Poll: Should the Govt provide every American with free guns?

[Rye Catcher]

"The second amendment is my license. Stupid commie."


is it?

who are you that you don't need to show any ID when buying a a gun....

how do I know you really ARE an American citizen with 2nd amendment rights?

you could be an islamic terrorist trying to buy weapons so you can kill REAL Americans...

sorry...

before i will concede you your 2nd amendment rights we are going to have to do a background check to PROVE you REALLY ARE an American.

An American, not a liberal commie scumbag like you.

You'll need a background check to prove

1. you are not a violent criminal
2. you are not a terrorist
3. you are a REAL American

Oh, then you're cool with Voter ID, so people have to prove they're real Americans?

It's not likely someone who casts a vote illegally kills another with that vote.

It's not likely anyone owning a gun legally kills another with that gun.

I know this is hard for you to accept -- your programming has been very successful -- but 99.99+% of legal gun owners didn't murder anyone yesterday.

All your unoriginal ideas for "gun control" do nothing about criminals. You don't actually care about criminals killing people.

No, you want law-abiding people disarmed so they can't resist leftist tyranny.

But your programming won't let you see that.

Oh bullshit. Why not just post, "shall not infringe" and join the rest of the sheep?

Not everyone driving a car kills pedestrians who have the right away in a crosswalk. Do you believe Involuntary Manslaughter ought to be struck from the Vehicle or Penal Codes since it only applies to someone who is negligent and kills someone?

Since all of us who drive must have a license to do so, is our liberty infringed by such a law?

As for your typical lie, phrased within an ad hominem, I DO NOT want law-abiding, sober and sane citizens the right to own a firearm.

Violent criminals, persons found to have been civilly detained as a danger to themselves or others, and those found to be addicted to alcohol or illict drugs are those cited in Heller by Scalia to historically be denied the so called Right to keep and bear arms.

 

[Nostra]

Since the Dimsocialists have invented the right to free healthcare out of thin air, and claim the govt has to provide it to all Americans, it seems reasonable that the REAL RIGHT to bear arms, which is actually in the Constitution, requires the govt to provide those arms free of charge to every American.

Let’s see if there are any non-hypocritical Dimsocialists on the board.

Like I told the lat person who started a thread like this (there are several a month), give in on healthcare, food, housing, etc. And we'll give you guns.

"... we'll give you guns"?

I love the statist presumption.

Read the OP. Dude is asking for free guns.

Reading the OP prevents you from being stupider than you have to be.

OP is mocking leftists and their "everything I want is a human right and the government should force other people to pay for it for me" mindset.

Leftists are too stupid to figure out when they are being mocked.

 

[Nostra]

An American, not a liberal commie scumbag like you.

You'll need a background check to prove

1. you are not a violent criminal
2. you are not a terrorist
3. you are a REAL American

Oh, then you're cool with Voter ID, so people have to prove they're real Americans?

It's not likely someone who casts a vote illegally kills another with that vote.

It's not likely anyone owning a gun legally kills another with that gun.

I know this is hard for you to accept -- your programming has been very successful -- but 99.99+% of legal gun owners didn't murder anyone yesterday.

All your unoriginal ideas for "gun control" do nothing about criminals. You don't actually care about criminals killing people.

No, you want law-abiding people disarmed so they can't resist leftist tyranny.

But your programming won't let you see that.

Oh bullshit. Why not just post, "shall not infringe" and join the rest of the sheep?

Not everyone driving a car kills pedestrians who have the right away in a crosswalk. Do you believe Involuntary Manslaughter ought to be struck from the Vehicle or Penal Codes since it only applies to someone who is negligent and kills someone?

Since all of us who drive must have a license to do so, is our liberty infringed by such a law?

As for your typical lie, phrased within an ad hominem, I DO NOT want law-abiding, sober and sane citizens the right to own a firearm.

Violent criminals, persons found to have been civilly detained as a danger to themselves or others, and those found to be addicted to alcohol or illict drugs are those cited in Heller by Scalia to historically be denied the so called Right to keep and bear arms.

Link us up the the clause of the Constitution saying driving a car is a right....

 

[Vandalshandle]

Since the Dimsocialists have invented the right to free healthcare out of thin air, and claim the govt has to provide it to all Americans, it seems reasonable that the REAL RIGHT to bear arms, which is actually in the Constitution, requires the govt to provide those arms free of charge to every American.

