POLL: The "caravan" and the elections

[Theowl32]

The Dems are hoping for conflict between the US law enforcement and the caravan. The media wants to show video of people in the caravan being abused by US authorities. Just as they stated US forces acted in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan back in Vietnam.

And BINGO was his name-o

 

[easyt65]

The timing of this caravan thing sure is interesting. Ain't it?

So which party has the political advantage on this issue, particularly regarding the upcoming elections, and why?

My guess is this helps the GOP. Many voters won't say it out loud, but they don't like this.
.

There is no doubt it benefits the Republicans:

Who is the party of Open Borders?
Democrats

Who is the Party that opposes building the wall and securing our borders?
Democrats

Who is the Party of Federal Law-Violating Sanctuary Cities?
Democrats

Who is the Party always highlighted for registering Illegals to vote?
Democrats

Who is against stricter laws to prevent illegals from voting?
Democrats

Who is the Party that violates Constitution & Law for Illegals?
Democrats

Who is the Party that has protected / facilitated MS13 entering the US?
Democrats

Who is the Party that has protected violent illegals?
Democrats

Who is the Party that has protected Human Traffickers?
Democrats

Who is the Party that has armed / aided Mexican Drug Cartels?
Democrats

Who is the Party who MOCKED US citizens over their opposition of unidentified illegals being allowed to flow into the US un-checked, declaring these citizens were just 'afraid of widows and orphans'...only to have illegals / terrorists who were allowed in murder American citizens?
Democrats

The Democrats are deathly SILENT right now about the 7,000+-illegal Invasion coming right now because they KNOW it is bad for them....

The Democrats remain SILENT on this event because they KNOW the American people completely OPPOSE everything they stand for on this issue but they do not give a damn what the American people want.

 

[justoffal]

It helps tRump fire up his xenophobic followers.

Regardless of your pinons about Trump's supporters it does indeed do that....it also forces the hands of many fence sitters and numerous left leaning centrists....sweeping them effectively to the right. So if it was organized by the usual suspects....Obama et al most likely....it's backfiring badly.

JO

 

[WaitingFor2020]

The timing of this caravan thing sure is interesting. Ain't it?

So which party has the political advantage on this issue, particularly regarding the upcoming elections, and why?

My guess is this helps the GOP. Many voters won't say it out loud, but they don't like this.
.

Funny that Trump has come out swinging blaming the Democrats but he's the one that has cartel and organized crime connections via his condo and hotels in Panama:

A Panama tower carries Trump's name and ties to organized crime
https://www.nbcnews.com/.../panama-tower-carries-trump-s-name-ties-organized-crim...
Nov 17, 2017 - The Trump Organization licensed its name to a luxury condo tower in Panama ... like a sail and designed to be one of the tallest buildings in Latin America — a ... A Panama tower that has Trump's name is tied toorganized crime .... and their connections to government officials, saidPanama offered Donald ...
You visited this page on 10/22/18.

Trump-Branded Skyscraper in Panama Has Ties to Organized Crime ...
https://www.nbcchicago.com/.../Trump-Skyscraper-in-Panama-Has-Ties-to-Organized...
Nov 17, 2017 - The sail-shaped Trump Ocean Club International Hotel and Tower in ... Skyscraper in Panama Has Ties to Organized Crime ... Four Miami Men in Costa Rica for Bachelor Party Killed in Rafting Accident ...Connect With Us.
Missing: central ‎america
Trump's Panama tower used for money laundering by condo owners ...
https://www.theguardian.com/.../trump-ocean-club-panama-money-laundering-reports
Nov 18, 2017 - As one of the tallest structures in Latin America, it was a bold and lucrative ... with Trump's name had ties to international organised crime. ... played down Ventura's connections with the Trumps, telling Reuters they did not ...


Maybe Donald, being a transactional kind of beast, cut a deal with the cartels to stir the shit to get the caravan rolling. After all, it did NOT start in Mexico. It started in Honduras.
.
.
.

 

[easyt65]

It helps tRump fire up his xenophobic followers.

WHY is it so hard for you imbeciles to understand that 7,000+ unidentified criminals - who have already violated other nations' laws en-route - marching on the US southern border with the full intent to criminally force their way into the United States, in violation of existing US law, has nothing to do with race, bias, or bigotry and everything to do with enforcing existing LAW?

United States Constitution, Article 4, Section 4
"The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion;"
- Article IV

Please point out the racism, bias, or bigotry you want to claim exists in Article 4, Section 4 of the united States Constitution.




A force of 7,000+ unidentified proven criminals continue to march on the southern border of the United States, to illegally force their way into the United States, and then demand physical and monetary compensation for their crimes of being in the United States illegally.

Were there individuals carrying a Russia, Chinese, or ISIS flag at the front of the invading force marching towards the US border no one would hesitate to call this a THREAT from an INVADING force. The fact that they do not carry a flag and do not have obvious weapons makes them no less of an INVASION FORCE.

According to the US Constitution the Federal Government of the United States - to include the President and all elected federal representatives in the House and Senate - have a responsibility to protect the United states and its citizens from this invasion.

Any member of that government who does not believe in the US constitution and Rule of Law, who believes they should not be followed / enforced should not be members of this government.

A refusal to carry out that duty of protecting the US and its citizens is an ACT of siding with the criminals, of betraying one's duties and should be subject to Censure and / or expulsion from government.

Remaining silent on this issue as the invasion force draws closer is NOT a 'refusal to act' but is an ACT in itself. CHOOSING to stay silent is tantamount to siding with the invading force.

The Democrats sided with the illegals long before now, but they are being especially quite right now because they know this is a HUGE LOSER for them...right before the mid terms.

 

[BookShaka]

The timing of this caravan thing sure is interesting. Ain't it?

So which party has the political advantage on this issue, particularly regarding the upcoming elections, and why?

My guess is this helps the GOP. Many voters won't say it out loud, but they don't like this.
.

If Trump’s reaction had been different I’d say it goes in the Republicans’ favor, but many see Trump as the face of the Republican Party and his reaction has been less than ideal. He just absolutely sucks at communicating things in a respectful manner. The unfounded claims he’s made make him and his base look bad, but many of these migrants crossed illegally into Mexico and there’s more than enough to not like about the caravan so I think there are reasons it makes both parties look bad.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Would we stop a mob that tried to climb over the wall of a rich gated community in San Francisco?

Why not? They just want to stay in your homes and eat your food and watch your TVs?

Why do walls seem to work for rich liberals?

Zuckerberg bought up all the houses around him so he could have a large compound with a barrier.

Can a bunch of people trespass on his property and use his stuff?

Would he be racist and turn them away?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Left wing lunatics.

Start a blog or something that gives your addresses for these poor asylum seekers to have sanctuary in your homes.

If you are not, you are racist.

 

[easyt65]

If Trump’s reaction had been different I’d say it goes in the Republicans’ favor, but many see Trump as the face of the Republican Party and his reaction has been less than ideal. He just absolutely sucks at communicating things in a respectful manner. The unfounded claims he’s made make him and his base look bad, but many of these migrants crossed illegally into Mexico and there’s more than enough to not like about the caravan so I think there are reasons it makes both parties look bad.

The President's reaction?

You mean his commitment to use military troops to comply with Article 4 Section 4 of the United States Constitution?

They aren't 'MIGRANTS' - they are ILLEGALS, CRMINALS. They have already violated the laws of several countries, and they have every intention of violating ours. They are a 7,000+-illegal INVASION FORCE.

Lack of Communication Skills?

I think Trump did an outstanding job painting the picture of what we are facing.

7,000+ illegals / criminals are marching on the US southern border.

We have no idea who they are.

We have no idea what their background is.

They are not 'REFUGEES'
- REFUGEE: A status is a form of protection that may be granted to people who meet the definition of refugee and who are of special humanitarian concern. 'Poverty' is not a condition that makes one a refugee. 'Violence' is not even a qualifying condition to be labeled a 'Refugee'. A 'Refugee' is someone of foreign residence who has no intention of leaving that residence but who is forced out. There is a massive list of requirements / qualifications to be listed as a 'Refugee'. None of these people qualify / have applied.
- Act 101(a)15P | USCIS

They are not 'ASYLUM SEEKERS'
- Asylum status is a form of protection available to people who Meet the definition of refugee (FAIL), are already in the United States (FAIL), & are seeking admission at a port of entry (FAIL)
** The UN provided them with an opportunity to register for Asylum, but the illegals completely blew off the UN because they only want to crash our borders illegally - INVADE, believing once here the United States does not have the will / courage to do anything to them except to give them what they want.

WE do not have any idea if they belong to any terrorist groups.
- But you can bet we have people on the ground collecting intel

These countries do not vaccinate their children people until an epidemic breaks out, so THEY ARE CARRYING DISEASES

The UN, again, gave them the opportunity to seek Asylum. Part of this process involves the UN doing a background check on them and providing them with full medical treatment, to include being vaccinated. AGAIN, THE ILLEGALS BLEW OFF THE UN AND CONTINUED THEIR MARCH NORTH, INTENT ON INVADING THE UNITED STATES.


