Patriots Super Bowl ring

[LA RAM FAN]

This thread is improving!

Indeed it is.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

This never will end.

"Per the [league] source, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is being pushed by a small handful of influential owners to hold firm on the four-game suspension. Working against that pressure, however, is the fear that the four-game suspension would be wiped out by a federal court."

Report Influential NFL Owners Pushing For Full Tom Brady Suspension

I tip my hat off to these small handful of owners for not being afraid to stand up to Goodell who has always had his head up Krafts ass.

Now if they would just grow some balls and demand that Goodel be fired as NFL commissioner and for Kraft lose ownership of the team,and Belicheat banned from football,the game could be reformed.

 

[Papageorgio]

someone farted in here.^

**** you *****.

 

[Papageorgio]

It's a Freudian thing, Phallics...which means it's probably over your head. The fact is...every time you start talking about Tom Brady...you seem fixated on his genitals and some strange "secret wishes" thing that I'm pretty sure I don't want to know anything about!

Oldstyle: “I have a hard-on” no more need be said.

Maybe you should stop taking advice from your constantly inebriated and occasionally institutionalized dominatrix ChrisL on what to post and stick to the OP.

I do agree your antics and warped posting about knowing Brady, his wife, Krapt and the Pats is over my head, I have no idea what you are talking about let alone what reality you think you are in. The Pats got dinged you got pissed and have attempted to derail this thread since the Wells report was issued.

You really need to act your age instead of your shoe size, but then again your shoe size is probably equivalent to your IQ. If anyone is inebriated around here it would be yourself and your crazy as **** girlfriend, Skye. You two make a great couple.

ChrisL: "you can't find a woman!" You need to stick to one story ChrisL either I cannot find a woman or I have a woman, I know that is hard for you with your perpetual hangover. Maybe you shout just stick to the OP.

Banana? You are really working overtime on this to no avail. Another day, another meltdown.

It's a Freudian thing, Phallics...which means it's probably over your head. The fact is...every time you start talking about Tom Brady...you seem fixated on his genitals and some strange "secret wishes" thing that I'm pretty sure I don't want to know anything about!

Oldstyle: “I have a hard-on” no more need be said.

Maybe you should stop taking advice from your constantly inebriated and occasionally institutionalized dominatrix ChrisL on what to post and stick to the OP.

I do agree your antics and warped posting about knowing Brady, his wife, Krapt and the Pats is over my head, I have no idea what you are talking about let alone what reality you think you are in. The Pats got dinged you got pissed and have attempted to derail this thread since the Wells report was issued.

You really need to act your age instead of your shoe size, but then again your shoe size is probably equivalent to your IQ. If anyone is inebriated around here it would be yourself and your crazy as **** girlfriend, Skye. You two make a great couple.

ChrisL.......does the L in your name stands for Looney????

like in ..... ChrisLooney?

why do you bring up my name in this thread? I haven't participated in this thread at all.

thats chrissy troll for ya.all this time here I was always under the impression chrissy here was a dude just like pooper and fartstyle who both have mancrushs on Brady and Belicheat.

well since chrissy is a she,unlike pooper and trollstyle,she at least gets a pass for having a mancrush on brady and belicheat.for pooper and trollstyle though for them though,thats pretty sad.

Fucktard! You have no honesty or integrity. Hand job you are waste of bandwidth.

 

[Papageorgio]

This thread is improving!

Indeed it is.

Not with you posting in it hand job.

 

[Alex.]

Here s what happens if Tom Brady takes his Deflategate suspension to court - Business Insider

This explains it better than I. I agree that an injunction will occur.

As I stated in other posts, Minnesota made the same infraction and only a letter was generated as a warning. This could bite them big time.

Also as the article stated the equipment personnel not the players are responsible for the equipment.

Then you have the wishy washy report, not saying that Brady definitely knew.

As far as I am concerned, Brady knew, however this was a poor investigation and taking it the federal court will hurt the NFL.

Why Tom Brady Will Win If He Sues Roger Goodell And The NFL Over Deflategate - Forbes

Sal Paolantonio The NFL think it s going to lose in court Mighty1090AM

So far the NFL gathered enough evidence to satisfy the preponderance of the evidence threshold. It appears no rules were broken in the CBA. We shall see.

 

[Papageorgio]

Preponderance of evidence? By whose standard? Certainly not a real court, it was an NFL investigation, no court investigated.

I am beginning to think no suspension will be the final outcome. Brady will start the season on Thursday night.

 

[Alex.]

Preponderance of evidence? By whose standard? Certainly not a real court, it was an NFL investigation, no court investigated.

I am beginning to think no suspension will be the final outcome. Brady will start the season on Thursday night.

Where did the NFL violate the CBA? A court case will look at that and very rarely at guilt or innocence that would undermine the alternative dispute resolution alternative firmly established in the American legal system.

 

[ChrisL]

Preponderance of evidence? By whose standard? Certainly not a real court, it was an NFL investigation, no court investigated.

I am beginning to think no suspension will be the final outcome. Brady will start the season on Thursday night.

Here's to hoping!

 

[Dot Com]

This never will end.

"Per the [league] source, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is being pushed by a small handful of influential owners to hold firm on the four-game suspension. Working against that pressure, however, is the fear that the four-game suspension would be wiped out by a federal court."

Report Influential NFL Owners Pushing For Full Tom Brady Suspension

The NFL is a monopoly, kind of like the mob, so it doesn't surprise me that they are trying to eliminate the suspension to increase revenue. Thats another reason I'm not a big supporter of the cartel

 

[ChrisL]

This never will end.

"Per the [league] source, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is being pushed by a small handful of influential owners to hold firm on the four-game suspension. Working against that pressure, however, is the fear that the four-game suspension would be wiped out by a federal court."

Report Influential NFL Owners Pushing For Full Tom Brady Suspension

The NFL is a monopoly, kind of like the mob, so irt doesn't surprise me that they are trying to eliminate the suspension to increase revenue. Thats another reason I'm not a big supporter of the cartel

People want to see Brady play, not some nobody. That is what they are paying to see.

 

[Papageorgio]

Where did the NFL violate the CBA? A court case will look at that and very rarely at guilt or innocence that would undermine the alternative dispute resolution alternative firmly established in the American legal system.

The policies for handling equipment in the NFL manuals falls under employees and not players. Even if the rule applied to Brady, there is no precedent for a four game suspension. Under the current CBA, the players have a right to know the specific consequences for specific violations of league rules. With the way the NFL handle Minnesota's tampering, it was merely a letter. So there are no specific penalties for what happened, that goes against the CBA.

 

[Alex.]

Where did the NFL violate the CBA? A court case will look at that and very rarely at guilt or innocence that would undermine the alternative dispute resolution alternative firmly established in the American legal system.

The policies for handling equipment in the NFL manuals falls under employees and not players. Even if the rule applied to Brady, there is no precedent for a four game suspension. Under the current CBA, the players have a right to know the specific consequences for specific violations of league rules. With the way the NFL handle Minnesota's tampering, it was merely a letter. So there are no specific penalties for what happened, that goes against the CBA.

The CBA as it pertains to the hearing?

 

[Alex.]

This never will end.

"Per the [league] source, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is being pushed by a small handful of influential owners to hold firm on the four-game suspension. Working against that pressure, however, is the fear that the four-game suspension would be wiped out by a federal court."

Report Influential NFL Owners Pushing For Full Tom Brady Suspension

The NFL is a monopoly, kind of like the mob, so irt doesn't surprise me that they are trying to eliminate the suspension to increase revenue. Thats another reason I'm not a big supporter of the cartel

People want to see Brady play, not some nobody. That is what they are paying to see.

People no, new england fans yes. Most people do not give a hoot who plays as long as there is a Sunday football party that carries over to Monday and last through Thursday.

 

[Papageorgio]

Where did the NFL violate the CBA? A court case will look at that and very rarely at guilt or innocence that would undermine the alternative dispute resolution alternative firmly established in the American legal system.

The policies for handling equipment in the NFL manuals falls under employees and not players. Even if the rule applied to Brady, there is no precedent for a four game suspension. Under the current CBA, the players have a right to know the specific consequences for specific violations of league rules. With the way the NFL handle Minnesota's tampering, it was merely a letter. So there are no specific penalties for what happened, that goes against the CBA.

The CBA as it pertains to the hearing?

I apologize, I don't understand your question.

 

[Alex.]

Where did the NFL violate the CBA? A court case will look at that and very rarely at guilt or innocence that would undermine the alternative dispute resolution alternative firmly established in the American legal system.

The policies for handling equipment in the NFL manuals falls under employees and not players. Even if the rule applied to Brady, there is no precedent for a four game suspension. Under the current CBA, the players have a right to know the specific consequences for specific violations of league rules. With the way the NFL handle Minnesota's tampering, it was merely a letter. So there are no specific penalties for what happened, that goes against the CBA.

The CBA as it pertains to the hearing?

I apologize, I don't understand your question.

What will be addressed is whether the NFL followed the agreed to terms in the CBA. The court will not re-try the case.

 

[Papageorgio]

Where did the NFL violate the CBA? A court case will look at that and very rarely at guilt or innocence that would undermine the alternative dispute resolution alternative firmly established in the American legal system.

The policies for handling equipment in the NFL manuals falls under employees and not players. Even if the rule applied to Brady, there is no precedent for a four game suspension. Under the current CBA, the players have a right to know the specific consequences for specific violations of league rules. With the way the NFL handle Minnesota's tampering, it was merely a letter. So there are no specific penalties for what happened, that goes against the CBA.

The CBA as it pertains to the hearing?

I apologize, I don't understand your question.

What will be addressed is whether the NFL followed the agreed to terms in the CBA. The court will not re-try the case.

I don't agree. If the NFL doesn't remove the suspension, it will go to federal court, the NFLPA will argue that the suspension violates the CBA. Because it violates the CBA, then the whole process should never have happened and Brady can't be suspended. The idea one team gets a warning letter, with no fines or suspensions, and another time there are fines and suspensions, shows the rules are not being applied equally or fairly. The argument can be made the NFL is singling out on person or team and that also violates the CBA.

 

[Alex.]

Where did the NFL violate the CBA? A court case will look at that and very rarely at guilt or innocence that would undermine the alternative dispute resolution alternative firmly established in the American legal system.

The policies for handling equipment in the NFL manuals falls under employees and not players. Even if the rule applied to Brady, there is no precedent for a four game suspension. Under the current CBA, the players have a right to know the specific consequences for specific violations of league rules. With the way the NFL handle Minnesota's tampering, it was merely a letter. So there are no specific penalties for what happened, that goes against the CBA.

The CBA as it pertains to the hearing?

I apologize, I don't understand your question.

What will be addressed is whether the NFL followed the agreed to terms in the CBA. The court will not re-try the case.

I don't agree. If the NFL doesn't remove the suspension, it will go to federal court, the NFLPA will argue that the suspension violates the CBA. Because it violates the CBA, then the whole process should never have happened and Brady can't be suspended. The idea one team gets a warning letter, with no fines or suspensions, and another time there are fines and suspensions, shows the rules are not being applied equally or fairly. The argument can be made the NFL is singling out on person or team and that also violates the CBA.

What was the infraction that garnered a warning letter?

 

[Papageorgio]

The policies for handling equipment in the NFL manuals falls under employees and not players. Even if the rule applied to Brady, there is no precedent for a four game suspension. Under the current CBA, the players have a right to know the specific consequences for specific violations of league rules. With the way the NFL handle Minnesota's tampering, it was merely a letter. So there are no specific penalties for what happened, that goes against the CBA.

The CBA as it pertains to the hearing?

I apologize, I don't understand your question.

What will be addressed is whether the NFL followed the agreed to terms in the CBA. The court will not re-try the case.

I don't agree. If the NFL doesn't remove the suspension, it will go to federal court, the NFLPA will argue that the suspension violates the CBA. Because it violates the CBA, then the whole process should never have happened and Brady can't be suspended. The idea one team gets a warning letter, with no fines or suspensions, and another time there are fines and suspensions, shows the rules are not being applied equally or fairly. The argument can be made the NFL is singling out on person or team and that also violates the CBA.

What was the infraction that garnered a warning letter?

If you had read the links I provided you would know it was for tampering with their footballs during a game. They were heating them up in very cold weather, which tampers with the PSI and allows QBs to get a better grip and receivers an easier catch.

I also brought this out months ago and got accused of kissing Brady's ass, however giving one team a warning letter and suspending a player in another instance, where the rules don't even apply to player seems to be arbitrary.

 

[Oldstyle]

Alex doesn't care about OTHER players or other teams...he's got a thing about Tom Brady and the Patriots.