Panetta says Israel will strike Iran in March, April or May

[freedombecki]

And while bomb talks are going away, Assad goes on a killing spree.

And here's that face of the map Ahmadinejad was and wasn't but was and wasn't gonna wipe Israel off:

image credits
​

 

[GoneBezerk]

You're just lucky people like me protect you from yourself.

I'm like the police officer that protects your drunk ass when you're going to get your butt kicked in a bar.....

I understand I'm dealing with a nut in you, but here goes....

The US military ensures freedom of movement of people and goods worldwide free from rogue states like North Korea, Iran, etc from bording and seizing ships for their own gain. Of course, the pirates off Africa is another thing but the US Navy can't be in all places at all times and those kidnapped by the pirates would be killed in most cases if we intervene.

The US military makes sure our ships and others ships can promote free trade worldwide, idiots like you can get a computer made in Asia to type on this board making an ass of yourself 24/7.
]

It would be nicer if that computer was made in America, though, wouldn't it.

It seems to me that spending ourselves into a hole to make it easier for foreign companies to take our money and foreign workers to take our jobs isn't a very smart strategy.

Fact is, we spend more on the military than the next top 10 spenders combined, and 7 of them are allied states. Iran is down to the 12th biggest military, not very impressive, really.

But there's an Iranian hiding under your bed right now, you'd better watch out.

 

[GoneBezerk]

I understand you're a ******* idiot, but good god.

Iran is today's issue, Saddam died in 2006. It is 2012 you ******* moron.

You need to figure out the analogy on your own....which I doubt you can, now go **** yourself.

Uh, idiot....I was talking about Iran, try to stay in the modern era.

Saddam is dead....FYI.

lol...this is ******* hilarious and you need to stop getting medical advice from quacks. The US was never about to lose its legs because of Saddam Hussein. In fact, plenty of good men lost their legs by listening to a quack.

lol....the Iraq War isn't modern history? What sort of world do you live in?

Plus, Iran isn't threatening the legs of the US. Only a hypochondria would think that.

 

[freedombecki]

A draft would help rid The US of a lot of un-employed people, and give a boost to the bodybag industry

Nancy won't support it unless her other nephew gets half a billion out of it.

I don't see any free half-billion opportunities for Mme. Pelosi to exploit.

 

[JoeB131]

You're just lucky people like me protect you from yourself.

I'm like the police officer that protects your drunk ass when you're going to get your butt kicked in a bar.....

Actualy, you're more like the police officer in a quiet neighborhood that mooches free donuts.

Fighting wars on the other side of the planet when we have honest to god problems right here isn't very smart. We need to focus inwards. Everyone else is living off our dime. The Europeans, Chinese, Japanese have enough wealth to police their little pockets of the world. It's about time they started doing it.

 

[Valox]

I understand you're a ******* idiot, but good god.

Iran is today's issue, Saddam died in 2006. It is 2012 you ******* moron.

You need to figure out the analogy on your own....which I doubt you can, now go **** yourself.

Uh, idiot....I was talking about Iran, try to stay in the modern era.

Saddam is dead....FYI.

lol....the Iraq War isn't modern history? What sort of world do you live in?

Plus, Iran isn't threatening the legs of the US. Only a hypochondria would think that.

Iran is a problem, but they do not have the power to make the US a paraplegic.

Stop getting your advice from quacks.

 

[GoneBezerk]

You've been using your as you're for numerous posts because YOU'RE an idiot.

I don't take people seriously when they spell like a 1st grader, they are typically handing me french fries at Burger King.

The word you need to learn is "you're," idiot.

But you don't write much at Burger King, do you?

First of all, I am glad you are getting so excited. It does prove who the useful idiot is.

Some how you think only your brand of patriotism matters.

Your just a loud mouth *****. Dime a dozen of the wannabe variety.

Your argument is so powerful you must mention a dropped E

Should I run or keep laughing at how stupid you are?