IF THE UNITED STATES DOES NOT STOP THIS INVASION RIGHT NOW THERE WILL BE ANOTHER 7,000+ IN A FEW MONTHS, ANPOTHER 7,000+ PER MONTH, 7,000+ PER WEEK.....THERE WILL BE NO STOPPING IT.

Our economy can not support that.

Our economy will collapse.

We will BECOME Honduras and the nations they came from.

Our nation will collapse.

All because the Democrats / our elected Govt officials refused to enforce / uphold the United States Constitution and our Existing Laws / Rule of law.

 

[gipper]

The timing of this caravan thing sure is interesting. Ain't it?

So which party has the political advantage on this issue, particularly regarding the upcoming elections, and why?

My guess is this helps the GOP. Many voters won't say it out loud, but they don't like this.
.

The timing is interesting. It seems someone or something is pulling the strings. We go from one big story to the next, like clockwork.

 

[easyt65]

Damn...the Republicans have been 'busted'. In order to save their hold on Congress they went down to Honduras and organized this whole invasion at just the right time to hurt the Democrats / to stop the 'Blue Wave'.

 

[BookShaka]

If Trump’s reaction had been different I’d say it goes in the Republicans’ favor, but many see Trump as the face of the Republican Party and his reaction has been less than ideal. He just absolutely sucks at communicating things in a respectful manner. The unfounded claims he’s made make him and his base look bad, but many of these migrants crossed illegally into Mexico and there’s more than enough to not like about the caravan so I think there are reasons it makes both parties look bad.

The President's reaction?

You mean his commitment to use military troops to comply with Article 4 Section 4 of the United States Constitution?

They aren't 'MIGRANTS' - they are ILLEGALS, CRMINALS. They have already violated the laws of several countries, and they have every intention of violating ours. They are a 7,000+-illegal INVASION FORCE.

Lack of Communication Skills?

I think Trump did an outstanding job painting the picture of what we are facing.

7,000+ illegals / criminals are marching on the US southern border.

We have no idea who they are.

We have no idea what their background is.

They are not 'REFUGEES'
- REFUGEE: A status is a form of protection that may be granted to people who meet the definition of refugee and who are of special humanitarian concern. 'Poverty' is not a condition that makes one a refugee. 'Violence' is not even a qualifying condition to be labeled a 'Refugee'. A 'Refugee' is someone of foreign residence who has no intention of leaving that residence but who is forced out. There is a massive list of requirements / qualifications to be listed as a 'Refugee'. None of these people qualify / have applied.
- Act 101(a)15P | USCIS

They are not 'ASYLUM SEEKERS'
- Asylum status is a form of protection available to people who Meet the definition of refugee (FAIL), are already in the United States (FAIL), & are seeking admission at a port of entry (FAIL)
** The UN provided them with an opportunity to register for Asylum, but the illegals completely blew off the UN because they only want to crash our borders illegally - INVADE, believing once here the United States does not have the will / courage to do anything to them except to give them what they want.

WE do not have any idea if they belong to any terrorist groups.
- But you can bet we have people on the ground collecting intel

These countries do not vaccinate their children people until an epidemic breaks out, so THEY ARE CARRYING DISEASES

The UN, again, gave them the opportunity to seek Asylum. Part of this process involves the UN doing a background check on them and providing them with full medical treatment, to include being vaccinated. AGAIN, THE ILLEGALS BLEW OFF THE UN AND CONTINUED THEIR MARCH NORTH, INTENT ON INVADING THE UNITED STATES.


IF THE UNITED STATES DOES NOT STOP THIS INVASION RIGHT NOW THERE WILL BE ANOTHER 7,000+ IN A FEW MONTHS, ANPOTHER 7,000+ PER MONTH, 7,000+ PER WEEK.....THERE WILL BE NO STOPPING IT.

Our economy can not support that.

Our economy will collapse.

We will BECOME Honduras and the nations they came from.

Our nation will collapse.

All because the Democrats / our elected Govt officials refused to enforce / uphold the United States Constitution and our Existing Laws / Rule of law.

He didn’t need to call them terrorists. Of course it’s possible there are some terrorists in the group but claiming things he doesn’t are even true is foolish and just fuels the media’s anti-Trump narrative that he’s “racist, xenophobic, bigoted, blah blah blah.”