What do you think would convince him that he lost? I don't think he understands that states are the one's that do the counting, not the federal government. It isn't his place to tell the states how to run their elections.
Sure, all these states might be corrupt, but it is the duty of the people in these individual states to hold their officials accountable, NOT the POTUS of the U.S. If the people in these states either don't care, or won't hold their government officials accountable? There is nothing he can or should do. . . unless he can prove foreign interference.
(See the tenth Amendment.)
He's right about going to paper, all of Europe uses paper, they don't tolerate this computerized nonsense.
IN the early 2000's, the DNC was claiming that Diebold was helping steal elections, now we have the same problem with Dominion. smh.
Whether these allegations are true or not, if a person is non-partisan, and investigates these issues in good faith, they will see the truth.
. . . now, with that said. . .
I have looked into the exit polling, I am not absolutely convinced that he would have won without the so called documented instances of hi-jinks.
During my political science research, we learned that exit polls are the only statistically, and mathematically reliable polls. And. . . according to those polls, if we had a complete, open, and fair audit, things would probably not look good for Trump. So why is the DNC so resistant to looking into that? I don't know.
It is my belief, the folks really pulling the strings don't give a shit who really won, Trump is an agent of chaos, what they really want, just like BLM and ANTIFA before the election, what they want after the election. . . is continuing chaos. No matter what the truth really is. It doesn't matter to them.
What an audit might show is just how many folks DID vote for him, or just how many poor, women and minorities voted for him? That wouldn't be good for the narrative, that's for sure.
Voters have good reason to lack confidence in our election systems. But claims of widespread fraud aren’t going to fix anything.
www.thenation.com
Trump’s team thought religious-minded voters would save him in key states. They now appear to have turned away just enough for him to lose.
www.politico.com
While whites continue to favor the Republican candidate—as they have in every presidential election since 1968—it is notable that this margin has been reduced from 20% to 15% nationally.
www.brookings.edu
Donald Trump won roughly 70 percent of white people in 2016 who did not graduate college -- but he won only 64 percent in 2020.
www.breitbart.com
Any time an official exit poll is being done by a research institution, and a conservative, or hell, any populist, is being asked by a credited outfit how they voted AFTER the election? If they refuse to answer THAT type of poll? They are just shooting themselves in the foot if they refuse to answer or they lie. This used to be how we projected winners of elections before the 2000 election, and it is how political scientists detect fraud in elections around the world. If you are not honest? Then you get corrupt elections.