Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Well, all you have to do is know the procedure and then get a list of unique numbers. Then you have to individually print every ballot with that code.Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Why are you asking stupid questions? You get the procedure or copy the codes to do that... duh. Are you pretending that they are some kind of pixie dust that can't be copied?
Well, all you have to do is know the procedure and then get a list of unique numbers. Then you have to individually print every ballot with that code.Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Why are you asking stupid questions? You get the procedure or copy the codes to do that... duh. Are you pretending that they are some kind of pixie dust that can't be copied?
The source in the OP made it sound like you could just run a bunch of copies of ballots and submit them. They clearly don't know what they're talking about.
Looks like it to me.Well, all you have to do is know the procedure and then get a list of unique numbers. Then you have to individually print every ballot with that code.Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Why are you asking stupid questions? You get the procedure or copy the codes to do that... duh. Are you pretending that they are some kind of pixie dust that can't be copied?
The source in the OP made it sound like you could just run a bunch of copies of ballots and submit them. They clearly don't know what they're talking about.
That's clearly not what the OP said. Now you are just lying, or you did not read it. Go elsewhere if all you can do is lie and distort. The article clearly mentions getting the envelopes which contain the code.
Note that there is no "one" mail in voting. There are more secure systems, and less secure ones. Given that the current ones are designed so that democrats could cheat, you can take a bet whether they are secure. They would have to be looked at individually to determine the best way to commit fraud.
“I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.
Looks like it to me.Well, all you have to do is know the procedure and then get a list of unique numbers. Then you have to individually print every ballot with that code.Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Why are you asking stupid questions? You get the procedure or copy the codes to do that... duh. Are you pretending that they are some kind of pixie dust that can't be copied?
The source in the OP made it sound like you could just run a bunch of copies of ballots and submit them. They clearly don't know what they're talking about.
That's clearly not what the OP said. Now you are just lying, or you did not read it. Go elsewhere if all you can do is lie and distort. The article clearly mentions getting the envelopes which contain the code.
Note that there is no "one" mail in voting. There are more secure systems, and less secure ones. Given that the current ones are designed so that democrats could cheat, you can take a bet whether they are secure. They would have to be looked at individually to determine the best way to commit fraud.
“I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.
Looks like it to me.Well, all you have to do is know the procedure and then get a list of unique numbers. Then you have to individually print every ballot with that code.Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Why are you asking stupid questions? You get the procedure or copy the codes to do that... duh. Are you pretending that they are some kind of pixie dust that can't be copied?
The source in the OP made it sound like you could just run a bunch of copies of ballots and submit them. They clearly don't know what they're talking about.
That's clearly not what the OP said. Now you are just lying, or you did not read it. Go elsewhere if all you can do is lie and distort. The article clearly mentions getting the envelopes which contain the code.
Note that there is no "one" mail in voting. There are more secure systems, and less secure ones. Given that the current ones are designed so that democrats could cheat, you can take a bet whether they are secure. They would have to be looked at individually to determine the best way to commit fraud.
“I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.
If it looks like that to you, you need to read again.
Looks like it to me.Well, all you have to do is know the procedure and then get a list of unique numbers. Then you have to individually print every ballot with that code.Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Why are you asking stupid questions? You get the procedure or copy the codes to do that... duh. Are you pretending that they are some kind of pixie dust that can't be copied?
The source in the OP made it sound like you could just run a bunch of copies of ballots and submit them. They clearly don't know what they're talking about.
That's clearly not what the OP said. Now you are just lying, or you did not read it. Go elsewhere if all you can do is lie and distort. The article clearly mentions getting the envelopes which contain the code.
Note that there is no "one" mail in voting. There are more secure systems, and less secure ones. Given that the current ones are designed so that democrats could cheat, you can take a bet whether they are secure. They would have to be looked at individually to determine the best way to commit fraud.
“I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.
If it looks like that to you, you need to read again.
As we discussed, there are security measures on ballots and running a ballot through a copy machine and getting an identical ballot is not a way to commit fraud since ballots are unique and cannot be counted twice.
So, the source in the OP doesn't know what they're talking about.
