Patriots Super Bowl ring

I guess they are the best in your mind. For everyone else their accomplishments are tarnished. This whole ball thing proves something to me. Seattle acquired Branch and he performed well in New England. Seattle he was not effective. Most thought it was because he didn't turn out to be a good fit but in light of this deflate issue it is possible that the reason he performed so much better there was because the balls were softer to catch. Just something to ponder

Gee, think it might have been the quarterback that was throwing those balls to him? One is a future first round Hall of Famer...the other is not. What you've over looked is when the rule was changed in 2006 which is the year that Branch went from the Patriots to the Seahawks. So the balls that Brady was throwing to Branch the first four years he played were not balls that Brady had control over...they were the game balls provided by the league. Care to "ponder that"?
You are desperate to find fault in someone else instead of owning your teams guilt. I was just throwing the possibility of that out there for thought. Boy you are easily offended personally over things that are not personal

You're kidding...right? You claimed that Branch performed better in New England than he did in Seattle because of deflated balls to which I responded that the rule allowing QB's to adjust ball pressure and use their own game balls didn't take place until AFTER Branch went to Seattle. But rather than admit that you were wrong in your premise you post nonsense about me being "offended"? Deion Branch didn't perform well in Seattle because he was injured most of the time. I know that and I'm not even a Seahawks fan!
You pick out what you want to hear and read. I didn't say it was a fact I said it was something to think about
 
I guess they are the best in your mind. For everyone else their accomplishments are tarnished. This whole ball thing proves something to me. Seattle acquired Branch and he performed well in New England. Seattle he was not effective. Most thought it was because he didn't turn out to be a good fit but in light of this deflate issue it is possible that the reason he performed so much better there was because the balls were softer to catch. Just something to ponder

Looks like trollstyle got desperate from his ass beatings here and enlisted chrissy for help.:biggrin:
I dislike the idea of trying to be discredited for being female therefore not thought to know about football. I have been watching the Seahawks for 30 years.
Like I said,trollstyle enlisted chrissy for help because he got tired of the constant ass beatings from people like you,myself and others.lol

I did not realise you were female.very few football fans frequent the sports section that are of the female variety.thats a switch.lol

when the Rams come back to LA next year,if you decide to go on a road trip to see them play them,you will have a much shorter flight now thats for sure.lol.

that more than anything is why the hawks,niners,and cards want them back in LA badly.:biggrin:
I thought the picture and screen name were pretty explanatory I was female but then again there are women on here with mens names trying to confused people. As for road trips, I do not go on them and I do not have tickets to see my own team play. I do not live close enough to do that but finally Seahawks mania has spread through the whole of the region so I encounter way more fans than I used to when out and about

So you have lots of bandwagon fans, that sums up Seahawk fans.

I have been to a couple games but I rooted for the other teams. Qwest field is a nice facility, I prefer Safeco field, it has a great feel to it.
I said in an earlier post I have been a fan for 30 years. You have been to two games in that time but for health complications it is not feasible for me to travel that far to see a game in person nor climb into stadium seating. Just because I cannot see my team in person doesnt make me a lesser fan
 
Looks like trollstyle got desperate from his ass beatings here and enlisted chrissy for help.:biggrin:
I dislike the idea of trying to be discredited for being female therefore not thought to know about football. I have been watching the Seahawks for 30 years.
Like I said,trollstyle enlisted chrissy for help because he got tired of the constant ass beatings from people like you,myself and others.lol

I did not realise you were female.very few football fans frequent the sports section that are of the female variety.thats a switch.lol

when the Rams come back to LA next year,if you decide to go on a road trip to see them play them,you will have a much shorter flight now thats for sure.lol.

that more than anything is why the hawks,niners,and cards want them back in LA badly.:biggrin:
I thought the picture and screen name were pretty explanatory I was female but then again there are women on here with mens names trying to confused people. As for road trips, I do not go on them and I do not have tickets to see my own team play. I do not live close enough to do that but finally Seahawks mania has spread through the whole of the region so I encounter way more fans than I used to when out and about

So you have lots of bandwagon fans, that sums up Seahawk fans.

