OhPleaseJustQuit
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2021
- 74,489
- 87,674
- 3,488
- Thread starter
- #21
.
He's gone live.
.
He's gone live.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.
Should start soon. I wondered how long it would take for the President to do this briefing.
My guess is that he will announce a "Plan B" for just this contingency.
The problem is that Democrats want our country to be at a disadvantage and will fight against tariffs.
Yes, that's correct.So other countries can place tariffs on us, but we can’t return the “favor”?
No, it was the left decision.This was the right decision.
Right.
Why I never tune in to watch or listen to this imbecile
What nonsense.The problem is that Democrats want our country to be at a disadvantage and will fight against tariffs.
So other countries can place tariffs on us, but we can’t return the “favor”?
.Yes, that's correct.
We're right back to being weak-kneed Uncle Sucker again.
That's because we've become a dumb country, with dumb judges, dumb legislators and dumb ideas.
Pathetic.
Not true, while you may think comparing Apples and Oranges makes for a coherent, credible, and valid argument it's been proven that there are "Distinct differences" between those rulings and instances.No, the problem has been presidents doing things as if there is no bound to their limits. It's like when the Supreme Court prevented Biden paying off student loans though use of the HEROS Act which was beyond the use authorized within the legislation.
No, the problem has been presidents doing things as if there is no bound to their limits. It's like when the Supreme Court prevented Biden paying off student loans though use of the HEROS Act which was beyond the use authorized within the legislation.
This was the right decision.
We can place tariffs, it was a ruling against using a specific method to.So other countries can place tariffs on us, but we can’t return the “favor”?
Not true, while you may think comparing Apples and Oranges makes for a coherent, credible, and valid argument it's been proven that there are "Distinct differences" between those rulings and instances.
Yes.The cases may be apple and oranges but the role of the Court remains the same in keeping the president within his rightful lane.
She was too busy trying to figure out what a woman is..
"Justice" Jackson was Auto-Penned in. Maybe it's time for something to happen.
.
Yes.
That is if Presidents agree to abide by SCOTUS rulings.
The Trump admin already laid plans for that, but so has the opposition to Trump admin tactics and strategies.I think he'll find a way to do the tariffs based on another law, similar to what Biden did with the student loans fiasco.
It is the same on the Republican side. Most of the job of "governing" is learning to compromise. Trump and Republicans in Congress don't know how to do this.Democrats wont ever approve of anything that Trump does. It doesnt matter if its good for the country, they will still vote no.
Congress is broken. It no longer functions in a beneficial way for US citizens. There is never any consideration for what would be useful. Its just pure politics on the democrat side. They make zero concessions and they never listen to reason. There is only pure partisan politics now.
That’s what he just said in his speech, although I didn’t follow it entirely. (I’m multi-tasking.)I think he'll find a way to do the tariffs based on another law, similar to what Biden did with the student loans fiasco.