Politics And Robots

[there4eyeM]

Um, okay, good for you, I guess. Do you think that sexbots are going to replace children and family?


What does any of that have to do with creepy-looking sex bots that you apparently find attractive?

'Chic has a much greater sense of humor than previously thought.

 

[Robert W]

So you think no one masterbated before robots?

That does not resemble at all what she thinks.

 

[buttercup]

No, I have no problem with your view, but both may be correct.

I have never understood this:

AI Overview

The "liberal plan not to have children" is a term used to describe the growing trend of individuals, especially young people, choosing not to have children, or to have fewer children, due to environmental concerns, such as climate change. This trend is often associated with a feeling of responsibility towards the planet and a desire to reduce their carbon footprint.

I think they've fallen for all sorts of lies...and they live in fear, so they're not having children.... which is what many of that globalist crowd want. And yeah, putting their affection on a robot definitely fits into that psychopathy. I think it's also part of the transhumanism agenda. That's a thread in and of itself. I know I keep saying this, but I might post a thread on that topic soon.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

The problems that come along with the female species is fueling the production of these robots.

Women are very different creatures these days. Men don't want to deal with their insanity and selfishness.

 

[PoliticalChic]

'Chic has a much greater sense of humor than previously thought.

I'm not certain that I'm taking your note in the way you meant it, I assume you're trying to laugh at the idea I'm proposing about the Left/Democrats/Socialists..

If so, how crazy do the Democrats/Leftists have to be to have voted for this for America?

Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system



Seems to me that neither have anything to with humor.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I think they've fallen for all sorts of lies...and they live in fear, so they're not having children.... which is what many of that globalist crowd want. And yeah, putting their affection on a robot definitely fits into that psychopathy. I think it's also part of the transhumanism agenda. That's a thread in and of itself. I know I keep saying this, but I might post a thread on that topic soon.

Do it!
We need more of an intellectual agenda on the board.

 

[there4eyeM]

I'm not certain that I'm taking your note in the way you meant it, I assume you're trying to laugh at the idea I'm proposing about the Left/Democrats/Socialists..

If so, how crazy do the Democrats/Leftists have to be to have voted for this for America?

Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system



Seems to me that neither have anything to with humor.

The very subject of such robots is fraught with humoristic aspects. As for the Democratic Party, it provokes profound laughter from anyone who can get past the seriousness of the damage it's done, in league with its counter-part, "red" party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The very subject of such robots is fraught with humoristic aspects. As for the Democratic Party, it provokes profound laughter from anyone who can get past the seriousness of the damage it's done, in league with its counter-part, "red" party.

Yet, you haven't been able to articulate a response to my providing the .....'laughable".....Democrat agenda, the one the electorate laughted out of Washington.


Cat got your tongue?


Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system

 

[22lcidw]

Um, okay, good for you, I guess. Do you think that sexbots are going to replace children and family?


What does any of that have to do with creepy-looking sex bots that you apparently find attractive?

A growing percentage of people are into themselves. There will be a market for this.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A growing percentage of people are into themselves. There will be a market for this.

What an excellent point.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

What an excellent point.

.

Cultural suicide.


.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

A growing percentage of people are into themselves. There will be a market for this.

These are only high tech sex dolls. They are just a sexual outlet for some men's sexual lust because we are living in the days prophecied when women would change their natures.
A growing percentage of Western men are disillusioned with Western women and if it's not this, they are turning to foreign brides.

No man wants to be PLAGUED with this kind of GIRL

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Men are tired of the crazy, women bring to the table

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Men are tired of the crazy, women bring to the table

.

Traditional Catholic wives love their chosen role as home maker and mother.


.

 

[JoeB131]

No, I have no problem with your view, but both may be correct.

I have never understood this:

AI Overview

The "liberal plan not to have children" is a term used to describe the growing trend of individuals, especially young people, choosing not to have children, or to have fewer children, due to environmental concerns, such as climate change. This trend is often associated with a feeling of responsibility towards the planet and a desire to reduce their carbon footprint.

Does anyone note the irony of PC complaining about sex robots replacing real women, and then uses an "AI Overview" to delineate her conspiracy theory as a liberal plan to not have children?

The main reason why families today don't have five kids like my parents did is that they can't afford them. That is because for the last 50 years, Republicans/Conservatives/Corporate America have been systematically destroying unions and workers' rights.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Does anyone note the irony of PC complaining about sex robots replacing real women, and then uses an "AI Overview" to delineate her conspiracy theory as a liberal plan to not have children?