I have been to a couple games but I rooted for the other teams. Qwest field is a nice facility, I prefer Safeco field, it has a great feel to it.
I said in an earlier post I have been a fan for 30 years. You have been to two games in that time but for health complications it is not feasible for me to travel that far to see a game in person nor climb into stadium seating. Just because I cannot see my team in person doesnt make me a lesser fan

I never called you a lesser fan. I am calling most Hawk fans bandwagon fans. Nobody gave a rip about them until half way into their Super Bowl. You maybe a good fan, but most are not, look at 9/11 he is a typical Hawk fan.
 
Well, it doesn't make someone a troll because they are loyal to their team and are defending them, IMO.

The only troll is 9/11, he says the same stupid shit over and over, calls others names, dogs people, does his stupid fart jokes. The rest are pretty good.
 
I dislike the idea of trying to be discredited for being female therefore not thought to know about football. I have been watching the Seahawks for 30 years.
Like I said,trollstyle enlisted chrissy for help because he got tired of the constant ass beatings from people like you,myself and others.lol

I did not realise you were female.very few football fans frequent the sports section that are of the female variety.thats a switch.lol

when the Rams come back to LA next year,if you decide to go on a road trip to see them play them,you will have a much shorter flight now thats for sure.lol.

that more than anything is why the hawks,niners,and cards want them back in LA badly.:biggrin:
I thought the picture and screen name were pretty explanatory I was female but then again there are women on here with mens names trying to confused people. As for road trips, I do not go on them and I do not have tickets to see my own team play. I do not live close enough to do that but finally Seahawks mania has spread through the whole of the region so I encounter way more fans than I used to when out and about

So you have lots of bandwagon fans, that sums up Seahawk fans.

s.
I have been to a couple games but I rooted for the other teams. Qwest field is a nice facility, I prefer Safeco field, it has a great feel to it.
I said in an earlier post I have been a fan for 30 years. You have been to two games in that time but for health complications it is not feasible for me to travel that far to see a game in person nor climb into stadium seating. Just because I cannot see my team in person doesnt make me a lesser fan

I never called you a lesser fan. I am calling most Hawk fans bandwagon fans. Nobody gave a rip about them until half way into their Super Bowl. You maybe a good fan, but most are not, look at 9/11 he is a typical Hawk fan.

>>>>>>>
Hey...its ok to be a new fan.
The only fan type I don't like is someone who sees a team lose a game or two, then hates the whole team with a vengeance.

... nothing wrong with gaining some new fans during the high time
 
I guess they are the best in your mind. For everyone else their accomplishments are tarnished. This whole ball thing proves something to me. Seattle acquired Branch and he performed well in New England. Seattle he was not effective. Most thought it was because he didn't turn out to be a good fit but in light of this deflate issue it is possible that the reason he performed so much better there was because the balls were softer to catch. Just something to ponder

Gee, think it might have been the quarterback that was throwing those balls to him? One is a future first round Hall of Famer...the other is not. What you've over looked is when the rule was changed in 2006 which is the year that Branch went from the Patriots to the Seahawks. So the balls that Brady was throwing to Branch the first four years he played were not balls that Brady had control over...they were the game balls provided by the league. Care to "ponder that"?
You are desperate to find fault in someone else instead of owning your teams guilt. I was just throwing the possibility of that out there for thought. Boy you are easily offended personally over things that are not personal

welcome to the world of trollstyle.He goes into meltdown mode when he is confronted with pesky little facts he cant counter that the cheats organization is the biggest scandal in sports history since the black sox scandal.

I put him on ignore years ago.He isnt worth the time or effort.

If Trinity continues to post ridiculous things like Deion Branch was more successful in New England than Seattle because of deflated balls then perhaps she SHOULD put me on ignore because I'm going to make her look foolish.

Feel free to rip the Patriots, Bill Belichick and Tom Brady all you want, Kiddies...just know that when you do it with a factually inaccurate post...I'm going to call you on it!
You make yourself look foolish, without help by trying to post old info and tack it into something happening today and also trying to tell me how drug testing work because you know someone who took a drug test.

