Power the U.S. With Solar Panels!

That is the operating cost after the cost of building the plant is depreciated. The cost of wind and solar are include the building cost and the operating cost, as does the real cost for nuclear starting at $129 and as high as $198. And, since we have no nuclear waste storage yet, that cost, and it will be high, has not been included. The $41 for coal does not include the cost of transportation and storage. Include that and it is a low of $65 and a high of $159. On gas, the $28 is the assumed cost for the gas. Building and operating cost is a low of $44 and a high of $73.

And, of course, the price of coal, gas, and nuclear continue to climb, while the cost of wind and solar continue to decline;

View attachment 539375

That is the operating cost after the cost of building the plant is depreciated.

You're not trying to decommission already built, depreciated nuclear, coal and gas plants?

The cost of wind and solar are include the building cost and the operating cost

You're not trying to build, new wind and solar?

And, of course, the price of coal, gas, and nuclear continue to climb,

Of course? What have the prices of uranium, coal and gas done over the last 10 years? 20 years?
 
That is the operating cost after the cost of building the plant is depreciated.

You're not trying to decommission already built, depreciated nuclear, coal and gas plants?

The cost of wind and solar are include the building cost and the operating cost

You're not trying to build, new wind and solar?

And, of course, the price of coal, gas, and nuclear continue to climb,

Of course? What have the prices of uranium, coal and gas done over the last 10 years? 20 years?
No, I am not. But a lot of utilities are.

 
That is the operating cost after the cost of building the plant is depreciated.

You're not trying to decommission already built, depreciated nuclear, coal and gas plants?

The cost of wind and solar are include the building cost and the operating cost

You're not trying to build, new wind and solar?

And, of course, the price of coal, gas, and nuclear continue to climb,

Of course? What have the prices of uranium, coal and gas done over the last 10 years? 20 years?
No, I am not building the wind and solar, but the utilities are;

1631671096882.png

 
That is the operating cost after the cost of building the plant is depreciated.

You're not trying to decommission already built, depreciated nuclear, coal and gas plants?

The cost of wind and solar are include the building cost and the operating cost

You're not trying to build, new wind and solar?

And, of course, the price of coal, gas, and nuclear continue to climb,

Of course? What have the prices of uranium, coal and gas done over the last 10 years? 20 years?
what has the price of transporting uranium, coal, and gas done over the last two decades? What has the price of transporting wind and sunlight done over the last decade?
 
Have they been rising or falling for the last 20 years? I expect the rise to be less steep as we transition to 100% renewables.

Have they been rising or falling for the last 20 years?

Rising more in Germany than elsewhere. Must be all the cheap green goodness.

I expect the rise to be less steep as we transition to 100%

Like in California?
 
Maybe the reason they are using less power is because they are are getting more energy from solar.

Solar power is magic? You don't need as much solar to surf the web? DURR

But far fewer dryers. That doesn't make much sense. Unless they are really into using clotheslines to dry their clothes.

If your power was tripled in price, you'd probably have to use clotheslines.

It takes far more energy to wash clothes than it does to dry them.
 
Wrong. Not triple. Double is closer to it.

View attachment 539338


Germany, 0.3006 Euro per KWh. About 35.5 cents

US, 13.85 cents.


35.5 / 13.85 = 2.56

Closer to triple.

Different sites say different things. But who has most of the money. Energy companies. So who has the ability to put out more disinformation that is to their advantage. Energy companies. Just go all solar. You can't go wrong.
 
Actually there is a way to do this without all of that. Tesla and South Australia are building it right now.

I don't feel like watching your video. What is this virtual power plant. And wouldn't a real one be better? Also, what powers this virtual power plant. Are you just referring the large battery Mr Musk is building to collect electricity from solar panels?
 
They all say Germany has the highest rates in Europe.

Germany, only having around 80 million people and being far smaller than the U.S. and having far fewer natural resources produces about the same value in exports as the U.S. And they aren't doing it with massive wheat or corn exports. They must be manufacturing things. That requires electricity. So maybe that's why they pay so much for electric.
 

Forum List

Back
Top