Bummer for you, I am here for the laughs. When do we attack china?

 

[percysunshine]

When the mud fight gets to '**** You and and the Horse you road into town on!'

well....chuckle

 

[Full-Auto]

You've been using your as you're for numerous posts because YOU'RE an idiot.

I don't take people seriously when they spell like a 1st grader, they are typically handing me french fries at Burger King.

The word you need to learn is "you're," idiot.

But you don't write much at Burger King, do you?

Your argument is so powerful you must mention a dropped E

Should I run or keep laughing at how stupid you are?

Bummer for you, I am here for the laughs. When do we attack china?

My keyboard command sucks and youre a *****.

Now what useful idiot?

 

[GoneBezerk]

Idiot.....Iran with a nuclear bomb (being dead) is worse than a conventional war with Iran (lose your leg). Going to war with Iran is the surgery everyone fears.

Now, go to recess, little boy.

I understand you're a ******* idiot, but good god.

Iran is today's issue, Saddam died in 2006. It is 2012 you ******* moron.

You need to figure out the analogy on your own....which I doubt you can, now go **** yourself.

lol....the Iraq War isn't modern history? What sort of world do you live in?

Plus, Iran isn't threatening the legs of the US. Only a hypochondria would think that.

Iran is a problem, but they do not have the power to make the US a paraplegic.

Stop getting your advice from quacks.

 

[GoneBezerk]

The internet gives Burger King fry rack technicians the ability to show off their English skills and their knowledge of world events (foreign policy and the threats).

Thanks to algore for the laughs.

 

[Valox]

Idiot.....Iran with a nuclear bomb (being dead) is worse than a conventional war with Iran (lose your leg). Going to war with Iran is the surgery everyone fears.

Now, go to recess, little boy.

I understand you're a ******* idiot, but good god.

Iran is today's issue, Saddam died in 2006. It is 2012 you ******* moron.

You need to figure out the analogy on your own....which I doubt you can, now go **** yourself.

Iran is a problem, but they do not have the power to make the US a paraplegic.

Stop getting your advice from quacks.

Iran doesn't have a bomb nor an effective military to fly one over here. In addition, it would be suicide for them to attack us.

 

[Full-Auto]

The internet gives Burger King fry rack technicians the ability to show off their English skills and their knowledge of world events (foreign policy and the threats).

Thanks to algore for the laughs.

When you have some actual credibility to display, the laughter will cease.

You have proven you are a big government neocon.

A whiny little *****....

and can not explain what we obviously dont know in your eyes.

You are a hack, a fraud and a puss.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Thank you algore for inventing the internet so this idiot can show off his knowledge about Iran for a good laugh.

Iran is going to "fly a nuclear bomb to America."

Idiot.....Iran with a nuclear bomb (being dead) is worse than a conventional war with Iran (lose your leg). Going to war with Iran is the surgery everyone fears.

Now, go to recess, little boy.

Iran is a problem, but they do not have the power to make the US a paraplegic.

Stop getting your advice from quacks.

Iran doesn't have a bomb nor an effective military to fly one over here. In addition, it would be suicide for them to attack us.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Idiot, going around calling real conservatives "neo-cons" just shows you are an idiot.

I am not a neo-con since I was never a liberal or even a moderate Democrat. I have voted for every Republican I could when I turned 18...years ago, long before you little boy.

Just because I have an educated view about national defense after being there and done that compared to you doesn't make me a "neo-con or chickenhawk" as you idiots like to yell.

You haven't done shit in the US military, that about sums up your credibility and knowledge of national defense issues. Go find a cliff and jump.

The internet gives Burger King fry rack technicians the ability to show off their English skills and their knowledge of world events (foreign policy and the threats).

Thanks to algore for the laughs.

When you have some actual credibility to display, the laughter will cease.

You have proven you are a big government neocon.

A whiny little *****....

and can not explain what we obviously dont know in your eyes.

You are a hack, a fraud and a puss.

 

[Full-Auto]

You've been using your as you're for numerous posts because YOU'RE an idiot.

I don't take people seriously when they spell like a 1st grader, they are typically handing me french fries at Burger King.

The word you need to learn is "you're," idiot.

But you don't write much at Burger King, do you?

Your argument is so powerful you must mention a dropped E

Should I run or keep laughing at how stupid you are?

Bummer for you, I am here for the laughs. When do we attack china?

Still crying like a little *****. Are you a closet democrat?

 

[GoneBezerk]

These Losertarians or Paulestinians go around calling normal conservatives/Republicans "neo-cons" as if they are the norm, when their nominee keeps coming in 3rd or 4th in the GOP race.

Uh, you are the fringe kooks.

Also, the neo-con term is a word used by liberals on former liberals that turned to the right, so you are showing your kook colors aligning yourselves with libs calling people neo-cons and constantly claiming Israel/the Jews control the world.....

 

[imbalance]

I understand I'm dealing with a nut in you, but here goes....

The US military ensures freedom of movement of people and goods worldwide free from rogue states like North Korea, Iran, etc from bording and seizing ships for their own gain. Of course, the pirates off Africa is another thing but the US Navy can't be in all places at all times and those kidnapped by the pirates would be killed in most cases if we intervene.

The US military makes sure our ships and others ships can promote free trade worldwide, idiots like you can get a computer made in Asia to type on this board making an ass of yourself 24/7.

The US military stepped up after WWII and prevented the Soviets from taking over Europe like the Nazis and the Chicoms from taking over Asia has helped maintain our economic growth and world peace compared to the periods of time during WWI and WWII where idiots like you made things worse by ignoring threats until too late.

What were the US foreign wars that crushed Communism again? The fact is, statist governments in Socialist Europe and Communist Asia are as strong as ever and they owe their thanks to a globalization movement driven by the infiltration of foreign influence into US policy. "Free Trade" and "World Peace" code words aren't actually free or peaceful at all.

As so let's honestly ask ourselves what this UN-encouraged and US-enabled globalization has done exactly for those US citizens within her borders other than suppress their economic freedom and impose legitimate risk of terrorist attack? Globalization code words like World Peace and Free Trade always sound great until you realize they're not ends but rather the means to universal government. In practical terms that you can understand, global economic organization is a zero-sum game that enforces a wealth ceiling on the vast majority of Americans which never before existed and is exclusive to the inalienable Natural Law philosophy theorized by Plato, articulated by John Locke, and asserted by the Founders in order to establish United States sovereignty.

Nice try but no. You keep avoiding the issue which is, as the Founders intended, the interests of individual US citizens. This Free Trade you cheerlead for;

HOW DOES IT AFFECT THE INTEREST OF INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES CITIZENS?

You will refuse to answer that as you know it obliterates your argument. Because perpetuating what you call Free Trade only perpetuates US trade deficits and outflows of privately held $USDs offshore to foreign entities which then transfer these $USDs to the US government in exchange for either US Treasuries or OPEC petroleum. The individual US citizen is severely damaged by this wealth-transfer arrangement as it requires regulatory gov intervention to gridlock domestic private industry and private wealth creation. This is fact and if you can't understand how that works, you ought to crack open an intro to economics textbook and learn how the world works.

You try to use this deceptive meme of "Free Trade" to justify military hyper-interventionism but the problem for you is that I know more about your strategy than you do. So don't try to tell me that perpetuating a net-negative (for US citizens) to perpetuate another net-negative (for US citizens) is in the best interest of voters.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Ok kook, the Founding Fathers didn't mind if the British Navy or even "pirates" plundered our trade ships bound for France....

You are clearly not balanced in the head.

I understand I'm dealing with a nut in you, but here goes....

The US military ensures freedom of movement of people and goods worldwide free from rogue states like North Korea, Iran, etc from bording and seizing ships for their own gain. Of course, the pirates off Africa is another thing but the US Navy can't be in all places at all times and those kidnapped by the pirates would be killed in most cases if we intervene.

