Poll - should we just pack up and leave and let Israel fight its own wars?

[Hafar1014]

and we can trust you on that because you are a big treasonous Zionist Fascist Liar who insists a 757 can fly at 530mph with nose 8 feet above ground...

You support Irans plan to explode a nuke in ash DC. That defines you as a traitor.

 

[EMH]

You support Irans plan to explode a nuke in ash DC

This is Dick Cheney's reason to invade Iraq, "if we don't we'll have a mushroom cloud in one of our cities."

That was all BS. The US invasion of Iraq was a 100% pure sellout of our troops to serve ISRAEL. We, the American people, are sick and tired of that, and the poll in this topic should tell you that...

 

[Hafar1014]

This is Dick Cheney's reason to invade Iraq, "if we don't we'll have a mushroom cloud in one of our cities."

That was all BS. The US invasion of Iraq was a 100% pure sellout of our troops to serve ISRAEL. We, the American people, are sick and tired of that, and the poll in this topic should tell you that...

The Iranians do have the means and intent and youre their supporter

 

[EMH]

The Iranians do have the means and intent and youre their supporter

Same noises.


If you don't want to sell out our troops to serve Israel in Iraq, you love Saddam.

That's what Fox News was saying.


Nuke is 80 year old tech. WE have yet to detect in Iran

1. a single nuke test
2. a radiation spike


because the Russians run their nuke power plants and they know what they are doing.

 

[Deadstick]

Same noises.


If you don't want to sell out our troops to serve Israel in Iraq, you love Saddam.

That's what Fox News was saying.


Nuke is 80 year old tech. WE have yet to detect in Iran

1. a single nuke test
2. a radiation spike


because the Russians run their nuke power plants and they know what they are doing.

They believe all the lies and bullshit because they want to no matter what the facts are.

 

[Hafar1014]

Same noises.


If you don't want to sell out our troops to serve Israel in Iraq, you love Saddam.

That's what Fox News was saying.


Nuke is 80 year old tech. WE have yet to detect in Iran

1. a single nuke test
2. a radiation spike


because the Russians run their nuke power plants and they know what they are doing.

Hey lest wait for them to build one. Sure that makes sense

 

[EMH]

Hey lest wait for them to build one. Sure that makes sense

Joe Kent says all 18 US intel agencies had zero evidence they were building a nuke. Nobody has refuted that.

Are you going to apologize to the American people for all the lies you parroted about Iraq?

 

[Deadstick]

Hey lest wait for them to build one. Sure that makes sense

So you wage a brutal attack on a Country for something they may do in the future even though there is zero evidence they will, that doesn't make sense at all, it means anarchy with many Countries being attacked on that nonsense, like me attacking my neighbour in case he attacks me a year down the line.

 

[Hafar1014]

So you wage a brutal attack on a Country for something they may do in the future even though there is zero evidence they will, that doesn't make sense at all, it means anarchy with many Countries being attacked on that nonsense, like me attacking my neighbour in case he attacks me a year down the line.

Something that are working on to do with most of their energy that has already attacked 3 American embassies a marine barracks and killed over 1000 Americans. Thats not enough for you. You cant be that dumb

 

[August West]

It shows how dumb they are, now i think Trump is in a panic and doesn't know what to do, he likes winning and if he starts to look like a loser he could do something even more stupid than he has already.

To paraphrase Gomer Bush, "don`t misunderestimate him".

 

[Deadstick]

Something that are working on to do with most of their energy that has already attacked 3 American embassies a marine barracks and killed over 1000 Americans. Thats not enough for you. You cant be that dumb

There was no Iranian attack on a marine barracks, what makes you think if you attack a Country they won't fight back and resist, you peope just don't get that for some reason, those Israeli gangsters have the same attitude, if your country was attacked would you resist?

 

[Hafar1014]

There was no Iranian attack on a marine barracks, what makes you think if you attack a Country they won't fight back and resist, you peope just don't get that for some reason, those Israeli gangsters have the same attitude, if your country was attacked would you resist?

Denial isnt a valid point
Iran and its proxy militias have targeted American embassies and diplomatic facilities, primarily in Iraq and the Middle East, with rockets, drones, and organized protests. Recent reports from March 2026 indicate repeated, heightened attacks against US diplomatic compounds and military bases in the region, including incidents at the Baghdad embassy and a drone attack in Riyadh.
If you are referring to the most famous attack on a Marine barracks, that occurred on October 23, 1983, in Beirut, Lebanon. A suicide truck bomb killed 241 American service members (including 220 Marines). While a U.S. court later found Iran responsible for providing material support to the attackers, the 1983 event is distinct from the active military engagements currently taking place in 2026.




