader of Isis all say they have no idea what the president was talking about.

And

That Mr Trump seems to have made up the scene of a whimpering terrorist may be shocking on one level yet not all that surprising from a president who over the years has made a habit of inventing people who do not exist and events that did not happen. Mr Trump’s flexibility with fact has become such an established feature of his presidency that polls show most Americans, including even many of his own supporters, do not, as a rule, take him at his word.

Why do you clowns degrade yourselves by defending him when he is clearly lying again ?

This thread again vividly demonstrates the rapidly increasing desperation of far-left Progressives.

NO one posting on this thread, including our illustrious Troll Tommy Tainant, has ever told a story without exaggeration, NO ONE! If the far-left wasn't so increasingly desperate, they would not care one iota about President Donald Trump's exaggerations.

No one really cares if the savage, barbaric, ruthless, terrorist Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi met his 72 virgins whimpering and crying as he hid behind his children or leading five other terrorists attacking our troops with automatic weapons.

He lied and you dumb fucks lap it up.

Hey, you're the one linking the Guardian FFS!

 

[Markle]

Doubts over Donald Trump's dramatic account of Baghdadi raid

Footage of the US special forces raid on Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s Syrian compound reportedly consisted of overhead surveillance footage and no audio, prompting questions over the extent of the dramatic licence taken by Donald Trump in describing the final moments of one of the most wanted terrorists in the world.

US officials who also watched the feed have declined to echo details of Trump’s macabre account of the Isis’s leader death on Saturday, including that Baghdadi was “whimpering, crying and screaming all the way”.

Enabling Donny to deduce pinpoint audio reactions from a purely video link. They reckon that you cant hear a tree fall in the woods (or similar) but every day this amazing man pushes back the boundary of what is possible.

The Six Million Dollar Man had super human powers of hearing and perhaps we have found the man who could do justice to that role in any remake of the classic ?

God bless you Donny.

Guardian is even faker than NYT or WaPo.

No evidence found to support Trump's 'whimpering terrorist' account of Baghdadi killing

In the days since President Donald Trump gave the world a graphic account of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s last minutes, no evidence has emerged to confirm it. The secretary of defence, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and the regional commander who oversaw the operation that killed the leader of Isis all say they have no idea what the president was talking about.

And

That Mr Trump seems to have made up the scene of a whimpering terrorist may be shocking on one level yet not all that surprising from a president who over the years has made a habit of inventing people who do not exist and events that did not happen. Mr Trump’s flexibility with fact has become such an established feature of his presidency that polls show most Americans, including even many of his own supporters, do not, as a rule, take him at his word.

Why do you clowns degrade yourselves by defending him when he is clearly lying again ?

This thread again vividly demonstrates the rapidly increasing desperation of far-left Progressives.

NO one posting on this thread, including our illustrious Troll Tommy Tainant, has ever told a story without exaggeration, NO ONE! If the far-left wasn't so increasingly desperate, they would not care one iota about President Donald Trump's exaggerations.

No one really cares if the savage, barbaric, ruthless, terrorist Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi met his 72 virgins whimpering and crying as he hid behind his children or leading five other terrorists attacking our troops with automatic weapons.

He lied and you dumb fucks lap it up.

 

[Crepitus]

Saw the post headline.

Didn't see one defending him.

How is that defending him?

It's five words kiddo, only one with more than a single syllable.

This ain't rocket surgery, you can figure it out.

 

[Paulie]

Oh yeah?

Who do you think is going to declare war on the U.S.

The Simpsons...... Very impressive.

China, for the obvious one. Any number of third party nations could get in on the action.

And I don't need to convince you of anything. The fact is isolationism is a very bad policy that insures
a dangerous future.

I don't think we are in any threat of "isolationism" if a person advocates for NON-INTERVENTIONISM.


I am beginning to get a sense that you are too dumb to understand the difference.


Where in the World Is the U.S. Military?

That same tired argument made against Ron Paul for his non interventionist position. How can you possible be isolating when you’re trying to literally trade with the whole world?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

That same tired argument made against Ron Paul for his non interventionist position. How can you possible be isolating when you’re trying to literally trade with the whole world?

Because trade and military action are two very different things. Somewhere between Ron Paul and the Lindsey Grahams of the world is the perfect foreign policy for America.
I don't advocate for neo isolationists or neo cons.

