Popular Mechanics

[DiveCon]

being naced is fun..you get use to it like booze or drugs and its all good fun...and the bubbles really do sound like bells ..you can come uo just a few feet sometimes and the effects are quicky gone.. its very strange

but the effects of alchohol at depth are magnified
its not wise to dive drunk, or to drink while diving


do i know people that have and didnt get hurt? yes.

still, its not wise to do

 

[eots]

I have this in book form...interesting if your into it..my favorite part is the deep dive tables where it gets to 1000 ft there is a footnote ..warning dives to 10000 ft or more can cause permanent personality changes WTF ??..wonder who the lucky navy diver guinea pig was they discovered that through ...


U.S NAVY DIVE MANUAL

http://www.coralspringsscuba.com/usn/Contents.pdf

 

[kakarothusain]

Popular Mechanics is a service magazine covering a variety of information on home improvement, automotive needs, electronics, computers, telecommunications and i dont thing that it was wrong in any matter.

 

[eots]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3uQI2msoDA[/ame]

 

[C-101]

Lets see these alleged 3,847 youtube.videos

Be careful what you wish for.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8v8ai2-S0Q&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q20NmYGE-T4&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is_qBXqObes&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjaN8NqN8CE&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSQYOq71io8&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8B-AvIt6V4&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtyzsSL3Gaw&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySHgiUxnLC0&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVbw4tbq7jM&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j_c1tPMiG0&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwFGLIsIBuM&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9Mhhvl7vWk&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1g3OAOiOP0&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTNRkb7AaQk&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tacYjsS-g6k&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLShZOvxVe4&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tp8T2s96pg&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7iX_jHg_Uo&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kSq663m0G8&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBHi9CbrNf4&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhHzMttUKO0&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFW_T2QfjgY&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh8hErn2UZU&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTXFnAIP6A0&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XebFE_7N-Dk&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMZ-nkYr46w&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IergOYj63oE&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jir7yWTroN8&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDXNDZDATLg&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jb-OFhxvEo8&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjcAoc3ZPwY&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsUYhrXonXQ&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=989BqQ0WF2A&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ikRc4ER2xY&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xjBbqRJT7Q&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhC3ElWQkEc&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1wQ2BJsgx0&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWpC_1WP8do&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z96MZOZyilo&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zs5jWvu4tR8&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKcPA4heOOQ&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YXzjAKJQOg&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJpsxQ3UI30&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MRSr1MnFuk&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRCTkSJOViY&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3uq9zFT6xA&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6fe9YlHQwA&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAd_9zeldkI&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hBDXB6cifo&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lhwCM_dicc&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkivdEGph9A&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgjWU6jXrdc&feature=channel_page[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43F54hR0NW8&feature=channel_page[/ame]

Let me know when you have disproved all these videos.

There's only about fifty of them, so it shouldn't take you that long.

The remaining 3800 or so videos will come once you get through these first 50 or so.

 

[eots]

ya there s a lot of disinformation that that calls itself debunking ... that offers explanations that are ludicrous and very often not in compliance with the official story or NIST or 9/11 commission and omits other key information....it is the facts and information contained in the videos that is the issue ..not the volume of so called debunking nonsense you can find...pick 3 and and compare information and facts ...because they are all simply ridiculous and debunk nothing

 

[DiveCon]

ya there s a lot of disinformation that that calls itself debunking ... that offers explanations that are ludicrous and very often not in compliance with the official story or NIST or 9/11 commission and omits other key information....it is the facts and information contained in the videos that is the issue ..not the volume of so called debunking nonsense you can find...pick 3 and and compare information and facts ...because they are all simply ridiculous and debunk nothing

did you actually watch any of them?

 

[C-101]

ya there s a lot of disinformation that that calls itself debunking ... that offers explanations that are ludicrous and very often not in compliance with the official story or NIST or 9/11 commission and omits other key information....it is the facts and information contained in the videos that is the issue ..not the volume of so called debunking nonsense you can find...pick 3 and and compare information and facts ...because they are all simply ridiculous and debunk nothing

That was my point in posting all those videos. They are all different and they all point out various facts which "truthers" love to ignore.

Remember, it is the "truthers" that are making all allegations in this argument and it is up to them to address flaws in their argument no matter what their opinion is of the source.

Simply labeling 50 videos as "disinformation" was something I expected from at least one of you guys and further demonstrates that your side is not interested in the truth because:

A) The space of time between my post and your post is around 30 minutes which isn't even enough time to view the majority of the videos let alone every video.

B) That time may be even shorter depending upon when you noticed my post.

C) You could have not effectively analyzed and debunked every video I posted in less than a half hour.

D) Your failure to even mention one video that is wrong and proving why is disinformation in of itself.

 

[DiveCon]

ya there s a lot of disinformation that that calls itself debunking ... that offers explanations that are ludicrous and very often not in compliance with the official story or NIST or 9/11 commission and omits other key information....it is the facts and information contained in the videos that is the issue ..not the volume of so called debunking nonsense you can find...pick 3 and and compare information and facts ...because they are all simply ridiculous and debunk nothing

That was my point in posting all those videos. They are all different and they all point out various facts which "truthers" love to ignore.

Remember, it is the "truthers" that are making all allegations in this argument and it is up to them to address flaws in their argument no matter what their opinion is of the source.

Simply labeling 50 videos as "disinformation" was something I expected from at least one of you guys and further demonstrates that your side is not interested in the truth because:

A) The space of time between my post and your post is around 30 minutes which isn't even enough time to view the majority of the videos let alone every video.

B) That time may be even shorter depending upon when you noticed my post.

C) You could have not effectively analyzed and debunked every video I posted in less than a half hour.

D) Your failure to even mention one video that is wrong and proving why is disinformation in of itself.

i loved how it exposed the troofer LIES about what Minetta said

 

[eots]

ya there s a lot of disinformation that that calls itself debunking ... that offers explanations that are ludicrous and very often not in compliance with the official story or NIST or 9/11 commission and omits other key information....it is the facts and information contained in the videos that is the issue ..not the volume of so called debunking nonsense you can find...pick 3 and and compare information and facts ...because they are all simply ridiculous and debunk nothing

That was my point in posting all those videos. They are all different and they all point out various facts which "truthers" love to ignore

.

no one is ignoring anything but you pick 3 for me to destroy or shut up

Remember, it is the "truthers" that are making all allegations in this argument and it is up to them to address flaws in their argument no matter what their opinion is of the source

well actually its the 9/11 commission that needs to address all of its flaw and omissions
most of which you are no doubt unaware of because you did not form your opinions on thorough a investigation of the facts..and simply make lame attempts to debunk

Simply labeling 50 videos as "disinformation" was something I expected from at least one of you guys and further demonstrates that your side is not interested in the truth because:

A) The space of time between my post and your post is around 30 minutes which isn't even enough time to view the majority of the videos let alone every video.

B) That time may be even shorter depending upon when you noticed my post.

C) You could have not effectively analyzed and debunked every video I posted in less than a half hour.

D) Your failure to even mention one video that is wrong and proving why is disinformation in of itself

pick 3 to start coward

 

[DiveCon]

ya there s a lot of disinformation that that calls itself debunking ... that offers explanations that are ludicrous and very often not in compliance with the official story or NIST or 9/11 commission and omits other key information....it is the facts and information contained in the videos that is the issue ..not the volume of so called debunking nonsense you can find...pick 3 and and compare information and facts ...because they are all simply ridiculous and debunk nothing

.

no one is ignoring anything but you pick 3 for me to destroy or shut up








well actually its the 9/11 commission that needs to address all of its flaw and omissions
most of which you are no doubt unaware of because you did not form your opinions on thorough a investigation of the facts..and simply make lame attempts to debunk

Simply labeling 50 videos as "disinformation" was something I expected from at least one of you guys and further demonstrates that your side is not interested in the truth because:

A) The space of time between my post and your post is around 30 minutes which isn't even enough time to view the majority of the videos let alone every video.

B) That time may be even shorter depending upon when you noticed my post.

C) You could have not effectively analyzed and debunked every video I posted in less than a half hour.