The main reason why families today don't have five kids like my parents did is that they can't afford them. That is because for the last 50 years, Republicans/Conservatives/Corporate America have been systematically destroying unions and workers' rights.

1. I used AI to support what I posted

2.What is the conspiracy theory?

3.100% correct :"families today don't have five kids like my parents did is that they can't afford them."

4.Obvious lie: "That is because for the last 50 years, Republicans/Conservatives/Corporate America have been systematically destroying unions and workers' rights."

5. Everybody knows they, Democrats/Fascisets are called the "tax and spend Democrats."
The NYTimes wrote this about the guy you called God, Jesus and the messiah...Obama
"But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.” Education of a President (Published 2010)

 

[PoliticalChic]

Does anyone note the irony of PC complaining about sex robots replacing real women, and then uses an "AI Overview" to delineate her conspiracy theory as a liberal plan to not have children?

The main reason why families today don't have five kids like my parents did is that they can't afford them. That is because for the last 50 years, Republicans/Conservatives/Corporate America have been systematically destroying unions and workers' rights.

I just quoted you in today's OP......https://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/if-you-are-too-busy-earning-a-living-to-pay-attention.1164075/

 

[Sunsettommy]

Do you blame "leftism" for everything?

I see a lot of problems with AI, but sex robots replacing real women isn't one of them.

They exist because too many women are feminized and deep into careerism thus hard to make affectionate connection with them.

Robots are worse as hedonism gets worse and worse that also legitimizes the 350 LB loser.

 

[Sunsettommy]

I know you can't seem to focus, so a reminder: unlike Democrats, I favor life, and family and children.

That's the subtext, you dolt.




"OUT OF TOUCH Wisconsin Democrats Introduce 164-Page Bill to Erase Gender Language In the Name of Equity
They never learn.

Wisconsin's Democratic Party -- who only control the governorship -- have decided to go all-in on the gender ideology nonsense.
Democratic Governor Tony Evers proposed changing the word 'mother' to the Orwellian (and gross) phrase 'inseminated persons' not too long ago, but that apparently wasn't radical enough.

Now the Dems have introduced legislation to erase 'mother' and 'father' from state documents and legislation.
Democrats in the Wisconsin Legislature have introduced a bill that replaces the word "mother" with "person who gave birth" 370 times and eliminates the concept of a "biological mother," replacing it with "natural parent" 47 times."
Twitchy.com




'The time of corona is an excellent time to practice abolishing it'

A far-left publication that gets some of its support for the liberal billionaire George Soros says there could be some good that comes out of the coronavirus pandemic.

www.wnd.com

For example, the total elimination of "the family."

"We deserve better than the family. And the time of corona is an excellent time to practice abolishing it," wrote radical-feminist activist Sophie Lewis on the website openDemocracy.

"Even when the private nuclear household poses no direct physical or mental threat to one's person – no spouse-battering, no child rape, and no queer-bashing – the private family qua mode of social reproduction still, frankly, sucks," wrote Lewis, the author of "Fu She said the nuclear family "genders, nationalizes and races us."

"It norms us for productive work. It makes us believe we are 'individuals,'" she said. "It minimizes costs for capital while maximizing human beings' life-making labor (across billions of tiny boxes, each kitted out – absurdly – with its own kitchen, micro-creche and laundry.) It blackmails us into mistaking the only sources of love and care we have for the extent of what is possible."

Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family.

"In short, the pandemic is no time to forget about family abolition. … Far from a time to acquiesce to 'family values' ideology, then, the pandemic is an acutely important time to provision, evacuate and generally empower survivors of – and refugees from – the nuclear household."

Sekulow pointed out openDemocracy gets funding from "notoriously liberal billionaire George Soros."

He also noted Lewis' demand for the abolition of private home ownership.

"This is a disgusting attack on traditional family values by the radical Left. It is unwarranted and unjustified assault at a time when so many are worried and uncertain about the future," he wrote.”

People embracing leftism are mentally ill.

 

[Sunsettommy]

JoeB131 writes:

Um, okay, good for you, I guess. Do you think that sexbots are going to replace children and family?

NO they will replace feminists women, leftist women, TDS filled women, man hating women, women who suffers from gender dysphoria.

Real men will prefer women who are mentally healthy prefer a loving family based relationship and avoid leftists at all times.