Let’s see if there are any non-hypocritical Dimsocialists on the board.

Free health care? Maybe you need to have your hearing aid serviced. No candidate is advocating free health care. On the other hand, there are supporters for Medicare for all, which I presently enjoy after paying for it for 50 years.

Fauxcohontas says she is paying for her healthcare plan with a wealth tax so she can give free healthcare to everyone else.

You really should educate yourself before jumping into a thread and humiliating yourself by exposing your ignorance.

So, Warren is going to raise taxes on the wealthy (Heavens forbid!) to pay for HER healthcare, and then she is going to give it away for free to everybody else? Have you been drinking this morning?

 

[Nostra]

Since the Dimsocialists have invented the right to free healthcare out of thin air, and claim the govt has to provide it to all Americans, it seems reasonable that the REAL RIGHT to bear arms, which is actually in the Constitution, requires the govt to provide those arms free of charge to every American.

Let’s see if there are any non-hypocritical Dimsocialists on the board.

Free health care? Maybe you need to have your hearing aid serviced. No candidate is advocating free health care. On the other hand, there are supporters for Medicare for all, which I presently enjoy after paying for it for 50 years.

Fauxcohontas says she is paying for her healthcare plan with a wealth tax so she can give free healthcare to everyone else.

You really should educate yourself before jumping into a thread and humiliating yourself by exposing your ignorance.

So, Warren is going to raise taxes on the wealthy (Heavens forbid!) to pay for HER healthcare, and then she is going to give it away for free to everybody else? Have you been drinking this morning?

Learn to read simple English, dummy.

 

[daveman]

An American, not a liberal commie scumbag like you.

You'll need a background check to prove

1. you are not a violent criminal
2. you are not a terrorist
3. you are a REAL American

Oh, then you're cool with Voter ID, so people have to prove they're real Americans?

It's not likely someone who casts a vote illegally kills another with that vote.

It's not likely anyone owning a gun legally kills another with that gun.

I know this is hard for you to accept -- your programming has been very successful -- but 99.99+% of legal gun owners didn't murder anyone yesterday.

All your unoriginal ideas for "gun control" do nothing about criminals. You don't actually care about criminals killing people.

No, you want law-abiding people disarmed so they can't resist leftist tyranny.

But your programming won't let you see that.

Oh bullshit. Why not just post, "shall not infringe" and join the rest of the sheep?

Not everyone driving a car kills pedestrians who have the right away in a crosswalk. Do you believe Involuntary Manslaughter ought to be struck from the Vehicle or Penal Codes since it only applies to someone who is negligent and kills someone?

Since all of us who drive must have a license to do so, is our liberty infringed by such a law?

As for your typical lie, phrased within an ad hominem, I DO NOT want law-abiding, sober and sane citizens the right to own a firearm.

Violent criminals, persons found to have been civilly detained as a danger to themselves or others, and those found to be addicted to alcohol or illict drugs are those cited in Heller by Scalia to historically be denied the so called Right to keep and bear arms.

Why do you idiots always bring up driving as some kind of parallel to owning guns?

Owning guns is in the Constitution. Driving is not -- and as long as I stay off public roads, I can drive legally without a licence or insurance.

And quit bitching about ad hominem, you flaming hypocrite.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Oh bullshit. Why not just post, "shall not infringe" and join the rest of the sheep?

Look how desperate you have become at wanting to confiscate guns, you have just accused everyone who is a constitutionalist as being sheep for citing it...are they parrots as well? you can count me in on both counts

Not everyone driving a car kills pedestrians who have the right away in a crosswalk. Do you believe Involuntary Manslaughter ought to be struck from the Vehicle or Penal Codes since it only applies to someone who is negligent and kills someone?

Since all of us who drive must have a license to do so, is our liberty infringed by such a law?

the constitution does not provide for you're right to drive, a license is a privilege, if the constitution protected your" right to drive" with the words "shall not infringe" then YES!, your "liberty" would most certainly be infringed upon by requiring a license

 

[progressive hunter]

Since the Dimsocialists have invented the right to free healthcare out of thin air, and claim the govt has to provide it to all Americans, it seems reasonable that the REAL RIGHT to bear arms, which is actually in the Constitution, requires the govt to provide those arms free of charge to every American.

Let’s see if there are any non-hypocritical Dimsocialists on the board.

