Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
www.rollingstone.com
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a study that found unvaccinated people who had a prior Covid-19 infection were 5.5 times more likely to test positive for the virus than vaccinated individuals who never had Covid.
“All eligible persons should be vaccinated against Covid-19 as soon as possible, including unvaccinated persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2,” researchers recommended in the center’s weekly report published Friday.
The study examined hospital patient data from 7,000 patients in 187 hospitals. Analysis revealed that among adults hospitalized with Covid symptoms, unvaccinated people who had a prior Covid infection within the last 3-6 months tested positive 5.5 times more often than patients who received an mRNA vaccine (Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech) within the same time frame.
“We now have additional evidence that reaffirms the importance of Covid-19 vaccines, even if you have had prior infection,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in a statement. “This study adds more to the body of knowledge demonstrating the protection of vaccines against severe disease from Covid-19.”
Earlier studies have contributed to busting the myth that natural immunity acquired through infection conveys the same or better protection than vaccines. One CDC study found that less than two-thirds of people who had Covid in the past developed any antibodies against the virus (compared to 100 percent of individuals who developed antibodies after vaccination). Another study found that natural immunity can wane, especially among people who mounted a lower initial immune response to the virus.
The CDC study’s results come as the number Covid cases continues to decline across the U.S., dropping by almost 25 percent in the last two weeks, according to NBC News. It also shortly follows the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the vaccine for children ages 5-11. Currently, the CDC reports that nearly 58 percent of people in America, 192 million individuals, have been fully vaccinated.
How effective is immunity after Covid recovery relative to vaccination? An Israeli study by Gazit et al. found that the vaccinated have a 27 times higher risk of symptomatic infection than the Covid recovered. At the same time, the vaccinated were nine times more likely to be hospitalized for Covid. In contrast, a CDC study by Bozio et al. claims that the Covid recovered are five times more likely to be hospitalized for Covid than the vaccinated. Both studies cannot be right.CDC Reveals Just How Much More Protective Vaccines Are Than Prior Infection (Hint: A Lot)
Unvaccinated people with a prior Covid-19 infection were much more likely to test positive for the coronavirus than vaccinated people.
brownstone.org
It links directly to the study.You get your health news from "Rolling Stone" magazine?
Bullshit. The so-called vaccines do not give long term immunity against WuFlu. Your body never encounters the virus, only the spike proteins to create temporary anti-bodies.CDC Reveals Just How Much More Protective Vaccines Are Than Prior Infection (Hint: A Lot)
Unvaccinated people with a prior Covid-19 infection were much more likely to test positive for the coronavirus than vaccinated people.
That first paragraph of the article, strike me as just plain weird.CDC Reveals Just How Much More Protective Vaccines Are Than Prior Infection (Hint: A Lot)
Unvaccinated people with a prior Covid-19 infection were much more likely to test positive for the coronavirus than vaccinated people.
And if you read the actual study you’d see they used a lot of monkey math to come up with their bullshit narrative, such as this gem:It links directly to the study.
Why do you always pull this stupid shit?
There are reasons why JoeXi and Fau Chi's dem-nazi media is not touching Omicron's new mutations, but focusing on the old mutations, also found in Delta, and the variants before Delta. Omicron's new mutation N969K is a vaccine-linked mutation that the media has to pretend not to notice. Otherwise, N969K would make POSPOTUS JoeXi and his medically-inclined trollop visiting Wisconsin to scare little children, look like the horse's rear end.How effective is immunity after Covid recovery relative to vaccination? An Israeli study by Gazit et al. found that the vaccinated have a 27 times higher risk of symptomatic infection than the Covid recovered. At the same time, the vaccinated were nine times more likely to be hospitalized for Covid. In contrast, a CDC study by Bozio et al. claims that the Covid recovered are five times more likely to be hospitalized for Covid than the vaccinated. Both studies cannot be right.
I have worked on vaccine epidemiology since I joined the Harvard faculty almost two decades ago as a biostatistician. I have never before seen such a large discrepancy between studies that are supposed to answer the same question. In this article, I carefully dissect both studies, describe how the analyses differ, and explain why the Israeli study is more reliable.
........
Conclusions
Concerning the Covid recovered, there are two key public health issues. 1. Would the Covid recovered benefit from also being vaccinated? 2. Should there be vaccine passports and mandates that require them to be vaccinated in order to work and participate in society?
The CDC study did not address the first question, while the Israeli study showed a small but not statistically significant benefit in reducing symptomatic Covid disease. Future studies will hopefully shed more light on this issue.
Based on the solid evidence from the Israeli study, the Covid recovered have stronger and longer-lasting immunity against Covid disease than the vaccinated. Hence, there is no reason to prevent them from activities that are permitted to the vaccinated. In fact, it is discriminatory.
Many of the Covid recovered were exposed to the virus as essential workers during the height of the pandemic before vaccines were available. They kept the rest of society afloat, processing food, delivering goods, unloading ships, picking up garbage, policing the streets, maintaining the electricity network, putting out fires, and caring for the old and sick, to name a few.