Key Instances of Attacks on U.S. Diplomatic Facilities:

• Baghdad Embassy (2019-2026): The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad has been repeatedly targeted by rockets and drones fired by Iran-backed groups. In December 2019, protesters associated with these militias broke into the compound and set fires. As of March 2026, missiles have struck the helipad inside the compound.
• Riyadh Embassy and Dubai Consulate (March 2026): Iranian drones hit the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, causing a fire, according to a PBS report. Simultaneously, an Iranian drone damaged the U.S. consulate grounds in Dubai, reported on YouTube.
• Beirut Embassy (1983-1984): The U.S. Embassy & Consulates in China notes that Iran-backed groups carried out suicide bombings at the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, killing 17 Americans in 1983, and another attack on the annex in 1984.
• Tehran Hostage Crisis (1979): Iranian students, supported by the regime, stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, holding 66 Americans hostage for 444 days.
  
  
  U.S. Embassy & Consulates in China +5

 

[Concerned American]

So you wage a brutal attack on a Country for something they may do in the future even though there is zero evidence they will, that doesn't make sense at all, it means anarchy wIith many Countries being attacked on that nonsense, like me attacking my neighbour in case he attacks me a year down the line.

If someone threatens to kill you for 47 years and makes numerous marginally successful attempts, are you going to sit on your hands when you discover they have obtained the means to be successful? You're not the sharpest tool in the shed.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Israel has never sent any military to fight because it would incite the entire Muslim world to war against us. They do provide intelligence and logistic aid.

That's it! You need to stop posting while under the influence. Are you Tiger Woods?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Iran is a threat to the entire world, not just Israel. Even the Gulf states think that.

He just hates Jews. That is all he ever does.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

That's it! You need to stop posting while under the influence. Are you Tiger Woods?

Perhaps this will explain the reasons to you. I do hope you have worked on your compression

Why hasn't Israel fought alongside America in any of its wars in the Middle East?

It is often claimed that Israel is America's "greatest ally" in the Middle East. In fact, the relationship between Israel and America is perhaps the closest relationship between two count...

politics.stackexchange.com

Try this.
The US’ choice to adopt a policy of restraint toward a possible Israeli involvement is a safe and cautious strategy. A change in such stance would not only cause the derailment of the US-led coalition but it would also increase the level of hostility in the region with the consequent risk of a degeneration of the already strained Israeli-Arab relations into a wider, large-scale conflict.

I know for a fact that you will just lose the train of thought.

A discussion of why


I know I am wasting my time. But, perhaps others are entertained by your antics.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Perhaps this will explain the reasons to you. I do hope you have worked on your compression

Why hasn't Israel fought alongside America in any of its wars in the Middle East?

It is often claimed that Israel is America's "greatest ally" in the Middle East. In fact, the relationship between Israel and America is perhaps the closest relationship between two count...

politics.stackexchange.com

Try this.
The US’ choice to adopt a policy of restraint toward a possible Israeli involvement is a safe and cautious strategy. A change in such stance would not only cause the derailment of the US-led coalition but it would also increase the level of hostility in the region with the consequent risk of a degeneration of the already strained Israeli-Arab relations into a wider, large-scale conflict.

I know for a fact that you will just lose the train of thought.

A discussion of why


I know I am wasting my time. But, perhaps others are entertained by your antics.

You said:
"Israel has never sent any military to fight because it would incite the entire Muslim world to war against us. They do provide intelligence and logistic aid."

That statement by itself is not true. You didn't explain what the **** you meant in that incredibly false statement. Where did you say anything about the US or even Iraq. Which war in Iraq are you even taking about? I fought in one and my daughter fought alongside the Iraqis against ISIS.

You lost your train of thought while typing out that post.

Perhaps reading AND writing lessons are in order.

 

[Billiejeens]

and we can trust you on that because you are a big treasonous Zionist Fascist Liar who insists a 757 can fly at 530mph with nose 8 feet above ground...

You are the most phixated on one thing phuck in the history of history.

 

[Leo123]

We do have that option, just leave, no ground troops, no forever war, let Israel fight the wars Israel wants....

Iran was only weeks away from full enrichment and was building intercontinental missiles. We could not afford to ignore that especially since their mantra was 'death to America' and all the terror they have inflicted on US ever since 1974. It was way past time to stop passing the buck.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You said:
"Israel has never sent any military to fight"

That statement by itself is not true. You didn't explain what the **** you meant in that incredibly false statement. You didn't say anything like what you just posted. You lost your train of thought while typing out that post.

Perhaps reading AND writing lessons are in order.

I am profoundly sorry that your ability to read the written word is so sadly absent. Perhaps a tutor.