Pete Hegseth lashes out at 'kill them all' report on boat strikes

The boat was struck by a missile. We're there people close enough to rescue anyone? Was there even enough time, given they were injured? It would be cruel and unusual to leave them to die a painful death, suffering and such. Of course that is only relevant if this whole thing isn't just another liberal fabrication.
So Petey may have ordered the hit because they were injured & he wanted to put them out of their misery, like a dog or a maim horse? Are you insane?

Guess what? Me thinks Petey ordered the second hit because dead men tell no tales. If he did he's a sick son of a ***** who needs to be held accountable.
 
The DOD Law of War Manual is clear. The articles were detailed.

UCMJ is also clear on the consequences.

The bots, trolls, incels, and kool aid drinkers have nothing.

There will be consequences in 2029 after Trump is gone, and all of the magaflexing isn't going to be able to save those complicit. This actually deserves summary execution by firing squad on a military base.
There might be consequences before that. The Republicans in congress are not pleased with their military being besmirched by drunken morons who are putting on shows of weakness by murdering drug runners.
 
Our laws don’t extend to cartels running drugs in the open sea, Dipshit.
Clown, show evidence that they're drug runners, CLOWN. Btw, Trump humper, if those people are narco terrorists how come they're not being captured to gather evidence? Why aren't those bosts being seized to show that dope is being run accross the C.S. by drug runner's? Hmmm? :dunno:
 
So Petey may have ordered the hit because they were injured & he wanted to put them out of their misery, like a dog or a maim horse? Are you insane?

Guess what? Me thinks Petey ordered the second hit because dead men tell no tales. If he did he's a sick son of a ***** who needs to be held accountable.
If rescue wasn't a viable option, those folks would suffer immensely, likely eaten by sharks or something. Then you loons would whine about that. Your defense of narco-terrorists is noted. Any other enemies of the people you'd like to defend?
 
If rescue wasn't a viable option, those folks would suffer immensely, likely eaten by sharks or something. Then you loons would whine about that. Your defense of narco-terrorists is noted. Any other enemies of the people you'd like to defend?
Tough shit, the law says you have to rescue them.

As they did with two survivors of a later, similar boat attack.
 
1764624415570.webp



 
The DOD Law of War Manual is clear. The articles were detailed.

UCMJ is also clear on the consequences.

The bots, trolls, incels, and kool aid drinkers have nothing.

There will be consequences in 2029 after Trump is gone,
What do you think Rubio, Bondi, Vance or Don Jr. will do?
 
If rescue wasn't a viable option, those folks would suffer immensely, likely eaten by sharks or something. Then you loons would whine about that. Your defense of narco-terrorists is noted. Any other enemies of the people you'd like to defend?
Who said they couldn't be captured? Btw, they captured a guy not long ago who turned out to be a fisherman. He was released on the double before he could talk. Guess why?
 
When they relate what whistle blowers tell them, that's not speculation.

We may not be at war with venezuela yet, but you are at war with the English language.
The proper vernacular was ''according to two people familiar with the matter'.

But he is already a dead man walking.
Based on what, more of your speculation?
 
There was a video of the boat being obliterated. It was released right away. I have been asking you loons where the video of humans swimming in the water and being blown up is. Where is THAT video?
How the hell do I know? Ask Hegseth. And you can bet the farm that there IS a video of what happened.
 
The law never forces the impossible, since it can't. Try harder.
Yes it does. Notice you have to make shit up out of thin air to have anything to say.

And the rescue of two survivors later shows it is not impossible.

So ya got nothin'.
 
15th post
Who said they couldn't be captured? Btw, they captured a guy not long ago who turned out to be a fisherman. He was released on the double before he could talk. Guess why?
I mentioned capture/rescue may not have been possible. If so, your whining has no teeth. Prove it was possible.

Did they question the narco-terrorist? Did they turn him? You don't know why they let him go.
 
22 pages of banter about an unproven nothingburger.

Makes me want to start another thread about Epstein.
 
22 pages of banter about an unproven nothingburger.

Makes me want to start another thread about Epstein.
Why are you claiming isn’t proven?
 
Back
Top Bottom