Poll: Do You Agree with US Policy to Kill Narco Terrorists?

[schmidlap]

There was a JAG Officer sitting next to Admiral Bradly when all four strikes were made on the boat, and you cannot get more 'military lawyer' than that.

What kind of "war against drugs" kills combatants who could be captured and interrogated?
Where is the evidence?
This whole fiasco stinks.

 

[buttercup]

Get Congress to ok it and this isn't an issue. Half of the issue with most of what the Trump admin does is it wants to take short cuts instead of going through the required process in order to enact it's policies/goals. Labeling the cartels "narco terrorists" is just another in a long string of those shortcuts.

The sad part is, the team sports politics crowd doesn't seem to care at all about the law or constitution these days. Or maybe they never did? And it appears that very few people realize that whatever you allow the government to do to others, they will eventually do to you.

If this continues, I'm sadly concluding that we deserve to lose the US. If no one cares about the law, the constitution, truth, or anything but retarded team sports politics....imo they deserve whatever SHTF is coming. And it IS coming. It's not a matter of if but when.

 

[buttercup]

When are you planning of going to war with Venezuela? Right now all we are doing is blowing up the boats and drugs and narco-terrorists heading toward the US.

Right now that's what we're hearing about, but according to Donald: “Very soon we're going to start doing it on land, too.”

As for the reason, the government typically lies about the reasons we go to "war." So imo too many people here are being far too trusting...especially when dealing with a proven liar.

This is just another CIA regime change operation, sold to Americans on the pretext of stopping “narco-terrorists.”

 

[Bitterhook]

What kind of "war against drugs" kills combatants who could be captured and interrogated?
Where is the evidence?
This whole fiasco stinks.

You're probably not going to find any evidence here at USMB, so there's no need to ask that and pretend you care about evidence. Perhaps you should contact your Representatives in Congress and tell them what you think they should do, because I damn sure cannot help you with your problems.

 

[Rawley]

Right now that's what we're hearing about, but according to Donald: “Very soon we're going to start doing it on land, too.”

As for the reason, the government typically lies about the reasons we go to "war." So imo too many people here are being far too trusting...especially when dealing with a proven liar.

Got it. This is all about your hatred for the President. Thanks for making that clear.

 

[Leo123]

If the Commander in Chief has that policy then it should be carried out. That being said, if we could somehow wax the boaters we could seize the boat, get the drugs, sell them and get the revenue. LOL

 

[buttercup]

Got it. This is all about your hatred for the President. Thanks for making that clear.

That's a convenient way to dodge everything I said, and oh so typical and predictable.

I don't hate him because to me it's not even about Trump. I've been saying for years that presidents these days are mostly puppets, or spokespeople. They're not the actual powers. So why would I get emotional about someone who I don't even believe is the actual power?

So no. And now that that's out of the way, care to actually address what I said? If you disagree, that's fine. But it's a logical fallacy to dismiss everything I said with an ad hom...and a tired cliché one, at that.

 

[Rawley]

That's a convenient way to dodge everything I said, and oh so typical and predictable.

Sorry dude, you inject irreverent pejoratives into the discussion, you lose credibility as on honest poster.

I don't hate him because to me it's not even about Trump. I've been saying for years that presidents these days are mostly puppets, or spokespeople. They're not the actual powers. So why would I get emotional about someone who I don't even believe is the actual power?

So no. And now that that's out of the way, care to actually address what I said? If you disagree, that's fine. But it's a logical fallacy to dismiss everything I said with an ad hom...and a tired cliché one, at that.

Not ad hominum, the truth.

If you had a bit of honesty, you'd shut off your masters and go listen to what he has actually said. If you can get out of his words that he planning on bombing Venezuela, well, God bless.

 

[BS Filter]

 

[toobfreak]

What kind of "war against drugs" kills combatants who could be captured and interrogated?

The best kind.

Where is the evidence?

At the bottom of the ocean now I bet.

This whole fiasco stinks.

That is just yourself. Keep your arms down when you type and you will be OK.

 

[toobfreak]

View attachment 1190864

There could be innocent immigrant fishing children in those barrels
escaping Venezuela for a better life
in America for all
you know.

 

[buttercup]

Not ad hominum, the truth.

If you had a bit of honesty, you'd shut off your masters and go listen to what he has actually said. If you can get out of his words that he planning on bombing Venezuela, well, God bless.

