Pete Hegseth lashes out at 'kill them all' report on boat strikes

Shooting twice isn't the issue. If it had been a two shot salvo, not a problem.

The problem is there was a single strike, it was determined there were unarmed survivors in the water or clinging to wreckage and a sperate strike was ordered to kill them.
You don't know ANY of that.

Your claim is based on a second hand report from a completely unknown source who wouldnt put his name on the claim.
 
You don't know ANY of that.

Your claim is based on a second hand report from a completely unknown source who wouldnt put his name on the claim.

I’m open to a non-executive branch review to get the facts. Subpoena power sands the ability to take testimony under oath subject to perjury.

How about you.

WW
 
I’m open to a non-executive branch review to get the facts. Subpoena power sands the ability to take testimony under oath subject to perjury. How about you. WW
No witch hunts. Just ask the ******* pilots what happened.
 
Your claim is based on a second hand report from a completely unknown source who wouldnt put his name on the claim.

Hey...don't be stealing my material.

It has been a long time so I forget alot of Military stuff.

LIBs don't understand...they already had thier mission plan when they took off.

The Military does not use the "kill everybody terminology" except for may be the lower levels of the chain of command while in battle. They may say "mission accomplished...as planned...returning to base." Up the chain...they know a whole from those 3 sentences.
 
No witch hunts. Just ask the ******* pilots what happened.

No witch hunt.

Agreed ask the pilots and examine to footage of the strike.

If the 2nd strike was on survivors of the first strike in the water it on wastage - then start asking to the chain of command. Determine who B issued the orders.

WW
 
Rats scurrying for cover.


Its what happens when you appoint an alcoholic talk show host to run the military.
Stop Lying.
“Some people I kn
It was good enough for the WaPo and for you to lap it up.

Don't get mad because my truthful sources contradict your liars.
I’m open to a non-executive branch review to get the facts. Subpoena power sands the ability to take testimony under oath subject to perjury.

How about you.

WW
Absolutely.

Start by swearing in the WaPo reporter who claimed he or she had an anonymous source for these claims. Then the source can testify under oath and under his or her name.

If it then seems like a good lead, investigate it thoroughly.

Otherwise, I'm not interested in spending millions of tax dollars on investigations of allegations that some guy in a bathrobe smoking weed dreams up and prints.
 
Pete's book, "The War on Warriors" gave his plan to remake the Department of War.
Better than the Biden's MIA guy, EV tanks, DEI, woke, tranny's rule, and no standards for anything.

After serving in combat, blowing off steam is recommended. You should respect real combat veterans.

Always with the deflections.
 
Hey...don't be stealing my material.

It has been a long time so I forget alot of Military stuff.

LIBs don't understand...they already had thier mission plan when they took off.

The Military does not use the "kill everybody terminology" except for may be the lower levels of the chain of command while in battle. They may say "mission accomplished...as planned...returning to base." Up the chain...they know a whole from those 3 sentences.
Yes, someone saying "kill everbody" is a Hollywood fantasy. They see that in a movie and think it must be real, because the actors are so believable.

The Sheen's are especially convincing for them. Gets them all work up.
 
Yes, someone saying "kill everbody" is a Hollywood fantasy. They see that in a movie and think it must be real, because the actors are so believable.

The Sheen's are especially convincing for them. Gets them all work up.
Was there a second strike ordered or not?
 
No witch hunt. Agreed ask the pilots and examine to footage of the strike.
If the 2nd strike was on survivors of the first strike in the water it on wastage - then start asking to the chain of command. Determine who B issued the orders. WW
If the pilots say no one ordered the 2nd strike, it was their discretion, no second guessing them.
 
15th post
They're "at war" with everybody.

Laws don't matter.
The call everyone evil and this justifies everything...

First it was the Mexicans, but we are not Mexican
Then is was the LGBTQ+, but we are not LGBTQ+
Next it was Farmers, but we are not Farmers,
....

These guys don't give a ****...

This will be a simple investigation...
Who pull the trigger, who ordered you(have you got proof, witness will do)?
Then you gave the order, have you got proof?
...

The problem with the ****
 
Yes, someone saying "kill everbody" is a Hollywood fantasy. They see that in a movie and think it must be real, because the actors are so believable.

The Sheen's are especially convincing for them. Gets them all work up.

I like CIA / ORG Crime shoot 'em ups and I like the actors...some of them look like they're for real. Some of them look like "good actors."

I watched a Arnold S. 3 letter GOV movie. It was terrible but I watched thru just to kill time.

The greatest acting I have ever seen was Marlon Brando / Colonel Kurtz, in Apocalypse Now.
 
Was there a second strike ordered or not?
You should have the facts if you are going to make claims.

I don't doubt that if they hit the cartel drug boat with a drone, and the boat was damaged but no destroyed, they would have fired a second shot.

The idea that they fired one shot, saw survivors swimming in the water, then paused and radio'd Sec Def Hegseth to ask if they should shoot the survivors, is pure fantasy.

Since we are both guessing, mine is that they fired, saw the boat was still afloat, and fired again. But that's only a guess. Maybe it was SOP to do a double tap, that makes sense also.

The idea of Pete Hegseth watching the feed and saying, "look at those little brown dudes dog paddlin' like they was crossing the Rio Grand-ay!" and ordering a second strike is an SNL sketch that some posters on here want to believe really happened.

None of the videos that the news is airing show clearly how much time passed between a first shot and a second. Some of them are misleadingly editing together multiple strikes on different days.

I like World Watcher's idea of doing an independent investigation, starting with putting the journalist who broke the story and then his source under oath, so that the investigators know who to question next.
 
I like CIA / ORG Crime shoot 'em ups and I like the actors...some of them look like they're for real. Some of them look like "good actors."

I watched a Arnold S. 3 letter GOV movie. It was terrible but I watched thru just to kill time.

The greatest acting I have ever seen was Marlon Brando / Colonel Kurtz, in Apocalypse Now.
I liked the old Stan Kubrick movie "Paths of Glory."


I'll bet a lot of the lefties on here have seen it many times.

It has a heroic commander (Kirk Douglas!), just trying to keep killing to the minimum (in the trenches of WWII), and his very villianous senior Commander, a Frenchie, no less. The movie was about the French Army, but for some reason, the good guy was American in a French uniform. Everyone else had a French accent, but not Kirk Douglas. He had the dimples. Not a dry liberal man in the House when his pictures played.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom