President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

[Modbert]

Saying it's outrage over and over does not make it any more true than the first time you told that lie. Just keep saying that lie, we'll keep correcting you, then you can use use that idiotic reason that number of posts equate to outrage.

How completely idiotic your points are

It is outrage. You and others are upset over this. Which is what I really don't get. I don't even think Obama deserved the award but I didn't bother to complain. Why? It doesn't affect me. None of the Nobel Prize Winners getting their awards affect me. You know what affects me though? Their work. If their work can improve mankind for the better, then that is great.

Did Obama's work thus far make him deserving of such a award? No.

Do I wish that perhaps one day he will? Of course. Because that will mean he had made this country better.

 

[The T]

No. It still isn't. You can point to no actual anger, as you know. So, you can stop with your lying, now, you silly little twit.

Come on. It's funny.

Nobody gives a shit. It denegrates any value the award might actually have -- as honors go -- to give it to a guy who hasn't actually done anything to merit it.

But they gave it to him anyway. And it's funny. The derisive comments are not anger. They are justified derision. Jokes. Amusement.

And that's all this is worth.

You know it. We all do. Your faux claim of "outrage" will never fly because it's just you lying. There is still no outrage.

Laughter? Yep. It's funny. The punchline to a whole bunch of future jokes: "President Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing!"

It's funny? You throwing out around personal insults along with plenty of others is anything but showing laughter. It's anger on some level. I'm sure when you heard this it pissed you off a bit.

By the way, the biggest irony in here is you obviously didn't pay attention in history class.

Why do you put so much weight into a award created by the inventor of Dynamite who only created these awards to save his legacy?

I am going to FOLLOW YOUR LEAD...When are WE going to A'Stan DOGBOY?

 

[Liability]

No. It still isn't. You can point to no actual anger, as you know. So, you can stop with your lying, now, you silly little twit.

Come on. It's funny.

Nobody gives a shit. It denegrates any value the award might actually have -- as honors go -- to give it to a guy who hasn't actually done anything to merit it.

But they gave it to him anyway. And it's funny. The derisive comments are not anger. They are justified derision. Jokes. Amusement.

And that's all this is worth.

You know it. We all do. Your faux claim of "outrage" will never fly because it's just you lying. There is still no outrage.

Laughter? Yep. It's funny. The punchline to a whole bunch of future jokes: "President Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing!"

It's funny? * * * *

Yes. Quite funny. I might also suggest you get an adult to explain the concept of "derisive" laughter to you. But that doesn't change the fact that there is no outrage. It's funny.

 

[Si modo]

Saying it's outrage over and over does not make it any more true than the first time you told that lie. Just keep saying that lie, we'll keep correcting you, then you can use use that idiotic reason that number of posts equate to outrage.

How completely idiotic your points are

It is outrage. You and others are upset over this. Which is what I really don't get. I don't even think Obama deserved the award but I didn't bother to complain. Why? It doesn't affect me. None of the Nobel Prize Winners getting their awards affect me. You know what affects me though? Their work. If their work can improve mankind for the better, then that is great.

Did Obama's work thus far make him deserving of such a award? No.

Do I wish that perhaps one day he will? Of course. Because that will mean he had made this country better.

You don't get it Dogbert. Any outrage at this point is over annoying little ankle-biters.

 

[Modbert]

I am going to FOLLOW YOUR LEAD...When are WE going to A'Stan DOGBOY?

Unlike you I don't think the Afghanistan or Iraq people are liberated. Whether we stay there for a year or a hundred years, they will not be "liberated."

The Government in Afghanistan is corrupt and oppressive already. The only way a country can be truly "liberated" in a situation like this if they did liberated themselves. Did you see France liberating us? No. We did ourselves. If France had done it and put themselves in charge here, would we not them as just another group trying to control us?

We did not liberate either country. We are better off leaving now before we go the way of the Soviet Union in terms of losses.

 

[Modbert]

It's funny? * * * *

Yes. Quite funny. I might also suggest you get an adult to explain the concept of "derisive" laughter to you. But that doesn't change the fact that there is no outrage. It's funny.[/QUOTE]

I'm going to ask you to stop taking my posts out of context. As for this whole outrage vs laughter stuff, whatever. Delude yourself if you care to. The fact you're continuing to respond to my point on this means you really don't want anyone thinking this is outrage. So again, whatever. Feel whatever makes you happy.

 

[The T]

I am going to FOLLOW YOUR LEAD...When are WE going to A'Stan DOGBOY?

Unlike you I don't think the Afghanistan or Iraq people are liberated. Whether we stay there for a year or a hundred years, they will not be "liberated."

The Government in Afghanistan is corrupt and oppressive already. The only way a country can be truly "liberated" in a situation like this if they did liberated themselves. Did you see France liberating us? No. We did ourselves. If France had done it and put themselves in charge here, would we not them as just another group trying to control us?

We did not liberate either country. We are better off leaving now before we go the way of the Soviet Union in terms of losses.

In other words? *I* Fronted a direct challange to *YOU* and you seem to want to creep OUT of it.

Figures. From now on? Talk to the HAND DogBoy...

 

[RadiomanATL]

I bet some of those terrorists also think that 2+2=4. So do I. The logic of the left on display.

The fact you characterize an entire side by one person on this speaks volumes of your intelligence or rather lack there of.

Well, the person he was responding to was doing the exact same thing. Whats good for the goose and all...

 

[Modbert]

In other words? *I* Fronted a direct challange to *YOU* and you seems to want to creep OUT of it.

Figures. From now on? Talk to the HAND DogBoy...

What is your direct challenge? To go to Afghanistan? You're the one who seems to think they are liberated, not me. If you care to go die in the desert wasteland, feel free.

You are nothing but a partisan hack who is also arrogant. Do you think the fact you donate also makes you right always?

 

[Modbert]

Well, the person he was responding to was doing the exact same thing. Whats good for the goose and all...

Except two wrongs don't make a right. Or is that outdated?

 

[RadiomanATL]

Well, the person he was responding to was doing the exact same thing. Whats good for the goose and all...

Except two wrongs don't make a right. Or is that outdated?

Not outdated, but this is an MB. Different rules apply. When someone makes a dumb generalization, another dumb generalization is sometimes appropriate.

 

[Modbert]

Not outdated, but this is an MB. Different rules apply. When someone makes a dumb generalization, another dumb generalization is sometimes appropriate.

Very true I suppose. Either way, two dumb generalizations and it doesn't bode well for the MB IQ.

 

[The T]

In other words? *I* Fronted a direct challange to *YOU* and you seems to want to creep OUT of it.

Figures. From now on? Talk to the HAND DogBoy...

What is your direct challenge? To go to Afghanistan? You're the one who seems to think they are liberated, not me. If you care to go die in the desert wasteland, feel free.

You are nothing but a partisan hack who is also arrogant. Do you think the fact you donate also makes you right always?

Laugh it up...You proposed that I go there...while NOT willing to do the same?

Spare me DogBoy. You failed. You are now making excuses.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Ah yes, those great unwashed, unemployed and unemployable libertards. Blue collar liberals like myself. Of course, I did have one minor job last year, but I only managed to crack very low six figure earned income, so it is just as if I did not work at all, correct?

Cali, you, and the rest here, are a so damned stupid with your stereotypes.

kinda like you are Rocks.....how many times have you called anyone who disagrees with you.....a Neo-con.....too many times to count......

 

[RadiomanATL]

Not outdated, but this is an MB. Different rules apply. When someone makes a dumb generalization, another dumb generalization is sometimes appropriate.

Very true I suppose. Either way, two dumb generalizations and it doesn't bode well for the MB IQ.

All MB IQ's fall somewhere between Forrest Gump (dumb, but unintentionally profound at times) and Eminem (foul mouthed violent retard).

 

[Modbert]

Laugh it up...You proposed that I go there...while NOT willing to do the same?

Spare me DogBoy. You failed. You are now making excuses.

Yes, I did propose you go there. YOU feel that they have been liberated. Therefore YOU should feel that it is safe enough to go there. However, I do not feel that they have been liberated or that it is safe enough to go over there.

So why don't you go over there for a few years since you feel they are liberated.

I haven't failed or making excuses. We have different opinions on this, so why would I want to take the same action that yours should?

Looks like donating to this board couldn't buy you what you needed most of all, common sense.

 

[Si modo]

Not outdated, but this is an MB. Different rules apply. When someone makes a dumb generalization, another dumb generalization is sometimes appropriate.

Very true I suppose. Either way, two dumb generalizations and it doesn't bode well for the MB IQ.

All MB IQ's fall somewhere between Forrest Gump (dumb, but unintentionally profound at times) and Eminem (foul mouthed violent retard).

I doubt that. It's a diverse crowd here, though.

 

[RadiomanATL]

Very true I suppose. Either way, two dumb generalizations and it doesn't bode well for the MB IQ.

All MB IQ's fall somewhere between Forrest Gump (dumb, but unintentionally profound at times) and Eminem (foul mouthed violent retard).

I doubt that. It's a diverse crowd here, though.

I didn't say posters. I meant the MB as a whole.

For every intelligent, good looking and debonair poster such as myself...there's a JenT, a Mal, a Chris and a Bass to water down the sterling qualities of us good people.

 

[The T]

Laugh it up...You proposed that I go there...while NOT willing to do the same?

Spare me DogBoy. You failed. You are now making excuses.

Yes, I did propose you go there. YOU feel that they have been liberated. Therefore YOU should feel that it is safe enough to go there. However, I do not feel that they have been liberated or that it is safe enough to go over there.

So why don't you go over there for a few years since you feel they are liberated.

I haven't failed or making excuses. We have different opinions on this, so why would I want to take the same action that yours should?

Looks like donating to this board couldn't buy you what you needed most of all, common sense.

So in other words? YOU caved to your OWN proposal. Typical Lib Statist...say things challange folks to do something they themselves aren't willing to do.

Yeah...*I* know...I was IN the Military for a DECADE. And you, DOGBOY?

 

[mal]

Laugh it up...You proposed that I go there...while NOT willing to do the same?

Spare me DogBoy. You failed. You are now making excuses.

Yes, I did propose you go there. YOU feel that they have been liberated. Therefore YOU should feel that it is safe enough to go there. However, I do not feel that they have been liberated or that it is safe enough to go over there.

So why don't you go over there for a few years since you feel they are liberated.

I haven't failed or making excuses. We have different opinions on this, so why would I want to take the same action that yours should?

Looks like donating to this board couldn't buy you what you needed most of all, common sense.

So in other words? YOU caved to your OWN proposal. Typical Lib Statist...say things challange folks to do something they themselves aren't willing to do.

Yeah...*I* know...I was IN the Military for a DECADE. And you, DOGBOY?

You're Wasting your Time, T...



peace...