Perhaps the best test of alternate realities - clear video of the shooting

She was a member of a group that set out to block and obstruct ICE in doing their job

She refused to obey a lawful order to get out of the car

She tried to drive away as an officer was still in physical contact with the car

She did hit another officer which caused injuries

Yet some call this a murder when the officer fired his weapon?

What gives?
Your alleged facts are not facts. And we have a right to disagree with our government, even to be civil disobeidient...it doesn't give cops a right to kill us...for goodness sake! She did not try to kill him. She did not run him over. There is no video of her even bumping him that I have SEEN....he put himself in danger, thus his actions count against him....

He shot her twice after he was out of the car's way....that's a no no.
 
Your alleged facts are not facts. And we have a right to disagree with our government, even to be civil disobeidient...it doesn't give cops a right to kill us...for goodness sake! She did not try to kill him. She did not run him over. There is no video of her even bumping him that I have SEEN....he put himself in danger, thus his actions count against him....

He shot her twice after he was out of the car's way....that's a no no.
It was confirmef by her neigjbor and friend. Her wife admitted such

Care the ***** hit a police officer which caused internal bleeding

I guarantee you if you or I did the same thing we would six feet under or in a urn
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
It does when you assault one with a motor vehicle.

You're lying. Your own curt case says so.
Do these Democrats have any idea the criminals that are in their neighborhood and near their kids?
01KF1406ZC1QDDFMHQAETCXD43.webp
 
You Dems can tag posts ",fake nrws" all you want. It does not change the facts you are determined to ignore

I do hope you never lose a lived one to.a mucking ILLEGAL

Based on what I have seen, some of you would blame Trump for not deporting them
 
Nope. That is not how it works, since the Supreme Court ruling of 9 to 0 on Barnes vs Felix in May of 2025.

The totality of the incident MUST BE taken in to consideration for its reasonableness, of the actions....including whether the cop followed guidelines and regs on him placing himself in danger by his own actions, whether the car driver had committed a felony or violent felony and that is why they stopped her or just a driving infraction etc etc etc....
Good luck with that.

Especially right before 3 illegals ambushed an ICE agent.

The person who should be going to jail is the slime she called a wife.

She was out baiting the officer right before it happened.

Only adding to the situation.
 
Your alleged facts are not facts. And we have a right to disagree with our government, even to be civil disobeidient...it doesn't give cops a right to kill us...for goodness sake!
Nope, but moving your car in his direction when he is vulnerable might.....for goodness sake.

She did not try to kill him.
You don't know that. You have no idea what she was thinking.

She pushed the car forward and struck him.

That's what we know.

What you think you know is meaningless.

She did not run him over.
Had he not moved or been knocked out of the way she might have.

There is no video of her even bumping him that I have SEEN
How convenient. It's all over this site.

he put himself in danger, thus his actions count against him....
This is simply stupid.

She was given a direction and failed to comply.

Instead she chose to flee. Her actions are all on her.

Had she followed their commands, she'd still be a live.

But her "wife" told her to drive on. Hmmmmm........

He shot her twice after he was out of the car's way....that's a no no.
They are taught to fire in small bursts. That is likely training kicking in.

Talk to the head of ICE.
 
Democrats are blinded by hate, rage, and jealousy. They will never accept Cackles lost.

For the next three years the Dem game plan is oppose everything Trumo is for and support everything he is against
Yeah Cackles was just another feckless weak vessel they wanted full control over, but the plan was foiled. Obama with his cronies wanted a fourth term behind the scenes, but that too was foiled. Now their only remaining option is exactly what you described above... 👍
 
This is starting at the top. We have never had a President be this aggressively divisive, not even close, not ever.

Every single goddamn day, multiple times a day.

He could start turning this whole thing around today. But he won't.
So for year's you got yourself use to weak (probably corrupt go along to get along), Pieces of crap politician's that allowed all what you are witnessing today, to then actually materialize along with the acceptance of their brainwashing that made them think that it was A-OK for their imaginations to just run so wild that they became like creatures unrecognizable to normal Americans these day's.

Can't even answer Josh Hawleys question "can a biological male get pregnant" ????.. Of course anyone in their right mind knows the immediate answer in which is an emphatical NO, but we gave witness to a so called doctor and her attempt to skate or deflect for fear of going against the radical left. It's where we are folks, and the left is the guilty party.
 
This thread is less about the Minnesota shooting and more about how America has split into two different realities.

President Trump, Vice President Vance, Secretary Noem and most MAGAs on this site are saying the ICE agent was "hit" or "run over".

This is easily the clearest view of the positioning of the vehicle and the shooter. At :09, she puts the vehicle in drive, you can see the tires turning to the right, and the shooting begins.

Please view this video and describe how the agent is "hit". Or, please tell me if you think Trump, Vance, Noem and MAGA are lying.

PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT YOU SEE.


 
I have to say... it does look very different in that clip. And in the background there's a person with white pants on walking in a strange way...which I don't see in the main clip. (I'll have to look again when I have more time.)

I have to go now, but it is very weird. So I'd like to get to the bottom of it... maybe there's another angle I haven't seen yet that syncs with that one that shows that strange person walking by.

I hope you don't mind me posting this vid below in your thread. But I agree with what this person said....accountability is essential, or else everything will get worse.

This is hard to watch:


 
.
I see a cold-blooded murder.

When the federal government starts shooting Americans, it is just a matter of time before they start shooting back. This is just the sort of thing all the Second Amendment fanatics talk about.


.

Oh please. You guys couldn’t care less about protecting the 2nd Amendment, but if your misplaced rage over ICE wakes your side up to the importance of citizens being armed, then that’s good for everyone.
 

As the second by second analysis of the incident shows, using a number of videos from multiple angles, the regime's narrative about the shooting is a total fabrication.

Which is why they are stonewalling an investigation.

President Trump and members of his administration have said that Renee Good, the woman killed by a federal agent in Minneapolis on Jan. 7, “weaponized her vehicle” against the agent who shot her — an interpretation they claim is confirmed by the agent’s cellphone video.

“She didn’t try to run him over,” Mr. Trump said on the day of the shooting. “She ran him over.”

That description has been contested by local and state officials, who have blamed the federal government for the tension, saying aggressive tactics that violate police protocol had stirred unrest. Demonstrators have taken to the streets nationwide to protest the killing of Ms. Good, a U.S. citizen. The administration has responded by sending 1,000 additional agents to Minnesota.

In a video analysis, The Times focuses on some of the key contested moments of the agent’s cellphone video alongside other footage. More videos are likely to emerge, but the visual evidence shows no indication that the agent who fired the shots, Jonathan Ross, had been run over. The footage provides visibility into the positioning between the agent and Ms. Good’s S.U.V., and the key moments of escalation. It also establishes — millisecond by millisecond — how Mr. Ross put himself in a dangerous position near her vehicle in the first place.
 
15th post
As the second by second analysis of the incident shows, using a number of videos from multiple angles, the regime's narrative about the shooting is a total fabrication.

Which is why they are stonewalling an investigation.

I think there is a lot of gray area here actually. The shooting by the ICE officer seems to fall within the broad definition of justified. In the same way a ball hitting the upright and going through still counts as a field goal.

The crime is ICE being there in this capacity. Its designed to be a show of force to intimidate and dehumanize people to score political points.

The fault lies with Trump.
 
I think there is a lot of gray area here actually. The shooting by the ICE officer seems to fall within the broad definition of justified. In the same way a ball hitting the upright and going through still counts as a field goal.

The crime is ICE being there in this capacity. Its designed to be a show of force to intimidate and dehumanize people to score political points.

The fault lies with Trump. Nobody else.
Oh so now MR PC Trump was driving and hit the officer, then put the blond ***** behind the wheel
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom