Pluto and Surface Air Pressure

The Climate Science Legal Defense Fund protects the scientific endeavor....




2: activity directed toward a goal : ENTERPRISE



The goal is to increase the amount the Co2 FRAUD has bilked America by more than just the $20 trillion it already has....


The Co2 FRAUD is an "enterprise" meaning it is in the business of profit....

Funny, Einstein never needed a Relativity Legal Defense Fund.... and he posted his actual data, didn't fight in court to keep it secret.
 
The Co2 FRAUD is based entirely on FUDGE. These guys have been active in Co2 FRAUD, and gotten rich off Co2 FRAUD.


This fudge job is easy. Just move dates 183 days forward....


10 minutes for a computer whiz...

How many days apart should the data be, since we're talking about data 6 months apart?
 
The Climate Science Legal Defense Fund protects the scientific endeavor....




2: activity directed toward a goal : ENTERPRISE



The goal is to increase the amount the Co2 FRAUD has bilked America by more than just the $20 trillion it already has....


The Co2 FRAUD is an "enterprise" meaning it is in the business of profit....

Funny, Einstein never needed a Relativity Legal Defense Fund.... and he posted his actual data, didn't fight in court to keep it secret.

Now that I've shown you that data actually exists for the southern hemisphere, find some.
 
How many days apart should the data be, since we're talking about data 6 months apart?


That's the thing about fudging, sometimes it is hard, and sometimes it is easy. If all of their SAP data from Sydney is in one database, they can just alter the dates by starting a new data base and importing the old one with


Date + 183 days

in the cell function.
 
data actually exists



The "data" is suspected of being fudged, like the last one you posted, that map with super high air pressure over Asian land more than 1 mile above sea level.... OOOOppps...

Did the Weather Underground cook up that for you too?
 
That's the thing about fudging, sometimes it is hard, and sometimes it is easy. If all of their SAP data from Sydney is in one database, they can just alter the dates by starting a new data base and importing the old one with


Date + 183 days

in the cell function.

Did I manufacture the website?

Or did the website I found manufacture their data?

Or did your mental illness manufacture all of it?
 
Weather Underground is founded/owned by extreme climate activists...


This guy for one...




“Symptoms” covers signs such as melting ice and extreme weather, while “Science” lays out what we know and how we figured it out. “Debates” tackles the controversy and politics, while “Solutions” and “Actions” discuss what we can do as individuals and communities to create the best possible future.




Problem = Earth not experiencing an ongoing net ice melt










TOO FUNNY, already raising money to hire lawyers to self defend...


donate to the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund



Someone please ask this liar a few basic climate questions he won't answer...

1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

If you knew you were a moron then you'd be slightly more intelligent than a moron.
 
Or did the website I found manufacture their data?


The suspicion here is that, because that website is controlled by Co2 FRAUD activists and profiteers.
 
The suspicion here is that, because that website is controlled by Co2 FRAUD activists and profiteers.

Why would CO2 activists reverse summer and winter SAP readings in a Sydney database that I only found yesterday?

You're the only moron on the planet who thinks SAP increases when it warms.
 
Just a quick reminder: Earth's radius vector sweeps out equal area over equal time ... or Kepler's Second Law more simply stated the Earth moves faster when it's closest to the Sun ... twice the power over half the time delivers the same energy ...

Sorry to interrupt ...
 
Just a quick reminder: Earth's radius vector sweeps out equal area over equal time ... or Kepler's Second Law more simply stated the Earth moves faster when it's closest to the Sun ... twice the power over half the time delivers the same energy ...

Sorry to interrupt ...

What does Kepler say about EMH's idiotic SAP claims?
 
Why would CO2 activists reverse summer and winter SAP readings in a Sydney database that I only found yesterday?

You're the only moron on the planet who thinks SAP increases when it warms.



SAP increases on Mars and Pluto when those planets warm.

SAP was higher during Jurassic when it was also warmer. You have no time period on Earth where that correlation is not present.

You are trying to hype a 1-2% fluctuation that actually is caused by Earth being closer to the Sun, which makes it all three planets that do that, fudging it, and trying to use that to "refute" all the rest, and it ain't happening...

Your "data" comes from a very biased "source" deeply involved in climate profiteering and legal issues, and seems to be raising money for legal causes.... which may very well come soon depending on who Trump picks as AG and FBI Director.

And if that data was "corrected" by moving it back to its actual dates, it would validate the entire theory... which is why you and your kind at WU fudged it...
 
or Kepler's Second Law more simply stated the Earth moves faster when it's closest to the Sun


What a genius you are... so Mercury must be fast... wow... you pass 6th grade...

In reality, the "speeding up" of Earth isn't twice the speed, and this isn't about speed, it is about

WHETHER A PLANET's SAP RISES WHEN IT IS CLOSER TO THE SUN

and we have

Mars and Pluto validating that, and your side is fudging data to claim Earth is "violating" that LAW...
 
What does Kepler say about EMH's idiotic SAP claims?

I'm looking at Charles's Law ... also known as the Law of Volumes ... temperature is proportional to volume under conditions of constant pressure ...

Pressure is fundamentally force per unit area, and the force in this case is gravity, which doesn't change with temperature ... atmospheres are open containers, any increase in temperature will cause and increase in volume, not pressure ...

EMH is too immature to accept any of this ... he thinks he's smarter than 18th Century alchemists or something ...


Barometers on Pluto? ... what a moron ...
Pluto_(Disney)_transparent.png
 
SAP increases on Mars and Pluto when those planets warm.

SAP was higher during Jurassic when it was also warmer. You have no time period on Earth where that correlation is not present.

You are trying to hype a 1-2% fluctuation that actually is caused by Earth being closer to the Sun, which makes it all three planets that do that, fudging it, and trying to use that to "refute" all the rest, and it ain't happening...

Your "data" comes from a very biased "source" deeply involved in climate profiteering and legal issues, and seems to be raising money for legal causes.... which may very well come soon depending on who Trump picks as AG and FBI Director.

And if that data was "corrected" by moving it back to its actual dates, it would validate the entire theory... which is why you and your kind at WU fudged it...

SAP increases on Mars and Pluto when those planets warm.

Nobody cares. SAP decreases on Earth when this planet warms.

SAP was higher during Jurassic when it was also warmer.


Nobody cares.

Prove that twice the current air in our atmosphere is trapped in the ice, or it doesn't matter.

You are trying to hype a 1-2% fluctuation that actually is caused by Earth being closer to the Sun,

If only you could prove closer raised SAP and not colder.

Your "data" comes from a very biased "source" deeply involved in climate profiteering

Why would such a biased source post fake SAP that could be so easily disproven?

Are the biased sources claiming that SAP fluctuations require trillions to fix?

And if that data was "corrected" by moving it back to its actual dates

Find the "real data" before the Jews finish you off for good.
 
and the force in this case is gravity, which doesn't change with temperature


Not according to Mars. Mars completely refutes that statement.

Mars proves temperature and SAP are correlated, as they are in a sealed container and for AP at given altitude.

LOL!!!


atmospheres are open containers


No, they are rigid on one side and force constrained on the other.
 
The Co2 FRAUD always prefers FUDGE to actual DATA.

You could always find some fudge-free data that shows SAP increases when the planet warms.

LOL!

I know, who am I kidding? You're too stupid to find real data that supports your stupid claims.
 
Back
Top Bottom