Trinity...YOU claimed that Deion Branch played better in New England than he did at Seattle because the Patriots were using an under inflated ball and the Seahawks were not. All I did was point out that the rule change allowing quarterbacks to use their own balls was passed in 2006...the very year that Branch started playing for the Seahawks. In the four years prior to that, Branch would have been catching game balls that were provided by the NFL. Now did you want to put on your "big girl panties" and admit that what you claimed wasn't based on anything factual...or are you going to complain about my posting "old info" while you disregard the fact that the old info is factually correct?

As for my knowledge of how drug testing "works"? I lived with people that were using steroids. Believe me, I know what they took back then. I know how they cycled...going off anabolic steroids and taking masking agents in the run-up to when they knew they would be getting tested. I've always been amused at the naive notion that there aren't PED's in sports or that the testers are catching the violators. The truth is, the savvy users don't get caught. Barry Bonds never failed a drug test. Neither did A-Rod. Both of them took numerous tests while they were using PEDs. The people that get caught these days are either ratted out by a disgruntled former trainer, like what took place with the BALCO scandal...or they're too stupid to stay on the schedule given to them by the drug supplier.
 
I guess they are the best in your mind. For everyone else their accomplishments are tarnished. This whole ball thing proves something to me. Seattle acquired Branch and he performed well in New England. Seattle he was not effective. Most thought it was because he didn't turn out to be a good fit but in light of this deflate issue it is possible that the reason he performed so much better there was because the balls were softer to catch. Just something to ponder

Gee, think it might have been the quarterback that was throwing those balls to him? One is a future first round Hall of Famer...the other is not. What you've over looked is when the rule was changed in 2006 which is the year that Branch went from the Patriots to the Seahawks. So the balls that Brady was throwing to Branch the first four years he played were not balls that Brady had control over...they were the game balls provided by the league. Care to "ponder that"?
You are desperate to find fault in someone else instead of owning your teams guilt. I was just throwing the possibility of that out there for thought. Boy you are easily offended personally over things that are not personal

You're kidding...right? You claimed that Branch performed better in New England than he did in Seattle because of deflated balls to which I responded that the rule allowing QB's to adjust ball pressure and use their own game balls didn't take place until AFTER Branch went to Seattle. But rather than admit that you were wrong in your premise you post nonsense about me being "offended"? Deion Branch didn't perform well in Seattle because he was injured most of the time. I know that and I'm not even a Seahawks fan!
You pick out what you want to hear and read. I didn't say it was a fact I said it was something to think about

Seriously? You're posting things that you grudgingly admit aren't factual but absolving yourself of responsibility for doing so because you said it was "something to think about"?
 
Finally the voice of reason, "Study backs Tom Brady in ball brouhaha"

Thank God Tom Brady has a set balls worth fighting for. This report is done by American Enterprise Institute the most esteemed and respected organization suited for such a difficult task. Objective, scientific, well researched and used by the NFL for the Saint's penalties on Bountygate.


Oh wait, the are funded by Kraft Foundation could be the cheaters funding the AEI who knows

 
Oh, wait...someone's actually going to try and PROVE Tom Brady did something wrong? I thought we were just going to ASSUME he did and then penalize him for not helping us PROVE that he did? Isn't that the way things have gone down in this joke of an "investigation"?
 
Oh, wait...someone's actually going to try and PROVE Tom Brady did something wrong? I thought we were just going to ASSUME he did and then penalize him for not helping us PROVE that he did? Isn't that the way things have gone down in this joke of an "investigation"?
The study supports Brady of course you did not read the post you were to preoccupied with thinking about Brady's balls.
 
Oh, wait...someone's actually going to try and PROVE Tom Brady did something wrong? I thought we were just going to ASSUME he did and then penalize him for not helping us PROVE that he did? Isn't that the way things have gone down in this joke of an "investigation"?
The study supports Brady of course you did not read the post you were to preoccupied with thinking about Brady's balls.

I haven't read ANYTHING that proves Tom Brady asked for balls to be deflated to illegal levels, Alex! That's the amazing thing about this whole "scandal". It's just assumed that he did...in the absence of proof he didn't. Since when is that how our legal system operates?
 