Like I told the lat person who started a thread like this (there are several a month), give in on healthcare, food, housing, etc. And we'll give you guns.

"... we'll give you guns"?

I love the statist presumption.

Read the OP. Dude is asking for free guns.

Reading the OP prevents you from being stupider than you have to be.

maybe you should read the OP you stupid fuck,,,cause he asked a question not ask for free guns,,,

 

[Vandalshandle]

Since the Dimsocialists have invented the right to free healthcare out of thin air, and claim the govt has to provide it to all Americans, it seems reasonable that the REAL RIGHT to bear arms, which is actually in the Constitution, requires the govt to provide those arms free of charge to every American.

Let’s see if there are any non-hypocritical Dimsocialists on the board.

Free health care? Maybe you need to have your hearing aid serviced. No candidate is advocating free health care. On the other hand, there are supporters for Medicare for all, which I presently enjoy after paying for it for 50 years.

Fauxcohontas says she is paying for her healthcare plan with a wealth tax so she can give free healthcare to everyone else.

You really should educate yourself before jumping into a thread and humiliating yourself by exposing your ignorance.

So, Warren is going to raise taxes on the wealthy (Heavens forbid!) to pay for HER healthcare, and then she is going to give it away for free to everybody else? Have you been drinking this morning?

Learn to read simple English, dummy.

Doesn't sound "free" to me. Sounds like Bill Gates and Trump are going to have to do some creative accounting to remain in the 1%.

 

[Nostra]

Since the Dimsocialists have invented the right to free healthcare out of thin air, and claim the govt has to provide it to all Americans, it seems reasonable that the REAL RIGHT to bear arms, which is actually in the Constitution, requires the govt to provide those arms free of charge to every American.

Let’s see if there are any non-hypocritical Dimsocialists on the board.

Free health care? Maybe you need to have your hearing aid serviced. No candidate is advocating free health care. On the other hand, there are supporters for Medicare for all, which I presently enjoy after paying for it for 50 years.

Fauxcohontas says she is paying for her healthcare plan with a wealth tax so she can give free healthcare to everyone else.

You really should educate yourself before jumping into a thread and humiliating yourself by exposing your ignorance.

So, Warren is going to raise taxes on the wealthy (Heavens forbid!) to pay for HER healthcare, and then she is going to give it away for free to everybody else? Have you been drinking this morning?

Learn to read simple English, dummy.

Doesn't sound "free" to me. Sounds like Bill Gates and Trump are going to have to do some creative accounting to remain in the 1%.

That’s because you are an idiot who has no clue what the Dimsocialist candidates are proposing.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Free health care? Maybe you need to have your hearing aid serviced. No candidate is advocating free health care. On the other hand, there are supporters for Medicare for all, which I presently enjoy after paying for it for 50 years.

Fauxcohontas says she is paying for her healthcare plan with a wealth tax so she can give free healthcare to everyone else.

You really should educate yourself before jumping into a thread and humiliating yourself by exposing your ignorance.

So, Warren is going to raise taxes on the wealthy (Heavens forbid!) to pay for HER healthcare, and then she is going to give it away for free to everybody else? Have you been drinking this morning?

Learn to read simple English, dummy.

Doesn't sound "free" to me. Sounds like Bill Gates and Trump are going to have to do some creative accounting to remain in the 1%.

That’s because you are an idiot who has no clue what the Dimsocialist candidates are proposing.

Is Hillary still plotting to snatch your gun in the middle of the night?

 

[Shawnee_b]

I'm the liberal who believes that married same sex couples should have guns to protect their legal marijuana crops.

I don't want to take guns from law abiding citizens. Sometimes I do take the devil's advocate position when some of the more extreme members shout "shall not be infringed" at any mention of any sort of gun control.

I have no problem with that except one issue,, Infringement at any level on anything in the Constitution, Bill of rights, amendments,,, 1st, 2nd, 5th, any of them, is a problem and should not be tolerated. Get the 66% vote or whatever is required and amend it but don't fuk with them otherwise.

We have ALOT of gun control measures and laws, they just don't get enforced,,, both rules on guns and rules on people.

 

[Nostra]

Fauxcohontas says she is paying for her healthcare plan with a wealth tax so she can give free healthcare to everyone else.

You really should educate yourself before jumping into a thread and humiliating yourself by exposing your ignorance.

So, Warren is going to raise taxes on the wealthy (Heavens forbid!) to pay for HER healthcare, and then she is going to give it away for free to everybody else? Have you been drinking this morning?

