Poll: Do You Agree with US Policy to Kill Narco Terrorists?

[OODA_Loop]

For ***** sake. Click on the link you retard.

U.S.C. Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

As used in this chapter—

(1) the term “international terrorism” means activities that—

(A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended—

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and


(C) occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum;


You can't just cherry pick parts of definitions. This is and always has been a political aspect of terrorism.

Murder, drug trafficking, robberies, human trafficking, kidnapping fall under 1(A).

You're not really trying are you?

 

[sparky]

Show me evidence these are narco terrorists. Show me the congressional oversight.

i would refer you to the PA g5

~S~

 

[Couchpotato]

Murder, drug trafficking, robberies, human trafficking, kidnapping fall under 1(A).

You're not really trying are you?

A, B AND C. Not A, or B, or C.

 

[Calgon]

Uh, drug dealers are hardly terrorists. They couldn't care less about changing government.

 

[OODA_Loop]

A, B AND C. Not A, or B, or C.

Murder, drug trafficking, robberies, human trafficking, kidnapping fall under 1(A).

You're not really trying are you?

There is no operative AND at the end of (1)(A)

§2331. Definitions​

As used in this chapter—


(1) the term “international terrorism” means activities that—


(A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;

 

[IM2]

We already control the oil Chevron owns it.

Of course we do. So again, if we want to stop "narco terrorism" we start here with rganized crime.

 

[Hafar1014]

Of course we do. So again, if we want to stop "narco terrorism" we start here with rganized crime.

Then a lot of blacks will be arrested

 

[schmidlap]

If you oppose one and not the other you do. Or if you contention is that they are somehow different you do.

As previous noted, I claim no expertise and welcome congressional scrutiny.

The U.S. military's strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean have raised significant international law concerns. The strikes have been described as "lethal targeting" by the administration, but legal experts and lawmakers have raised alarms about their legality. The White House has denied allegations of extrajudicial killings, but the situation remains contentious. The strikes have resulted in multiple fatalities, and the legal implications are being closely monitored by Congress and international law enforcement.

Who was this pointed at?

Any and all ideological kibitzers whose opinions masquerade as authoritative.

 

[Couchpotato]

There is no operative AND at the end of (1)(A)

§2331. Definitions​

As used in this chapter—


(1) the term “international terrorism” means activities that—


(A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;

You seriously cant be this stupid.

(A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;

If this is the only requirement then if I go get drunk tonight and run over someone with my car I'm a terrorist.

 

[Couchpotato]

As previous noted, I claim no expertise and welcome congressional scrutiny.

The U.S. military's strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean have raised significant international law concerns. The strikes have been described as "lethal targeting" by the administration, but legal experts and lawmakers have raised alarms about their legality. The White House has denied allegations of extrajudicial killings, but the situation remains contentious. The strikes have resulted in multiple fatalities, and the legal implications are being closely monitored by Congress and international law enforcement.

Any and all ideological kibitzers whose opinions masquerade as authoritative.

Have an opinion. Explain why YOU think they are different. Congress is full of political hacks why would you trust their judgement on the subject in place of your own?

 

[sparky]

Uh, drug dealers are hardly terrorists.

ok, then just what would you classify sorts killing our kids Cal........?

~S~

 

[schmidlap]

Have an opinion. Explain why YOU think they are different. Congress is full of political hacks why would you trust their judgement on the subject in place of your own?

If I offered an "opinion," it would just be another uninformed one, of which there is no shortage.

Questions must be asked and answered.

... [W]ithout any evidence from the administration for its claims about the cargo or the identities and affiliations of the people on the boats, Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said the strikes are “extrajudicial killings.”​

​

Some legal experts, meanwhile, have said the U.S. actions were “not lawful.”...​

Assessing the Facts and Legal Questions About the U.S. Strikes on Alleged Drug Boats - FactCheck.org

At least 61 people have been killed in 14 U.S. military strikes on boats in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean since early September. Here, we will address what is known about the targets of the strikes, the trafficking of illicit substances from South and Central America to the U.S., and what...

www.factcheck.org

​

​

 

[OODA_Loop]

You seriously cant be this stupid.

(A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State;

If this is the only requirement then if I go get drunk tonight and run over someone with my car I'm a terrorist.

The "and" happens after B and includes C

So the formula is

A or B and C

 

[Couchpotato]

The "and" happens after B and includes C

So the formula is

A or B and C

That would mean that anyone committing an act anywhere in the world that would be illegal in the US regardless of whether that act is legal where they are is a terrorist.

Dumb as a bag of hair.

 

[otto105]

What historical acts have Christian missionaries done that rise to have them declared terrorist organizations?

The crusades.

Christian prostatism.

 

[Anarchy666]

Much is being made of US policy to kill narco terrorists in international waters. Do you agree with this policy?

I suppose, if there is no better option

 

[Anarchy666]

The crusades.

Christian prostatism.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The CRUSADES!?

One big gray area, even a cursory understanding of history would help you understand this.
Both sides committed atrocities against the other.
You people are just as bad as the bible thumpers imo

 

[OODA_Loop]

That would mean that anyone committing an act anywhere in the world that would be illegal in the US regardless of whether that act is legal where they are is a terrorist.

Dumb as a bag of hair.

If you commit violent acts against Americans outside of our international boundaries we can declare you terrorists.

 

[otto105]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
The CRUSADES!?

One big gray area, even a cursory understanding of history would help you understand this.
Both sides committed atrocities against the other.
You people are just as bad as the bible thumpers imo

Hilarious

You feel like you understand the crusades?

 

[Couchpotato]

If you commit violent acts against Americans outside of our international boundaries we can declare you terrorists.

LOL.

As I said dumb as a bag of hair.