Photographic PROOF of 90 Years of Sea level Rise!

mamooth

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
22,816
Reaction score
4,864
Points
290
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
TRANSLATION: Any inconsistency in Liberal Climate Theory that can be dismissed or explained away, WILL BE.
See? We have one here saying that tides are a liberal conspiracy. They make 'em really, really stupid in denier land.

It's not enough yet to even show beyond the ordinary gravitational pull of the Moon from 238,000 miles away yet, but give it another 9 centuries and it WILL be more than the ordinary tide of the Moon which we have no concern about! :auiqs.jpg:
Our mere earth-logic can't parse that into anything sensible. Denier logic is clearly not like our earth-logic.
 
OP
JimBowie1958

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2011
Messages
62,039
Reaction score
14,120
Points
2,220
Location
Fredericksburg, VA
Antarctica, Greenland and the world's continental ice sheets are pouring billions and billions of tons of meltwater into our oceans. Additionally, the ocean's temperature has increased 0.18C in the last 50 years. Last time I checked, increasing temperatures cause increasing volume. Where the fuck do you think all that's going? And average sea level rise through the 20th century has been 1.7mm/yr. Satellite data since 1993 shows a rise between 2000 and 2020 of 60 mm. That gives a total of approximately 175mm or 6.9 inches. Did you actually expect anyone to believe that a 6.9 inch change would be visible in the two photographs you provided? Fucking idiot.

Let me repeat: Fucking idiot.
1602892089212.png
 

whitehall

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
46,646
Reaction score
10,433
Points
2,040
Location
Western Va.
Mostly left wing "environmentalists" who grew up in front of a computer are willing to use "global warming" as a political tool even if they don't realize it. Migratory bird killing windmills and acres of expensive solar panels built with haz-mat stuff is the pipe dream of the left even if they don't fully understand it. During the bloody 20th century millions of tonnage of oil tankers and ammunition and fuel and God knows what else was dumped in the ocean. Atomic tests obliterated Pacific islands and became so prevalent in Nevada that it became a freaking tourist attraction. The point is that the world survived WW2 and became sensitive about pollution but it took a failed politician with no background in science who figured out a way to sell invisible "carbon credits" for profit to create the (unscientific) political agenda we used to call MMGW (man-made global warming) which has morphed into the benign "climate change" that ironically occurs naturally as the seasons change.
 

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
23,353
Reaction score
5,014
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
TRANSLATION: Any inconsistency in Liberal Climate Theory that can be dismissed or explained away, WILL BE.
See? We have one here saying that tides are a liberal conspiracy. They make 'em really, really stupid in denier land.

It's not enough yet to even show beyond the ordinary gravitational pull of the Moon from 238,000 miles away yet, but give it another 9 centuries and it WILL be more than the ordinary tide of the Moon which we have no concern about! :auiqs.jpg:
Our mere earth-logic can't parse that into anything sensible. Denier logic is clearly not like our earth-logic.
What’s wrong with denying alarmist extremism?
 

toobfreak

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
30,677
Reaction score
14,514
Points
1,600
TRANSLATION: Any inconsistency in Liberal Climate Theory that can be dismissed or explained away, WILL BE.
See? We have one here saying that tides are a liberal conspiracy. They make 'em really, really stupid in denier land.
UP YOURS, SHITSTAIN! Only a frothing idiot lemming like you would try to claim stupidity and denial while plainly and stupidly misquoting a person, claiming something not even remotely close to what I actually said! :auiqs.jpg:
 

Sunsettommy

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
5,710
Reaction score
3,095
Points
1,050
Thread summary:

Every consevative on this thread is too dopey to understand that the concept of "tides" make any photo comparison pointless.

They really shouldn't be bothering the grownups. Conservatives, this is why the normal people send you back to the kiddie table. You're all morons.

This was the only part that you needed to write, the rest was just more of your usual bigoted attacks on people here, the name calling is boring and indicate that you are a profoundly hostile person.

"....the concept of "tides" make any photo comparison pointless."


======


That is what I wonder about too for the city of Sydney, the tidal range difference from low to high

Today's tide times for Sydney, Australia

Today's tide times for Sydney:Saturday 17 October 2020
Tide
tide state
Time (AEDT)& DateHeight
Low Tide2:56 AM(Sat 17 October)0.43 ft(0.13 m)
High Tide9:10 AM(Sat 17 October)5.71 ft(1.74 m)
Low Tide3:23 PM(Sat 17 October)0.39 ft(0.12 m)
High Tide9:33 PM(Sat 17 October)5.51 ft(1.68 m)

LINK


See how easy it was to be nice to everyone here?
 
Last edited:

ChemEngineer

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
1,865
Reaction score
1,064
Points
930
Antarctica, Greenland and the world's continental ice sheets are pouring billions and billions of tons of meltwater into our oceans. Additionally, the ocean's temperature has increased 0.18C in the last 50 years. Last time I checked, increasing temperatures cause increasing volume. Where the fuck do you think all that's going? And average sea level rise through the 20th century has been 1.7mm/yr. Satellite data since 1993 shows a rise between 2000 and 2020 of 60 mm. That gives a total of approximately 175mm or 6.9 inches. Did you actually expect anyone to believe that a 6.9 inch change would be visible in the two photographs you provided? Fucking idiot.

Let me repeat: Fucking idiot.
Well your vulgar insults certainly convinced me to believe you and Al Gore. Yes indeed, when science fails you, simply call those you hate "fucking idiot" and they'll switch sides. It worked for you, didn't it.

1. Glaciers have always melted. Snow continues to fall and accumulate. Antarctica's outposts have buildings that they continue to elevate due to the increased elevation of the ice pack. And Antarctica contains 90% of the world's ice.

2. .07 degrees per decade. Oooooo, scary.
.07 per decade


3. http://TheGlobalWarmingFraud.wordpress.com

Spend a day reading and learning.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,063
Reaction score
1,442
Points
275
Location
N/A
Antarctica, Greenland and the world's continental ice sheets are pouring billions and billions of tons of meltwater into our oceans. Additionally, the ocean's temperature has increased 0.18C in the last 50 years. Last time I checked, increasing temperatures cause increasing volume. Where the fuck do you think all that's going? And average sea level rise through the 20th century has been 1.7mm/yr. Satellite data since 1993 shows a rise between 2000 and 2020 of 60 mm. That gives a total of approximately 175mm or 6.9 inches. Did you actually expect anyone to believe that a 6.9 inch change would be visible in the two photographs you provided? Fucking idiot.

Let me repeat: Fucking idiot.
View attachment 402645
Wow, THAT is an incredibly convincing argument. Thanks.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,063
Reaction score
1,442
Points
275
Location
N/A
Antarctica, Greenland and the world's continental ice sheets are pouring billions and billions of tons of meltwater into our oceans. Additionally, the ocean's temperature has increased 0.18C in the last 50 years. Last time I checked, increasing temperatures cause increasing volume. Where the fuck do you think all that's going? And average sea level rise through the 20th century has been 1.7mm/yr. Satellite data since 1993 shows a rise between 2000 and 2020 of 60 mm. That gives a total of approximately 175mm or 6.9 inches. Did you actually expect anyone to believe that a 6.9 inch change would be visible in the two photographs you provided? Fucking idiot.

Let me repeat: Fucking idiot.
You’re a sheep.
ANOTHER incredibly convincing argument. Have any of you folks ever heard of the concept of EVIDENCE? LOGIC? REASON?
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,063
Reaction score
1,442
Points
275
Location
N/A
Antarctica, Greenland and the world's continental ice sheets are pouring billions and billions of tons of meltwater into our oceans. Additionally, the ocean's temperature has increased 0.18C in the last 50 years. Last time I checked, increasing temperatures cause increasing volume. Where the fuck do you think all that's going? And average sea level rise through the 20th century has been 1.7mm/yr. Satellite data since 1993 shows a rise between 2000 and 2020 of 60 mm. That gives a total of approximately 175mm or 6.9 inches. Did you actually expect anyone to believe that a 6.9 inch change would be visible in the two photographs you provided? Fucking idiot.

Let me repeat: Fucking idiot.
Well your vulgar insults certainly convinced me to believe you and Al Gore.
Why? Does Al Gore use a lot of profanity? No, he doesn't. Was that the best you could come up with for a personal insult? I guess its true what they say about chemical engineers.

Yes indeed, when science fails you, simply call those you hate "fucking idiot" and they'll switch sides. It worked for you, didn't it.
I called him a fucking idiot because he IS a fucking idiot for reasons I clearly demonstrated.

