President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

[Modbert]

So in other words? YOU caved to your OWN proposal. Typical Lib Statist...say things challange folks to do something they themselves aren't willing to do.

Yeah...*I* know...I was IN the Military for a DECADE. And you, DOGBOY?

There you go with the dishonest once again. The proposal was to you, not myself. We have different views on Afghanistan and Iraq, so why would I want to go to a desert wasteland that isn't liberated? You feel they are, so you can go.

I salute you and applaud you for your Military service. However, it has nothing to do with this thread and wasn't even called into question. Once again, you're being dishonest and it's obvious.

 

[Ame®icano]

No. It's not outrage at all, you dishonest litle twit.

You repeating your pointless little lie doesn't actually convert it into the truth.

There is still no outrage, ya hapless meaningless twit.

Did I mention that you are a twit? That shouldn't go unmentioned. You twit.

It is outrage. People are truly angry over this, which is sad. Just because you keep repeating something doesn't make it true there Liability. I see more outrage and "commentary" on this non-issue than the real issues. Which is another thing that is plain sad.

You have made your "commentary" on this issue several times I'm sure, why does it bear repeating? Will something change if you keep repeating it? If you say 'Obama didn't deserve it' three times fast do you think he'll appear in your mirror or computer screen with a axe to kill you?

There is outrage... by those who after 700+ posts still can't answer one simple question from the first page...

What Obama has done to deserve the prize?

 

[Modbert]

There is outrage... by those who after 700+ posts still can't answer one simple question from the first page...

What Obama has done to deserve the prize?

I have already answered that question several times and in several threads for example. So your post doesn't apply.

 

[mal]

No. It's not outrage at all, you dishonest litle twit.

You repeating your pointless little lie doesn't actually convert it into the truth.

There is still no outrage, ya hapless meaningless twit.

Did I mention that you are a twit? That shouldn't go unmentioned. You twit.

It is outrage. People are truly angry over this, which is sad. Just because you keep repeating something doesn't make it true there Liability. I see more outrage and "commentary" on this non-issue than the real issues. Which is another thing that is plain sad.

You have made your "commentary" on this issue several times I'm sure, why does it bear repeating? Will something change if you keep repeating it? If you say 'Obama didn't deserve it' three times fast do you think he'll appear in your mirror or computer screen with a axe to kill you?

There is outrage... by those who after 700+ posts still can't answer one simple question from the first page...

What Obama has done to deserve the prize?

What Rational Person would Claim that Obama did ANYTHING?...

Obama Concedes that himself.



peace...

 

[RadiomanATL]

No. It's not outrage at all, you dishonest litle twit.

You repeating your pointless little lie doesn't actually convert it into the truth.

There is still no outrage, ya hapless meaningless twit.

Did I mention that you are a twit? That shouldn't go unmentioned. You twit.

It is outrage. People are truly angry over this, which is sad. Just because you keep repeating something doesn't make it true there Liability. I see more outrage and "commentary" on this non-issue than the real issues. Which is another thing that is plain sad.

You have made your "commentary" on this issue several times I'm sure, why does it bear repeating? Will something change if you keep repeating it? If you say 'Obama didn't deserve it' three times fast do you think he'll appear in your mirror or computer screen with a axe to kill you?

There is outrage... by those who after 700+ posts still can't answer one simple question from the first page...

What Obama has done to deserve the prize?

Almost every poster agrees that he has done nothing, and did not truly deserve to win it over the other nominees.

Hey, I know, lets do a poll!

 

[Modbert]

Almost every poster agrees that he has done nothing, and did not truly deserve to win it over the other nominees.

Wouldn't bother really. People are bent on their self-righteous trip. That question was answered several hundred posts ago.

Edit: I would agree with a poll. But even with the results, the same people wouldn't end their whining over this.

 

[Si modo]

All MB IQ's fall somewhere between Forrest Gump (dumb, but unintentionally profound at times) and Eminem (foul mouthed violent retard).

I doubt that. It's a diverse crowd here, though.

I didn't say posters. I meant the MB as a whole.

For every intelligent, good looking and debonair poster such as myself...there's a JenT, a Mal, a Chris and a Bass to water down the sterling qualities of us good people.

Ah, I see. Indeed you are debonair. LOL.