Not by any of the the means which the "inside source" claimed in the OP.Looks like it to me.Well, all you have to do is know the procedure and then get a list of unique numbers. Then you have to individually print every ballot with that code.Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Why are you asking stupid questions? You get the procedure or copy the codes to do that... duh. Are you pretending that they are some kind of pixie dust that can't be copied?
The source in the OP made it sound like you could just run a bunch of copies of ballots and submit them. They clearly don't know what they're talking about.
That's clearly not what the OP said. Now you are just lying, or you did not read it. Go elsewhere if all you can do is lie and distort. The article clearly mentions getting the envelopes which contain the code.
Note that there is no "one" mail in voting. There are more secure systems, and less secure ones. Given that the current ones are designed so that democrats could cheat, you can take a bet whether they are secure. They would have to be looked at individually to determine the best way to commit fraud.
“I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.
If it looks like that to you, you need to read again.
As we discussed, there are security measures on ballots and running a ballot through a copy machine and getting an identical ballot is not a way to commit fraud since ballots are unique and cannot be counted twice.
So, the source in the OP doesn't know what they're talking about.
As we and the OP has already discussed, the protection measures are easily surpassed.
And apparently the leftists themselves acknowledge this, finding Trump's suggestion to even check your vote problematic.
Not by any of the the means which the "inside source" claimed in the OP.Looks like it to me.Well, all you have to do is know the procedure and then get a list of unique numbers. Then you have to individually print every ballot with that code.Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Why are you asking stupid questions? You get the procedure or copy the codes to do that... duh. Are you pretending that they are some kind of pixie dust that can't be copied?
The source in the OP made it sound like you could just run a bunch of copies of ballots and submit them. They clearly don't know what they're talking about.
That's clearly not what the OP said. Now you are just lying, or you did not read it. Go elsewhere if all you can do is lie and distort. The article clearly mentions getting the envelopes which contain the code.
Note that there is no "one" mail in voting. There are more secure systems, and less secure ones. Given that the current ones are designed so that democrats could cheat, you can take a bet whether they are secure. They would have to be looked at individually to determine the best way to commit fraud.
“I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.
If it looks like that to you, you need to read again.
As we discussed, there are security measures on ballots and running a ballot through a copy machine and getting an identical ballot is not a way to commit fraud since ballots are unique and cannot be counted twice.
So, the source in the OP doesn't know what they're talking about.
As we and the OP has already discussed, the protection measures are easily surpassed.
And apparently the leftists themselves acknowledge this, finding Trump's suggestion to even check your vote problematic.
Which is why I think the source is not a very reliable one.
So you have a few options.Not by any of the the means which the "inside source" claimed in the OP.Looks like it to me.Well, all you have to do is know the procedure and then get a list of unique numbers. Then you have to individually print every ballot with that code.Ballots have unique bar codes for each voter. You can't just photo copy them and expect they'll all be counted, the system will flag them.Total fabrication... For one thing, you cannot just make up your own ballot and have it counted by the election officials. The OP is yet another lie from a poster incapable of honesty.
What prevents you? Have you not heard of a printer - you know - the machine where the ballot comes out of in the first place?
You are the only one who is full of horse shit, and most likely are for mail in voting BECAUSE of the ability to cheat, so cut the crap.
And how difficult are those to forge? Not very, if the democrat establishment is in on it, just give the generation procedure to the fraudsters and you are set. Alternatively, copy the codes when they are sent. There is no way to monitor anything unlike with the normal counting of ballots.
A lot more difficult than the "insider source" made it out to be. I have serious questions about the validity of your source given they don't know these things.
How do you copy the codes when they are sent? How do you get ahold of the generation procedure?
Why are you asking stupid questions? You get the procedure or copy the codes to do that... duh. Are you pretending that they are some kind of pixie dust that can't be copied?
The source in the OP made it sound like you could just run a bunch of copies of ballots and submit them. They clearly don't know what they're talking about.
That's clearly not what the OP said. Now you are just lying, or you did not read it. Go elsewhere if all you can do is lie and distort. The article clearly mentions getting the envelopes which contain the code.