1. Glaciers have always melted.
No they have not. Now who's a fucking idiot.

Snow continues to fall and accumulate. Antarctica's outposts have buildings that they continue to elevate due to the increased elevation of the ice pack. And Antarctica contains 90% of the world's ice.
If, as is currently the case in Greenland and Antarctica, that ice is melting faster than snow is falling, GUESS WHAT HAPPENS.

2. .07 degrees per decade. Oooooo, scary.
.07 per decade


Your graph is NOT global temperature. It is the magnitude of June anomalies. You'd think an engineer might have caught that detail and be aware what it actually meant. Here. Actual global temperatures
1602973266302.png

And since the delta T has obviously been changing on a decadal scale, a linear fit across 140 years is statistical bullshit. It might also be a good idea to compare the current rate of change with pre-industrial trends. Guess what that would show?

Good idea, but I'd suggest reading peer reviewed journals rather than bullshit like that. So, where'd you get your degree from?
 
Last edited:

eagle1462010

Diamond Member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
48,081
Reaction score
15,631
Points
2,250
Thread summary:

Every consevative on this thread is too dopey to understand that the concept of "tides" make any photo comparison pointless.

They really shouldn't be bothering the grownups. Conservatives, this is why the normal people send you back to the kiddie table. You're all morons.
Gore said we'd be under water by now........put your life jacket back on quick.....hurry or you are going to drown.

:CryingCow::CryingCow:
 

BasicHumanUnit

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
13,484
Reaction score
6,599
Points
390
Location
Everywhere needed
Antarctica, Greenland and the world's continental ice sheets are pouring billions and billions of tons of meltwater into our oceans. Additionally, the ocean's temperature has increased 0.18C in the last 50 years. Last time I checked, increasing temperatures cause increasing volume. Where the fuck do you think all that's going? And average sea level rise through the 20th century has been 1.7mm/yr. Satellite data since 1993 shows a rise between 2000 and 2020 of 60 mm. That gives a total of approximately 175mm or 6.9 inches. Did you actually expect anyone to believe that a 6.9 inch change would be visible in the two photographs you provided? Fucking idiot.

Let me repeat: Fucking idiot.
Well your vulgar insults certainly convinced me to believe you and Al Gore.
Why? Does Al Gore use a lot of profanity? No, he doesn't. Was that the best you could come up with for a personal insult? I guess its true what they say about chemical engineers.

Yes indeed, when science fails you, simply call those you hate "fucking idiot" and they'll switch sides. It worked for you, didn't it.
I called him a fucking idiot because he IS a fucking idiot for reasons I clearly demonstrated.

1. Glaciers have always melted.
No they have not. Now who's a fucking idiot.

Snow continues to fall and accumulate. Antarctica's outposts have buildings that they continue to elevate due to the increased elevation of the ice pack. And Antarctica contains 90% of the world's ice.
If, as is currently the case in Greenland and Antarctica, that ice is melting faster than snow is falling, GUESS WHAT HAPPENS.

2. .07 degrees per decade. Oooooo, scary.
.07 per decade


Your graph is NOT global temperature. It is the magnitude of June anomalies. You'd think an engineer might have caught that detail and be aware what it actually meant. Here. Actual global temperatures
View attachment 403152
And since the delta T has obviously been changing on a decadal scale, a linear fit across 140 years is statistical bullshit. It might also be a good idea to compare the current rate of change with pre-industrial trends. Guess what that would show?

Good idea, but I'd suggest reading peer reviewed journals rather than bullshit like that. So, where'd you get your degree from?
How long did it take your 2 year old to create those FAKE Memes ???

ClimateisChanging.jpg


You idiots have been swallowing every drop of Bullshit from your Globalists handlers for decades.

Peoplel like Al Gore and AOC.....very credible sources. <sarcasm>
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,063
Reaction score
1,442
Points
275
Location
N/A
You idiots have been swallowing every drop of Bullshit from your Globalists handlers for decades.

Peoplel like Al Gore and AOC.....very credible sources. <sarcasm>
How about you do a search through the several thousand posts I have here and find all the instances where I have used Al Gore or AOC as a reference. Asshole.
 

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
23,353
Reaction score
5,014
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
Antarctica, Greenland and the world's continental ice sheets are pouring billions and billions of tons of meltwater into our oceans. Additionally, the ocean's temperature has increased 0.18C in the last 50 years. Last time I checked, increasing temperatures cause increasing volume. Where the fuck do you think all that's going? And average sea level rise through the 20th century has been 1.7mm/yr. Satellite data since 1993 shows a rise between 2000 and 2020 of 60 mm. That gives a total of approximately 175mm or 6.9 inches. Did you actually expect anyone to believe that a 6.9 inch change would be visible in the two photographs you provided? Fucking idiot.

Let me repeat: Fucking idiot.
You’re a sheep.
ANOTHER incredibly convincing argument. Have any of you folks ever heard of the concept of EVIDENCE? LOGIC? REASON?
Yeah, that’s why I called you a sheep.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,063
Reaction score
1,442
Points
275
Location
N/A
Antarctica, Greenland and the world's continental ice sheets are pouring billions and billions of tons of meltwater into our oceans. Additionally, the ocean's temperature has increased 0.18C in the last 50 years. Last time I checked, increasing temperatures cause increasing volume. Where the fuck do you think all that's going? And average sea level rise through the 20th century has been 1.7mm/yr. Satellite data since 1993 shows a rise between 2000 and 2020 of 60 mm. That gives a total of approximately 175mm or 6.9 inches. Did you actually expect anyone to believe that a 6.9 inch change would be visible in the two photographs you provided? Fucking idiot.

Let me repeat: Fucking idiot.
You’re a sheep.
ANOTHER incredibly convincing argument. Have any of you folks ever heard of the concept of EVIDENCE? LOGIC? REASON?
Yeah, that’s why I called you a sheep.
Then you must have loads of evidence on which you can apply logic and reason to support whatever theory you seem to hold in opposition to the vast majority of the world's climate scientists. Let's hear it, asshole.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,063
Reaction score
1,442
Points
275
Location
N/A
You idiots have been swallowing every drop of Bullshit from your Globalists handlers for decades.

Peoplel like Al Gore and AOC.....very credible sources. <sarcasm>
How about you do a search through the several thousand posts I have here and find all the instances where I have used Al Gore or AOC as a reference. Asshole.
My apologies BHU. I missed your <sarcasm> tag. I'm often too quick.
 

ChemEngineer

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Messages
1,865
Reaction score
1,064
Points
930
I called him a fucking idiot because he IS a fucking idiot for reasons I clearly demonstrated.
You didn't demonstrate anything clearly except how vulgar and petty you are.

As to your ignorant claim that glaciers don't melt, they are seasonal and move down all over the earth to the oceans, where they calve.

You contradict yourself by first claiming that they don't melt but the oceans are rising, NASA states that Antarctica is accumulating ice, as I originally stated.

A new NASA study says that Antarctica is overall accumulating ice.

Peer reviewed journals are no better than non-peer reviewed journals.

I have no more interest in reading vulgar ignorance that you present.
Join other vulgar people like yourself on my Ignore List.

ciao brutto

.07 per decade
 

RoshawnMarkwees

Assimilationist
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
23,353
Reaction score
5,014
Points
280
Location
Middle class, suburban ghetto.
Antarctica, Greenland and the world's continental ice sheets are pouring billions and billions of tons of meltwater into our oceans. Additionally, the ocean's temperature has increased 0.18C in the last 50 years. Last time I checked, increasing temperatures cause increasing volume. Where the fuck do you think all that's going? And average sea level rise through the 20th century has been 1.7mm/yr. Satellite data since 1993 shows a rise between 2000 and 2020 of 60 mm. That gives a total of approximately 175mm or 6.9 inches. Did you actually expect anyone to believe that a 6.9 inch change would be visible in the two photographs you provided? Fucking idiot.

Let me repeat: Fucking idiot.
You’re a sheep.
ANOTHER incredibly convincing argument. Have any of you folks ever heard of the concept of EVIDENCE? LOGIC? REASON?
Yeah, that’s why I called you a sheep.
Then you must have loads of evidence on which you can apply logic and reason to support whatever theory you seem to hold in opposition to the vast majority of the world's climate scientists. Let's hear it, asshole.
Richard Lindzen, Judith Curry, Watts up with that, etc.
All castigated by MSM and google links which do nothing but enhance their credibility.
Do some vetting, consider the sources of disagreement with non-AGW extremists and use logic.
If you still insist on AGW as absolute, then you’re nothing more that a biased hack.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top