Parler CEO ‘Prepared to Take Full Legal Action’ After Big Tech Companies Target Platform

[westwall]

I'm okay with this. There may be an antitrust violation here. It's worth looking into

Not even close.

It's your Democratic Party that plans on going after Big Tech over the amount of control they have regarding information.

Jan. 6 âought to shape the future of techâ: How the Capitol siege could lead to Big Tech reform

The riotous actions of a pro-Trump mob amid a shift in legislative power sharpened the focus on the outsize roles Facebook, Twitter and other tech companies...

www.marketwatch.com

No they don't. So long as big tech enforces Democrat party mandates the Dems will wave their hands and shout, but do nothing.

 

[Rigby5]

The information war has begun.

Parler CEO ‘Prepared to Take Full Legal Action’ After Big Tech Companies Target Platform

www.theepochtimes.com

This is very simple and basic contract law.

parler signed a contrat with Amazon. In that contract they said they read and understood all of Amazon's rules. In that contract they agreed with Amazon that if they violated the rules they agreed to Amazon can terminate the contract.

parler broke the contract.

Thus Amazon enforced their contractual right to terminate the contract.

parler agreed with Amazon that Amazon could do exactly what they did if parler violated the contract they singed.

parler will be laughed out of court just the same way trump was with all his voting fraud and cheating cases were thrown out quickly.

Great, except you never mentioned what aspect of any contract that Paler violated?
Without that, you are not saying anything at all.
Then it is just your arbitrary desire, and that is no more legal than the arbitrary desire of Amazon.
The one breaking the contract is the one obligated to prove it is legal to break the contract.

 

[Lesh]

Again...Parler allowed the Capitol attack to be plotted on their plqtform

Fuck Them

 

[Crepitus]

I'm okay with this. There may be an antitrust violation here. It's worth looking into

Not even close.

It's your Democratic Party that plans on going after Big Tech over the amount of control they have regarding information.

Jan. 6 âought to shape the future of techâ: How the Capitol siege could lead to Big Tech reform

The riotous actions of a pro-Trump mob amid a shift in legislative power sharpened the focus on the outsize roles Facebook, Twitter and other tech companies...

www.marketwatch.com

Doesn't change the fact that suspending an account that refuses to follow known rules isn't an anti trust violation.

It may be when only a handful of companies work together to control the access. Preventing that is the point of antitrust laws. I guess we'll see in time as this plays out.

Not when the rules are common sense, like "don't plot treason".

Parler allowed their platform to be used to plot the Capitol attack

Fuck em

Damn right.

 

[the other mike]

Parler allowed their platform to be used to plot the Capitol attack

Fuck em

Damn right.

In September and October of 2020, Twitter used their platform to censor facts which could affect the US election and gets away with it, but that's okay ?

 

[Crepitus]

I'm okay with this. There may be an antitrust violation here. It's worth looking into

Not even close.

It's your Democratic Party that plans on going after Big Tech over the amount of control they have regarding information.

Jan. 6 âought to shape the future of techâ: How the Capitol siege could lead to Big Tech reform

The riotous actions of a pro-Trump mob amid a shift in legislative power sharpened the focus on the outsize roles Facebook, Twitter and other tech companies...

www.marketwatch.com

Do you really think they mean that? Considering big tech is targeting the enemies of the democrat party and China?

Stop with the crazy shit.

"Big tech" is covering their own ass.

 

[Crepitus]

You most certainly can sue for unfair or discriminatory enforcement of rules

And everyone who abided by the rules should sue them for that. They let parler get away with it until someone died. Multiple someones.

 

[Crepitus]

occupation of congress was protected political expression

Well that's laughably inaccurate.

 

[Crepitus]

Parler allowed their platform to be used to plot the Capitol attack

Fuck em

Damn right.

In September and October of 2020, Twitter used their platform to censor facts which could affect the US election and gets away with it, but that's okay ?

Lol, they prohibited the spread of crazy conspiracy theories.

That's not "censoring facts".

 

[Rigby5]

You most certainly can sue for unfair or discriminatory enforcement of rules

And everyone who abided by the rules should sue them for that. They let parler get away with it until someone died. Multiple someones.

What regulation did Paler violate?
Parler did not occupy congress, did not know anyone intended to occupy congress, and occupying is a protected political expression that harmed no one.
All the deaths were cause by the police, not the protestors.

 

[Rigby5]

occupation of congress was protected political expression

Well that's laughably inaccurate.

The ONLY things that can ever be illegal are things that hard the rights of others.
And occupying a public building over political dissent, harms no one.
Those that died were all from the actions of the police.

 

[Rigby5]

Parler allowed their platform to be used to plot the Capitol attack

Fuck em

Damn right.

In September and October of 2020, Twitter used their platform to censor facts which could affect the US election and gets away with it, but that's okay ?

Lol, they prohibited the spread of crazy conspiracy theories.

That's not "censoring facts".

No one gets to censor anything by claiming arbitrarily that it is a crazy conspiracy theory.
The only legal censorship is when it is deliberate libel or slander, intended to cause harm to the rights of one or more individuals.
Otherwise, any sort of censorship at all is totally illegal and prohibited by FCC regulations.

 

[Lesh]

occupying is a protected political expression that harmed no one.

Occupying the Capitol or the White House is "political expression"?

All the deaths were cause by the police, not the protestors.

So the cop killed himself? Beat himself to death with a fire extinguisher did he?

What planet do you live on that you expect people to believe the garbage you spew?

 

[pknopp]

Parler allowed their platform to be used to plot the Capitol attack

Fuck em

Damn right.

In September and October of 2020, Twitter used their platform to censor facts which could affect the US election and gets away with it, but that's okay ?

Lol, they prohibited the spread of crazy conspiracy theories.

That's not "censoring facts".

No one gets to censor anything by claiming arbitrarily that it is a crazy conspiracy theory.
The only legal censorship is when it is deliberate libel or slander, intended to cause harm to the rights of one or more individuals.
Otherwise, any sort of censorship at all is totally illegal and prohibited by FCC regulations.

Google Music Self-Censoring Naughty Lyrics for Some Users

 

[Lesh]

No one gets to censor anything by claiming arbitrarily that it is a crazy conspiracy theory.

WTF are you talking about? Who told you that? It's complete bullshit

 

[Crepitus]

You most certainly can sue for unfair or discriminatory enforcement of rules

And everyone who abided by the rules should sue them for that. They let parler get away with it until someone died. Multiple someones.

What regulation did Paler violate?
Parler did not occupy congress, did not know anyone intended to occupy congress, and occupying is a protected political expression that harmed no one.
All the deaths were cause by the police, not the protestors.

Do you really think that allowing themselves to be used to plan an insurrection isn't a violation of the TOS?

 

[Crepitus]

The ONLY things that can ever be illegal are things that hard the rights of others.

Again, laughably inaccurate.

 

[Crepitus]

No one gets to censor anything by claiming arbitrarily that it is a crazy conspiracy theory.

Nothing "arbitrary" about it.

 

[the other mike]

No one gets to censor anything by claiming arbitrarily that it is a crazy conspiracy theory.

WTF are you talking about? Who told you that? It's complete bullshit

Not when the double standard is so clear.
Iran and China tweet anti-American shit at will....4 years we heard about RUSSIA colluding with Trump -----ALL proven lies.

 

[Lesh]

By the way...didn't twitter simply label bullshit as such and still allow it to be tweeted?