President Trump continues to be vindicated

[Camp]

1983 Beirut barracks bombings - Wikipedia

" An obscure group calling itself 'Islamic Jihad' claimed responsibility for the bombings and that the bombings were aimed to get the MNF out of Lebanon."


The next time we heard about "Islamic Jihad" was episode #17 of the show "24."

ISRAEL hit our Marines
ISRAEL wanted a US war with Hezbo.

You know nothing dude. You are completely ignorant about this topic. Islamic Jihad is the predominant terrorist group for the Palestinians. It is still being funded by Iran.

 

[Camp]

The group called itself Islamic Jihad

Timeline...

Marines get hit
Media and Israel blame Hezbo
Reagan DOJ/DOD determines it was not Hezbo
Media screams "Islamic Jihad"


"Islamic Jihad" was faux. It never existed.

I challenge anyone to do a search for "Islamic Jihad and come back and explain how it is a fake organization and never existed.

 

[LaDexter]

Just "search" and find them...

They "took credit" for Lebanon only AFTER Reagan ruled out Hezbo, not before....

 

[P@triot]

The day after President Trump won the election in November, the snowflakes on the left started screaming "impeach" (because they have no idea what that is or how it works). Since then, anything they didn't like they declared an "impeachable" offense. But now, the entire narrative has come crumbling down around them and they are left looking like the dumbest little monkeys ever.

First Nancy Pelosi stated there was nothing to impeach President Trump over. Then Maxine Waters admitted that there was absolutely no evidence. And now, Allen Dershowitz himself has come and declared that even if all of the accusations were true, there is no crime as it is not against the law.

“Nobody can point me to a statute that would be violated [by the Trump-Russia collusion],” Dershowitz said. “And a prosecutor is only allowed to look for evidence of a federal crime.”

Some of the most prominent progressives are now waving the white-flag and acknowledging that there is absolutely nothing here but left-wing hyperbole and propaganda. No evidence exists whatsoever and even if it had - there is no law against President Trump's team speaking with Russia.

Alan Dershowitz pulverizes liberal anti-Trump Russia theories — and nearly leaves Carlson speechless

 

[Zander]

There is no there there.

 

[deanrd]

President Trump continues to be vindicated

Wrong, he looks more guilty every day.

 

[Reasonable]

There is no there there.

That's why the White House lawyers have been going over impeachment possibilities the past few days.

 

[Zander]

View attachment 127906

There is no there there.

That's why the White House lawyers have been going over impeachment possibilities the past few days.

Keep dreamin' kiddo!

 

[Contumacious]

Every time President Trump speaks, the left-wing snowflakes fall to pieces and scream that he is "lying". And ever time he has been vindicated in the end.

DOJ FOUND FALSELY PLANTED MALWARE AT TRUMP TOWER DESIGNED TO MIMIC TIES TO RUSSIA
Dovetails with Wikileaks revelation that CIA can stage 'Russian' cyber hacks

the Department of Justice revealed just last week that in fact some of these ties that they had witnessed between Trump Tower servers and Russian entities in fact, were stooged,” Kredo said, discussing the FBI’s investigation and James Comey’s testimony before Congress.

the Wikileaks ‘Vault 7’ documents revealed that this process is something that the CIA has been actively working on for some time. A CIA project identified as “Umbrage,” maintained a substantial library of Russian cyber-attack techniques “stolen” from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.

Reminder: DOJ Found Falsely Planted Malware At Trump Tower Designed to Mimic Ties To Russia

There we agree.


The CIA UMBRAGE technique accomplishes the same thing.


.

 

[P@triot]

That's why the White House lawyers have been going over impeachment possibilities the past few days.

Snowflake....they are only preparing for the left's inability to accept that the American people have spoken. No matter how hard you wish otherwise, President Trump will be your president for the next 4 years (guaranteed) and possibly for the next 8 years (likely). The sooner you accept reality, the less painful this will be for you.