D) Your failure to even mention one video that is wrong and proving why is disinformation in of itself

pick 3 to start coward

i'll pick one
lets see you "destroy" this one you fucking LIAR

[youtube]DwFGLIsIBuM[/youtube]
you have posted other videos that twisted the FUCK out of what he actually said
now try and destroy that one asshole

 

[eots]

Aaron Dykes / JonesReport | June 26, 2007
Former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta answered questions from members of 9/11 Truth Seattle.org about his testimony before the 9/11 Commission report.

Mineta says Vice President Cheney was "absolutely" already there when he arrived at approximately 9:25 a.m. in the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) bunker on the morning of 9/11. Mineta seemed shocked to learn that the 9/11 Commission Report claimed Cheney had not arrived there until 9:58-- after the Pentagon had been hit, a report that Mineta definitively contradicted.



Norman Mineta revealed that Lynn Cheney was also in the PEOC bunker already at the time of his arrival, along with a number of other staff.

well there are some problems with the 9/11 commission report timeline and omitted testomony and the fact Cheney and bush would not testify under oath or address the question of these discrepancies.. if this timeline is correct it could only of been a stand down order


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-5PKQTUz5o[/ame]



http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/260607_mineta.html

 

[eots]

this video is a hoax is such photo imaging was available that should a cut out of a airliner-like this the government would of released and it would be case closed its laughable

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8v8ai2-S0Q[/ame]


and these inteligent and informed experts would not be saying this









Major General Albert Stubblebine

Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 - 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.

Member, Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.
Video 7/11/06: "One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?" http://www.und


Editor's note: For more information on the impact at the Pentagon, see Colonel Nelson, Commander Muga, Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski, Lt. Col. Latas, Major Rokke, Capt. Wittenberg, Capt. Davis, Barbara Honegger, April Gallop, Colonel Bunel, and Steve DeChiaro.




[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOtnvXMsWOo[/ame]




Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency. 20-year Air Force career. Member adjunct faculty, Political Science Department, James Madison University. Instructor, University of Maryland University College and American Public University System. Author of African Crisis Response Initiative: Past Present and Future (2000) and Expeditionary Air Operations in Africa: Challenges and Solutions (2001).


Contributor to 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out 8/23/06: Account of Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, Pentagon employee and eyewitness to the events at the Pentagon on 9/11. "I believe the Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research. ...

It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics. ...

There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile". ...

I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.

The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.

The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon. ...

More information is certainly needed regarding the events of 9/11 and the events leading up to that terrible day."

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

 

[eots]

lets see that debunkig molten steel NIST story holds up under questioning



[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9qEIlNVl5s[/ame]

 

[eots]

PULL IT

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mvDcgf3x3I[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

Aaron Dykes / JonesReport | June 26, 2007
Former Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta answered questions from members of 9/11 Truth Seattle.org about his testimony before the 9/11 Commission report.

Mineta says Vice President Cheney was "absolutely" already there when he arrived at approximately 9:25 a.m. in the PEOC (Presidential Emergency Operations Center) bunker on the morning of 9/11. Mineta seemed shocked to learn that the 9/11 Commission Report claimed Cheney had not arrived there until 9:58-- after the Pentagon had been hit, a report that Mineta definitively contradicted.



Norman Mineta revealed that Lynn Cheney was also in the PEOC bunker already at the time of his arrival, along with a number of other staff.

well there are some problems with the 9/11 commission report timeline and omitted testomony and the fact Cheney and bush would not testify under oath or address the question of these discrepancies.. if this timeline is correct it could only of been a stand down order


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-5PKQTUz5o



Norman Mineta Confirms His Testimony with Members of 911TruthSeattle.org

more lies from a troofer site
another FAIL by eots

 

[DiveCon]

PULL IT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mvDcgf3x3I

ROFLMAO
you just keep up with the lies

 

[eots]

thats your big debunk..just write..lies...ya big rebuttle loser

 

[DiveCon]

thats your big debunk..just write..lies...ya big rebuttle loser

what you posted didnt debunk anything
except in your weak mind

 

[eots]

Not much for details are you diveconman