They are now being fired and excluded despite having stronger immunity than the vaccinated work-from-home administrators that are firing them.
A Review and Autopsy of Two COVID Immunity Studies ⋆ Brownstone Institute
I have never before seen such a large discrepancy between immunity studies that are supposed to answer the same question.
Oklahoma gunshot victims was also debunked. RS is now in the pocket of the JoeXi-Fau Chi Nazi-Dem media, drenched with CIA-MI6 modus operandae:You get your health news from "Rolling Stone" magazine?
www.zerohedge.com
How effective is immunity after Covid recovery relative to vaccination? An Israeli study by Gazit et al. found that the vaccinated have a 27 times higher risk of symptomatic infection than the Covid recovered. At the same time, the vaccinated were nine times more likely to be hospitalized for Covid. In contrast, a CDC study by Bozio et al. claims that the Covid recovered are five times more likely to be hospitalized for Covid than the vaccinated. Both studies cannot be right.
I have worked on vaccine epidemiology since I joined the Harvard faculty almost two decades ago as a biostatistician. I have never before seen such a large discrepancy between studies that are supposed to answer the same question. In this article, I carefully dissect both studies, describe how the analyses differ, and explain why the Israeli study is more reliable.
........
Conclusions
Concerning the Covid recovered, there are two key public health issues. 1. Would the Covid recovered benefit from also being vaccinated? 2. Should there be vaccine passports and mandates that require them to be vaccinated in order to work and participate in society?
The CDC study did not address the first question, while the Israeli study showed a small but not statistically significant benefit in reducing symptomatic Covid disease. Future studies will hopefully shed more light on this issue.
Based on the solid evidence from the Israeli study, the Covid recovered have stronger and longer-lasting immunity against Covid disease than the vaccinated. Hence, there is no reason to prevent them from activities that are permitted to the vaccinated. In fact, it is discriminatory.
Many of the Covid recovered were exposed to the virus as essential workers during the height of the pandemic before vaccines were available. They kept the rest of society afloat, processing food, delivering goods, unloading ships, picking up garbage, policing the streets, maintaining the electricity network, putting out fires, and caring for the old and sick, to name a few.
They are now being fired and excluded despite having stronger immunity than the vaccinated work-from-home administrators that are firing them.
A Review and Autopsy of Two COVID Immunity Studies ⋆ Brownstone Institute
I have never before seen such a large discrepancy between immunity studies that are supposed to answer the same question.
And if you read the actual study you’d see they used a lot of monkey math to come up with their bullshit narrative, such as this gem:
“Patients were excluded if they had received 1 mRNA vaccine dose only, received the second dose <14 days before index test date, or received the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson [Ad26.COV2]) vaccine (because of sparse data). To reduce the chance that the hospitalization was related to an ongoing SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients were also excluded from the previous infection group if their most recent previous positive test result occurred 14–89 days before hospitalization.¶”
CDC Reveals Just How Much More Protective Vaccines Are Than Prior Infection (Hint: A Lot)
Unvaccinated people with a prior Covid-19 infection were much more likely to test positive for the coronavirus than vaccinated people.
In a separate CDC study they found no antibodies in 36% of patients who recovered from covid, in contrast, everyone who was vaccinated showed antibodies 100% of the time. Plus, the amount of antibodies detected ranged significantly from 182 to over 312,500. They found similar results for antibodies against other parts of the virus including the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid (N). Ultimately, 26 (36%) remained seronegative, meaning that they never developed detectable levels of such antibodies in their blood, even when multiple blood samples were checked for each person.
Funny, I read the article and think that the tests are falsely coming back positive for covid when it is just antibodies to the virus.CDC Reveals Just How Much More Protective Vaccines Are Than Prior Infection (Hint: A Lot)
Unvaccinated people with a prior Covid-19 infection were much more likely to test positive for the coronavirus than vaccinated people.
theconversation.com
Funny, I read the article and think that the tests are falsely coming back positive for covid when it is just antibodies to the virus.
Oh and I look: (NOTE THE PART ABOUT FALSE POSITIVES FOR THOSE THAT HAVE RECOVERED FROM COVID). CDC knows this shit but still choses to spin nonsense and lie to people.....
"Laboratory errors include clerical error, testing the wrong sample, cross-contamination from someone else’s positive sample, or problems with the reagents used (such as chemicals, enzymes and dyes). Someone who has had COVID-19 and recovered might also show a false positive result."
Why are some COVID test results false positives, and how common are they?
We’ve learnt two cases linked to Melbourne’s COVID outbreak were in fact ‘false positives’. Here’s what that means, why it can happen, and how common it is.
thenationalpulse.com
The unvaccinated aren't just testing positive, they are being hospitalized at a much greater rate then those who have had 2 shots, and more so those who have had boosters. At some you just have to accept reality.
COVID Data Tracker
CDC’s home for COVID-19 data. Visualizations, graphs, and data in one easy-to-use website.covid.cdc.gov
citizenfreepress.com
