Polling in Israel looks tight - statistical tie

Statistikhengst

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 2013
45,564
11,756
2,070
deep within the statistical brain!!
What does it mean?

Opinion polling for the Israeli legislative election 2015 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

All 13 polls from 03/10 to 03/13 indicate that Netanyahu's Likud is losing ground, but a 2-3 seat difference can still very much be a statistical tie. The Zionist Camp / Labor Party has a tenuous lead, but this can again change overnight.

That being said, the trend is very much toward the opposition to Netanyahu. If these numbers hold, then Herzog will get first crack at trying to form a coalition government. If he fails, then Bibi could also try a three-way coalition. This possiblity does exist.

Please look at the polls and notice how MANY parties are being represented. There are 15 parties that, according to polls, are going to get some seats in the Knesset. 2 parties formed after the 2013 elections.

The average of those 13 polls that came in over three days time is 21.2 seats in the Knesset for Bibi's Likud and 24.6 for Labor/Hatnuah, a +3.5 aggregate average out of 120 total Knesset seats, or 17.5% for Likud and 20.5% for Labor/Hanuah. That's not enough for either, but whoever ends up with the higher raw total of seats will get first crack at building a viable coalition. And a +3 margin is right or under the edge of most MoEs, so this could be closer than people realize. Wait and see.

You can see a noticeable shift in the polling that was released from 03/4 to 03/8 vis-a-vis polling released from 03/10 to 03/13. In the 7 polls from 03/4 to 03/8, Likud lead in one poll and was tied with the opposition in 4 polls. But this last week, it trailed consistently in all 13 polls. And of the seven polls from yesterday, Likud is behind by 4 seats in 4 polls and by 5 seats in one poll. That's not good news for Netanyahu, whose party easily won with a wide lead in 2013.

Now, one poll can be wrong. But 13 polls all showing one side with a lead usually means that that side really DOES have the lead. It's the margin that is still so slim that, imo, makes this contest still a tossup. No one should be betting on any horses yet. Memories of Dewey-Truman 1948 remind us that on election day, many things can happen.

That's not propaganda for Bibi, because I am certainly not a huge fan of his: it's just electoral fact.

One thing for Americans: look at that list of 15 parties. The reason why Israel has so many splitter parties is because it DOES NOT have an electoral college.

BTW, yesterday was the last day, according to Israeli election law, that an an election poll for the 2015 parliamentary cycle can be released. So, there will be no more polls.

Hope this information helps.
 
Last edited:
Yepp......I heard Net-Yahoo wasn't doing so good. I guess that little GOP charade of coming to the US, didn't quite work out as planned....:)
 
Perhaps the most interesting thing about this election is that it is a self inflicted wound by Bibi. He didn't have to call an election until 2018 but he was so self confident that he would be triumphant that he did it anyway. Then he went and shot himself in the foot by coming to Congress and setting up a rift between himself and the Whitehouse. On top of that he decides to dictate foreign policy to the United States which is earning him serious criticism from other nations.

Those are three major political blunders on his part which makes his judgment suspect IMO.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
Perhaps the most interesting thing about this election is that it is a self inflicted wound by Bibi. He didn't have to call an election until 2018 but he was so self confident that he would be triumphant that he did it anyway. Then he went and shot himself in the foot by coming to Congress and setting up a rift between himself and the Whitehouse. On top of that he decides to dictate foreign policy to the United States which is earning him serious criticism from other nations.

Those are three major political blunders on his part which makes his judgment suspect IMO.
Gerhard Schröder (SPD) made a similar mistake in Germany in 2005: he called for a no-confidence vote in order to bump up the parliamentary elections one year from 2006 to 2005 and then lost to Angela Merkel (CDU).

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 
Most don't understand how the election is Israel works.
Netanyahu's party has not had the majority of seat before. Kadima had the most seats but that does not determine the PM.
Netanyahu was the one to intentionally bring about the early election.
It is not about controlling the Knesset but forming a coalition.

Sadly far too many don't even understand the election system in the US either.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Most don't understand how the election is Israel works.
Netanyahu's party has not had the majority of seat before. Kadima had the most seats but that does not determine the PM.
Netanyahu was the one to intentionally bring about the early election.
It is not about controlling the Knesset but forming a coalition.

Sadly far too many don't even understand the election system in the US either.
As I clearly stated in the OP, no party of the 15 will be even close to a majority, but the major party with a plurality will get first crack at trying to form a coalition. Did you not read the OP?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
 

Forum List

Back
Top