 

[P@triot]

Epic. At every single turn, President Trump continues to be vindicated.

“Walls work — just ask Israel.” - President Trump

Trump Tells Reporters: ‘Walls Work - Just Ask Israel’ - Breitbart

 

[P@triot]

Since March, 2017 is only as high as July, 2016, it's not the highest since April, 2006.

Unless you can produce a higher number since April 2006 (and you can't), then that number is in fact the highest since that date. Exactly like the report from the Department of Labor stated. There is absolutely no number higher until you go back to April, 2006. That in fact it makes it the highest number since that date.

You called it "FAKE NEWS" in a panic - before doing your homework. Then, in a panic, you grabbed the wrong numbers from the Department of Labor website (which exposed your illiteracy). And now you're screwed because you dug yourself a hole and you think they only way out is to keep digging...

 

[Faun]

Since March, 2017 is only as high as July, 2016, it's not the highest since April, 2006.

Unless you can produce a higher number since April 2006 (and you can't), then that number is in fact the highest since that date. Exactly like the report from the Department of Labor stated. There is absolutely no number higher until you go back to April, 2006. That in fact it makes it the highest number since that date.

You called it "FAKE NEWS" in a panic - before doing your homework. Then, in a panic, you grabbed the wrong numbers from the Department of Labor website (which exposed your illiteracy). And now you're screwed because you dug yourself a hole and you think they only way out is to keep digging...

And it's not the highest number since 2006 since it's no higher than the number in July, 2016.

 

[P@triot]

Since March, 2017 is only as high as July, 2016, it's not the highest since April, 2006.

Unless you can produce a higher number since April 2006 (and you can't), then that number is in fact the highest since that date. Exactly like the report from the Department of Labor stated. There is absolutely no number higher until you go back to April, 2006. That in fact it makes it the highest number since that date.

You called it "FAKE NEWS" in a panic - before doing your homework. Then, in a panic, you grabbed the wrong numbers from the Department of Labor website (which exposed your illiteracy). And now you're screwed because you dug yourself a hole and you think they only way out is to keep digging...

And it's not the highest number since 2006 since it's no higher than the number in July, 2016.

That number - including the one from July 2016 - is the highest. If no number is higher - that number is the highest. When you're trying to argue that the highest number is not the highest, you know you've reached desperation. Keep digging snowflake.

 

[Faun]

Since March, 2017 is only as high as July, 2016, it's not the highest since April, 2006.

Unless you can produce a higher number since April 2006 (and you can't), then that number is in fact the highest since that date. Exactly like the report from the Department of Labor stated. There is absolutely no number higher until you go back to April, 2006. That in fact it makes it the highest number since that date.

You called it "FAKE NEWS" in a panic - before doing your homework. Then, in a panic, you grabbed the wrong numbers from the Department of Labor website (which exposed your illiteracy). And now you're screwed because you dug yourself a hole and you think they only way out is to keep digging...

And it's not the highest number since 2006 since it's no higher than the number in July, 2016.

That number - including the one from July 2016 - is the highest. If no number is higher - that number is the highest. When you're trying to argue that the highest number is not the highest, you know you've reached desperation. Keep digging snowflake.

LOLOL

You poor, imbecile. Even you admit there it's not the highest since 2006. To be the highest since 2006 would require it to be higher than every number since then. And you just confirmed it was no higher than last year's figure in July.

But who knows, maybe you'll get lucky and the number will get bumped up once it gets updated?

Of course, we still have you cheering for the other figure... what was it? 322,000 manufacturing jobs filled? There was a net total of only 13,000 manufacturing jobs added in March. That's what you're celebrating. If 322,000 were filled, the 309,000 were lost.

 

[P@triot]

Since March, 2017 is only as high as July, 2016, it's not the highest since April, 2006.

