President Trump Promotes Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier to Under Secretary of the Air Force After He Was Fired in 2021 for Making Anti-Marxist Comments

I dunno....The most strident of them almost always end up being peter puffers, like Rohm.
That's true, but Im2stupid is incredibly lazy, and incompetent. That tends more towards being an INCEL.

But you could be correct too, who knows with these freaks.
 
a mob of thousands from you Marxist party has descended on DC to protest the will of the majority of voters that voted in nov ..
49 percent is not a majority. The Marxist party as you see Marxism, is yours.
 
And Nevil Chamberlin was your hero eh?

I think Chamberlain gets a bad rap for the wrong reasons.

He was actually quite right on the topic of the Sudentenland. Germany had them surrounded on three sides with 3 million Ethnic Germans who wanted to be part of Germany.

The Slovaks and Hungarians didn't want to be part of "Czechoslovakia", either. It's why it no longer exists today.

What Neville did wrong was write the Polish Colonels a blank check over Danzig, when he should have been pushing them to make concessions to avoid war, and give the UK more time to rebuild their military.

Also, driving Mussolini and Stalin into alliances with Hitler was kind of a bad idea. Either of them could have been enticed to the UK's position with the right incentives.
 
What poetic justice. On Friday, January 17, 2025, President Trump said he was promoting Lohmeier to Under Secretary of the Air Force. Sweet justice.

Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier, a former fighter pilot, was a commander of a unit that detected ballistic missile launches.

He was fired and investigated for anti-Marxist comments he made during a podcast in 2021.

Matthew was relieved of his duties in May 2021 by Lt. Gen. Stephen Whiting.

In May 2021, Lohmeier self-published a book titled, “Irresistible Revolution: Marxism’s Goal of Conquest & the Unmaking of the American Military.”
The current Admnistration has been widely publicized for scouring and removing all rightwing 'extremists' from the military. So of course someone vocally expressing anti-Marxist remarks would be classified as such.

I hope hope hope Pete Hegseth is confirmed as that kind of fascism exercised by the current administration will come to a very necessary screeching halt.
 
The current Admnistration has been widely publicized for scouring and removing all rightwing 'extremists' from the military. So of course someone vocally expressing anti-Marxist remarks would be classified as such.

I hope hope hope Pete Hegseth is confirmed as that kind of fascism exercised by the current administration will come to a very necessary screeching halt.

Given that right-wing extermists have been responsible for most of the terrorist incidents inside this country, giving them military training seems like a bad idea.

The last thing we need are more Tesla Bombers.
 
What poetic justice. On Friday, January 17, 2025, President Trump said he was promoting Lohmeier to Under Secretary of the Air Force. Sweet justice.

Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier, a former fighter pilot, was a commander of a unit that detected ballistic missile launches.

He was fired and investigated for anti-Marxist comments he made during a podcast in 2021.

Matthew was relieved of his duties in May 2021 by Lt. Gen. Stephen Whiting.

I

Karl Marx came from a wealthy background and was a planned Deep State insert .
It is one sign of an intelligent person that they can spot a Marxist and expose their shallow and dishonest narratives .
 
I think Chamberlain gets a bad rap for the wrong reasons.

He was actually quite right on the topic of the Sudentenland. Germany had them surrounded on three sides with 3 million Ethnic Germans who wanted to be part of Germany.

The Slovaks and Hungarians didn't want to be part of "Czechoslovakia", either. It's why it no longer exists today.

What Neville did wrong was write the Polish Colonels a blank check over Danzig, when he should have been pushing them to make concessions to avoid war, and give the UK more time to rebuild their military.

Also, driving Mussolini and Stalin into alliances with Hitler was kind of a bad idea. Either of them could have been enticed to the UK's position with the right incentives.
Chamberlin will forever be the face of appeasement....Coddling an enemy never works...

But, you are demonstrating that you are the prototypical liberal....It's not that Chamberlin fucked up, it's that he wasn't allowed to go further...

What a dupe.
 
Chamberlin will forever be the face of appeasement....Coddling an enemy never works...

But, you are demonstrating that you are the prototypical liberal....It's not that Chamberlin fucked up, it's that he wasn't allowed to go further...

What a dupe.

Well, yes, that has become the sloppy historical shorthand for his making the sensible decision.

Let's review what he was dealing with in 1938.

Germany, after unification with Austria, had Bohemia surrounded on three sides.

Three million Germans in the Sudetenland wanted to be part of Germany. They made up 22% of the population.

The Slovaks made up 16% of the population, and wanted their own country.

Hungarians wanted to rejoin Hungary.

While the UK was starting a rearmament program, they just weren't there yet. the UK populace didn't want another war.

Furthermore, the French had invested very little in offensive weaponry, putting all their money into static defenses.
 
Well, yes, that has become the sloppy historical shorthand for his making the sensible decision.

Let's review what he was dealing with in 1938.

Germany, after unification with Austria, had Bohemia surrounded on three sides.

Three million Germans in the Sudetenland wanted to be part of Germany. They made up 22% of the population.

The Slovaks made up 16% of the population, and wanted their own country.

Hungarians wanted to rejoin Hungary.

While the UK was starting a rearmament program, they just weren't there yet. the UK populace didn't want another war.

Furthermore, the French had invested very little in offensive weaponry, putting all their money into static defenses.
,/---/ Chamberlin was wrong, Churchill was right.
"In 1938, Winston Churchill criticized the Munich Agreement, calling it a "total and unmitigated defeat" that gave Hitler everything he wanted. In a speech to the Reichstag, Hitler attacked Churchill and others who objected to the agreement." - Wikipedia
 
,/---/ Chamberlin was wrong, Churchill was right.
"In 1938, Winston Churchill criticized the Munich Agreement, calling it a "total and unmitigated defeat" that gave Hitler everything he wanted. In a speech to the Reichstag, Hitler attacked Churchill and others who objected to the agreement." - Wikipedia

Except the UK wasn't ready to go to war in 1938.

They really weren't ready to go to war by 1940, which is why they were defeated in France so easily.

The problem with Czechoslovakia was that it was an artificial creation to help contain Germany. The Czechs and Slovaks never liked each other and never wanted to be in the same country.

The problem really wasn't with Munich, which returned German areas to Germany. The problem is what happened afterwards, when the Slovaks, Hungarians and Poles all swooped in to take their share of the pie.
 
Well, yes, that has become the sloppy historical shorthand for his making the sensible decision.

Let's review what he was dealing with in 1938.

Germany, after unification with Austria, had Bohemia surrounded on three sides.

Three million Germans in the Sudetenland wanted to be part of Germany. They made up 22% of the population.

The Slovaks made up 16% of the population, and wanted their own country.

Hungarians wanted to rejoin Hungary.

While the UK was starting a rearmament program, they just weren't there yet. the UK populace didn't want another war.

Furthermore, the French had invested very little in offensive weaponry, putting all their money into static defenses.
All setting up a perfect opportunity for a mad man to attempt to concur the world. And you seem to think we should have let him.
 
The Man of Lawlessness, wins again.


This man broke his military command and military rules. Rewarding such actions, supports LAWLESSNESS.... and you all support lawlessness. So, what are our military men and women suppose to support now with a man that went against military law being rewarded? Lawlessness for themselves?

I truly do not understand your support for this?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom