Pete Hegseth lashes out at 'kill them all' report on boat strikes

[Fort Fun Indiana]

22 pages of banter about an unproven nothingburger.

You sure did trip over yourself to make some things up out of thin air to defend against the nothingburger.

 

[Leo123]

How the hell do I know? Ask Hegseth. And you can bet the farm that there IS a video of what happened.

If you don't know, why are you saying it happened? You can't prove it and all you have is TDS hatred.

 

[Mack The Finger]

The military has the military code to go by and we abide by the Geneva Convention. So if Hegseth is doing anything he will face article 92 as well as article 134 plus the Geneva Convention.

I hope you are not a betting man. No one is going to dictate to the United States.

All orders come from the Commander-in-Chief...top to bottom.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I hope you are not a betting man. No one is going to dictate to the United States.

All orders come from the Commander-in-Chief...top to bottom.

Except this one of course, which Trump has already disowned.

Oops.

Do you guys ever get tired of the fat rapist pulling the rug out from under you?

 

[Clipper]

I mentioned capture/rescue may not have been possible. If so, your whining has no teeth. Prove it was possible.

Did they question the narco-terrorist? Did they turn him? You don't know why they let him go.

If he was a "narco terrorist", why was he released? That hole you're digging is getting deeper.

 

[kyzr]

Why are you claiming isn’t proven?

Prove that Hegseth said "kill them all". He denies it. I saw no one prove he gave an illegal order.
Shooting twice at a target is not unusual.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Weak sauce.

The solution then is to kill em?

The solution was to sink the boat completely, which took two shots, according to some people I know who asked not to be named. They were not deliberately killed. They made no effort to indicate surrender or desire to be rescued. They died firing flare guns at the drone.

Brave or hopped up on their own supply? my sources couldn't say.

"If anyone had survived the second shot, then how would a drone have been able to rescue them?" is the question that you are currently dodging.

 

[Delldude]

Based.on Trump saying he would not have wanted the order given.

Nobody knows what orders were given other than what's reported in the media.

The solution then is to kill em?

Who says anyone was killed?

 

[Rogue AI]

Yes it does. Notice you have to make shit up out of thin air to have anything to say.

And the rescue of two survivors later shows it is not impossible.

So ya got nothin'.

Unenforceable law is no law at all. Try harder. All a court could do is order them to try, they cannot force an outcome that is not possible. You loons need to think things through.

Different situation, perhaps they changed methods or something. You cannot compare them unless you have some proof both were handled identically.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Prove that Hegseth said "kill them all".

Thats what the congressional committees will do.

 

[Clipper]

Except this one of course, which Trump has already disowned.

Oops.

Do you guys ever get tired of the fat rapist pulling the rug out from under you?

Leavitt just threw an Admiral under the bus today in a W.H. presser saying he was "authorized", blah blah blah.

The shit coming from that crew is really getting deep.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Unenforceable law is no law at all.

Except they did rescue two survivors.

So yeah, you're embarrassing yourself.

 

[Delldude]

Thats what the congressional committees will do.

So until then all you have is speculation.

 

[Rogue AI]

If he was a "narco terrorist", why was he released? That hole you're digging is getting deeper.

If the narco-terrorist is now giving information on the ground they are more valuable than sitting in a cell on the taxpayers' dime. Perhaps your lovely cartels will be merciful and take good care of him. Who knows? Certainly not you.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Prove that Hegseth said "kill them all". He denies it. I saw no one prove he gave an illegal order.
Shooting twice at a target is not unusual.

Shooting twice isn't the issue. If it had been a two shot salvo, not a problem.

The problem is there was a single strike, it was determined there were unarmed survivors in the water or clinging to wreckage and a sperate strike was ordered to kill them.

WW

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So until then all you have is speculation.

Oh no!

I apologize for any pain and suffering I have caused you or your gerbil.

 

[Delldude]

Oh no!

I apologize for any pain and suffering I have caused you or your gerbil.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/12/01/politics/trump-venezuela-meeting

 

[Clipper]

If the narco-terrorist is now giving information on the ground they are more valuable than sitting in a cell on the taxpayers' dime. Perhaps your lovely cartels will be merciful and take good care of him. Who knows? Certainly not you.

Keep digging. It's priceless!

 

[Rogue AI]

Keep digging. It's priceless!

So you got nothing but more whining? Got it.

 

[Rogue AI]

Except they did rescue two survivors.

So yeah, you're embarrassing yourself.

When your reading comprehension reaches the point you can get past the first sentence, get back to me. That was covered.