President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

[Liability]

This was given to Obama in response to Obama not being Bush. If that is not obvious, then people need to get a clue. Now, almost 700 posts later, the bitching continues for a award that affects none of us.

In fact, until a couple days ago, I bet few people on here even knew who was being considered for the Nobel Peace Prize this year. The faux outrage gets tiring after awhile.

Not nearly as tiring as the false claim (shared by you) that there is any "outrage" at all, much less this alleged "false outrage."

I see no outrage.

I see commentary. I see derision (justified). But outrage? Nope.

And nobody can justify the granting of such an award to this President on the basis of anything he has ever actually done. That probably merits another mention since Obamaphile hacks like to just skip past that point.

 

[Modbert]

After what you said you want me to be socialble enough to answer your mother fucken questions?

Did I make you cry? Seriously, grow up and grow a pair if you're a man. This isn't a place where your stupid comments are going to be sheltered.

 

[mudwhistle]

In the same sentence he claimed he was undeserving while he was describing himself as a transformational figure.

He just trying to snow us with his false modesty.

Link? Where in the same sentence did he say that? Was saying he was humble describing himself as a transformational figure?

Before I even consider answering that question, which is easy enough....I want an apology from you for your rude behavior.

Until then forget it.

 

[Si modo]

In the same sentence he claimed he was undeserving while he was describing himself as a transformational figure.

He just trying to snow us with his false modesty.

Link? Where in the same sentence did he say that? Was saying he was humble describing himself as a transformational figure?

Before I even consider answering that question, which is easy enough....I want an apology from you for your rude behavior.

Until then forget it.

That won't happen.

And, he's a kid.

 

[Modbert]

Not nearly as tiring as the false claim (shared by you) that there is any "outrage" at all, much less this alleged "false outrage."

I see no outrage.

I see commentary. I see derision (justified). But outrage? Nope.

And nobody can justify the granting of such an award to this President on the basis of anything he has ever actually done. That probably merits another mention since Obamaphile hacks like to just skip past that point.

Commentary doesn't last for 700+ posts you hack.

This is outrage as it's best.

The thing is, this award affects none of us. So therefore, you have no reason to give a **** about it. As previously mentioned, the fact you put so much weight into this award in the first place makes me question some things.

By the way, the award could of gone to plenty of other deserving people. Guess what? It didn't. I wanted The Dark Knight to win Best Movie of the Year but it didn't even get nominated. Did I ***** for weeks and cry on a message board about a award that didn't affect me like some of you people will probably be doing so? No. I shrugged and said well better luck next time.

The only people who have a right to be "outraged" really are the ones who lost.

 

[Modbert]

Before I even consider answering that question, which is easy enough....I want an apology from you for your rude behavior.

Until then forget it.

Rude behavior? If you make stupid comments, I'm going to say so. If you refuse to answer my questions, you're dodging and being a hack.

 

[Modbert]

That won't happen.

And, he's a kid.

I'm not a kid and you have no room to talk there Si Modo.

 

[Liability]

Not nearly as tiring as the false claim (shared by you) that there is any "outrage" at all, much less this alleged "false outrage."

I see no outrage.

I see commentary. I see derision (justified). But outrage? Nope.

And nobody can justify the granting of such an award to this President on the basis of anything he has ever actually done. That probably merits another mention since Obamaphile hacks like to just skip past that point.

Commentary doesn't last for 700+ posts you hack.

Of course it does you lying twit.

This is outrage as it's best.

No. It's not outrage at all, you dishonest little twit.

You repeating your pointless little lie doesn't actually convert it into the truth.

There is still no outrage, ya hapless meaningless twit.

Did I mention that you are a twit? That shouldn't go unmentioned. You twit.

 

[The T]

This was given to Obama in response to Obama not being Bush. If that is not obvious, then people need to get a clue. Now, almost 700 posts later, the bitching continues for a award that affects none of us.

In fact, until a couple days ago, I bet few people on here even knew who was being considered for the Nobel Peace Prize this year. The faux outrage gets tiring after awhile.

But a FEW did? And I'd be willing to bet that the Bamster did. No proof...but it's part and parcel to whom he is, and It wouldn't suprise me that he knew he was nominated after his immaculation.

But I have to give credit where it is DUE...

Just look at whom the NOBEL Committee has given the award to in recent years?

Bamster is in good Statist/Liberal Company...

And perhaps the Euro-Trash Statists themselves did give it to him for NOT being George W. Bush.

It's a sound theory, and one that further drives the final NAIL in their coffin for being a JOKE of an 'AWARD'. Never mind that BUSH Liberated 50+ Million folks from the tryranny they were suffering from the murderous philosophies of those that they were subject.

NAH...couldn't be...

 

[Navy1960]

Forgive me here, but after a day of this , the real shame of all this is that we are all actually debating President Obama having received the Nobel prize under what some would claim are less than notable circumstances and those are not just republicans making that claim, it's also democrats as well as the Daily Kos the last time I checked was not a institution that anyone could see as bought and paid for by the GOP. The real sad thing about all this is we are all here debating this Nobel prize that long ago lost it's luster when it was awarded to Yasser Arafat and then such notables as the IPCC, when we are all about to eat big tax sandwich all in the name of non-exitant healthcare reform. So before all of you jump on the "why are you here then" bandwagon, I'll save you the trouble and state this is the last comment I will make on President Obama's new trophy.

 

[Modbert]

No. It's not outrage at all, you dishonest litle twit.

You repeating your pointless little lie doesn't actually convert it into the truth.

There is still no outrage, ya hapless meaningless twit.

Did I mention that you are a twit? That shouldn't go unmentioned. You twit.

It is outrage. People are truly angry over this, which is sad. Just because you keep repeating something doesn't make it true there Liability. I see more outrage and "commentary" on this non-issue than the real issues. Which is another thing that is plain sad.

You have made your "commentary" on this issue several times I'm sure, why does it bear repeating? Will something change if you keep repeating it? If you say 'Obama didn't deserve it' three times fast do you think he'll appear in your mirror or computer screen with a axe to kill you?

 

[Si modo]

That won't happen.

And, he's a kid.

I'm not a kid and you have no room to talk there Si Modo.

I don't spend my time lying, backpeddling, and using logical fallacies over and over so perhaps I don't have room to talk on that practice; it's foreign to me.

Celebrate well when you can purchase alcohol legally in the USA.

 

[Modbert]

It's a sound theory, and one that further drives the final NAIL in their coffin for being a JOKE of an 'AWARD'. Never mind that BUSH Liberated 50+ Million folks from the tryranny they were suffering from the murderous philosophies of those that they were subject.

NAH...couldn't be...

If you call the people of Afghanistan and Iraq liberated then perhaps you won't mind going to live over there for a few years? Unless of course you feel you'll need the McCain treatment.

 

[Liability]

No. It's not outrage at all, you dishonest litle twit.

You repeating your pointless little lie doesn't actually convert it into the truth.

There is still no outrage, ya hapless meaningless twit.

Did I mention that you are a twit? That shouldn't go unmentioned. You twit.

It is outrage. * * * *

No. It still isn't. You can point to no actual anger, as you know. So, you can stop with your lying, now, you silly little twit.

Come on. It's funny.

Nobody gives a shit. It denegrates any value the award might actually have -- as honors go -- to give it to a guy who hasn't actually done anything to merit it.

But they gave it to him anyway. And it's funny. The derisive comments are not anger. They are justified derision. Jokes. Amusement.

And that's all this is worth.

You know it. We all do. Your faux claim of "outrage" will never fly because it's just you lying. There is still no outrage.

Laughter? Yep. It's funny. The punchline to a whole bunch of future jokes: "President Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing!"

 

[mal]

Not where this goes...



peace...

 

[The T]

It's a sound theory, and one that further drives the final NAIL in their coffin for being a JOKE of an 'AWARD'. Never mind that BUSH Liberated 50+ Million folks from the tryranny they were suffering from the murderous philosophies of those that they were subject.

NAH...couldn't be...

If you call the people of Afghanistan and Iraq liberated then perhaps you won't mind going to live over there for a few years? Unless of course you feel you'll need the McCain treatment.

I'll follow your ******* LEAD...What's the iteniary DogBoy?

 

[Si modo]

No. It's not outrage at all, you dishonest litle twit.

You repeating your pointless little lie doesn't actually convert it into the truth.

There is still no outrage, ya hapless meaningless twit.

Did I mention that you are a twit? That shouldn't go unmentioned. You twit.

It is outrage. People are truly angry over this, which is sad. Just because you keep repeating something doesn't make it true there Liability. I see more outrage and "commentary" on this non-issue than the real issues. Which is another thing that is plain sad.

You have made your "commentary" on this issue several times I'm sure, why does it bear repeating? Will something change if you keep repeating it? If you say 'Obama didn't deserve it' three times fast do you think he'll appear in your mirror or computer screen with a axe to kill you?

Saying it's outrage over and over does not make it any more true than the first time you told that lie. Just keep saying that lie, we'll keep correcting you, then you can use use that idiotic reason that number of posts equate to outrage.

How completely idiotic your points are

 

[mal]

What the!...



peace...

 

[Modbert]

No. It still isn't. You can point to no actual anger, as you know. So, you can stop with your lying, now, you silly little twit.

Come on. It's funny.

Nobody gives a shit. It denegrates any value the award might actually have -- as honors go -- to give it to a guy who hasn't actually done anything to merit it.

But they gave it to him anyway. And it's funny. The derisive comments are not anger. They are justified derision. Jokes. Amusement.

And that's all this is worth.

You know it. We all do. Your faux claim of "outrage" will never fly because it's just you lying. There is still no outrage.

Laughter? Yep. It's funny. The punchline to a whole bunch of future jokes: "President Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing!"

It's funny? You throwing out around personal insults along with plenty of others is anything but showing laughter. It's anger on some level. I'm sure when you heard this it pissed you off a bit.

By the way, the biggest irony in here is you obviously didn't pay attention in history class.

Why do you put so much weight into a award created by the inventor of Dynamite who only created these awards to save his legacy?

 

[Si modo]

No. It still isn't. You can point to no actual anger, as you know. So, you can stop with your lying, now, you silly little twit.

Come on. It's funny.

Nobody gives a shit. It denegrates any value the award might actually have -- as honors go -- to give it to a guy who hasn't actually done anything to merit it.

But they gave it to him anyway. And it's funny. The derisive comments are not anger. They are justified derision. Jokes. Amusement.

And that's all this is worth.

You know it. We all do. Your faux claim of "outrage" will never fly because it's just you lying. There is still no outrage.

Laughter? Yep. It's funny. The punchline to a whole bunch of future jokes: "President Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing!"

It's funny? You throwing out around personal insults along with plenty of others is anything but showing laughter. It's anger on some level. I'm sure when you heard this it pissed you off a bit.

By the way, the biggest irony in here is you obviously didn't pay attention in history class.

Why do you put so much weight into a award created by the inventor of Dynamite who only created these awards to save his legacy?

Sometimes folks can get a bit testy with ankle-biters like you.