President Trump Press Briefing re: Supreme Court Decision

[CrusaderFrank]

The USAID DNC slush fund is DEAD.
So at least there's that, so far.....

True

Sad that’s only about 2% of what DOGE could have delivered

 

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[drudge X]

Oh yes he did. What world do you live in?

Even the AI Bot has you being the fool:

AI Overview:
President Biden has generally complied with Supreme Court rulings by halting policies deemed unlawful, such as the initial student loan forgiveness plan and eviction moratoriums.

While strongly criticizing decisions like the 2024 presidential immunity ruling, his administration has pivoted to alternative legal strategies rather than defying court orders.

He may have but Biden also used a loophole to circumvent the ruling. Expect Trump to do the same.

 

[drudge X]

View attachment 1221473

This is why voters should demand at least 5 parties to keep each other in check. With two, it’s scratch my back and I will scratch yours

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Oh yes he did. What world do you live in?

Even the AI Bot has you being the fool:

AI Overview:
President Biden has generally complied with Supreme Court rulings by halting policies deemed unlawful, such as the initial student loan forgiveness plan and eviction moratoriums.

While strongly criticizing decisions like the 2024 presidential immunity ruling, his administration has pivoted to alternative legal strategies rather than defying court orders.

The difference being *Biden used student loan payoffs to buy votes. Trump is using tariffs to help America.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Three more years! Enjoy!

Doubtful. He is literally dying before our eyes. He will have a surprise MRI again shortly

 

[TimFitz]

Three more years! Enjoy!

You may enjoy your fool of a president denigrate people in general, indulge in stupid social media attacks, ramp up phony “armadas” to maybe start wars, break the law right and left, alienate our allies, and betray the Constitution and the rule of law, but most people don’t.

 

[Lisa558]

You may enjoy your fool of a president denigrate people in general, indulge in stupid social media attacks, ramp up phony “armadas” to maybe start wars, break the law right and left, alienate our allies, and betray the Constitution and the rule of law, but most people don’t.

Fewer foreign conflicts, no more illegals streaming in, a ramp-down on the antisemitism on liberal campuses, a roaring stock market, and a decrease in crime.

That’s what counts.

Under Biden, Russia invaded Ukraine and Islamist terrorists massacred innocent Jews…..10 million illegals streamed in….liberal colleges set up “No-Jew” zones….and inflation reached a 50-year high.

 

[rightwinger]

Another Trump tantrum when he doesn’t get his way

 

[johnwk]

Another Trump tantrum when he doesn’t get his way

Regardless of how you feel . . .
Trump’s tariffs fall within one or more of the following delegations of power by Congress, and are thus constitutional, unless Congress is not authorized to delegate such power:

Tariff Act of 1930, Section 338
Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962;
Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974;
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974;
And, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977

Keep in mind, nowhere in the S.C’s. majority opinion does it find that Congress may not delegate the above mentioned authority to the President.

Trump’s tariffs were, without question, constitutional.


Justice Roberts is a notoriously evil FIFTH COLUMN activist who has been using his office of public trust to undermine and subjugate the intentions and beliefs under which the States and people therein adopted our written Constitution.

 

[Churchill]

Wrong. It is Roberts and his cabal, who are not only pathetic, but openly ignoring power delegated to the president to impose tariffs.

They alone have the authority to interpret the law, not the president, not congress.

The 1930’s tariff Act, also known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, allows under Section 338, the president to impose tariffs of up to 50% on countries that discriminate against U.S. commerce.

The irrefutable fact is, Congress has delegated broad powers to impose tariffs on other countries. The Supreme Court is not vested with power to meddle in policy making decisions of this kind.

SCOTUS know all this and more, they alone have the authority to interpret the law, not the president, not congress.

Buy some books, bigly.

 

[johnwk]

SCOTUS know all this and more, they alone have the authority to interpret the law, not the president, not congress.

Baloney. Members on our S.C., by the terms of our Constitution, are required to support and defend "this constitution", and not one they imagine ought to be the law.


The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it._____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)

 

[Churchill]

Fewer foreign conflicts, no more illegals streaming in, a ramp-down on the antisemitism on liberal campuses, a roaring stock market, and a decrease in crime.

That’s what counts.

Under Biden, Russia invaded Ukraine

Under Trump Russia continues to invade Ukraine.

and Islamist terrorists massacred innocent Jews

When was Biden Prime Minister of Israel?

…..10 million illegals streamed in….

How did they count the number of people entering the country illegally?

liberal colleges set up “No-Jew” zones

No they didn't

….and inflation reached a 50-year high.

No it didn't

The highest annual inflation rate during the past 50 years was around 13.5% in 1980, based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This period is widely recognized as the worst inflation spike in modern U.S. history outside of World War I.

I don't know why you bother posting here, all you do is make an ass of yourself.

 

[Churchill]

Baloney. Members on our S.C., by the terms of our Constitution, are required to support and defend "this constitution", and not one they imagine ought to be the law.

Do you know what "Judicial Review" means? Are you seriously going to argue the supreme court has broken constitutional law?

The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it._____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)

Perhaps you can explain why all those republican small business owners who were hurt by illegal tariffs should ever vote republican again, because if they don't maga will be nothing more than a footnote, a blip in history.

Buy some books, bigly.

 

[johnwk]

Do you know what "Judicial Review" means?

Do you know the fundamental rules of constitutional construction, which are to be used when determining what the text of our Constitution means? Our Supreme Court is not vested with power to apply the Humpty Dumpty theory of language when interpreting what our constitution means:

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean- neither more nor less.”

“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master-that’s all.”

 

[Churchill]

Do you know the fundamental rules of constitutional construction, which are to be used when determining what the text of our Constitution means? Our Supreme Court is not vested with power to apply the Humpty Dumpty theory of language when interpreting what our constitution means:

“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean- neither more nor less.”

“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master-that’s all.”

Trump's tariffs were illegal, deal with it snowflake.

If you want trump to arrest John Roberts then just say so, otherwise STFU.

 

[johnwk]

Trump's tariffs were illegal,

Baloney!

It is an irrefutable fact that Trump’s tariffs fall within one or more of the following delegations of power by Congress:

Tariff Act of 1930, Section 338
Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962;
Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974;
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974;
And, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Another Trump tantrum when he doesn’t get his way

.

Take a beep breath, child. Three more years.






.

 

[Churchill]

Baloney!

It is an irrefutable fact that Trump’s tariffs fall within one or more of the following delegations of power by Congress:

Buddy, really?

Tariff Act of 1930, Section 338
Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962;
Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974;
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974;
And, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977

Let it go man, he's been put in his place now get on with your life, enough cry baby theatrics.

 

[johnwk]

Buddy, really?

Let it go man, he's been put in his place now get on with your life, enough cry baby theatrics.

Your adolescent comments are noted.

As I previously stated, It is an irrefutable fact that Trump’s tariffs fall within one or more of the following delegations of power by Congress:

Tariff Act of 1930, Section 338
Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962;
Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974;
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974;
And, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977