Ravi
Diamond Member
No.This is a little bit different than your earlier claim that he wouldn't have won the presidency if he wasn't black... isn't it?![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.This is a little bit different than your earlier claim that he wouldn't have won the presidency if he wasn't black... isn't it?![]()
His ethnicity did play some role in the primaries. He garnared 87 percent of the African American vote in the primaries.
Why are you misstating what I said?btw: My support and vote for Obama had absolutely nothing to do with being fed up with white men. Perhaps it did for you, but to assume that is a majority mindset is a bit spurious, if not arrogant.
It depends.So you don't think a white male candidate could've beaten McCain?![]()
Why are you misstating what I said?
The Republicans have made people fed up with white men.
btw: My support and vote for Obama had absolutely nothing to do with being fed up with white men. Perhaps it did for you, but to assume that is a majority mindset is a bit spurious, if not arrogant.
To be honest the media has been attacking Kennedy about her being the senator from NY. But she is just going for Senator if Palin was going for Senator no one would have mind most of what she was saying. But when you are just one step away from being president you need to be more mindful of what you say and how you say it.
His ethnicity did play some role in the primaries. He garnared 87 percent of the African American vote in the primaries.
I was talking about in the democratic primaries, not the general.
Saying that I thought you voted for Obama because he's black or that I voted for Obama because he's black. Do you actually read my posts or do you just ASSUME everything?Where is the misstatement?
Palin got more scrutiny because she was in an election for national office. Kennedy is not in an election, nor is it for a national office. If anything, Palin *should* have gotten more scrutiny because its a more important position. Palin was running to represent millions upon millions more people than Kennedy. Those aspiring to represent 50 states should get more scrutiny than those aspiring to represent 1 state.
This makes less sense than a hypothetical situation where McCain complains that Mark Warner got less media scrutiny in their respective 2008 elections.
Manifold what does one hundred years ago or fifty years ago have to do with the Election 2 months ago? Frankly, being black (sort of) was a tremendous help to Obama. It would not have been so 10 years ago. I suspect more than a few Obama votes were cast by people hoping once and for all to bury all the racist cholesterol that's been clogging the nations arteries for the last 150 years.
Saying that I thought you voted for Obama because he's black or that I voted for Obama because he's black.
Do you actually read my posts or do you just ASSUME everything?