"ties to terrorism" and "ties to terrorists who attacked us" are two completely different things.
If "ties to terrorism" were all it took to get a place invaded, conquered and occupied by the US military, South Boston, Massachusetts would have been under martial law a long time ago for their continued support for IRA terror.
?????
I'm not justifying action. And I know that Iraq had nothing to do with
9-11. Thanks for clarifying the differences in terrorism....