It's a pretty good sample population here - normal distribution.

 

[DiveCon]

No. It's not outrage at all, you dishonest litle twit.

You repeating your pointless little lie doesn't actually convert it into the truth.

There is still no outrage, ya hapless meaningless twit.

Did I mention that you are a twit? That shouldn't go unmentioned. You twit.

It is outrage. People are truly angry over this, which is sad. Just because you keep repeating something doesn't make it true there Liability. I see more outrage and "commentary" on this non-issue than the real issues. Which is another thing that is plain sad.

You have made your "commentary" on this issue several times I'm sure, why does it bear repeating? Will something change if you keep repeating it? If you say 'Obama didn't deserve it' three times fast do you think he'll appear in your mirror or computer screen with a axe to kill you?

WHO is angry??

hell, i'm LOL

 

[RadiomanATL]

I doubt that. It's a diverse crowd here, though.

I didn't say posters. I meant the MB as a whole.

For every intelligent, good looking and debonair poster such as myself...there's a JenT, a Mal, a Chris and a Bass to water down the sterling qualities of us good people.

Ah, I see. Indeed you are debonair. LOL.

It's a pretty good sample population here - normal distribution.

Thats mah point.

The normal distribution on MB's usually makes the MB's retarded.

This is not a slam against this board. This is one of the best ones on the 'net IMO. But as a whole we're all pretty retarded.

 

[RadiomanATL]

And yes, I am debonair.

::

 

[DiveCon]

No. It still isn't. You can point to no actual anger, as you know. So, you can stop with your lying, now, you silly little twit.

Come on. It's funny.

Nobody gives a shit. It denegrates any value the award might actually have -- as honors go -- to give it to a guy who hasn't actually done anything to merit it.

But they gave it to him anyway. And it's funny. The derisive comments are not anger. They are justified derision. Jokes. Amusement.

And that's all this is worth.

You know it. We all do. Your faux claim of "outrage" will never fly because it's just you lying. There is still no outrage.

Laughter? Yep. It's funny. The punchline to a whole bunch of future jokes: "President Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing!"

It's funny? You throwing out around personal insults along with plenty of others is anything but showing laughter. It's anger on some level. I'm sure when you heard this it pissed you off a bit.

By the way, the biggest irony in here is you obviously didn't pay attention in history class.

Why do you put so much weight into a award created by the inventor of Dynamite who only created these awards to save his legacy?

ROFLMAO

NO, WRONG

i was SHOCKED and wondered what the hell for
then i LAUGHED at how stupid it was to even nominate a POTUS for an award after he had been in offices for only 12 days(one of which was just parties)

 

[Modbert]

WHO is angry??

hell, i'm LOL

Well that's good. I think everyone can agree that he wasn't worthy of this prize. So why do people need a 800 circle-jerk post thread? "Oh you're right, oh you're right, oh you're right too."

 

[mal]

No. It still isn't. You can point to no actual anger, as you know. So, you can stop with your lying, now, you silly little twit.

Come on. It's funny.

Nobody gives a shit. It denegrates any value the award might actually have -- as honors go -- to give it to a guy who hasn't actually done anything to merit it.

But they gave it to him anyway. And it's funny. The derisive comments are not anger. They are justified derision. Jokes. Amusement.

And that's all this is worth.

You know it. We all do. Your faux claim of "outrage" will never fly because it's just you lying. There is still no outrage.

Laughter? Yep. It's funny. The punchline to a whole bunch of future jokes: "President Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing!"

It's funny? You throwing out around personal insults along with plenty of others is anything but showing laughter. It's anger on some level. I'm sure when you heard this it pissed you off a bit.

By the way, the biggest irony in here is you obviously didn't pay attention in history class.

Why do you put so much weight into a award created by the inventor of Dynamite who only created these awards to save his legacy?

ROFLMAO

NO, WRONG

i was SHOCKED and wondered what the hell for
then i LAUGHED at how stupid it was to even nominate a POTUS for an award after he had been in offices for only 12 days(one of which was just parties)

Again, it was an Obvious Shot @ (43), as was Carter's...

Even Liberals in the Media have Acknowledged it, and Barry has said he didn't Deserve it.



peace...

