Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Isn't it time to get the money out of politics?
Would you support changes in the tax code disallowing all write-offs for political donations?
Would you support changes in the tax code making the acceptance of any political donations income and taxable?
Of course the devil is in the details of any such proposal, but in principle, shouldn't donations be called what in fact they truly are: BRIBES?
No such thing as free airtime. Somebody has to pay for it.Free airtime for qualified candidates would go along way
I'm not so sure about the donation thing. I do think that it should be illegal for any political candidate to spend more on the election campaign than what the job pays. Example, if the political office pays $200,000 per year than no more than $200,000 could be spent on the campaign. It amazes me how many millions are spend on a Presidential election. I think the whole process is corrupt.
So who would control the content?
Control the internet?
Pfffttt..... ME of course!
I think you missed it, but I was talking about a Cable TV Network
Immie
I did miss it! 
No such thing as free airtime. Somebody has to pay for it.Free airtime for qualified candidates would go along way
And what do you mean by "qualified" candidates?
Somehow, I don't think it's that simple with Truthmatters.No such thing as free airtime. Somebody has to pay for it.Free airtime for qualified candidates would go along way
And what do you mean by "qualified" candidates?
Qualified?
1) Over 35 years of age.
2) Natural born Citizen....
Control the internet?
Pfffttt..... ME of course!
I think you missed it, but I was talking about a Cable TV Network
Immie
OY!!
But I still think I should control the internet!!!
Somehow, I don't think it's that simple with Truthmatters.No such thing as free airtime. Somebody has to pay for it.
And what do you mean by "qualified" candidates?
Qualified?
1) Over 35 years of age.
2) Natural born Citizen....
Somehow, I don't think it's that simple with Truthmatters.Qualified?
1) Over 35 years of age.
2) Natural born Citizen....
Everything is simple for that simpleton. If it is good the Democrats did it. If it is bad then Republicans did it. Simple as that. Why haven't you figured that out yet?
Immie
Yes, I know that, but I want to hear how she determines if a candidate's qualified or not.
Somehow, I don't think it's that simple with Truthmatters.
Everything is simple for that simpleton. If it is good the Democrats did it. If it is bad then Republicans did it. Simple as that. Why haven't you figured that out yet?
Immie
I bet there's a litmus test.
Yes. I know that.Everything is simple for that simpleton. If it is good the Democrats did it. If it is bad then Republicans did it. Simple as that. Why haven't you figured that out yet?
Immie
I bet there's a litmus test.
Smack!!!
Of course there is.
(D) follows name vote for it.
(R) follows name don't vote for it.
Simple as that!
Yes. I know that.
I bet there's a litmus test.
Smack!!!
Of course there is.
(D) follows name vote for it.
(R) follows name don't vote for it.
Simple as that!
*sigh*
I want to know about how she'll determine which candidates are qualified to receive this fictional "free" airtime.
Yes, I know it'll all be Democrats. Yes, I know no Republicans will be qualified.
I just want to hear her say it.
Isn't it time to get the money out of politics?
Would you support changes in the tax code disallowing all write-offs for political donations?
Would you support changes in the tax code making the acceptance of any political donations income and taxable?
Of course the devil is in the details of any such proposal, but in principle, shouldn't donations be called what in fact they truly are: BRIBES?
...while calling me stupid and misspelling a bunch of words.Yes. I know that.Smack!!!
Of course there is.
(D) follows name vote for it.
(R) follows name don't vote for it.
Simple as that!
*sigh*
I want to know about how she'll determine which candidates are qualified to receive this fictional "free" airtime.
Yes, I know it'll all be Democrats. Yes, I know no Republicans will be qualified.
I just want to hear her say it.
Hehe,
I think I'm going to have to repeat myself again!
Oh, and she will ignore your question anyway just like she does everyone else's. If she comments at all it will be to tell you that the Heritage Foundation are right wing frauds or ask you why you don't trust court documents that don't say what she claims they say.
Immie
I think you missed it, but I was talking about a Cable TV Network
Immie
OY!!
But I still think I should control the internet!!!
Are you Al Gore on the other side of that monitor?
He's the father of the internet and thus only he has the right to control the internet.
If you are not he... then I suggest you GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!!
Immie
...while calling me stupid and misspelling a bunch of words.Yes. I know that.
*sigh*
I want to know about how she'll determine which candidates are qualified to receive this fictional "free" airtime.
Yes, I know it'll all be Democrats. Yes, I know no Republicans will be qualified.
I just want to hear her say it.
Hehe,
I think I'm going to have to repeat myself again!
Oh, and she will ignore your question anyway just like she does everyone else's. If she comments at all it will be to tell you that the Heritage Foundation are right wing frauds or ask you why you don't trust court documents that don't say what she claims they say.
Immie
...while calling me stupid and misspelling a bunch of words.Hehe,
I think I'm going to have to repeat myself again!
Oh, and she will ignore your question anyway just like she does everyone else's. If she comments at all it will be to tell you that the Heritage Foundation are right wing frauds or ask you why you don't trust court documents that don't say what she claims they say.
Immie
Well duh!
Immie
Explain if you will why both of you support a flat tax? I support a progressive income tax for the simple reason it helps prevent a nobility rising in America.
The UK has a much more "progressive" income tax than we do, yet they have nobility. Maybe we should try a regressive tax if your goal is to prevent nobility.
Except nobility preceded the tax. Don't see it on the rise, do you?
Yes, I would be pissed if a Rep did the same thing in our position!!I think its outrageous for a sitting president to spend almost a billion dollars ( according to the figures they are saying) on the next election when our economy is in the crapper
Of course you do. Would you if the sitting president wasn't a Democrat?
Yes, I would be pissed if a Rep did the same thing in our position!!I think its outrageous for a sitting president to spend almost a billion dollars ( according to the figures they are saying) on the next election when our economy is in the crapper
Of course you do. Would you if the sitting president wasn't a Democrat?
