President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

[Modbert]

Funny - Nobel's will requires that the prize be given for deeds over one year. So, in reality, Obama was mostly given the prize for running a political campaign.

It's good to see you are reading more closely now considering one of the threads earlier wondering why we didn't know who nominated Obama for the prize.

 

[Modbert]

i havent seen anyone express anger over this
everyone i see is laughing at the stupidity of it all
well, other than a few on the left that are angry that anyone dare laugh at the award being given to their glorious leader

So nobody in this country, anywhere is not angry over Obama getting this? Nobody, not at all, not in any way are angry? Why do I not believe you in that case?

 

[mudwhistle]

NO, WRONG

i was SHOCKED and wondered what the hell for
then i LAUGHED at how stupid it was to even nominate a POTUS for an award after he had been in offices for only 12 days(one of which was just parties)

Plenty of people are angry about this. Did I say you?

It's plain to see someone like yourself doesn't know the difference between anger and bewilderment.

I would have to say your rudeness is based in anger. Anger at anyone who thinks Obama's act is getting a little too much to put up with.

I think you're pissed because some of us feel the little shit is in insufferable bore....which explains why you identify with him.

 

[The T]

No. It still isn't. You can point to no actual anger, as you know. So, you can stop with your lying, now, you silly little twit.

Come on. It's funny.

Nobody gives a shit. It denegrates any value the award might actually have -- as honors go -- to give it to a guy who hasn't actually done anything to merit it.

But they gave it to him anyway. And it's funny. The derisive comments are not anger. They are justified derision. Jokes. Amusement.

And that's all this is worth.

You know it. We all do. Your faux claim of "outrage" will never fly because it's just you lying. There is still no outrage.

Laughter? Yep. It's funny. The punchline to a whole bunch of future jokes: "President Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing!"

It's funny? You throwing out around personal insults along with plenty of others is anything but showing laughter. It's anger on some level. I'm sure when you heard this it pissed you off a bit.

By the way, the biggest irony in here is you obviously didn't pay attention in history class.

Why do you put so much weight into a award created by the inventor of Dynamite who only created these awards to save his legacy?

ROFLMAO

NO, WRONG

i was SHOCKED and wondered what the hell for
then i LAUGHED at how stupid it was to even nominate a POTUS for an award after he had been in offices for only 12 days(one of which was just parties)

Which BEGS the question of 'whom' Nominated him for it, and under what pretense other than his "Community Organizeing? His associations with known Communists? Terrorists? Statists?

What was the prerequisite for the Nomination? And of thsaid prerequisite? Is it enough to get nominated, much less Awarded this phoney Reward for being a Liberal/Statist dipshit?

Obama's hands, and the rest of him have been TIED in a straightjacket, for NOW he has to live up to now finishing off his supposed "Home Country", that these on the Committee seem to HATE.

 

[Darkwind]

Unfucking believable. We can now officially write that award off as absolutely MEANINGLESS. And we can assume the committee is full of idiots, retards and political hacks..

That happened back when algore joined the list.

 

[Modbert]

It's plain to see someone like yourself doesn't know the difference between anger and bewilderment.

I would have to say your rudeness is based in anger. Anger at anyone who thinks Obama's act is getting a little too much to put up with.

I think you're pissed because some of us feel the little shit is in insufferable bore....which explains why you identify with him.

You talk about rudeness, but then go ahead and state what you think is my opinions as fact. Lovely hypocrisy there.

I don't think Obama is worthy of this award, not sure how many times I have to say it before you can understand that.

 

[Si modo]

Funny - Nobel's will requires that the prize be given for deeds over one year. So, in reality, Obama was mostly given the prize for running a political campaign.

It's good to see you are reading more closely now considering one of the threads earlier wondering why we didn't know who nominated Obama for the prize.

What does one have to do with the other in your mind?

 

[Modbert]

What does one have to do with the other in your mind?

Because if you had read more closely earlier, you would of never had to ask that question.

 

[GWV5903]

It's a sound theory, and one that further drives the final NAIL in their coffin for being a JOKE of an 'AWARD'. Never mind that BUSH Liberated 50+ Million folks from the tryranny they were suffering from the murderous philosophies of those that they were subject.

NAH...couldn't be...

If you call the people of Afghanistan and Iraq liberated then perhaps you won't mind going to live over there for a few years? Unless of course you feel you'll need the McCain treatment.

It has become so absurd that liberals such as yourself deny the success in Iraq

Numerous friends, family and business associates have repeated the same story time and time again, the majority of the Iraqi's love the fact that we did what we did, they can buy milk on a daily basis, bread, the newspaper, own cell phones, live their lives with more freedoms than they have ever had......are you sure they have not been liberated???

Try this you never know, it might help.....

 

[Si modo]

It's plain to see someone like yourself doesn't know the difference between anger and bewilderment.

I would have to say your rudeness is based in anger. Anger at anyone who thinks Obama's act is getting a little too much to put up with.

I think you're pissed because some of us feel the little shit is in insufferable bore....which explains why you identify with him.

