Pelosi stock trading record: 16,930% returns.

[Nostra]

Nope. Prove it.

Already did. I provided the link. Not my problem you refuse to look at it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What damages does Pelosi have from the NY Post article?

Well if it unleashes the DOJ on her and she incurs massive legal fees. That’s for her attorney to ascertain but it’s quite slanderous.

 

[Marener]

Well if it unleashes the DOJ on her and she incurs massive legal fees. That’s for her attorney to ascertain but it’s quite slanderous.

Since there’s no investigation, and even if there was no way to prove it occurred because of an article, then there’s no damage, I suppose that’s a plausible reason as to why she hasn’t sued.

If you’re a public figure, you should expect this kind of dishonesty. Public figures who sue are thin skinned, weak losers.

 

[Marener]

Already did. I provided the link. Not my problem you refuse to look at it.

Your AI slop is meaningless.

 

[Nostra]

Your AI slop is meaningless.

Two INDIVIDUAL STOCKS listed in Biden’s STOCK PORTFOLIO:

Microsoft
Apple


Those never have legislation pending that affects them, huh stupid?

 

[Nostra]

Your AI slop is meaningless.

Still don’t know how AI works, huh Simp.

You took what I cut and pasted from my link, fed it into AI, and then claim AI invented it.

What a moron.

 

[Marener]

Two INDIVIDUAL STOCKS listed in Biden’s STOCK PORTFOLIO:

Microsoft
Apple


Those never have legislation pending that affects them, huh stupid?

Show me the financial disclosure listing them.

 

[Dragonlady]

Zero

Never had an article written about me that was a lie and slanderous.

What a weird question

Hey stoopid!!! You don't need someone to write an article about you to sue for slander. Anyone who starts or promotes a rumour about you which isn't true and negatively impacts your life, or your income, is guilty of slander.

Of course, calling you stupid, ill-informed and a waste of skin would be stating the obvious and not actionable at all.

 

[Nostra]

Show me the financial disclosure listing them.

Where did I claim your Vegetable Messiah reported them as required?

You think that’s the only record of them?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Since there’s no investigation, and even if there was no way to prove it occurred because of an article, then there’s no damage, I suppose that’s a plausible reason as to why she hasn’t sued.

If you’re a public figure, you should expect this kind of dishonesty. Public figures who sue are thin skinned, weak losers.

That’s untrue. Hulk Hogan bankrupted Gawker. There are laws and slander and lies are against the law.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Dragonlady you hate Jews

Sue me

 

[Lockback]

Hey stoopid!!! You don't need someone to write an article about you to sue for slander. Anyone who starts or promotes a rumour about you which isn't true and negatively impacts your life, or your income, is guilty of slander.

Of course, calling you stupid, ill-informed and a waste of skin would be stating the obvious and not actionable at all.

I think he should sue you for writing this claptrap.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I think he should sue you for writing this claptrap.

You have to show malice. She is a stupid old hag but if I knew she didn’t hate Jews and maliciously said she did, she could sue me. Unfortunately for her she has quotes that support the claim.

 

[Marener]

Where did I claim your Vegetable Messiah reported them as required?

You think that’s the only record of them?

So where is the record?

 

[Marener]

That’s untrue. Hulk Hogan bankrupted Gawker. There are laws and slander and lies are against the law.

Hulk Hogan didn’t bankrupt Gawker for slander, but for invasion of privacy.

Maybe Hunter Biden should have sued Rudy for $100 million.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Hulk Hogan didn’t bankrupt Gawker for slander, but for invasion of privacy.

Maybe Hunter Biden should have sued Rudy for $100 million.

He would have to prove malice. Good luck with that. He can try.

It wasn’t just invasion of privacy. Do you ever tell the truth?


The lawsuit centered on:

• Invasion of privacy
• Publication of private facts
• Intentional infliction of emotional distre

 

[Marener]

He would have to prove malice. Good luck with that. He can try.

It wasn’t just invasion of privacy. Do you ever tell the truth?


The lawsuit centered on:

• Invasion of privacy
• Publication of private facts
• Intentional infliction of emotional distre

All applies to Rudy Giuliani and the NY Post.

Invaded privacy.
Published private facts.
Intentionally inflicted emotional damage.

 

[Lockback]

Hulk Hogan didn’t bankrupt Gawker for slander, but for invasion of privacy.

Maybe Hunter Biden should have sued Rudy for $100 million.

Hunter should sue himself for being so fucked up he left his laptop at a repair shop with all that shit on it.

What a dumbass.
He had two strikes against him:
1) Being a drug addict
2) Being the son of the dumbest man to ever occupy the Oval Office

 

[gipper]

So you are complaining that Trump bought stocks (which he didn’t because he’s not running his companies) at a time he was planning to go to war with Iran which would depress the market?

Lol. You’re not informed. Get informed.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

All applies to Rudy Giuliani and the NY Post.

Invaded privacy.
Published private facts.
Intentionally inflicted emotional damage.

Then he should sue. Were the facts incorrect? What’s he afraid of?