It was a text book ad hom fallacy, because you dismissed the argument by attacking what you thought was my motive.

Anyway, I didn't claim he was going to "bomb" Venezuela. You asked when we were going to war, and I posted a clip of him saying "This is war...Very soon we're going to start doing it on land, too." How you want to interpret that is up to you.

And I don't have "masters"....I'm not the one who automatically believes official narratives, that would be most of you folks here.

 

[Care4all]

When are you planning of going to war with Venezuela? Right now all we are doing is blowing up the boats and drugs and narco-terrorists heading toward the US.

Who's heading towards the US? The alleged Narco terrorist are not...they are mostly just heading to Trinidad, 7 miles away, or Tobago, 75 miles....or other nearby islands...and no, we should not be simply blowing them up and killing them as their judge, jury, and executioner... Capture, and charge them....and give them their due process.... It's Biblical!!!

 

[Rawley]

Who's heading towards the US? The alleged Narco terrorist are not...they are mostly just heading to Trinidad, 7 miles away, or Tobago, 75 miles....or other nearby islands...and no, we should not be simply blowing them up and killing them as their judge, jury, and executioner... Capture, and charge them....and give them their due process.... It's Biblical!!!

Again, you didn't have a single problem when Obama played judge, jury, and executioner, killing 3,700 brown people without any due process, including hundreds of women and children

 

[Blisterfinger]

Name one fuckup

Your withdrawal from Afghanistan FAGAt.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Well, I am not a lawyer, but if you want to help fight the drug war at home, the volunteer firefighters around here are accepting whatever you can afford in donations to purchase Narcan Nasal Spray.

My daughter is a paramedic and treated a girl yesterday that OD'ed 6 times in the last two weeks. They had given her boyfriend NARCAN for her on a previous call, but he refused to give it to her and just called the EMS. They took her to the hospital and she walked out AMA with blood oxygen % of 81 as they were leaving. Some people just can't be saved.

 

[Rawley]

It was a text book ad hom fallacy, because you dismissed the argument by attacking what you thought was my motive.

Anyway, I didn't claim he was going to "bomb" Venezuela. You asked when we were going to war, and I posted a clip of him saying "This is war...Very soon we're going to start doing it on land, too." How you want to interpret that is up to you.

And I don't have "masters"....I'm not the one who automatically believes official narratives, that would be most of you folks here.

I'll ask again where did you get Venezuela from his words? (hint - your post from your masters)

 

[Blisterfinger]

No response. Noted. Troll.

Blah blah blah, that's the sound of Mariner losing. I love it!

 

[buttercup]

I'll ask again where did you get Venezuela from his words? (hint - your post from your masters)

Ok, if you don't think we're going to war with Venezuela, I genuinely hope you are right.

We'll see. Either way, I don't agree with allowing the government to blow up anyone they claim is a "terrorist" and as Care4all put it, acting as the judge, jury, and executioner. If you trust the government enough to grant them that power, then bless your little heart. How quickly some folks forget that J6ers were accused of being "terrorists" and the wrong people in power have been known to call gun owners or anti-vaxxers "terrorists".... so unlike some of you I prefer to do things the legal and constitutional way. And not for the sake of the bad guys, but for all of our sakes.

 

[Blisterfinger]

A man responsible for 400 TONS of drugs into the US has just been pardoned by Donald Trump.

Elites gotta elite. Elites gotta look out for each other.

Let's apply some BondiMath™ to this situation.

According to our truckling Attorney General Pam Bondi, Donald Trump is responsible for intercepting 3400 kilos of drugs this year, saving (are you ready for this media?) 258 million lives.

My goodness, if those drugs had managed to get into the US, there would only be 70 million of us left to tell the tale!

HEIL TRUMP!

Unfortunately, Hernandez managed to get 400 TONS of drugs into the US. And using BondiMath™, he is responsible for the deaths of over 27.5 BILLION Americans!


400 TONS.

A pardon.


And Trump's cult actually falls for some fireworks for their amusement to mean Trump gives a flying **** about our drug problem.

It is simply astonishing how easily Dear Leader is able to lead his cattle.

Hernandez conviction smacks of political persecution which the Biden Administration was famous for. Biden's corruption and in confidence alone warrants pardons for anyone punished by his regime.
FAGATs heads were spinning and screaming to the sky when Trump pardoned him. That alone is worth the price of admission