The US military makes sure our ships and others ships can promote free trade worldwide, idiots like you can get a computer made in Asia to type on this board making an ass of yourself 24/7.

What were the US foreign wars that crushed Communism again? The fact is, statist governments in Socialist Europe and Communist Asia are as strong as ever and they owe their thanks to a globalization movement driven by the infiltration of foreign influence into US policy. "Free Trade" and "World Peace" code words aren't actually free or peaceful at all.

As so let's honestly ask ourselves what this UN-encouraged and US-enabled globalization has done exactly for those US citizens within her borders other than suppress their economic freedom and impose legitimate risk of terrorist attack? Globalization code words like World Peace and Free Trade always sound great until you realize they're not ends but rather the means to universal government. In practical terms that you can understand, global economic organization is a zero-sum game that enforces a wealth ceiling on the vast majority of Americans which never before existed and is exclusive to the inalienable Natural Law philosophy theorized by Plato, articulated by John Locke, and asserted by the Founders in order to establish United States sovereignty.

Nice try but no. You keep avoiding the issue which is, as the Founders intended, the interests of individual US citizens. This Free Trade you cheerlead for;

HOW DOES IT AFFECT THE INTEREST OF INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES CITIZENS?

You will refuse to answer that as you know it obliterates your argument. Because perpetuating what you call Free Trade only perpetuates US trade deficits and outflows of privately held $USDs offshore to foreign entities which then transfer these $USDs to the US government in exchange for either US Treasuries or OPEC petroleum. The individual US citizen is severely damaged by this wealth-transfer arrangement as it requires regulatory gov intervention to gridlock domestic private industry and private wealth creation. This is fact and if you can't understand how that works, you ought to crack open an intro to economics textbook and learn how the world works.

You try to use this deceptive meme of "Free Trade" to justify military hyper-interventionism but the problem for you is that I know more about your strategy than you do. So don't try to tell me that perpetuating a net-negative (for US citizens) to perpetuate another net-negative (for US citizens) is in the best interest of voters.

 

[imbalance]

Ok kook, the Founding Fathers didn't mind if the British Navy or even "pirates" plundered our trade ships bound for France....

You are clearly not balanced in the head.

I understand I'm dealing with a nut in you, but here goes....

The US military ensures freedom of movement of people and goods worldwide free from rogue states like North Korea, Iran, etc from bording and seizing ships for their own gain. Of course, the pirates off Africa is another thing but the US Navy can't be in all places at all times and those kidnapped by the pirates would be killed in most cases if we intervene.

The US military makes sure our ships and others ships can promote free trade worldwide, idiots like you can get a computer made in Asia to type on this board making an ass of yourself 24/7.

Nice try but no. You keep avoiding the issue which is, as the Founders intended, the interests of individual US citizens. This Free Trade you cheerlead for;

HOW DOES IT AFFECT THE INTEREST OF INDIVIDUAL UNITED STATES CITIZENS?

You will refuse to answer that as you know it obliterates your argument. Because perpetuating what you call Free Trade only perpetuates US trade deficits and outflows of privately held $USDs offshore to foreign entities which then transfer these $USDs to the US government in exchange for either US Treasuries or OPEC petroleum. The individual US citizen is severely damaged by this wealth-transfer arrangement as it requires regulatory gov intervention to gridlock domestic private industry and private wealth creation. This is fact and if you can't understand how that works, you ought to crack open an intro to economics textbook and learn how the world works.

You try to use this deceptive meme of "Free Trade" to justify military hyper-interventionism but the problem for you is that I know more about your strategy than you do. So don't try to tell me that perpetuating a net-negative (for US citizens) to perpetuate another net-negative (for US citizens) is in the best interest of voters.

If the US actually exported anything other than our currency and military you'd have a point. But it doesn't and you don't.