how do you know?Jesus never cursed the scribes or apostles. No, all except Paul new Jesus Christ personally.
John 16:12, "I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
how do you know?Jesus never cursed the scribes or apostles. No, all except Paul new Jesus Christ personally.
John 16:12, "I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now."
John WHO? to which "john" do you refer? got a zip code?Jesus never cursed the scribes or apostles. No, all except Paul new Jesus Christ personally.
John 16:12, "I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now."
How do you know he did? You said it. I said there are no words saying he cursed them except Judas.how do you know?
What are you? 12 years old?John WHO? to which "john" do you refer? got a zip code?
never probe into the age of a LADY!!!! "john" is a commonly used pen-nameWhat are you? 12 years old?
No, there’s but one John of the New Testament of Jesus Christ.never probe into the age of a LADY!!!! "john" is a commonly used pen-name
by writers of the NT
and you can't be intellectually honest. Not everyone can admit his or her own lack of integrity.So, you still can't logically reason.
Actually, it is. You made a claim about what the text said. I showed that it didn't and you moved the goal posts to your interpretation.The topic isn't the letter or spirit of the law.
I didn't say that that's what he did. He sat around for 40 days teaching the law. But well earlier, he did just introduce himself. You seem to have lost track of what you are talking about. I know it is tough, but try to make the effort to remember your own claims.The topic is that the Lord and Moses did more than to sit around for 40 days and nights with the Lord only introducing Himself to Moses.
Of course he did. He said I am the Lord thy God. He said he is the great I AM (Jehovah) Same as Jesus Christ did calling himself the great I AM. Good! We agree and you finally see that, that isn't all the Lord did. Glad you finally were intellectually honest.and you can't be intellectually honest. Not everyone can admit his or her own lack of integrity.
Actually, it is. You made a claim about what the text said. I showed that it didn't and you moved the goal posts to your interpretation.
I didn't say that that's what he did. He sat around for 40 days teaching the law. But well earlier, he did just introduce himself. You seem to have lost track of what you are talking about. I know it is tough, but try to make the effort to remember your own claims.
great. You just disproved yourself.Of course he did. He said I am the Lord thy God.
No, he didn't.He said he is the great I AM (Jehovah)
who cares what Jesus said? He's dead.Same as Jesus Christ did calling himself the great I AM. Good! We agree and you finally see that, that isn't all the Lord did. Glad you finally were intellectually honest.
You know what else Jesus didn’t say? That the only way to the Father is through the Son. No Jew would ever say such a thing.great. You just disproved yourself.
No, he didn't.
who cares what Jesus said? He's dead.
It isn't really the "time of the Jews" yet. But, there are some of us who are open to greater understanding and to the Spirit of God. Then, there are most who are not. They are entrenched with their traditions and continue to reject their Lord and Messiah. See, I realized that sticking with the Jewish teachings was a matter of tradition and not free moral agency. Much like young people who grow up and choose which political party to belong to. They mostly pick what their parents picked and it's just through tradition. Nothing to do with actual scriptural evidence nor the Spirit of God. I saw through it and when I asked God, He told me that he has a Son and that it is Jesus Christ. The Holy Ghost bore witness to this as my veil over my mind lifted.You know what else Jesus didn’t say? That the only way to the Father is through the Son. No Jew would ever say such a thing.
I was subjected to terrible harassment by an Evangelical couple who kept repeating the above “warning” to me - as if that would convince me of something. I was too polite (despite their disrespect to me) to say he never made such a claim, but in retrospect I’m sorry I didn’t. To say they were obnoxious is an understatement.
That cougar bear poster is a very rare Jew who decided to worship Jesus and thus abandon Judaism. I live about 10 miles from a massive missionary church, and they fan out once a year to try to convert Jews. They fail miserably.
OH!!! I didn't know---the 'John' who wrote the book of revulsions is the sameNo, there’s but one John of the New Testament of Jesus Christ.
As far as your age, prove you are a lady by giving into my logic and reason![]()
You are just a bigot liberal.OH!!! I didn't know---the 'John' who wrote the book of revulsions is the same
'John' who was MIKVEH MAN ---(in lady voice) thanks for letting me know
mr. bear
Under Jewish law, it was not murder. The Egyptian was a rodef - in the midst of beating a Hebrew to death. It was self-defense, taken over by Moses.
In My Vaunted Opinion IMVO ---freddie got it a lot closer than did
the shill of medina-----based on the symbolism of hebrew poetry
SO? destruction is a theme of lots of ancient scriptural ancient poetry. wars and natural disasters were all aroundOthers have their traditions but what are those based on? I see nothing sufficient for that. Revelation 18 has parallels to Isaiah 24 and I can see why it would apply to the inhabited cities on the earth. I can see how everything is really not stable as well. And I can see the application of Revelation 11:18.