Unless you can produce a higher number since April 2006 (and you can't), then that number is in fact the highest since that date. Exactly like the report from the Department of Labor stated. There is absolutely no number higher until you go back to April, 2006. That in fact it makes it the highest number since that date.

You called it "FAKE NEWS" in a panic - before doing your homework. Then, in a panic, you grabbed the wrong numbers from the Department of Labor website (which exposed your illiteracy). And now you're screwed because you dug yourself a hole and you think they only way out is to keep digging...

And it's not the highest number since 2006 since it's no higher than the number in July, 2016.

That number - including the one from July 2016 - is the highest. If no number is higher - that number is the highest. When you're trying to argue that the highest number is not the highest, you know you've reached desperation. Keep digging snowflake.

LOLOL

You poor, imbecile. Even you admit there it's not the highest since 2006. To be the highest since 2006 would require it to be higher than every number since then. And you just confirmed it was no higher than last year's figure in July.

But who knows, maybe you'll get lucky and the number will get bumped up once it gets updated?

Of course, we still have you cheering for the other figure... what was it? 322,000 manufacturing jobs filled? There was a net total of only 13,000 manufacturing jobs added in March. That's what you're celebrating. If 322,000 were filled, the 309,000 were lost.

That number - including the one from July 2016 - is the highest. If no number is higher - that number is the highest. When you're trying to argue that the highest number is not the highest, you know you've reached desperation. Keep digging snowflake.

 

[Faun]

Since March, 2017 is only as high as July, 2016, it's not the highest since April, 2006.

Unless you can produce a higher number since April 2006 (and you can't), then that number is in fact the highest since that date. Exactly like the report from the Department of Labor stated. There is absolutely no number higher until you go back to April, 2006. That in fact it makes it the highest number since that date.

You called it "FAKE NEWS" in a panic - before doing your homework. Then, in a panic, you grabbed the wrong numbers from the Department of Labor website (which exposed your illiteracy). And now you're screwed because you dug yourself a hole and you think they only way out is to keep digging...

And it's not the highest number since 2006 since it's no higher than the number in July, 2016.

That number - including the one from July 2016 - is the highest. If no number is higher - that number is the highest. When you're trying to argue that the highest number is not the highest, you know you've reached desperation. Keep digging snowflake.

LOLOL

You poor, imbecile. Even you admit there it's not the highest since 2006. To be the highest since 2006 would require it to be higher than every number since then. And you just confirmed it was no higher than last year's figure in July.

But who knows, maybe you'll get lucky and the number will get bumped up once it gets updated?

Of course, we still have you cheering for the other figure... what was it? 322,000 manufacturing jobs filled? There was a net total of only 13,000 manufacturing jobs added in March. That's what you're celebrating. If 322,000 were filled, the 309,000 were lost.

That number - including the one from July 2016 - is the highest. If no number is higher - that number is the highest. When you're trying to argue that the highest number is not the highest, you know you've reached desperation. Keep digging snowflake.

LOLOL

Repeating your idiocy doesn't make it right. If it's no higher than last year's figure then it's not the highest since 2006.

Your problems with English are no one else's problems.

 

[P@triot]

Repeating your idiocy doesn't make it right. If it's no higher than last year's figure then it's not the highest since 2006. Your problems with English are no one else's problems.

I know your desperate - but pretending like you don't understand what the word highest means is just absurd. If you can't provide a number which is higher (and you can't) then that number is indisputably the highest. The more you dig, the worse this is getting for you.

 

[Faun]

Repeating your idiocy doesn't make it right. If it's no higher than last year's figure then it's not the highest since 2006. Your problems with English are no one else's problems.

I know your desperate - but pretending like you don't understand what the word highest means is just absurd. If you can't provide a number which is higher (and you can't) then that number is indisputably the highest. The more you dig, the worse this is getting for you.

Highest means higher than all others. It doesn't mean as high as others.

It couldn't be simpler; but still, beyond your limited grasp.

 

[easyt65]

Another Day - No Evidence...