Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Sane policies"? You mean like controlling spending and not adding $10 trillion to the debt in 8 years? Securing our borders so terrorists can't come in and blow us up? Creating jobs instead of putting as many people as possible on welfare? Yeah, those are all losing issues, aren't they?The problem for Walker or any other GOP candidate is that they cannot present sane policies in the primary and become the candidate. But in the general, those policies they presented in the primary will destroy them with the electorate. The GOP is going to have to do some deep introspection after 2016, if they do not wish to go the way of the Whigs.
Walker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
Hillary would beat walker in WisconsinWalker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
BUt it will be no contest. Hillary is old, tired, and shrewish. She is nothing, offers nothing but the usual politics of personal destruction and class envy. Walker is afresh upbreat face. No contest.
Problem for Walker is nobody knows who he is, he lacks charisma to stand out in a crowd of 15 candidates and risks getting lost in the shuffle
I don't see any issue that makes him stand out
Of course she would. I am sure you are looking at a McGovern style blow out, right?Hillary would beat walker in WisconsinWalker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
BUt it will be no contest. Hillary is old, tired, and shrewish. She is nothing, offers nothing but the usual politics of personal destruction and class envy. Walker is afresh upbreat face. No contest.
Yepp. The "red meat" in the primary becomes a poison pill in the General.The problem for Walker or any other GOP candidate is that they cannot present sane policies in the primary and become the candidate. But in the general, those policies they presented in the primary will destroy them with the electorate. The GOP is going to have to do some deep introspection after 2016, if they do not wish to go the way of the Whigs.
She already is. In every match up he trails her in the Badger State by between 7 and 11 points.Hillary would beat walker in WisconsinWalker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
BUt it will be no contest. Hillary is old, tired, and shrewish. She is nothing, offers nothing but the usual politics of personal destruction and class envy. Walker is afresh upbreat face. No contest.
No. But Hillary will sail easily over 370 EV.Of course she would. I am sure you are looking at a McGovern style blow out, right?Hillary would beat walker in WisconsinWalker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
BUt it will be no contest. Hillary is old, tired, and shrewish. She is nothing, offers nothing but the usual politics of personal destruction and class envy. Walker is afresh upbreat face. No contest.
I still think that its going to to Be Rubio/Kasich. Conservatives are five times more intelligent that democrats, they will be looking for the ticket that will win most of the crucial states. Nothing against Walker, i think the world of him, but the 2016 race will be a fight for the hispanic vote. Rubio will eat away from the votes Obama got.
i dont think Jeb will even come close to first place in the first three primaries.I still think that its going to to Be Rubio/Kasich. Conservatives are five times more intelligent that democrats, they will be looking for the ticket that will win most of the crucial states. Nothing against Walker, i think the world of him, but the 2016 race will be a fight for the hispanic vote. Rubio will eat away from the votes Obama got.
That would probably be the most likely combo to win, I don't expect that's what we'll get. It will be Jeb who will lose.
i dont think Jeb will even come close to first place in the first three primaries.I still think that its going to to Be Rubio/Kasich. Conservatives are five times more intelligent that democrats, they will be looking for the ticket that will win most of the crucial states. Nothing against Walker, i think the world of him, but the 2016 race will be a fight for the hispanic vote. Rubio will eat away from the votes Obama got.
That would probably be the most likely combo to win, I don't expect that's what we'll get. It will be Jeb who will lose.
I know Trump has been gaining popularity lately but at this point in the race I'm gonna stick with Walker for a lot of reasons. But assuming he gets the nomination (which I believe he will), who should he pick as his running mate? Who would you choose for Walker?
Depends who Hillary runs againstOf course she would. I am sure you are looking at a McGovern style blow out, right?Hillary would beat walker in WisconsinWalker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
BUt it will be no contest. Hillary is old, tired, and shrewish. She is nothing, offers nothing but the usual politics of personal destruction and class envy. Walker is afresh upbreat face. No contest.
From your mouth to Gd's tuchas.No. But Hillary will sail easily over 370 EV.Of course she would. I am sure you are looking at a McGovern style blow out, right?Hillary would beat walker in WisconsinWalker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
BUt it will be no contest. Hillary is old, tired, and shrewish. She is nothing, offers nothing but the usual politics of personal destruction and class envy. Walker is afresh upbreat face. No contest.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
You must be smoking better shit than anyone else has.Depends who Hillary runs againstOf course she would. I am sure you are looking at a McGovern style blow out, right?Hillary would beat walker in WisconsinWalker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
BUt it will be no contest. Hillary is old, tired, and shrewish. She is nothing, offers nothing but the usual politics of personal destruction and class envy. Walker is afresh upbreat face. No contest.
She would beat Bush by around 100 EVs
Walker by 200
Any other Republican by 300 EVs
It would have to be another person like himself who doesn't have much in the way of a formal education. Lack of education is very appealing to the teabagger voting base.Who would you choose for Walker?
Hillary would beat walker in WisconsinWalker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
BUt it will be no contest. Hillary is old, tired, and shrewish. She is nothing, offers nothing but the usual politics of personal destruction and class envy. Walker is afresh upbreat face. No contest.
No. But Hillary will sail easily over 370 EV.Of course she would. I am sure you are looking at a McGovern style blow out, right?Hillary would beat walker in WisconsinWalker will do fine in WI and Ohio. Those are pretty big battleground states.But can she win votes in battleground states?Walker all the way. He is the best qualified in all senses of the word.
He needs a Washington insider as VP, someone who can negotiate Congress. I'd say Kay Bailey Hutchison is about perfect.
BUt it will be no contest. Hillary is old, tired, and shrewish. She is nothing, offers nothing but the usual politics of personal destruction and class envy. Walker is afresh upbreat face. No contest.
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
