Pocahontas Calls for Abortion Clinics to be Built in National Parks in Red States

Yeah, there's all kinds of hay to be made with this one. :laughing0301:

Hey, that will give Congress something else to do.....Naming abortion centers in national parks.....Naming walking trails is about all they are good for.
They should name national park abortion clinics after infamous left wing cretins like Pelosi, Warren, Schumer, Clinton, Obama.....
The Pelosi Abortion Clinic.... Warren Abortion Clinic
They should feel honored
 
From the article:

“Massachusetts could see a surge of patients coming to us for care, and putting a strain on our existing health care services. We’ve been preparing for this, though,” he added. Planned Parenthood is expanding access to both in-person and telehealth services, particularly for medication abortion, he said.​

He is talking about the killing of babies, right? Seriously, folks, it's all so very confusing:

Among the speakers was Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, who said the high court’s decision was expected, “but it doesn’t make it any easier to be here.”​
As the daughter of Taiwanese immigrants, Wu said, she always understood what her parents had sacrificed so that she could grow up in a country where “every generation would have better than the one before.”​
“It is heartbreaking to see us in a day where my kids and their generation will not know better than before, potentially,” Wu said, her voice cracking, over the din of occasional supportive honks on Beacon Street.​
But Wu urged those feeling scared, angry, or disillusioned to find hope in the array of elected officials and advocates who intend to combat the decision.​

These are the words of persons talking about the murder of babies, i.e., that less will be murdered unless they do something to keep it going. Let that sink in. Then reread the last two paragraph in the above and let it sink in again. Not so much as a hint of self-awareness.

Clown world. :laugh2:
 
That lady needs to realize women can still get their abortions in blue states. just like if someone wants their weed bad enough they will move to a state where it's legalized if they want abortions bad enough they can move to a blue state or drive to one.

Maybe warren needs to set up abortion travel companies for women. Or a abortion bus line.

This is exactly right.

This latest ruling by the Supreme Court is really not as "extreme" or earth shaking as Liberal Terrorists are pretending. In states like New York or Pennsylvania that are controlled by Leftards, abortion will continue and even accelerate their business at the abortion mills.
 
Fetuses aren't babies.
Merriam Webster disagrees. We've been over this before. Don't repeat disproven parsing BS. It's a diversion you people do because you don't have a defense for baby-killing.

child n.
3. an unborn or recently born person.

baby n.
1. a. an extremely young child

 
Last edited:
Merriam Webster disagrees. We've been over this before. Don't repeat disproven parsing BS. It's a diversion you people do because you don't have a defense for baby-killing.

Fetuses aren't viable.
We do not count fetuses on the Census.
We do not allow fetuses to be taken as tax deductions/dependents on tax forms.
Even when abortion was illegal, no one was charged with murder for having one.

Fetuses aren't babies.
 
Fetuses aren't viable.
We do not count fetuses on the Census.
We do not allow fetuses to be taken as tax deductions/dependents on tax forms.
Even when abortion was illegal, no one was charged with murder for having one.

Fetuses aren't babies.
Merriam Webster disagrees. We've been over this before. Don't repeat disproven parsing BS. It's a diversion you people do because you don't have a defense for baby-killing.

child n.
3. an unborn or recently born person.

baby n.
1. a. an extremely young child

 
You can revise your stupid post all you want.

Fetuses still aren't babies... Unless you are willing to start executing women for having them, it's all just a lot of talk.
I stated facts. Nobody cares about your opinion.
 
You stated your misogyny... we got it.

Until you call for the death penalty for women who have abortions, then your claims theyare babies is bullshit.
The baby-killers' world just ended yesterday. Dey goin' to jail from now on.

And I don't believe in the death penalty, so....
 
Last edited:
Are you saying the Republicans haven't? By the same logic, Republicans have had 50 years to appoint enough conservative justices to overturn Roe, but have chosen not to. That's because Republicans appointed moderates like Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Kennedy and Roberts, who realized what a shit show we would have if Roe were overturned.

Yeah, because most R's are spineless and are worthless. Orange man came along and did not care and appointed justices that did overturn this abomination RvW.
 
You can revise your stupid post all you want.

Fetuses still aren't babies... Unless you are willing to start executing women for having them, it's all just a lot of talk.
Again. . . .

