Plot to behead Pamela Geller

I wouldn't lift a finger to defend that crazy Jew bitch.


You don't have to defend her. How about defending all the infidels that these radicals hate and want to kill. You might be one of them.

What will you do when radical Muslims kill a liberal over something, such as gay rights? Will you say that the activists deserved it for poking the wasp's nest?


There is a big difference between being gay and what that vile thing is doing.

Fuck you hypocrite, both are equal when it comes to radical muslims.
 
So, you are simply going to accept all the radical Muslims, many who live here in the states, and expect everyone else to tiptoe around and be careful not to offend them? That sends a message that we will bend over and do whatever it takes to appease them. And we would have to continue it forever.

I would rather the radicals be the ones who change or leave. We have freedom of speech and people get offended every day. Either learn to turn the other cheek or you face the consequences of your actions.

If we give in on this, there will be a new demand to be met, and so on. The radicals aren't going to be content to live among infidels and they are merely doing this to try and scare us into following their rules. It's sad that the left seems so willing to go along with it.

As usual, the left is bashing the wrong ones. Not a word against the animals who plot to murder innocent people.

And you guys think it's funny when people want to stand up for their rights? You act as if the Muslims are justified for threatening those who offend them. Fucking sheep. You are the reason this country is going to hell.

Libs like it when terrorists threaten to kill people they don't like and want to shut up.
 
Was Mohammed a ******? Sure are a lot of them going radical here in the states. But then they are libs...maybe Mo was a libtard...

He would actually be considered a social conservative. :thup:

Then why are libs the ones who are always defending him?

It doesn't matter who defends him. Would you call radical Muslim beliefs socially conservative?

No. I call them liberal.
 
(CNN) —Usaamah Rahim, who was fatally shot after waving a military knife at law enforcement officers in Boston, was originally plotting to behead Pamela Geller, an activist and conservative blogger, law enforcement sources told CNN on Wednesday.

But Rahim, a 26-year-old security guard who officials believe was radicalized by ISIS and other extremists, decided instead to target the "boys in blue," a reference to police, according to court documents.

"I can't wait that long," he said of the original beheading plan, according to an FBI affidavit filed in federal court in Boston on Wednesday.

Geller drew national attention last month after an off-duty police officer working security thwarted an attack at her organization's contest for Prophet Mohammed drawings in Garland, Texas. She's president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative, which includes subsidiary programs Stop Islamization of America and Stop Islamization of Nations.

"They targeted me for violating Sharia blasphemy laws. They mean to kill everyone who doesn't do their bidding and abide by their law voluntarily," Geller told CNN's Erin Burnett.

"This is a showdown for American freedom. Will we stand against this savagery or bow down to them and silence ourselves?"

Geller said that she's had an "army of security" since last month's thwarted attack.

"This is what is required just to show a cartoon in America, 2015," she said. "It's striking. It's devastating, and people need to understand what's at stake. I mean, if we surrender on this point, what will we surrender next?"

More: Plot to kill conservative activist Geller - National News - KCCI Home

Geller should surrender to ISIS. When you poke a hornet's nest - expect to get stung.

Ahh, all to predictable, the peacenik's response to everything. Surrender. The Islamic response to everything? Surrender or die.

Lakhota, you manage to each time you post, reach a new low. You were hoping that plot would succeed, right?
 
Was Mohammed a ******? Sure are a lot of them going radical here in the states. But then they are libs...maybe Mo was a libtard...

He would actually be considered a social conservative. :thup:

Then why are libs the ones who are always defending him?

It doesn't matter who defends him. Would you call radical Muslim beliefs socially conservative?

No. I call them liberal.

Call them anything your retarded cum addled throat wants to. They are the text book definition of religious conservatives.
 
pamela-geller-thinks-jews-are-civilized.jpg
 
I wonder how all the liberals here would feel if he was wanting to behead a member of Obama's family? After all according to many of the left here and Obama himself he is really taking the fight to ISIS that must offend them and piss them off. Somehow I doubt you would be as nonchalant about and seemingly almost supportive of ISIS beheadings as you seem to be now.
 
Last edited:
Geller interprets her action as freedom of expression. I, like many, looked upon it as a rather childish act.
Muslims saw it as an unpardonable offense. We Christians believe vengeance belongs to Him not us.
I wish her well.
 
Then why are libs the ones who are always defending him?

It doesn't matter who defends him. Would you call radical Muslim beliefs socially conservative?

No. I call them liberal.

Call them anything your retarded cum addled throat wants to. They are the text book definition of religious conservatives.

And you are a text book definition of an America-hating, anti-Semite socialist asshole.

Then I'm sure you can point out how. I only criticized Lakhota and Islamic extremists in this thread, but... I disagreed with a conservative once. :eek:

My politics are on the conservative side of libertarianism. So here it is, I could take the cowards way out and apologize to you in a PM, but since I attacked you in front of the forum, I will apologize to you in front of the forum.

I am quite familiar with bripat's posts, so when you attacked him as you did, I acted how I felt was appropriate. I'm not insulting you, but I'm not as familiar with your posts, as I don't post nearly like I used to. I still don't approve of your attack on bripat, however I should have responded to you in a more cordial manner. I apologize for my attack on you; however I hope you understand my reaction to your attack on bripat. Bripat is one of the good guys.

While I'm a sarcastic, boistorous asshole, and I have no problem admitting it, there was no sarcasm in this post. If you accept my apology, I'll be pleased, if you want to extend the middle finger to me, I understand.
 
I wouldn't lift a finger to defend that crazy Jew bitch.


You don't have to defend her. How about defending all the infidels that these radicals hate and want to kill. You might be one of them.

What will you do when radical Muslims kill a liberal over something, such as gay rights? Will you say that the activists deserved it for poking the wasp's nest?


There is a big difference between being gay and what that vile thing is doing.


Gays are being beheaded and thrown off rooftops by radical Muslims, so apparently they don't see any difference. The radicals hate all infidels who do not follow sharia law and that includes all gays.

I didn't say gays were bad. It's radical Muslims who think they are committing a crime punishable by death and yet you don't defend others who are being slaughtered because they don't follow sharia law. Christians get mocked much worse, yet you lefties don't have a problem with that. So, mocking a religion is not a sin punishable by death except to radical Muslims.

When will the left finally speak out against radical Muslims? I doubt they will say a damn thing until a radical Muslim throws gays off the Golden Gate Bridge or shoots a liberal for offending them. Even then the left will try to blame the right for getting the idiots riled up. They are raised to be radical and need no prompting to kill infidels. Anyone who can kill over words is a subhuman piece of garbage.

Eventually, they will come after people the left support. Then you guy will sing a different tune. For now, it's much like it was in Hitler's time. The people not being targeted didn't speak out or help those being persecuted. No one cared until they were the victims.

There are some childish posts here making fun of the death threat against Geller and you think it's okay for a radical Muslim to threaten someone for exercising freedom of speech. Wake up because there are other things that offend them. Is it okay to kill over being offended or isn't it? Blaming the victims is so naïve.



Of course you would have to bring in Hitler. It's what you do. Being gay is not the same as attacking and degrading an entire religion.
 

Sexy? Holy shit, that's really sick. You'd probably also fuck Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann.


....and on the 8th day, God took a shit, thus creating Lakhota.

OMG, I'm crushed. Let's just stick to the thread topic - cutting off a Jew bitch's head.
Use a mirror boys, you don't want that evil **** looking at you....
images
 
I wouldn't lift a finger to defend that crazy Jew bitch.


You don't have to defend her. How about defending all the infidels that these radicals hate and want to kill. You might be one of them.

What will you do when radical Muslims kill a liberal over something, such as gay rights? Will you say that the activists deserved it for poking the wasp's nest?


There is a big difference between being gay and what that vile thing is doing.

Fuck you hypocrite, both are equal when it comes to radical muslims.


So now you are an expert on Muslims? Where did you gain all that vast knowledge, listening to rush?
 

Forum List

Back
Top