 

[Paulie]

That same tired argument made against Ron Paul for his non interventionist position. How can you possible be isolating when you’re trying to literally trade with the whole world?

Because trade and military action are two very different things. Somewhere between Ron Paul and the Lindsey Grahams of the world is the perfect foreign policy for America.
I don't advocate for neo isolationists or neo cons.

You’re wrong. Trade and military go hand in hand. We need to have a strong military to protect world trade. We don’t need to intervene in every country’s dealings but we need to keep order around the world for the purposes of free trade because it’s the most beneficial for the entire world. We’ve been using our military to protect a globalist perversion of “free market capitalism” and “free trade” for many decades now and that time is over. We’re going to see what really allowing the free market to be FREE can do for everyone. HAVE FAITH AND PRAY

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

You’re wrong. Trade and military go hand in hand. We need to have a strong military to protect world trade. We don’t need to intervene in every country’s dealings but we need to keep order around the world for the purposes of free trade because it’s the most beneficial for the entire world. We’ve been using our military to protect a globalist perversion of “free market capitalism” and “free trade” for many decades now and that time is over. We’re going to see what really allowing the free market to be FREE can do for everyone. HAVE FAITH AND PRAY

All I said was those two things are not synonymous.

 

[Paulie]

You’re wrong. Trade and military go hand in hand. We need to have a strong military to protect world trade. We don’t need to intervene in every country’s dealings but we need to keep order around the world for the purposes of free trade because it’s the most beneficial for the entire world. We’ve been using our military to protect a globalist perversion of “free market capitalism” and “free trade” for many decades now and that time is over. We’re going to see what really allowing the free market to be FREE can do for everyone. HAVE FAITH AND PRAY

All I said was those two things are not synonymous.

Ok cool. I have no idea what point you’re trying to make. Free and fair trade around the world can’t be accomplished without the military might to protect it. We’ve been fooled into believing our military has been protecting other countries but it’s been exactly the opposite for over 100 years now. That ends, and a time of peaceful trade will begin.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Ok cool. I have no idea what point you’re trying to make. Free and fair trade around the world can’t be accomplished without the military might to protect it. We’ve been fooled into believing our military has been protecting other countries but it’s been exactly the opposite for over 100 years now. That ends, and a time of peaceful trade will begin.

I've just been unsuccessfully trying to educate you that world trade and the overuse of our military in foreign lands
to achieve geopolitical goals aren't synonymous and isn't the same thing at all.
You can do one without the other.

It was a really simple point that you still seem baffled by.

 

[Paulie]

Ok cool. I have no idea what point you’re trying to make. Free and fair trade around the world can’t be accomplished without the military might to protect it. We’ve been fooled into believing our military has been protecting other countries but it’s been exactly the opposite for over 100 years now. That ends, and a time of peaceful trade will begin.

I've just been unsuccessfully trying to educate you that world trade and the overuse of our military in foreign lands
to achieve geopolitical goals aren't synonymous and isn't the same thing at all.
You can do one without the other.

It was a really simple point that you still seem baffled by.

You clearly need to go back and read what I wrote. Maybe do it several times if you need to. Or don’t, whatever.

 

[okfine]

Doubts over Donald Trump's dramatic account of Baghdadi raid

Footage of the US special forces raid on Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s Syrian compound reportedly consisted of overhead surveillance footage and no audio, prompting questions over the extent of the dramatic licence taken by Donald Trump in describing the final moments of one of the most wanted terrorists in the world.

US officials who also watched the feed have declined to echo details of Trump’s macabre account of the Isis’s leader death on Saturday, including that Baghdadi was “whimpering, crying and screaming all the way”.

Enabling Donny to deduce pinpoint audio reactions from a purely video link. They reckon that you cant hear a tree fall in the woods (or similar) but every day this amazing man pushes back the boundary of what is possible.

The Six Million Dollar Man had super human powers of hearing and perhaps we have found the man who could do justice to that role in any remake of the classic ?

God bless you Donny.

Wow defending the Most wanted man in the world

Odd..I read no defense? I heard him mocking Trump's over the top BS---perhaps you could show me the part where he defended the terrorist?

For the kazillionth time, Trump is a liar and Trumpsters are gullible.