You talk about rudeness, but then go ahead and state what you think is my opinions as fact. Lovely hypocrisy there.

I don't think Obama is worthy of this award, not sure how many times I have to say it before you can understand that.

You are seriously a bonafide idiot. His point is your idiotic claim that he and others are angry. Only an idiot would miss that, as it is his first sentence.

 

[Si modo]

IIRC, two - the inaugural parties and a Super Bowl party, no?

Anyway, I honestly thought it was a link to an Onion story so I initially laughed until I found that it wasn't. Then I came here and saw so many libs wetting themselves in glee. That made it even funnier than an Onion story.


Funny - Nobel's will requires that the prize be given for deeds over one year. So, in reality, Obama was mostly given the prize for running a political campaign.

It's good to see you are reading more closely now considering one of the threads earlier wondering why we didn't know who nominated Obama for the prize.

What does one have to do with the other in your mind?

Because if you had read more closely earlier, you would of never had to ask that question.

I understand. It is difficult for you to articulate a point. And, I understand now that you find questions posed to you insulting (LOL).

But, I will laugh yet again at those razor sharp logic skills of yours. Gotta love the 'you're too stupid to be able to understand my ramblings' debate methodology.

 

[Modbert]

It has become so absurd that liberals such as yourself deny the success in Iraq

Numerous friends, family and business associates have repeated the same story time and time again, the majority of the Iraqi's love the fact that we did what we did, they can buy milk on a daily basis, bread, the newspaper, own cell phones, live their lives with more freedoms than they have ever had......are you sure they have not been liberated???

Try this you never know, it might help.....

They couldn't buy milk and bread on a daily basis before Saddam?

Also:

Most Iraqis Favor Immediate U.S. Pullout, Polls Show - washingtonpost.com

Even going back to 2004:

USATODAY.com - Poll: Iraqis out of patience

BAGHDAD — Only a third of the Iraqi people now believe that the American-led occupation of their country is doing more good than harm, and a solid majority support an immediate military pullout even though they fear that could put them in greater danger, according to a new USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll

The poll shows that most continue to say the hardships suffered to depose Saddam Hussein were worth it. Half say they and their families are better off than they were under Saddam. And a strong majority say they are more free to worship and to speak

But while they acknowledge benefits from dumping Saddam a year ago, Iraqis no longer see the presence of the American-led military as a plus. Asked whether they view the U.S.-led coalition as "liberators" or "occupiers," 71% of all respondents say "occupiers

I'm not ungrateful that they took away Saddam Hussein," says Salam Ahmed, 30, a Shiite businessman. "But the job is done. Thank you very much. See you later. Bye-bye

"I would shoot at the Americans right now if I had the chance," says Abbas Kadhum Muia, 24, who owns a bicycle shop in Sadr City, a Shiite slum of 2 million people in Baghdad that was strongly anti-Saddam and once friendly to the Americans. "At the beginning ... there were no problems, but gradually they started to show disrespect (and) encroach on our rights, arresting people."

If that's love, I rather be unloved.

 

[The T]

It's a sound theory, and one that further drives the final NAIL in their coffin for being a JOKE of an 'AWARD'. Never mind that BUSH Liberated 50+ Million folks from the tryranny they were suffering from the murderous philosophies of those that they were subject.

NAH...couldn't be...

If you call the people of Afghanistan and Iraq liberated then perhaps you won't mind going to live over there for a few years? Unless of course you feel you'll need the McCain treatment.

It has become so absurd that liberals such as yourself deny the success in Iraq

Numerous friends, family and business associates have repeated the same story time and time again, the majority of the Iraqi's love the fact that we did what we did, they can buy milk on a daily basis, bread, the newspaper, own cell phones, live their lives with more freedoms than they have ever had......are you sure they have not been liberated???

Try this you never know, it might help.....

Dog Breath seems to MISS outright the Liberty angle. As long as he has his Liberty, and his liberrty here to challange others to GO to A'Stan, when he/she/IT aren't willing to do so...

Is telling.

Typical Liberal "I got mine, you get yours" mentality. And doesn't think it is worth the Blood/Sweat equity.

I wonder how this goof would have commented during WWII when we liberated Many more, and were too late to save others?

 

[Modbert]

Typical Liberal "I got mine, you get yours" mentality.[/B] And doesn't think it is worth the Blood/Sweat equity.

I wonder how this goof would have commented during WWII when we liberated Many more, and were too late to save others?

That's the typical Liberal mentality? After all the talk about entitlements and handouts to people? Can you not even keep your bullshit straight?

Afghanistan is not liberated and neither is Iraq. Sorry if you can't face reality with that.

We did liberate in WWII, we are not liberating here.

 

[DiveCon]

Typical Liberal "I got mine, you get yours" mentality.[/B] And doesn't think it is worth the Blood/Sweat equity.

I wonder how this goof would have commented during WWII when we liberated Many more, and were too late to save others?

That's the typical Liberal mentality? After all the talk about entitlements and handouts to people? Can you not even keep your bullshit straight?

Afghanistan is not liberated and neither is Iraq. Sorry if you can't face reality with that.

We did liberate in WWII, we are not liberating here.

really?
Iraq doesnt have an elected government?

 

[JakeStarkey]

It's a sound theory, and one that further drives the final NAIL in their coffin for being a JOKE of an 'AWARD'. Never mind that BUSH Liberated 50+ Million folks from the tryranny they were suffering from the murderous philosophies of those that they were subject.

NAH...couldn't be...

If you call the people of Afghanistan and Iraq liberated then perhaps you won't mind going to live over there for a few years? Unless of course you feel you'll need the McCain treatment.

It has become so absurd that liberals such as yourself deny the success in Iraq

Numerous friends, family and business associates have repeated the same story time and time again, the majority of the Iraqi's love the fact that we did what we did, they can buy milk on a daily basis, bread, the newspaper, own cell phones, live their lives with more freedoms than they have ever had......are you sure they have not been liberated???

Try this you never know, it might help.....

I can play that game as well. The majority of Iraqis love the fact that we will be going home, that we are not patrolling their streets, that we are not polluting their cultural and religious environment. And the government will ally with Iraq as soon as we are gone to make sure we never come back.

Nope, banghead, this is not a victory.

 

[GWV5903]

It has become so absurd that liberals such as yourself deny the success in Iraq

Numerous friends, family and business associates have repeated the same story time and time again, the majority of the Iraqi's love the fact that we did what we did, they can buy milk on a daily basis, bread, the newspaper, own cell phones, live their lives with more freedoms than they have ever had......are you sure they have not been liberated???

Try this you never know, it might help.....

They couldn't buy milk and bread on a daily basis before Saddam?

You didn't know this? You speak as though you would?? There goes your credibility on the subject.....

Also:

Most Iraqis Favor Immediate U.S. Pullout, Polls Show - washingtonpost.com

We have a difficult time justifying polls in this country and you want to base everything on a poll in that country??

Even going back to 2004:

USATODAY.com - Poll: Iraqis out of patience

BAGHDAD — Only a third of the Iraqi people now believe that the American-led occupation of their country is doing more good than harm, and a solid majority support an immediate military pullout even though they fear that could put them in greater danger, according to a new USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll

The poll shows that most continue to say the hardships suffered to depose Saddam Hussein were worth it. Half say they and their families are better off than they were under Saddam. And a strong majority say they are more free to worship and to speak

But while they acknowledge benefits from dumping Saddam a year ago, Iraqis no longer see the presence of the American-led military as a plus. Asked whether they view the U.S.-led coalition as "liberators" or "occupiers," 71% of all respondents say "occupiers

I'm not ungrateful that they took away Saddam Hussein," says Salam Ahmed, 30, a Shiite businessman. "But the job is done. Thank you very much. See you later. Bye-bye

"I would shoot at the Americans right now if I had the chance," says Abbas Kadhum Muia, 24, who owns a bicycle shop in Sadr City, a Shiite slum of 2 million people in Baghdad that was strongly anti-Saddam and once friendly to the Americans. "At the beginning ... there were no problems, but gradually they started to show disrespect (and) encroach on our rights, arresting people."

If that's love, I rather be unloved.

Thanks for clarifying what most of us already knew, you believe everything you read, on the other hand you dismiss first hand knowledge, no real surprise....

 

[mudwhistle]

It's plain to see someone like yourself doesn't know the difference between anger and bewilderment.

I would have to say your rudeness is based in anger. Anger at anyone who thinks Obama's act is getting a little too much to put up with.

I think you're pissed because some of us feel the little shit is in insufferable bore....which explains why you identify with him.

You talk about rudeness, but then go ahead and state what you think is my opinions as fact. Lovely hypocrisy there.

I don't think Obama is worthy of this award, not sure how many times I have to say it before you can understand that.

My attitude is justified.

You act like a little prick and I'm supposed to carry on like it never happened I suppose.

So spare me the indignation.

And of course you feel he's worthy of the award...mainly because you support everything he does. I believe that is because you really don't have any princples nor core values so to speak.

 

[The T]

Typical Liberal "I got mine, you get yours" mentality.[/b] And doesn't think it is worth the Blood/Sweat equity.

I wonder how this goof would have commented during WWII when we liberated Many more, and were too late to save others?

That's the typical Liberal mentality? After all the talk about entitlements and handouts to people? Can you not even keep your bullshit straight?

Afghanistan is not liberated and neither is Iraq. Sorry if you can't face reality with that.

We did liberate in WWII, we are not liberating here.

So? Have we annexed Afghanistan yet?

Silly Statist LIB toad...

In WAR you are there either to Liberate the oppressed, or there to take over the Country.

Which is it numbnuts?

And YES we Liberated them, or didn't the recent election say anything to you ?

Are you normally this dense, DoggieStyle?

 

[Modbert]

really?
Iraq doesnt have an elected government?

That's how you define liberated?