Oh, wait...someone's actually going to try and PROVE Tom Brady did something wrong? I thought we were just going to ASSUME he did and then penalize him for not helping us PROVE that he did? Isn't that the way things have gone down in this joke of an "investigation"?
The study supports Brady of course you did not read the post you were to preoccupied with thinking about Brady's balls.

I haven't read ANYTHING that proves Tom Brady asked for balls to be deflated to illegal levels, Alex! That's the amazing thing about this whole "scandal". It's just assumed that he did...in the absence of proof he didn't. Since when is that how our legal system operates?
This is not the "legal system" this is alternative dispute resolution agreed to in the CBA negotiated by the NFLPA with the NFL on behalf of the players like Tommy "small balls" Brady.
 
15th post
Oh, wait...someone's actually going to try and PROVE Tom Brady did something wrong? I thought we were just going to ASSUME he did and then penalize him for not helping us PROVE that he did? Isn't that the way things have gone down in this joke of an "investigation"?
The study supports Brady of course you did not read the post you were to preoccupied with thinking about Brady's balls.

I haven't read ANYTHING that proves Tom Brady asked for balls to be deflated to illegal levels, Alex! That's the amazing thing about this whole "scandal". It's just assumed that he did...in the absence of proof he didn't. Since when is that how our legal system operates?
This is not the "legal system" this is alternative dispute resolution agreed to in the CBA negotiated by the NFLPA with the NFL on behalf of the players like Tommy "small balls" Brady.

Gee, I wonder what players like Brady think about the CBA that's been "negotiated" for them when it takes away rights that every other American has as a matter of course!

Good to see that you're still fixated on Tom Brady's "junk". That seems to be your state of mind every morning, Alex...which begs the question...what are you dreaming about, little buddy? :cool-45::cool-45::cool-45:
 
Oh, wait...someone's actually going to try and PROVE Tom Brady did something wrong? I thought we were just going to ASSUME he did and then penalize him for not helping us PROVE that he did? Isn't that the way things have gone down in this joke of an "investigation"?
The study supports Brady of course you did not read the post you were to preoccupied with thinking about Brady's balls.

I haven't read ANYTHING that proves Tom Brady asked for balls to be deflated to illegal levels, Alex! That's the amazing thing about this whole "scandal". It's just assumed that he did...in the absence of proof he didn't. Since when is that how our legal system operates?
This is not the "legal system" this is alternative dispute resolution agreed to in the CBA negotiated by the NFLPA with the NFL on behalf of the players like Tommy "small balls" Brady.

Gee, I wonder what players like Brady think about the CBA that's been "negotiated" for them when it takes away rights that every other American has as a matter of course!

Good to see that you're still fixated on Tom Brady's "junk". That seems to be your state of mind every morning, Alex...which begs the question...what are you dreaming about, little buddy? :cool-45::cool-45::cool-45:
Now you are asking me personal questions? Guess Brady rejected your advances and I am. Stay on topic the CBA gave every player an advantage as well they voted on acceptance of the agreement. Brady sued the league and voted for it.

"The players€™ side would present the agreement to player reps for all 32 clubs, who would vote on whether to recommend the settlement to the plaintiffs in the Brady et al v. National Football League et al lawsuit. The player reps will meet in Washington, D.C., Wednesday, where a vote is expected to take place. The next step could be the recertification of the union, which requires all 1,900 players to vote, a simple majority to pass, and could be done by e-mail or conference call."

NFL player reps could vote on new CBA as early as Wednesday - NFL.com
 
Last edited:
Finally the voice of reason, "Study backs Tom Brady in ball brouhaha"

Thank God Tom Brady has a set balls worth fighting for. This report is done by American Enterprise Institute the most esteemed and respected organization suited for such a difficult task. Objective, scientific, well researched and used by the NFL for the Saint's penalties on Bountygate.


Oh wait, the are funded by Kraft Foundation could be the cheaters funding the AEI who knows
Truth is stranger than fiction :D AEI :rofl:
 
Back
Top Bottom