Actually, dummy, that's precisely what fetuses are, i.e., babies in gestation from quickening to birth:

fe·tus
[ˈfēdəs]
NOUN
  1. an unborn offspring of a mammal, in particular an unborn human baby more than eight weeks after conception.
 
Everything this goofy lady says is insane. Anytime she takes the mic, it's guaranteed she'll screech and rant and make some ridiculous proposal.
Now she wants Biden to use federal lands in red states to constuct baby-killing centers.

She reminds you of the bitchy nutty English teacher you had in tenth grade.

Good for her thinking outside the box.
 
Are you saying the Republicans haven't? By the same logic, Republicans have had 50 years to appoint enough conservative justices to overturn Roe, but have chosen not to. That's because Republicans appointed moderates like Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Kennedy and Roberts, who realized what a shit show we would have if Roe were overturned.
It isn't the Republicans out there setting fires and threatening the lives of judges is it?
The Republicans knew they would never have the numbers to write into law to ban abortion at the federal level. And didn't go batshit crazy about it.
The Democrats have had the numbers to codify RvW for 19 years. And never even brought it up.
And you could care less about that.
RvW would have been enacted into law if the Democrats did their job. But they were more interested in using abortion as a political pawn for those 19 years. And you don't care.
 
The baby-killers' world just ended yesterday. Dey goin' to jail from now on.

And I don't believe in the death penalty, so....

Actually, you won't send one abortionist to jail. Juries would never convict. You got the right to pass laws no one will obey.

Did you guys like, learn nothing from prohibition?

Yeah, because most R's are spineless and are worthless. Orange man came along and did not care and appointed justices that did overturn this abomination RvW.

Actually, he wasn't smart enough to realize WHY Republicans appointed pro-Roe justices. Let's not forget, the Roe Majority was Five Eisenhower and Nixon appointees with two democrats joining in.

Roe was decided because the abortion laws at the time were unworkable and largely being ignored. It wasn't even really controversial at the time. It was only after the Evangelicals needed a new issue to get asses into pews after segregation wasn't selling that this became an issue. But even then, Republicans were smart enough to pay lip service to the rubes, but not indulge them.

Except for Trump. He's an idiot.

Again. . . .

Actually, dummy, that's precisely what fetuses are, i.e., babies in gestation from quickening to birth:
Well, even if you want to use THAT definition, most abortions are performed between 8-12 weeks, before "Quickening".
 
Man,do they even let this guy dress himself?

It isn't the Republicans out there setting fires and threatening the lives of judges is it?
Naw, they just murder abortion doctors and bomb abortion clinics.


The Republicans knew they would never have the numbers to write into law to ban abortion at the federal level. And didn't go batshit crazy about it.

Actually, they easily had the numbers during Bush Jr's term. It would have just been struck down by the courts.

The Democrats have had the numbers to codify RvW for 19 years. And never even brought it up.
And you could care less about that.

Which years were those? They don't have them now. Unless you have a filibuster proof majority, you can't pass such a law for or against.

In the 50 years since Roe, the only years Democrats held both houses of Congress and the White House were 77-80, 93-94, and 09-10. So that's only EIGHT years that such a thing would have been feasible.

RvW would have been enacted into law if the Democrats did their job. But they were more interested in using abortion as a political pawn for those 19 years. And you don't care.

Or they felt they didn't need to pass a law over a protected right.
 
Actually, you won't send one abortionist to jail. Juries would never convict. You got the right to pass laws no one will obey.

Did you guys like, learn nothing from prohibition?



Actually, he wasn't smart enough to realize WHY Republicans appointed pro-Roe justices. Let's not forget, the Roe Majority was Five Eisenhower and Nixon appointees with two democrats joining in.

Roe was decided because the abortion laws at the time were unworkable and largely being ignored. It wasn't even really controversial at the time. It was only after the Evangelicals needed a new issue to get asses into pews after segregation wasn't selling that this became an issue. But even then, Republicans were smart enough to pay lip service to the rubes, but not indulge them.

Except for Trump. He's an idiot.


Well, even if you want to use THAT definition, most abortions are performed between 8-12 weeks, before "Quickening".

Im not basing anything in regards to what the apostate church thinks or thought about RoevW. The state has no business recognizing state sanctioned killing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top