 

[Modbert]

NO, WRONG

i was SHOCKED and wondered what the hell for
then i LAUGHED at how stupid it was to even nominate a POTUS for an award after he had been in offices for only 12 days(one of which was just parties)

Plenty of people are angry about this. Did I say you?

 

[DiveCon]

Yes. Quite funny. I might also suggest you get an adult to explain the concept of "derisive" laughter to you. But that doesn't change the fact that there is no outrage. It's funny.

I'm going to ask you to stop taking my posts out of context. As for this whole outrage vs laughter stuff, whatever. Delude yourself if you care to. The fact you're continuing to respond to my point on this means you really don't want anyone thinking this is outrage. So again, whatever. Feel whatever makes you happy.

except it is YOU that is deluding yourself
no one is angry, we are laughing at how meaningless the Nobel Peace Prize has become

 

[Si modo]

No. It still isn't. You can point to no actual anger, as you know. So, you can stop with your lying, now, you silly little twit.

Come on. It's funny.

Nobody gives a shit. It denegrates any value the award might actually have -- as honors go -- to give it to a guy who hasn't actually done anything to merit it.

But they gave it to him anyway. And it's funny. The derisive comments are not anger. They are justified derision. Jokes. Amusement.

And that's all this is worth.

You know it. We all do. Your faux claim of "outrage" will never fly because it's just you lying. There is still no outrage.

Laughter? Yep. It's funny. The punchline to a whole bunch of future jokes: "President Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing!"

It's funny? You throwing out around personal insults along with plenty of others is anything but showing laughter. It's anger on some level. I'm sure when you heard this it pissed you off a bit.

By the way, the biggest irony in here is you obviously didn't pay attention in history class.

Why do you put so much weight into a award created by the inventor of Dynamite who only created these awards to save his legacy?

ROFLMAO

NO, WRONG

i was SHOCKED and wondered what the hell for
then i LAUGHED at how stupid it was to even nominate a POTUS for an award after he had been in offices for only 12 days(one of which was just parties)

IIRC, two - the inaugural parties and a Super Bowl party, no?

Anyway, I honestly thought it was a link to an Onion story so I initially laughed until I found that it wasn't. Then I came here and saw so many libs wetting themselves in glee. That made it even funnier than an Onion story.


Funny - Nobel's will requires that the prize be given for deeds over one year. So, in reality, Obama was mostly given the prize for running a political campaign.

 

[The T]

It's funny? * * * *

Yes. Quite funny. I might also suggest you get an adult to explain the concept of "derisive" laughter to you. But that doesn't change the fact that there is no outrage. It's funny.

I'm going to ask you to stop taking my posts out of context. As for this whole outrage vs laughter stuff, whatever. Delude yourself if you care to. The fact you're continuing to respond to my point on this means you really don't want anyone thinking this is outrage. So again, whatever. Feel whatever makes you happy.

except it is YOU that is deluding yourself
no one is angry, we are laughing at how meaningless the Nobel Peace Prize has become [/quote]


The underlying current apparently shared worldwide.

 

[Modbert]

What confuses me the most about this is why people have so much weight into this award in the first place?

I keep seeing Carter, Yasser, and Gore brought up. So obviously those people didn't have much weight on this award beforehand I would assume.

As for the award itself, once again, Alfred Nobel, "The Merchant of Death", the inventor of Dynamite, created these awards to save his legacy. So I guess a lot of people do not see the irony in that.

 

[DiveCon]

NO, WRONG

i was SHOCKED and wondered what the hell for
then i LAUGHED at how stupid it was to even nominate a POTUS for an award after he had been in offices for only 12 days(one of which was just parties)

Plenty of people are angry about this. Did I say you?

i havent seen anyone express anger over this
everyone i see is laughing at the stupidity of it all
well, other than a few on the left that are angry that anyone dare laugh at the award being given to their glorious leader

 

[Si modo]

NO, WRONG

i was SHOCKED and wondered what the hell for
then i LAUGHED at how stupid it was to even nominate a POTUS for an award after he had been in offices for only 12 days(one of which was just parties)

Plenty of people are angry about this. Did I say you?

i havent seen anyone express anger over this
everyone i see is laughing at the stupidity of it all
well, other than a few on the left that are angry that anyone dare laugh at the award being given to their glorious leader

I haven't either, but if the kid keeps saying it, eventually it must become true?