Note that there is no "one" mail in voting. There are more secure systems, and less secure ones. Given that the current ones are designed so that democrats could cheat, you can take a bet whether they are secure. They would have to be looked at individually to determine the best way to commit fraud.
“I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.
If it looks like that to you, you need to read again.
As we discussed, there are security measures on ballots and running a ballot through a copy machine and getting an identical ballot is not a way to commit fraud since ballots are unique and cannot be counted twice.
So, the source in the OP doesn't know what they're talking about.
As we and the OP has already discussed, the protection measures are easily surpassed.
And apparently the leftists themselves acknowledge this, finding Trump's suggestion to even check your vote problematic.
Which is why I think the source is not a very reliable one.
It took me 2x to get my census info. In.
They never received the original form That I sent in months ago so a census worker appeared at my door yesterday. I had no time to talk to him so he gave me a form with an ID # with instructions to call in or use their website. So, I called today and they gave me a confirmation # that I answered the census.
Since the census fucks up, I can only imagine how fucked up mass mail-in ballots will be. When you mail your ballot in they could at least send you a confirmation # letting you know that they received it! But they don't!!
This upcoming election is gonna be a dry butt fucking!!!
Here is how mail in voter fraud is committed. Since democrats are going to be committing voter fraud, well it is up to you what to do about it.
Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots
Phony ballots
The ballot has no specific security features — like a stamp or a watermark — so the insider said he would just make his own ballots.
“I just put [the ballot] through the copy machine and it comes out the same way,” the insider said.
But the return envelopes are “more secure than the ballot. You could never recreate the envelope,” he said. So they had to be collected from real voters.
He would have his operatives fan out, going house to house, convincing voters to let them mail completed ballots on their behalf as a public service. The fraudster and his minions would then take the sealed envelopes home and hold them over boiling water.
“You have to steam it to loosen the glue,” said the insider.
He then would remove the real ballot, place the counterfeit ballot inside the signed certificate, and reseal the envelope.
“Five minutes per ballot tops,” said the insider.
The insider said he took care not to stuff the fake ballots into just a few public mailboxes, but sprinkle them around town. That way he avoided the attention that foiled a sloppy voter-fraud operation in a Paterson, NJ, city council race this year, where 900 ballots were found in just three mailboxes.
Inside jobs
The tipster said sometimes postal employees are in on the scam.
“You have a postman who is a rabid anti-Trump guy and he’s working in Bedminster or some Republican stronghold … He can take those [filled-out] ballots, and knowing 95% are going to a Republican, he can just throw those in the garbage.”
Nursing homes
Hitting up assisted-living facilities and “helping” the elderly fill out their absentee ballots was a gold mine of votes, the insider said.
“There are nursing homes where the nurse is actually a paid operative. And they go room by room by room to these old people who still want to feel like they’re relevant,” said the whistleblower. “[They] literally fill it out for them.”
The insider pointed to former Jersey City Mayor Gerald McCann, who was sued in 2007 after a razor-thin victory for a local school board seat for allegedly tricking “incompetent … and ill” residents of nursing homes into casting ballots for him. McCann denied it, though he did admit to assisting some nursing home residents with absentee ballot applications.
Voter impersonation
When all else failed, the insider would send operatives to vote live in polling stations, particularly in states like New Jersey and New York that do not require voter ID. Pennsylvania, also for the most part, does not.
The best targets were registered voters who routinely skip presidential or municipal elections — information which is publicly available.
Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots
A top Democratic operative says voter fraud, especially with mail-in ballots, is no myth. And he knows this because he’s been doing it, on a grand scale, for decades. Mail-in ballots have bec…nypost.com
mediabiasfactcheck.com
It took me 2x to get my census info. In.
They never received the original form That I sent in months ago so a census worker appeared at my door yesterday. I had no time to talk to him so he gave me a form with an ID # with instructions to call in or use their website. So, I called today and they gave me a confirmation # that I answered the census.
Since the census fucks up, I can only imagine how fucked up mass mail-in ballots will be. When you mail your ballot in they could at least send you a confirmation # letting you know that they received it! But they don't!!
This upcoming election is gonna be a dry butt fucking!!!
