Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers

No more people would have been killed in a gun free zone.
I don't know, French cops are pretty helpless even if armed.

"Emery Siamandi, an employee at the police headquarters, said he heard gunshots and immediately saw two officers leave an office weeping. A third officer, who Siamandi described as the person who shot and killed the assailant, came out on his knees, also in tears."​
 
Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers, injures others, assailant shot dead: officials
Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers, injures others, assailant shot dead: officials

The anti gun lobby insists only guns can kill multiple people.

These were POLICE OFFICERS.

How many gun control laws would it have taken to save these people?

As always, the focus should not be on controlling guns......but rather on dealing with societal issues that are at the ROOT of violence
And the dead would be more if a gun was used obviously. Or should we start arming our military with knives?
It took a good guy with a gun to stop it.
 
New York had plenty of crime when it was repub controlled by Rudy too. You make no sense,
Again, more liberal countries with strong gun control have much lower homicide rates.

Nonsense. it was safer under Rudy.
You are grabbing for straws.

CNN says it, so it MUST be fact :rolleyes:
Again, this argument has been debunked 100 times.
No actually crime has come down since Rudy. You don’t waste time with facts eh?
 
Again, most criminals aren’t political. You are spreading gibberish.

Again, you are in total denial.
First of all, you are playing a numbers game. Of COURSE the USa has more murders, we have MORE PEOPLE.

Your argument is stupid...like saying a room with 100 people in it has more fingers in it than a room with 5 people. Geez.

Second, European nations are known to suppress their true crime statistics. it makes them look bad. Proof is available....if only you wanted to know the truth.

Third, this has absolutely nothing to do with political criminals.
Because you can't comprehend...let me slowly spell it out for you....

Nearly ALL GUN CRIME OCCURS IN LEFTIST CONTROLLED AREAS. FACT.
No one said the criminals were political, but they just happen to almost always be IN DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED AREAS and you cannot deny that unless you lie.

where you came up with this "Criminals aren't political BS" is up for grabs.
I guess your denial strategy is to keep parroting that.
Mate, that is world class gibberish.You dont seem to have a grasp of the facts.
 
No actually crime has come down since Rudy. You don’t waste time with facts eh?

lmao.
It's Bubble Busting Time....

You're so naive and uninformed.....lmao (again)

Crime is down ACROSS THE USA. AS THE RATE OF PRIVATE GUN OWNERSHIP CLIMBED . CHEW ON THAT !!!

So tell us, which donkey's ass did you get YOUR "Facts" from this morning?

:dance:
 
No actually crime has come down since Rudy. You don’t waste time with facts eh?

lmao.
It's Bubble Busting Time....

You're so naive and uninformed.....lmao (again)

Crime is down ACROSS THE USA. AS THE RATE OF PRIVATE GUN OWNERSHIP CLIMBED . CHEW ON THAT !!!

So tell us, which donkey's ass did you get YOUR "Facts" from this morning?

:dance:
Yes it went down right after we got background checks.
 
Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers, injures others, assailant shot dead: officials
Paris knife attack in police station kills at least 4 officers, injures others, assailant shot dead: officials

The anti gun lobby insists only guns can kill multiple people.

These were POLICE OFFICERS.

How many gun control laws would it have taken to save these people?

As always, the focus should not be on controlling guns......but rather on dealing with societal issues that are at the ROOT of violence
And the dead would be more if a gun was used obviously. Or should we start arming our military with knives?

No, a knife, being silent, does not alert anyone and allows for more deaths serially.
Yes we should start arming our military only with knives if we demand that ordinary citizens not be armed.
There is no legal means by which the military hired by us, can possess weapons we are denied.
The principle of equal treatment under the law is enshrined by the 14th amendment.
 
And the dead would be more if a gun was used obviously. Or should we start arming our military with knives?

Knee jerk response. You have no proof more deaths would have occurred. Depends on many variables.

Still, in true gun grabber fashion, you REFUSE to address the REAL problem.
So we should save money and arm our military with knives cause they are just as deadly?