Learn to read simple English, dummy.

Doesn't sound "free" to me. Sounds like Bill Gates and Trump are going to have to do some creative accounting to remain in the 1%.

That’s because you are an idiot who has no clue what the Dimsocialist candidates are proposing.

Is Hillary still plotting to snatch your gun in the middle of the night?

^^^^^Throws in the towel^^^^

Dismissed.

 

[Rye Catcher]

You'll need a background check to prove

1. you are not a violent criminal
2. you are not a terrorist
3. you are a REAL American

Oh, then you're cool with Voter ID, so people have to prove they're real Americans?

It's not likely someone who casts a vote illegally kills another with that vote.

It's not likely anyone owning a gun legally kills another with that gun.

I know this is hard for you to accept -- your programming has been very successful -- but 99.99+% of legal gun owners didn't murder anyone yesterday.

All your unoriginal ideas for "gun control" do nothing about criminals. You don't actually care about criminals killing people.

No, you want law-abiding people disarmed so they can't resist leftist tyranny.

But your programming won't let you see that.

Oh bullshit. Why not just post, "shall not infringe" and join the rest of the sheep?

Not everyone driving a car kills pedestrians who have the right away in a crosswalk. Do you believe Involuntary Manslaughter ought to be struck from the Vehicle or Penal Codes since it only applies to someone who is negligent and kills someone?

Since all of us who drive must have a license to do so, is our liberty infringed by such a law?

As for your typical lie, phrased within an ad hominem, I DO NOT want law-abiding, sober and sane citizens the right to own a firearm.

Violent criminals, persons found to have been civilly detained as a danger to themselves or others, and those found to be addicted to alcohol or illict drugs are those cited in Heller by Scalia to historically be denied the so called Right to keep and bear arms.

Why do you idiots always bring up driving as some kind of parallel to owning guns?

Owning guns is in the Constitution. Driving is not -- and as long as I stay off public roads, I can drive legally without a licence or insurance.

And quit bitching about ad hominem, you flaming hypocrite.

Q. "Why do you idiots always bring up driving as some kind of parallel to owning guns?"

A. For the simple reason that guns and cars kill people. Sometimes intentionally, sometimes irresponsibly and sometimes accidentally. There are laws which enforce responsible ownership and operation of a car. Of course there are gun laws, but they are always objected to by people like you, with the "shall not infringe" meme. It is not a Right. Not only because Scalia wrote so, but history as far back as Plato concluded that some people should never own an arm (BTW, notice there is not one part of the 2nd where a gun is noted).

That is significant, since other arms (gravity knives, push button knives, nonchucks, fully automatic firearms, cane swords, etc. etc. are controlled, or outlawed.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Oh bullshit. Why not just post, "shall not infringe" and join the rest of the sheep?

Look how desperate you have become at wanting to confiscate guns, you have just accused everyone who is a constitutionalist as being sheep for citing it...are they parrots as well? you can count me in on both counts

Not everyone driving a car kills pedestrians who have the right away in a crosswalk. Do you believe Involuntary Manslaughter ought to be struck from the Vehicle or Penal Codes since it only applies to someone who is negligent and kills someone?

Since all of us who drive must have a license to do so, is our liberty infringed by such a law?

the constitution does not provide for you're right to drive, a license is a privilege, if the constitution protected your" right to drive" with the words "shall not infringe" then YES!, your "liberty" would most certainly be infringed upon by requiring a license

Wrong. See my post above.

 

[Crepitus]

Since the Dimsocialists have invented the right to free healthcare out of thin air, and claim the govt has to provide it to all Americans, it seems reasonable that the REAL RIGHT to bear arms, which is actually in the Constitution, requires the govt to provide those arms free of charge to every American.

Let’s see if there are any non-hypocritical Dimsocialists on the board.

Like I told the lat person who started a thread like this (there are several a month), give in on healthcare, food, housing, etc. And we'll give you guns.

"... we'll give you guns"?

I love the statist presumption.

Read the OP. Dude is asking for free guns.

Reading the OP prevents you from being stupider than you have to be.

OP flew over your flat head.

what are the odds?

No it didn't. You asked a question, I answered it.

 

[Crepitus]

Since the Dimsocialists have invented the right to free healthcare out of thin air, and claim the govt has to provide it to all Americans, it seems reasonable that the REAL RIGHT to bear arms, which is actually in the Constitution, requires the govt to provide those arms free of charge to every American.

