President Trump Press Briefing re: Supreme Court Decision

[Blaster]

Where in the constitution does it say supreme court justices must always vote in favor of the president who appointed them?

They usually do.

 

[Churchill]

Gorsuch and Barrett were selected by Trump for SCOTUS and then stabbed him in the back. Very disrespectful.

Trump may well have expected "loyalty" but he failed to grasp that those judges pledge loyalty to the constitution not the president who appointed them.

Trump broke the law, he should thank them for upholding it like a true patriot would.

Why do I know more about how your system of government functions than you do?

 

[Churchill]

They usually do.

Poor Trump, like his steaks, watches and phones, his fake presidency is falling apart too.

Get a new hero dipshit.

 

[Churchill]

Well I've had a tough week, looking forward to pouring a good brew and watching your namby pamby cry baby of a president throwing his toys out of his cot, this and Andrew getting arrested! can it get any better!

 

[Marener]

Democrats are children. Everybody knows that. It is exemplified on a daily basis with tantrums all across the country in the form of protests.Congressional Democrats and Supreme Court justices are no different.

Did you happen to catch Trump's temper tantrum today after the decision was released?

He's pathetic.

 

[Churchill]

Democrats are children. Everybody knows that. It is exemplified on a daily basis with tantrums all across the country in the form of protests. Congressional Democrats and Supreme Court justices are no different.

But protests, the right to protest one's government are defining characteristics of a democratic system.

Perhaps you'd prefer to live in a country where public protests are illegal? well I hear Saudi Arabia is a good option, no income tax, think about it, even your hero trump can't offer that!

 

[Blaster]

Poor Trump, like his steaks, watches and phones, his fake presidency is falling apart too.

Get a new hero dipshit.

Goodbye troll.

 

[Churchill]

Goodbye troll.

So long ***** - cat.

 

[TimFitz]

Nov 4, 2024. He won when it really counted!

He’s pathetic. Fooled you, though.

 

[Lisa558]

He’s pathetic. Fooled you, though.

Three more years! Enjoy!

 

[TimFitz]

Of course it would, he's showing the world what a weakling he actually is re: tariffs.

The world already knows.

 

[johnwk]

Did you happen to catch Trump's temper tantrum today after the decision was released?

He's pathetic.

Wrong. It is Roberts and his cabal, who are not only pathetic, but openly ignoring power delegated to the president to impose tariffs.

The 1930’s tariff Act, also known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, allows under Section 338, the president to impose tariffs of up to 50% on countries that discriminate against U.S. commerce.

The irrefutable fact is, Congress has delegated broad powers to impose tariffs on other countries. The Supreme Court is not vested with power to meddle in policy making decisions of this kind.

 

[Lisa558]

Goodbye troll.

These foreigners littering our website are ridiculous.

 

[Marener]

Wrong. It is Roberts and his cabal, who are not only pathetic, but openly ignoring power delegated to the president to impose tariffs.

The 1930’s tariff Act, also known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, allows under Section 338, the president to impose tariffs of up to 50% on countries that discriminate against U.S. commerce.

The irrefutable fact is, Congress has delegated broad powers to impose tariffs on other countries. The Supreme Court is not vested with power to meddle in policy making decisions of this kind.

Trump said he was issuing tariffs based on IEEPA.

SCOTUS said the law doesn’t allow that.

If Trump wanted to issue tariffs under other authority, he should have said so.

If he’s too stupid to do that, it’s his own fault.

 

[TimFitz]

Wrong. It is Roberts and his cabal, who are not only pathetic, but openly ignoring power delegated to the president to impose tariffs.

The 1930’s tariff Act, also known as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, allows under Section 338, the president to impose tariffs of up to 50% on countries that discriminate against U.S. commerce.

The irrefutable fact is, Congress has delegated broad powers to impose tariffs on other countries. The Supreme Court is not vested with power to meddle in policy making decisions of this kind.

I thought it was characteristic of Trump’s enablers that they would cite the Smoot Hawley tarriff. universally viewed as one of the most disasterous pieces of legislation ever passed.

 

[Natural Citizen]

 

[Natural Citizen]

Not sure why this modern concoction of Republicans and so-called conservatives maintain such contempt for the Constitution.

It's a heck of a thing...

 

[SaxonJackson]

Thats a shame. That was a nice tool for getting world powers to do the right thing. Oh well, I guess we can just go back to using military threats and missile strikes on nations when they dont fall in line.

Does anyone still listen to the Conman in Chief?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Thanks for illustrating my point. Republicans are so far gone on this fake news propaganda you have just quoted here they are unable to compromise and govern effectively.

To leftists USAID was governing effectively.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Did you happen to catch Trump's temper tantrum today after the decision was released?

He's pathetic.

Democrats and their supporters have been in a perpetual temper tantrum for over fifty years.