Knives are much more deadly in close urban situations, but just not in long range confrontations.
For example, the death toll of ancient wars before firearms, was much higher than later wars with firearms.
 
according to article knife man and murderer hasn't been identified by name yet . Would anyone like to make a guess who the murderer is ???
A muslim immigrant most likely....

But the French are a bunch of wimps, they won't round up all of the muslims and deport them
 
Yes it went down right after we got background checks.

<< Milk Spitting Meme here >>

background checks have proven ONE thing....that law abiding citizens don't commit mass murders.

NOTHING ELSE

Totally debunked nonsense.
Crime dropped drastically after getting background checks.

That Las Vegas mass shooter was law abiding till he wasn’t. Then many died.
 
And the dead would be more if a gun was used obviously. Or should we start arming our military with knives?

Knee jerk response. You have no proof more deaths would have occurred. Depends on many variables.

Still, in true gun grabber fashion, you REFUSE to address the REAL problem.
So we should save money and arm our military with knives cause they are just as deadly?

Knives are much more deadly in close urban situations, but just not in long range confrontations.
For example, the death toll of ancient wars before firearms, was much higher than later wars with firearms.
Almost 80 thousand people died instantly when nukes were dropped on a city.....tens of thousands more died from the after effects months later.....

What medieval weapon can kill that many people that instantly??
 
Again, most criminals aren’t political. You are spreading gibberish.

Again, you are in total denial.
First of all, you are playing a numbers game. Of COURSE the USa has more murders, we have MORE PEOPLE.

Your argument is stupid...like saying a room with 100 people in it has more fingers in it than a room with 5 people. Geez.

Second, European nations are known to suppress their true crime statistics. it makes them look bad. Proof is available....if only you wanted to know the truth.

Third, this has absolutely nothing to do with political criminals.
Because you can't comprehend...let me slowly spell it out for you....

Nearly ALL GUN CRIME OCCURS IN LEFTIST CONTROLLED AREAS. FACT.
No one said the criminals were political, but they just happen to almost always be IN DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED AREAS and you cannot deny that unless you lie.

where you came up with this "Criminals aren't political BS" is up for grabs.
I guess your denial strategy is to keep parroting that.
Mate, that is world class gibberish.You dont seem to have a grasp of the facts.

The facts are that 90% of the murders in the US have been proven to be caused by the War on Drugs.
Murders also spiked during Prohibition, for the exact same reason.
Whenever you make something illegal that should not be, there will be turf wars over all that cash.
 
Crime dropped drastically after getting background checks.
That Las Vegas mass shooter was law abiding till he wasn’t. Then many died.

Debunked nonsense.
A2guy, where are you when I need you?

Occasionally in a FREE society, bad things are going to happen. Sorry. There are very bad people.

However, because there are a FEW bad people is not justification for removing Constitutional Rights which have been PROVEN to
save entire nations (and millions upon millions) of people.

Your completely irrational argument is this......
"We should allow tens of millions to be at risk of tyranny or death by disarming them.....in order to save maybe 100 or so"
 
And the dead would be more if a gun was used obviously. Or should we start arming our military with knives?

Knee jerk response. You have no proof more deaths would have occurred. Depends on many variables.

Still, in true gun grabber fashion, you REFUSE to address the REAL problem.
So we should save money and arm our military with knives cause they are just as deadly?

Knives are much more deadly in close urban situations, but just not in long range confrontations.
For example, the death toll of ancient wars before firearms, was much higher than later wars with firearms.
Almost 80 thousand people died instantly when nukes were dropped on a city.....tens of thousands more died from the after effects months later.....

What medieval weapon can kill that many people that instantly??

The atomic bombs were not at all "instant".
It took many years to make the first 2, hours to fly them to location, etc.
And it was a surprise attack on a civilian population.
After learning what a nuclear attack was like, early warning systems, shelters, etc. make it impossible for similar death rates.

Lots of battles had over a million on each side, and they could easily kill more than 80,000 in minutes with edged weapons.
 

Forum List

Back
Top