Let’s see if there are any non-hypocritical Dimsocialists on the board.

Like I told the lat person who started a thread like this (there are several a month), give in on healthcare, food, housing, etc. And we'll give you guns.

"... we'll give you guns"?

I love the statist presumption.

Read the OP. Dude is asking for free guns.

Reading the OP prevents you from being stupider than you have to be.

maybe you should read the OP you stupid fuck,,,cause he asked a question not ask for free guns,,,

Go ahead a circle the wagons ladies. I'm done with you for today.

 

[Crepitus]

I'm the liberal who believes that married same sex couples should have guns to protect their legal marijuana crops.

I don't want to take guns from law abiding citizens. Sometimes I do take the devil's advocate position when some of the more extreme members shout "shall not be infringed" at any mention of any sort of gun control.

I have no problem with that except one issue,, Infringement at any level on anything in the Constitution, Bill of rights, amendments,,, 1st, 2nd, 5th, any of them, is a problem and should not be tolerated. Get the 66% vote or whatever is required and amend it but don't fuk with them otherwise.

We have ALOT of gun control measures and laws, they just don't get enforced,,, both rules on guns and rules on people.

Where is the Well Regulated Militia?

 

[Nostra]

Oh, then you're cool with Voter ID, so people have to prove they're real Americans?

It's not likely someone who casts a vote illegally kills another with that vote.

It's not likely anyone owning a gun legally kills another with that gun.

I know this is hard for you to accept -- your programming has been very successful -- but 99.99+% of legal gun owners didn't murder anyone yesterday.

All your unoriginal ideas for "gun control" do nothing about criminals. You don't actually care about criminals killing people.

No, you want law-abiding people disarmed so they can't resist leftist tyranny.

But your programming won't let you see that.

Oh bullshit. Why not just post, "shall not infringe" and join the rest of the sheep?

Not everyone driving a car kills pedestrians who have the right away in a crosswalk. Do you believe Involuntary Manslaughter ought to be struck from the Vehicle or Penal Codes since it only applies to someone who is negligent and kills someone?

Since all of us who drive must have a license to do so, is our liberty infringed by such a law?

As for your typical lie, phrased within an ad hominem, I DO NOT want law-abiding, sober and sane citizens the right to own a firearm.

Violent criminals, persons found to have been civilly detained as a danger to themselves or others, and those found to be addicted to alcohol or illict drugs are those cited in Heller by Scalia to historically be denied the so called Right to keep and bear arms.

Why do you idiots always bring up driving as some kind of parallel to owning guns?

Owning guns is in the Constitution. Driving is not -- and as long as I stay off public roads, I can drive legally without a licence or insurance.

And quit bitching about ad hominem, you flaming hypocrite.

Q. "Why do you idiots always bring up driving as some kind of parallel to owning guns?"

A. For the simple reason that guns and cars kill people. Sometimes intentionally, sometimes irresponsibly and sometimes accidentally. There are laws which enforce responsible ownership and operation of a car. Of course there are gun laws, but they are always objected to by people like you, with the "shall not infringe" meme. It is not a Right. Not only because Scalia wrote so, but history as far back as Plato concluded that some people should never own an arm (BTW, notice there is not one part of the 2nd where a gun is noted).

That is significant, since other arms (gravity knives, push button knives, nonchucks, fully automatic firearms, cane swords, etc. etc. are controlled, or outlawed.

Di hydro oxide kills a ton more people than guns. No license required to purchase that.

Why not?

 

[progressive hunter]

I'm the liberal who believes that married same sex couples should have guns to protect their legal marijuana crops.

I don't want to take guns from law abiding citizens. Sometimes I do take the devil's advocate position when some of the more extreme members shout "shall not be infringed" at any mention of any sort of gun control.

I have no problem with that except one issue,, Infringement at any level on anything in the Constitution, Bill of rights, amendments,,, 1st, 2nd, 5th, any of them, is a problem and should not be tolerated. Get the 66% vote or whatever is required and amend it but don't fuk with them otherwise.

We have ALOT of gun control measures and laws, they just don't get enforced,,, both rules on guns and rules on people.

Where is the Well Regulated Militia?

its all around you you stupid fuck,,,

I can see you standing in the middle of a forest and asking,,,WHERES ALL THE TREES!!!